The below jumped into my mind when I read the above statement. Interested to hear your thoughts
I can say for a fact, at some point in the future when all these unravels, the majority of the masses will say "I didn't know"... "I didn't know people were being locked up in quarantine facilities", "I didn't know they were lying about the vaccine", "I didn't know these vaccines caused heart attacks", "I didn't know a, b, c"....
These people will say they were acting based on what they knew at the time - what the BBC, CNN etc was telling them... I mean, how can anyone expect anything else and you can't blame innocent people for the consequences of lying politicians, scientists etc.
...but we know people COULD know. They just CHOSE not to know. In fact, they actively went out there way not to know and supported policies that meant the truth was SUPPRESSED.
I don't know, I mean, it's kind of tragic really... seeing people push themselves into a position where they'll be a "victim" and cry "innocence" at the end of it all but whilst that will psychologically offer comfort to them, it won't necessarily negate the real consequences of their choices and actions.
It's all rather interesting and it'll most likely end in disaster across the board - the people with the poison in their veins will always carry with them that "risk" that the poison holds but you know, let's be optimistic, this risk will remain only a possibility for the vast majority... but then it also depends how many injections and rounds of this special cocktail the public end up taking... in the end, if all goes to "plan", we know the "rounds" won't stop until the PTB achieve their objective (which isn't good for you Mr / Mrs Public). So there's that eventual disaster on that side of the equation. On the other side of the equation are those people without the poison... we know the governments won't stop and we know increasingly as things get worse for the jabbed, the scapegoating of the unjabbed will get worse. Eventually we know this may end up in a genocide type situation of the unjabbed - forced internment, unemployability etc which the masses of the jabbed will support or be indifferent to because the existence of the unjabbed will always carry the threat of showing things could have been different and the jabbed would never want to face that reality due to their culpability in bringing that reality to existence - heart attacks didn't have to start happening to young people at high numbers, natural immunity could actually stop covid etc.
Of course, before these reach their extremes something else will intervene, naturally and so both sides perhaps will be spared their ultimate fate if the story was to proceed without interruption. One can hope....!