Cosmological Questions
- Thread starter axj
- Start date
Since we are in the 'purgatory' or STS side of the Tree of Life, wouldn't any access to other dimensions be STS as well? Such as the window fallers?
As for cosmological questions: perhaps one regarding this 'rainbow bridge' as the world splits into positive and negative, with the Grand Cycle repeating once again. This bridge would be open or accessible for what? that 'thousand year transition period'? It wouldn't include the second eon for the PreAdamics, would it?
Another cosmo question from a past session reference would be the count of original fractals of the Creator that became each Logos/Galaxy. Just wondering if the number is significant in any way.
Another cosmo question would be what is the nature of 'explosion' in our 3d perception regarding the STS entities that decide to switch sides to enter 6D?
As for cosmological questions: perhaps one regarding this 'rainbow bridge' as the world splits into positive and negative, with the Grand Cycle repeating once again. This bridge would be open or accessible for what? that 'thousand year transition period'? It wouldn't include the second eon for the PreAdamics, would it?
Another cosmo question from a past session reference would be the count of original fractals of the Creator that became each Logos/Galaxy. Just wondering if the number is significant in any way.
Another cosmo question would be what is the nature of 'explosion' in our 3d perception regarding the STS entities that decide to switch sides to enter 6D?
Has anyone ever thought about or wrote out a short descriptive history of our planet and species as per the Cs cosmology?
Was wondering about it recently in terms of the "grand cycle" that is supposedly 309,000 years long and includes proto-humans being designed and planted on the earth and souls coming into them and turning them into more modern humans PLUS full formed humans being transported from Kantek to live along side these developing humans. Into the mix there's other alien types genetically modifying humans and dropping them in particular areas of the planet.
Anyway, I was just thinking I'd like to see a basic timeline of what supposedly happened starting from year 1 up to today.
That brought up an associated thought. The Cs said that everyone reached 7D at the same 'time'. But I was wondering how that can happen in the context of a cycle where there are always new beings 'moving up' into densities. It's not like 3D empties when all go to 4D and so on, so how might that work? Also, how long does that process of all ending up in 7D take?
Also, how old is our planet/universe? If the big bang happens after all reach 7th and all disburses out again, and that repeats almost infinitely, then maybe our planet/universe isn't 4.5 billion years old or whatever, but much less, and it just cycles around. It's like having endless games of chess, and each time the game ends, you mash up the board and pieces and make new ones out of them. Then after doing that a few trillion times, you ask in one specific game "how old is this board and pieces"?
Was wondering about it recently in terms of the "grand cycle" that is supposedly 309,000 years long and includes proto-humans being designed and planted on the earth and souls coming into them and turning them into more modern humans PLUS full formed humans being transported from Kantek to live along side these developing humans. Into the mix there's other alien types genetically modifying humans and dropping them in particular areas of the planet.
Anyway, I was just thinking I'd like to see a basic timeline of what supposedly happened starting from year 1 up to today.
That brought up an associated thought. The Cs said that everyone reached 7D at the same 'time'. But I was wondering how that can happen in the context of a cycle where there are always new beings 'moving up' into densities. It's not like 3D empties when all go to 4D and so on, so how might that work? Also, how long does that process of all ending up in 7D take?
Also, how old is our planet/universe? If the big bang happens after all reach 7th and all disburses out again, and that repeats almost infinitely, then maybe our planet/universe isn't 4.5 billion years old or whatever, but much less, and it just cycles around. It's like having endless games of chess, and each time the game ends, you mash up the board and pieces and make new ones out of them. Then after doing that a few trillion times, you ask in one specific game "how old is this board and pieces"?
I think the closest thing we have is this:
Cassiopaean timeline
I am in the midst of doing some work trying to organize information on prehistory from the Cassiopaean transcripts, and I thought that I would go ahead and post the timeline that I have put together which I am going to use as a reference in exploring various topics. I have two separate...
cassiopaea.org
Will probably adapt and expand for the Cass Substack "soon."
My guesses: that it's a very long process that from a 3D perspective would be the the life cycle of the observable universe. As for 3D emptying into 4D, maybe in billions more years, it won't look the same, and there will be fewer and fewer "3D planets" and beings, like a slow and progressive "emptying".
That's kinda how I picture it. Except I don't follow why the planet/universe might be less than billions of years old. I'd guess the universe is "endless" and however long it's been since the big bang is just our current cosmic epoch. Planet itself might be how old scientists think it is (or more or less if their methods are off).
Last edited:
Would be pretty hard to define how old something is if it's constantly being remade (as if new) with the same materials.
That would be an interesting idea Joe.
From 7D I can only guess that perhaps it's all already happened multiple time, is happening, will forever be happening - thus 'we are already there' from a 7D perspective, because 'it already happened'.
But we're 3D, so we're limited and not actually 'there yet' - if we ever make it.
See below on 3D emptying.
Well, given how hard it is to describe a 4D shape with a 3D mind, trying to tackle elements of 7D just make me laugh when I even try.
But a few things do come to mind, as possibilities at least - based on assumptions.
Now given they are based assumptions, take that as you will.
If everything is cycles, then a 'big bang' followed (some 3D time later) by a 'heat death' or 'big crunch' to the 3D physical universe seems likely. I like the analogy of 'god' breathing life into the universe. Well what happens when 'god' inhales again?
At some point the 3D school is going to become unviable for learning lessons due to entropy - [unless it doesn't, and it just continues to exist, but I'm not taking this perspective here].
So what happens then? Presumably the school gets rebuilt/refreshed, and the ultimate cycle begins again.
So if the 3D universe either goes cold or crunches back on itself, what's happening at other levels? Do they become less viable for learning lessons? 5D would be redundant at some level if there is no more 3D life. Does everything (or some things) get drawn back to 7D (ala the 'inhale of god')?
As to a 'new board' I'm reminded of the Theseus paradox:
en.wikipedia.org
Does the 'ship of Theseus' get renewed, or do we get a 'different ship'. Both?
Maybe the point is to try every point is to try every 'position on the board', including just being the board itself.
Or to be Theseus, his crew, all the other characters, as well as the ship (both the 'old' and the 'new'), the sea, the sky and the land.
Taking a more philosophical point of view - what (or who) are we more interested in when reading a story/watching a film?
Both the humans and the 'gods' are really more interesting than the ship.
Ok, I hope that's helpful. My head hurts now
Depends on your perspective?!
From 7D I can only guess that perhaps it's all already happened multiple time, is happening, will forever be happening - thus 'we are already there' from a 7D perspective, because 'it already happened'.
But we're 3D, so we're limited and not actually 'there yet' - if we ever make it.
See below on 3D emptying.
Well, given how hard it is to describe a 4D shape with a 3D mind, trying to tackle elements of 7D just make me laugh when I even try.
But a few things do come to mind, as possibilities at least - based on assumptions.
Now given they are based assumptions, take that as you will.
If everything is cycles, then a 'big bang' followed (some 3D time later) by a 'heat death' or 'big crunch' to the 3D physical universe seems likely. I like the analogy of 'god' breathing life into the universe. Well what happens when 'god' inhales again?
At some point the 3D school is going to become unviable for learning lessons due to entropy - [unless it doesn't, and it just continues to exist, but I'm not taking this perspective here].
So what happens then? Presumably the school gets rebuilt/refreshed, and the ultimate cycle begins again.
So if the 3D universe either goes cold or crunches back on itself, what's happening at other levels? Do they become less viable for learning lessons? 5D would be redundant at some level if there is no more 3D life. Does everything (or some things) get drawn back to 7D (ala the 'inhale of god')?
As to a 'new board' I'm reminded of the Theseus paradox:
Ship of Theseus - Wikipedia
So maybe this current iteration of the game is only a few billion years old, but is the game the same every time?
Does the 'ship of Theseus' get renewed, or do we get a 'different ship'. Both?
Maybe the point is to try every point is to try every 'position on the board', including just being the board itself.
Or to be Theseus, his crew, all the other characters, as well as the ship (both the 'old' and the 'new'), the sea, the sky and the land.
Taking a more philosophical point of view - what (or who) are we more interested in when reading a story/watching a film?
Both the humans and the 'gods' are really more interesting than the ship.
Ok, I hope that's helpful. My head hurts now
What do you mean by "constantly being remade"? In the chess analogy you used, the game is reset after each match. Within each match, it is possible to track the history of moves from beginning to end. The astrophysicists can correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of the big bang/big crunch model is that the big bang was the beginning of one cycle (or chess game). If we can accurately track the physics, we can determine the age of this cycle. That's not to say scientists have done so accurately, just that it is possible - like it's possible to track the trajectory of a thrown rock and determine the location and time from which it was thrown, or to trace the moves in the chess game from end to beginning. The transition from big crunch to big bang is the reset of those original materials. So you can trace the history of the universe, but nothing before the big bang, because there's nothing to trace, like with the reformed chess pieces.
Another way of looking at it is something like the creationist model, where the true "beginning" is completely arbitrary. The universe can be created 6000 years ago with a fake history, like dinosaur bones. Or, extend that back a bit, and you could say the planet is "only" 2 billion years old. But that way of looking at it has always seemed like a cop-out to me. If we can trace history back hundreds of years, we can do so billions of years. That's not to say the picture isn't different from a higher perspective ("it's all already happened multiple time, is happening, will forever be happening" as RedFox put it), but from ours it is linear and datable.
If by "constantly being remade" you mean instant to instant, I think there's a sense in which that it is true, but it still happens in such a way that we can "date" it. The body and cells and atoms are constantly being remade and recycled, but we can track those transitions and assign time references to them. From a more metaphysical angle, it's also true: every state of the universe is a revision of the previous state. But again, we trace those state transitions and "time" them.
I cannot see how "everyone" (presumably everyone now at 3D) will reach 7D at the same time; I would imagine it has to do with group souls and group lessons or something similar.
It was also said that some will graduate to 4D, while some will repeat the whole cycle again and be reborn in postapocalyptic world, living in caves...
Again, therefore I imagined it as having something to do with group soul - we learn together and share experiences and lessons and move forward as a soul group.
As for our current 3D reality/universe; I kind of think it was, is and will always be there as a one way for learning. Also, with STS recycling into matter so we have a constant flow of new atoms/material to support "material" of the universe, and with different soul´s lessons that would incarnate, they would remake the "reality" of the universe (for lack of better ter). So, yeah, like it´s being constantly remade.
Also the Cs said Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search:
And the souls who would pass through it and got to the 7D, would then have a new "big bang" in a different kind of universe (or maybe redo this one, because, why not!). Maybe there are many different kinds of universes/realities, some where laws of physicality are completely different! Window fallowers also come to mind.
It was also said that some will graduate to 4D, while some will repeat the whole cycle again and be reborn in postapocalyptic world, living in caves...
Again, therefore I imagined it as having something to do with group soul - we learn together and share experiences and lessons and move forward as a soul group.
As for our current 3D reality/universe; I kind of think it was, is and will always be there as a one way for learning. Also, with STS recycling into matter so we have a constant flow of new atoms/material to support "material" of the universe, and with different soul´s lessons that would incarnate, they would remake the "reality" of the universe (for lack of better ter). So, yeah, like it´s being constantly remade.
Also the Cs said Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search:
And the souls who would pass through it and got to the 7D, would then have a new "big bang" in a different kind of universe (or maybe redo this one, because, why not!). Maybe there are many different kinds of universes/realities, some where laws of physicality are completely different! Window fallowers also come to mind.
That statement by the C's had perplexed me as well. I now believe that it's a figurative explanation. So, as also implied by others, I think it is related to "all being 7th density." Of course, here we have the seemingly double meaning of 7D; that is, 7D as a separate density, and 7D as all densities or simply all/one. When souls become 7D (in the big-bang phase, at least?), they explode, 'becoming' entire existence, entire illusion, all density levels. Thus, I think, through big-bang, 7D somehow enables (coinheres?) 1D through 6D, which in turn enable 7D ("The Creator who is also the Created.") because it seems that the cycling of the densities is a necessity for being/existence.
I meant the physical board and chess pieces. After each game, they are all 'smushed' up and remade into a board and pieces, possibly with the addition of a small amount of external matter too. How does a person, who is playing one particular game, reliably date the age of the board and pieces material, unaware that it has gone through a few billion such smushes?
do you mean on these lines? I created this few months back. But, it is simple quotes, not in descriptive format. Atlantis Timelines - CassWiki & Others - Obsidian Publish
I can make a copy of it and modify it include all the events and timelines C's mentioned. I have them in excel format.
That would be great. You could use the timelines in the first post of this topic and from @Approaching Infinity a few posts later, and supplement them with the data you have collected on the wikipage. They were made in 2009 so could use an update. I wouldn't add in transcript quotes, just a distillation of the cosmology as we know it.
Looks like we're talking at cross purposes. I was only talking about one particular game and agree that in principle no one would be able to reliably date the age of the board prior to the current game.
So let's say the astrophysicists are in the ball park and it's been around 14 billion years since the big bang (maybe they are, maybe they're not). And that Earth is around 4.5 billion years old. From the perspective of "time", this chess game started 14 billion years ago, after the previous board and pieces got smushed and reformed; Earth formed about 9.5 billion years later, and we're currently being moved around on the board. In some undetermined amount of time (billions of years? tens?), the game will end and a new one will begin.
Are you not imagining the big bang as the beginning of a cycle? And if you are, then would you think that Earth would be much older than we think (not younger), just like "the universe", since it stretches back to previous "incarnations" prior to the big bang? Or are you trying to connect the "grand cycle" (309,000 years) to the big bang model? If so, I think the grand cycle is just a tiny cycle within the overall history of the cosmos. There are plenty of Cs references to things many millions of years in Earth history, and other phenomena, like this one in reference to soul smashing:
