I would like to post a brief summary of yesterday's 2nd Pathologists Conference here. The conference is being translated into English, but this will take some time. A little hint: The numbers in front of the diseases refer to the fall height and you can excuse me mistakes in the way of presentation, because I am neither English speaking nor have much knowledge in the visual presentation of such presentations. I believe that this information should be made available to all interested parties as soon as possible because of the importance of the topics discussed.
2nd pathologists' conference on 4.12 21 in Berlin
Speakers: Prof. Arne Burghardt, Prof. Walter Lang, Prof. Werner Bergholz, Dr. Ute Krüger, Attorney Elmar Becker
Prof. Burghardt
What do we currently know from pathological examinations of 19 individuals who died in temporal relation?
Deaths investigated
Place of death
Important for assessing whether patients were viable and healthy before vaccination. Also discussed here: sudden and unexpected deaths without prior illness.
9 Cases sudden at home/at work/in a car/on the road.
death related to vaccination
5 very likely
7 probable
2 unclear
1 no connection
What were the findings?
Lymphocytic myocarditis/epicarditis/pericarditis "lymphocytic predominance
2 maximum with pronounced fibrous necrosis
3 marked
9 minimal
Statement: Viral myocarditis is very likely to lead to death within 10 years.
Lypmocytic alveolitis DAD " lymphocyte predominance alveolitis".
3 with maximal lymphocytic follicle formation
4 maximum
1 marked
5 minimal
Statement: It can be assumed that the alveolitis has developed due to endogenous/internal noxae. The body has the ability to down regulate this immune response.
As a consequence of lymphocytic alveolitis can be expected
Sjögren's syndrome
Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia
Myasthenia
Hashimoto's disease
Chronic active hepatitis
vasculitis
11 Endovasculitis
10 Vasculitis/perivasculitis
2 Media necrosis and inflammation
Suspected corona Vaccine side effects with potential fatality
autoimmune phenomena "self to self attack".
Reduction of immune capacity
Influence on cancer growth
Vascular damage Endovasculitis/perivasculitis/panvasculitis
Erythrocyte clumping
Lymphocytes run amok
Massive lymphocytic infiltrates outside heart and lungs
3 kidney
2 Thyroid gland
2 aorta large vessels
1 lymphocytic pyelonephritis
1 dura
Immune/autoimmune phenomenon lymphocytic infiltrates in soft tissues/organs
7 Pseudolymphoma in spleen
2 epithelial - myoepithelial sialadenitis - Sjörgren syndrome
2 autoimmunthreoiditis Hashimodo
2 vasculitis skin
1 nephritis
2 liver – NASH
Impurities in the vaccine
Lipid nanoparticles
Minerals
Metals - Aluminiun compound - Stainless steel
2 Suspected microembolism lung/stainless steel and abdominal vessels/lipid particles.
Absence of aspiration during intramuscular injection
Statement: according to WHO since 2016 an evidence-based recommendation that aspiration can be omitted for pain,- and stress-related reasons. The blood vessels in the deltoideus and vastus lateralis are too small for a blood vessel to be hit.
Conclusion: The blood vessels in adults are very large, especially in older people. How does WHO come to claim this as evidence based. Assumption that this is based on children with small vessels. 5% of all injections enter directly without aspiration into the bloodstream.
Prof. Lang
What were the results of the analyses of the tissue samples?
Explanation Mass spectrometry. This method allows to determine whether the inoculated spike protein makes the disease, a mutant or the type of the variant. This can be detected with certainty.
The Drosten PCT test has a hypothetical sequence of amino acids for the spike protein assembled on the computer based on previous findings. It has never been validated. This test is used to control incidence. Prof. Andrea Sinz from Martin Luther University was able to detect corona infection by mass spectrometry in May 2020. Nevertheless, Drosten's PCR test is used as the gold standard.
Now, together with the MVZ Trier Prof. Kriegsmann/Prof. Otto this test is performed.
The vaccine is a virus genome that is injected. This means a very high viral load . In severely pre-diseased people the vaccination can be fatal, younger people are more likely to suffer from myocarditis with the possibility of recovery. Stunned by the vaccination recommendation in oncology. The terminally ill are still vaccinated there.
Prof. Lang shows a letter he wrote to the society to pathology with his resignation from this society. He writes that members are diffarmed which are interested. The behavior of the association concerning urgent questions about the consequences of vaccination is irresponsible. The chairman is Prof. Barreton. Prof. Lang calls the entire Society of Pathology corrupt. He is very disappointed with Prof. Schirmacher, whom he also publicly calls corrupt. Prof. Schirmacher informed that both professors will forward their findings to PEI in the future. What cannot be understood is that Prof. Schirmacher was the first to give the indications of this myocarditis. Prof. Lang insinuates that he, as a liver expert, suddenly cares only about myocarditis. The background is 5 million research funds per year for this disease. Suddenly he takes back his own statements regarding the danger of vaccination in relation to myocarditis.
Prof. Lang is very angry and calls in completely corrupt. He calls the medical profession, the associations, the Federal President and Montgomery completely corrupt. Prof. Lang is visibly shaken and angry.
The results of the mass spectrometry are expected next week.
Dr. Ute Krüger - Mamma CA
What other relevant observations have been made regarding tumors and their growth behavior?
More and more patients born in the 70s and 80s are affected. The tumors are larger than expected, more than 4cm is unusual. The tumors are more poorly differentiated. There is an unusually high rate of division. Tumor growth could be stimulated or triggered by vaccination. Is it a gene mutation marker 1? Here is the desire for data collection to identify the development of turbo cancer and also to analyze depending on the vaccine
Prof. Bergholz
Statistics and excess mortality
Statement RKI: Corona vaccination is indicated. The treating physician has to decide if the risk of the disease is higher than the risk of the treatment? If the risk is reduced by the treatment of a harm, vaccination is induced.
There is an ISO standard: How do I calculate a risk?
Germany shows clear evidence for under reporting. The statistics also show clear evidence of excess mortality . Here it gives evidence of high mortality in relation to football players and died suddenly. In the age group 10 - 59 years the mean value of mortality for unvaccinated is 1,3/100.000 - for double vaccinated is 2,8/100.000. These data were not collected in Germany but in England. For Germany, this would mean, according to extrapolation, that about 20,000 deaths would be added here.
The quality of the vaccination batches varies, as does the number of side effects. There are so-called bad batches.
Frequency of positive tests
Vaccinated people are infected 30 times more often than non-vaccinated people. Viral load in vaccinated people is up to 200 times higher.
In the end, he talks about the possibility of strengthening the immune system and the use of the already existing drug ivermectin.
Lawyer Elmar Becker
Representation for relatives in the question of death by vaccination
Mr. Becker is very concerned by statements of the two professors. Now 3 cases are presented.
Case 1
Boy, 12 years old, heart disease, 2 x Biontec, dies 2 days after second vaccination
Statement PEI: Considering the previous findings, the vaccination is not to be seen as the sole trigger of the fatal outcome.
Question:
Would the boy still be alive without this vaccination? Yes
What is the responsibility of the vaccinator? A great responsibility. He should have examined before the vaccination whether the vaccination suitability is given under consideration of coronary previous damages. There is intent here. Also the education of the parents is questioned in this case. In this case, an element of criminal law was fulfilled.
Case 2
Man 40 years, 1 vaccination on 19.5 with Astrazenega, died on 28.5 due to sinus vein thrombosis.
Reason: The vaccinator recommended paracetamol for headache and gave it to the patient. He did not inform him that if he had a headache, he should immediately go to the clinic to clarify cerebral venous thrombosis.
Letter from the public prosecutor's office: The proceedings were discontinued. With reference to the approval of the EMA, a general absolution applies. The fact that vaccines can cause side effects up to death is not in itself suitable to reproach the persons responsible on the basis of the legal and administrative regulations.
All reported deaths at PEI in children were vaccinated with Biontech
Case 3
Girl, 15 years old, 25.10. second vaccination of Biontech, on 3.11. sudden cardiac arrest, postvaccine myocarditis.
All doctors denied the connection with vaccination despite indications from mother and sister. Düring hospitalization, the girl suffered another arm vein thrombosis.
english dubbed version
