Elon Musk: Tech Genius! Green Warrior! Biz King! Good Oligarch?

About the secret war between the Deep State's financial arm and the Trumpism

Twitter: the new toy of Trumpian Elon Musk to defend freedom of expression

By Alfredo Jalife Rahme

While the citizens of the world are slaves to the Invisible Cybernetic Jail of GAFAT (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Twitter) the gigabanks titans of the financial Deep State and their instruments in the Democratic and Republican parties collided with Elon Musk (EM), very close to former President Trump.

EM captured Twitter, an intimate instrument of the Democratic Party in the US (sic) with all that this entails and derives.

Not to vary, among the first 10 institutional owners of Twitter are four well-known gigabanks that are part of the financialist Deep State that control the soul, spirit, will and pockets of the Western capitalist world.
First, Vanguard Group, 10.29 percent; third, BlackRock, 4.56 percent; fourth, State Street, 4.54 percent; and sixth, Fidelity, 2.14 percent.

It seems that the four gigabanks share the controls of the transnationals depending on the sector and its strategic scope.

The Financial Times (FT), mouthpiece of the neoliberal globalism of the British financial monarchy, seems to celebrate the fall in two days of more than 11 percent of Tesla shares – whose largest shareholder is EM (TSLA - Tesla Inc Shareholders - CNNMoney.com )–, which meant a loss of 110 billion dollars: 2.5 times more than the value of the purchase of Twitter! – which, curiously, is higher than the GDP of Bolivia, of 41 thousand 32 million dollars.

Tesla don't escape either, the clutches of the financial Deep State when among its 10 main institutional owners appear the four gigabanks in respectable seats: in the first place, Vanguard, with 5.72 percent; third, BlackRock, with 3.35 percent; fourth, State Street, 3.14 percent; and eighth, Fidelity, 0.92 percent.

According to the FT, EM financed its $44 billion purchase with $13 billion of debt from Wall Street merchant lenders and a $12.5 billion loan secured by part of its shares in Tesla (https:/ /on.ft.com/3vNCISO).

EM has not yet explained how it will cash finance the remaining $21 billion. The FT surmises that it will have to sell billions of its shares in Tesla, which has a market value of $920 billion.

Twitter has never been a good business and now less: it has lost 8 percent after the acquisition by EM

Is this a financialist civil war that dares not speak its name among the gigabanks and EM?

Tesla shares have plummeted 22 percent since EM's spectacular takeover of Twitter three weeks ago, signaling the clash of the giants of the financial Deep State that reflects the latent civil war in the US that has raged ever since 2021

Today, the drop in the prices of Twitter and Tesla reflects the true State of the Union.


They'll destroy Elon Musk, and Twitter, Twitter before they let Musk bring free speech to it. Here's how they'll do it, and why his fight has only just begun. Just 5 mins. (Please subscribe) #LiberalMeltDown #LiberalTears
MASHUP! Libs aren’t coping well with Elon Musk buying Twitter. A DOZEN people already deactivated their accounts. How will Elon ever recover from this?
 
This was from a year back when SpaceX launched their dragon event. I first saw this video showing a lil critter, supposedly a mouse, scurrying on the propulsion system:


I went to check the official C-Span video on the launch and the kerfuffle is on there to :shock:. See 4:13:00 on the video:


It looks to be attached by metal bars initially then it falls off. It behaves like an inanimate object when it hits the bottom part of the propulsion system, but then when it eventually leaves out of view, it looks like it's doing small hops. This is looking like metal debris the more I look at it however.
 
Last edited:
Don't trust Elon, not really sure what his angle is, what his specific agenda is, but this all seems it a bit artificial to me. Especially the part where people who were banned are being let back into their accounts now, there has been no official change of ownership yet. Maybe PTB think this will bring people back into their mass propaganda platform as people are bailing from Twitter and going to alternatives? I dunno.
 
MASHUP! Libs aren’t coping well with Elon Musk buying Twitter. A DOZEN people already deactivated their accounts. How will Elon ever recover from this?

I can't get over that first one and how she decided to record herself driving... if she's so desperate to get likes that she'd endanger her life and the lives of others to record a video and post it, I daresay she will really miss twitter and will eventually come back to it. It's that insane desire for attention that keeps people on Twitter.

Also, after claiming that Twitter was not biased, them reacting as such kind of disproves that claim.
 
Elon Musk Exposed.

"The fake genius to help lead humanity into the abyss".

Whoa!!!!!! This is Very Revealing....Elon Musk, the Great Pretender and Compulsive Liar.



Another revealing discussion. I've only begun listening to this so can't vouch for it but so far its also very informative.


Notes from the program: Going Way-Way-Way Beyond Elon Musk
Investers in Starlink/SpaceX:

Elon Musk’s SpaceX is controlled by the British Crown (via a “golden share” otherwise called a “Special Share.”
Advisors

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan, and Allen & Co. are serving as financial advisors to Twitter, and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP are serving as legal counsel. Morgan Stanley is acting as lead financial advisor to Mr. Musk. BofA Securities and Barclays are also acting as financial advisors. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as legal counsel.

This is the same crowd of corrupt institutions that hovered around Facebook, Google, etc.
 
What does this say about the hitherto seemingly untouchable tech Goliath's?

I think that they are only playing the "lifesaving mattress" when the pawns that preceded them are already worn out and did not do their job well. They are playing the "hero" card so that people will identify with him enough to trust him and when he presents them with the same control option like the pill hidden in the cake, people will be more comfortable/emotionally conditioned - because he is Elon Musk - to accept it. Elon attacks as if he is untouchable have, we really seen anyone in all of history who has been untouchable attacking in that direct way and come out unscathed? either he is not a major problem at the moment, his attitude helps the agenda unconsciously or he is simply part of the agenda and he himself is the best experiment they have.

There may be a lot of negative press around him, but surely that's part of the plan, to use "if they talk bad about you, it's because you're doing good" and people without much analysis who just enjoy the "digital slapstick" show on the networks think he's a right and noble person. It's as if the bad news is only meant to show how identified people are with him, not really to expose him. People who have really wanted to do something significantly good for the world have taken them out of the way. To me, Elon is just another phony in this world. An illusion meter useful for the moment.

Even Jordan B. Peterson himself has not been able to figure it out, he is confused and says he must be an alien. I am impressed but in a way, "what is going on with you Jordan? what am I not understanding here to say something so off topic. Or at least me, I haven't seen him talk that way about those topics. I am surprised that it is Jordan who says so. Not whether or not it's Elon, an alien.


As a billionaire tech guru, if he wanted a "free speech platform", the easiest would be to create one. He has the devotion of brainless tech nerds left and right so that wouldn't be a problem to have following. It looks more like a rescue of a sinking ship or a publicity stunt.

Yup, but is better to make wood the already fallen tree. How many/who are the fallen trees behind social networks? there the detail, take advantage of that circumstance and just press the button and navigate in Desire.com, linked mentally granting futures in exchange for virtual freedom.
 
Before the takeover when it was still just a possibility, I was talking with the chiropractor who is a republican from Canada. He was really hoping that Musk was going to buy Twitter and save free speech but as we talked I expressed that I didn't buy it. One reason was billionaires trying to save humanity was few and far between and most probably wouldn't be front and center in the news.

After reading many of the comments I wonder if it is a ploy to get the conservatives to come back to the platform to monitor them and get them back into the fold just using a different method. The fold being the move to digital everything marching toward transhumanism whether they actually make it there or not?
 
Even Jordan B. Peterson himself has not been able to figure it out, he is confused and says he must be an alien. I am impressed but in a way, "what is going on with you Jordan? what am I not understanding here to say something so off topic. Or at least me, I haven't seen him talk that way about those topics. I am surprised that it is Jordan who says so.
I love the creepy music and out of context clips they've used to try and make that case. It's pretty obvious that JP was joking. I guess whoever created that video failed to understand that Elon Musk and Fox Mulder are actually part of the same multidimensional consciousness. 😁
 
I don't understand the appeal of Musk. To me he's a like Steve Jobs for the twitter/tiktok generation.
From the big-tech's perspective, losing a big chunk of the internet population from platforms such as twitter is a loss in terms of data gathering capabilities. They don't want a twitter populated only with libtards because they already know what they think and that they will automatically support the current thing. What they are interested in is the others, those wild cards they need to study to tailor some propaganda for. The return of "previously cancelled figures" to twitter, in that sense is not strictly a defeat for the PtB, it could be part of a cycle: gather data, cancel annoying figures, propagandize, gather data, etc.
 
From the big-tech's perspective, losing a big chunk of the internet population from platforms such as twitter is a loss in terms of data gathering capabilities. They don't want a twitter populated only with libtards because they already know what they think and that they will automatically support the current thing. What they are interested in is the others, those wild cards they need to study to tailor some propaganda for. The return of "previously cancelled figures" to twitter, in that sense is not strictly a defeat for the PtB, it could be part of a cycle: gather data, cancel annoying figures, propagandize, gather data, etc.
I was also thinking about this, maybe what they want is for people to come back to the places where they could actually manufacture a reality and sell a certain perception of that reality... to maintain it as centralized as possible. After 2020 a lot of people went elsewhere.
 
I just can't get into this twitter debacle. It's just nothing more than Musk playing mind games with people thinking they can twitter all they want, bleed their hearts out on social media without censorship, all the while creating a ..Neurolink database? Of human emotions and thought to be uploaded into one of those soon to be created really human looking (just like in the movie Blade Runner) robotic creations,. Just like Data in the Star Trek episodes.

I am curious, in a detached way, to see how this unfolds.
 
I was also thinking about this, maybe what they want is for people to come back to the places where they could actually manufacture a reality and sell a certain perception of that reality... to maintain it as centralized as possible. After 2020 a lot of people went elsewhere.
The problem I have with this hypothesis is that when I consider the alternative - would they have preferred to let the current Twitter board run things indefinitely, even to the detriment of Twitters audience numbers and stock price, the answer I always arrive at is, "Yes". Not saying that Musk's reshaping of Twitter can't be advantageous for them in some way, just that I can't see it as being their preferred optimal outcome.
 
I tend to think that Musk is sincere and acting on principles that he believes in or feels strongly about. The problem is that he is a complete materialist and atheist, which fits right into the satanic transhumanist agenda. Maybe that is why he is given so much leeway by the globalist mafia.
 
The problem I have with this hypothesis is that when I consider the alternative - would they have preferred to let the current Twitter board run things indefinitely, even to the detriment of Twitters audience numbers and stock price, the answer I always arrive at is, "Yes". Not saying that Musk's reshaping of Twitter can't be advantageous for them in some way, just that I can't see it as being their preferred optimal outcome.

I think one way of looking at this is that IF we want to think in terms of a grand conspiracy here, it is not that "they" have planned for Musk to take over, simulate a battle between different oligarchic factions to trap us etc. muahaha. The "grand conspiracy" that seems to lead humanity down the dark path for a looong time can often be only discerned after the fact, where you go like "huh, how did all of that fit in so neatly together, when the people involved couldn't possibly foresee all the later developments?" Hence the idea of a hyperdimensional control system, as opposed to a purely human one.

So it's more about currents and patterns in thought, and the "evolution" of society. So for example, the time was simply ripe for a "punk entrepreneur" like Elon Musk to emerge, as opposed to the oldschool patriarchs of yesterday. Many in the establishment knew that and so built him up and supported him, and the fact that he is in line with many of their interests and agendas helped, of course.

And now, it seems that the zeitgeist is shifting again somewhat, where more and more people have had enough with Wokeism and Libtardism, which clearly has gone too far (especially with the Covid thing), and this includes some oligarchs like Musk. This creates a tension among certain factions, and new developments like the Twitter takeover.

But in the bigger scheme, all this might serve yet another purpose that we don't know about. The fact that Musk is a die-hard materialist and chips-impanter and Ukraine-supporter certainly doesn't command confidence that it will be positive, at least not directly.

The question is: who "manages" the zeitgeist? Who subtly controls the currents shaping our thought, and therefore society, over decades, centuries and millennia? It certainly isn't Klaus Schwab or Elon Musk; in a way, they are "just" shaped by the zeitgeist and various mind programs like the rest of us (although that is not the whole story, of course.)

In other words, both can be true: that Musk is sincere and has good intentions as far as his understanding of reality allows him to, AND that he is ultimately used to advance agendas we may not know about for a while. At the end of the day, if there aren't enough people who start walking the straight and narrow for real, nothing can change for the better, no matter who runs Twitter.
 
Back
Top Bottom