Does mRNA vaccination create cancer?
According to a scientific commentary currently published as a
preprint by the journal Authorea, injecting a modified mRNA into the human body, as is done for example with the Biontec/Pfizer injection, carries significant health risks that, beyond the already known side effects such as thrombosis, bleeding disorders, immune suppression, etc., can cause long-term consequences such as neurodegenerative diseases and accelerated cancer growth.
The modification of the mRNA...
...which was undertaken by the manufacturers to protect it from degradation in the body and also at the same time to cause an altered protein formation, can lead to "reading errors", which can promote the development of a variety of diseases. The modification of the mRNA sequence protects the mRNA in the cell from being recognised as foreign and degraded by the innate immune system. If reading errors occur in the production of the spike protein, different scenarios can occur:
(a) the spike protein changes its 3D structure and a false antibody reaction against a protein is generated, so that the antibodies formed do not recognise the original viral spike protein. Immunisation of the treated person against SARS-CoV-2 does not take place.
b) The spike protein cannot fold properly and is thus forced to be degraded by the cell. Since no spike protein is presented to the immune cells on the cell surface, no immune response can take place.
c) An altered protein with an undetermined function is generated. This protein may be functionless or may pose a greater threat to the body than the actual correct spike protein generated by the injection.
Problem of extraordinarily alteration mRNA
The problem, according to the author of the commentary, is that the mRNA for use in the vaccine has been extraordinarily altered from the natural mRNA from the virus: the component uracil has been replaced by Ψ (pseudouridine) to deceive the immune system, the speed of protein synthesis has been greatly increased by altered base sequences, which could lead to greater susceptibility to errors in the conversion of the mRNA into proteins. Two amino acids were replaced with prolines to keep the synthesised spike protein in a state of prefusion. This is the suspended state before the spike protein docks with the ACE2 receptor. Some amino acids have been replaced with proline and a sequence has been added to the end (3ÚTR) of the actual spike gene, of which it is not at all known what it consists.
If the body is confronted with artificial mRNA
,so-called codon usage errors can also occur when the body's own cells read the information. This is because the existing tRNA molecules that build the actual proteins do not exactly match the modified artificial mRNA.
Currently, due to a lack of sufficient studies, the mechanism leading to these possible synthesis errors has not been fully deciphered. The correlation between the speed of synthesis and the accumulation of defective protein expression is also not yet known. The "vaccination" is thus a scientific black box with a high potential for harm.
Raises the suspicion that "codon usage errors" can occur.
The author of the commentary states, "We can say that the sequence is not only not optimised for the actual purpose of producing a correct spike protein in the cells, which then triggers an immune response, but rather raises the suspicion that "codon usage errors" can occur.... It is possible to hypothesise that excessive modification aimed at extreme increases in protein expression may be the source of mRNA gene sequence assembly errors. Altered tRNA availability may lead to
neurodegenerative diseases, and
upregulation of specific tRNAs drives metastasis by increasing the stability of transcripts enriched in their cognate codons."
Risking serious long-term damage to human health
Her conclusion: "Basically, we can say that the code of the whole sequence is altered in an unbalanced way, too much compared to the natural viral counterpart, and too much to say that the human organism reproduces exactly the spike proteins that correspond to the original virus, risking serious long-term damage to human health, in addition to being ineffective in immunization."
Injected mRNA is not quickly degraded
The problem with the so-called vaccines is that the injected mRNA is not quickly degraded again in the body like natural RNA, but has become much more stable due to its modification, which poses a health risk, and therefore remains in the body for a long time - it is currently completely unknown how long - possibly even forever and can trigger the disease-driving disorders shown. And if this RNA remains in the body for a long time, it can also make an rtPCR test positive. Therefore, the CDC strongly advises against a PCR test for the spike gene in the "vaccinated".
(The Issue of likely creating PCR test false positives ?)
Interestingly, however, the so-called variants like Delta are detected by PCR exactly in the spike protein. Could it be that the injection creates many new spike gene variants in the body that are not actually disease-causing viruses, but which then cause the PCR test to give a false positive? So is the delta variant just a test phenomenon induced by the "vaccinations"?
___________________
Translated via DeepL
Notice: I injected titles between the textmasses, because I feel that large text becomes really tedious to read without any breaks.