I asked what was the point in discussing 'misses'. It was a serious question that has not really been taken up.
You see, misses are logically impossible to prove because we know how much smoke is blown over our reality both in political and historical terms. We can never know the truth about the death of Princess Diana. Even if there are collections of 'evidence' and we may like to think they are good, we can never know.
I personally think that question was obfuscated due to strong emotional energy that surrounded us at the time of that session. But I also know that there have been other questions that I wrote off as wrong either at the time or soon after, but later learned (after research), that the Cs were, in fact right.
My point is, there is little to be gained by listing 'misses' or trying to discuss them outside of the threads attached to the sessions in which they are found. We do the sessions, publish them, take the data into consideration, and do our homework. In many cases, the results are truly astonishing. In others, depending on our questions, not so much. The hits have led to amazing discoveries, the introduction of startling concepts into our reality that rapidly get taken over and twisted by copycats, and life-changing experiences for many of our readers. The misses are just noise, and thankfully, there is not a lot of that.
I'm not going to apologize for my writing style since most people like it, and find it to be clear because I am always considering any difficulties the reader may have. But if 03 doesn't like it, that's his/her prerogative. S/he is, however, saying so in the face of literally thousands of others who say otherwise.
Another point I would like to make: in the years when we were spending a lot of time studying psychopathology one thing we noted was that pathological individuals have some sort of inner mandate to force others to agree with them and/or force others to associate with them despite the fact that they declare themselves to be opposed or in disagreement. Obsessive stalking is one of the features of psychopathology and stems from this very drive. Perhaps it is a consequence of Millennial upbringing, helicopter parenting, giving everyone in class a prize so no one is left out so that nobody gets their feelings hurt.
Well, guess what, snowflakes? That doesn't cut it here. If you don't like the decor or the fellow guests, or the activities and they way they are done, hit the road. That doesn't make a cult, it's called Freedom of Association, i.e. the right to associate with people you like, get along with, agree with, have similar goals with, and to pursue those goals without being molested by persons who wish to do other things. You are not entitled to turn a chess club into a knitting club just because you don't like chess and want to knit. Go join a damn knitting club!