"Enjoying The Show" As The World Burns

Perhaps it could be good to split this recent discussion out into the public forum somehow even. I imagine it's something that many are struggling with recently.

I think this is a great idea. And for the session, we can ask the Cs to comment on our discussion, and we have a thread to link to for context, for readers.
 
It's kind of funny to see you say this. To answer the initial question, you basically had to say that their definition of enjoy is "not enjoy at all".:-D But to be honest, that seems to be the only logical answer.
I think what Keith quoted - proper perspective.

I think once you truly understand that our reality is just an illusion, maya, dream of god or whatever they may call it and all our struggles and suffering just a drop in the beautiful ocean of creation gives you peace and then you are cable of enjoying the show no matter what it entails.
The experience will solely be dependent on where you are on this learning/understanding curve. And this is the most difficult challenge we all face - getting over our material existence/ ego etc. OSIT
 
The C's put on several occasions "relax and sit back" before "enjoy the show" meaning that we can't (and not supposed to) change the situation, so we might as well just watch the unfolding drama. As for "enjoy" the "joy" is supposed to come from seeing and understanding (on many levels) the situation and not from seeing other people suffering per se. As for Palestinians, it can very well be that some karmic issues are involved or even voluntary decision of their soul group to endure it so that all other people may SEE and understand (would be interesting to know if that's the case).

That's how I understood this.
 
Sometimes I imagine each of those Palestinian souls, as they were standing at the threshold before being reborn into those bodies, knowing they will be brutalised and tortured and that the death will be a blessing for them, each of them knowing the traumas they will suffer as children, and I can not but being stunned by their bravery and heroism. Willingly to go and live trough such a life!? I find it very brave, for the lack of stronger word.

Is that karma, and what if they are reincarnation of some Nazis, or whoever, who did similar atrocities to others, and now they are paying a karmic debt; what does it mean? Maybe it means that these souls eventually choose STO path, and they realised the need for balance and payoff, as opposed they might have gone and incarnate again as i.e. Zionists in those death camps and cement themselves on STS path. But, by choosing STO, they realised the burden and bravely came back and did they role that not only will help themselves but also millions of others with their sacrifice.

From a soul perspective, to me that sounds quite triumphant.

But still leaves the problem of enjoying the show. Can we be part of the world but not of it, while watching this catastrophe? To me, the situation in Gaza looks like all the evils of past times are rolled into one, like Nazis and Inquisition had some mutant baby on steroids. I thought of how the life of a human had no value in the past, what did Inquisition do to the "withes", and all the horrors of so many ways people were tortured and killed in every war in the past (i.e. think of Impalement), and we are watching it all live. How can we not be angry and discussed at unnecessary sufferings? I don´t know, but for all we know we might just well gone ourselves trough all of this at some point in the past. We might as well been on both sides of the story and now is time for another lessons.

So maybe what we can do is to endure, to send our thoughts and prayers to these souls to endure their suffering with their hearts as pure as then possibly can be so they can move further on the STO path. And to keep spreading the word of a cause they are fighting for and support them thus.

Just a few thoughts…
 
Also, just wanted to add that, for me at least, it's not just that people suffer, the negative or depressive feelings are provoked in equal measure (or perhaps more) over HOW and WHY they are suffering.

In the case of Palestine, the suffering of those people is made much worse, in my mind and heart, by the fact that it is being done DELIBERATELY and in front of the entire "civilized" world, and in fact, being done BY a supposed member of the "civilized world". To compound the egregiousness, the leader of the "civilized world" is fully supporting the butchery and encouraging people to support it!!

So perhaps what is really at issue here is not the suffering per se - we can all accept the fact that humans suffer - but that it is being imposed on people by psychos. So maybe what's really behind the angst is being forced to witness the stark reality of psychopaths in position of global power, and the realization that THESE creatures rule this world and would have all of us under their wretched control if they had their way.

Yes.

It is the suffering of others in front of our eyes, the brutality, it is the injustice, it is the feeling of helplessness, it is the wanton and senseless destruction, the abuse of power and the support it gets, the shameless attempts to convince humanity that "this is not what it looks like", or the covert, "it is you next".

For people who seek to know and find meaning in everything that happens, it is even harder to fathom. Add to that an ability to see what could have been compared to what is, and it compounds the matter further.

A few of you mention a state of being where one is able to experience viscerally everything going on around us, without losing either empathy or equanimity. The C’s seem to inhabit such a state in 6th Density. I don’t know how available it is to us in 3D, given the physiology of the body we inhabit and the lessons we have yet to learn to get there. But it seems to be part of the lessons to say NO with all our being when faced with such evil, drawing the proverbial line in the sand: "This is where I stand".

Perhaps when the playing field is level, we'll see demons as they are and not as human-looking. It might be easier then to accept "demons will be demons", and the dividing line will be clearer. There be demons, here be the rest of us.

And maybe the Cs' different advices through the years are to show us what we can potentially achieve. Sort of like the child looking up to the parents to learn how to deal with the adult life awaiting ahead. Not necessarily how we are to be now.

And for the session, we can ask the Cs to comment on our discussion, and we have a thread to link to for context, for readers.

Let's do that. I too think this conversation will help the other members too, and I am very curious to see what the Cs' answers will be. I trust you all at the chateau to take them to task :halo:
 
I have no idea. They didn't put "enjoy" in quotes so, preferring not to second guess, I took it literally. I can't think of any way that that phrase can be used to mean something other than it's literal meaning, unless it is used sarcastically.
Coming back to exploring the idea that it is meant to be taken literally, then what is there to enjoy? Mass killings and brutality is nothing new and neither is conscious evil. What is different in contrast to the past is that the conscious evil is done openly and the puppet leaders are condoning it openly in front of a global audience of billions. Before it was something which was done behind the drawn curtains and where the evil intent could be deduced after the events from historical analysis. Either it is signs of desperation that they don't hide it anymore and/or extreme hubris or something else. The same was done during Covid, which was also part of the show, I presume, since the C's mentioned "enjoy the show" also before Covid. During Covid, conscious evil was also perpetrated on billions worldwide and including on children and babies with devastating outcomes for many.

So this revealing of conscious evil in wars, pedophilia, psychopathy, the pharma industry, human smuggling, the Deep State, the Orwellian mascarade of Western 'values' etc. etc. etc., is, I think, something to enjoy as we also sense that it will lead to its downfall. The lies can not stand the truth just like darkness can not survive exposure to the light. It is like the cancer growth that is taking over the body and then has to be cut out. The cutting out does not look pretty and some healthy cells are also likely to be lost, but if it isn't done then the body will not survive. Here it is those aligned with the entropic forces of not-Being who are trying to take over or exterminate those aligned with the creative force of Being. Perhaps a reason why conscious evil is displayed so openly by our rulers is because they are getting desperate as the balancing force of Light is becoming ever more present and is slowly but persistently piercing the veils of darkness.

That would be something to rejoice, though it does not take away the suffering of being a witness to the 'show'. Perhaps it is as in childbirth as was mentioned, where there is pain, blood and suffering while there is also joy of knowing that it leads to the birth of a baby.
 
Reading all the discussion here and so many C's quotes on this theme, all I can imagine is that any new answers they give will be a rephrasing of things they have already said. Maybe there are no words they can use that will convey an understanding, we have to find it for ourselves as always. So we soldier on, I don't think any of us would be able to sit back and do nothing - whoever told us to! That suggests to me that with all these choices of words, like 'sit back' or 'enjoy' they are probably the best available but ultimately very limited in their ability to convey a certain concept.
 
I have very little to add to what has been said, and been said so excellently, except for that, for me, "enjoying the show" has to be only partially literal, because life is much more than a 'show' and always will be. You could call it a 'game' and that would be closer, but it's much more than a game, as well. The C's have said, "Life is Religion" and that seems to get even closer, but then there is also the concept of lessons and Life as a school. Is there even more to it than that? Possibly, but this is probably only answerable on the level of 7th Density, or so I think. Enjoyment, victory, praise and learning may just be steps on the 'staircase' to a destination which is impossible to grasp at this level, so perhaps it's better to just do what is in front of us to do, as well as we can, and let God take care of the rest, even, and perhaps especially, if that doing includes asking lots of interesting questions!

FWIW.
 
I also don't have much to add to the discussion, but wanted to say something that some of you have already mentioned in your posts. Perhaps, the reason why we find it so hard to understand fully how is it that we can "enjoy the show" is because this is not possible to do fully in 3D.

As Keit quoted:

Q: (L) That is inexpressibly depressing. Do you understand?

A: Why? Change will follow.

Q: (L) Will it follow soon?

A: You are slipping a bit. Refer to Literature "Bringers of the Dawn". Challenge will be ecstasy if viewed with proper perspective which is not, we repeat: not of third level reality, understand?

And what Alana said:

And maybe the Cs' different advices through the years are to show us what we can potentially achieve. Sort of like the child looking up to the parents to learn how to deal with the adult life awaiting ahead. Not necessarily how we are to be now.

So perhaps, one thing we can achieve at this level is to sort of have a dual awareness. Much like what some therapists try to encourage in their clients in some trauma therapies, which allows them to look at the painful memories, while keeping some perspective of the present, sort of like having one foot here and now, and the other foot in the painful memory. Just to give an example, this bit is from Healing Developmental Trauma:

Whereas psychodynamic therapies focus on attachment and developmental themes with the perspective that the past determines who we are in the present, NARM explores personal history to clarify patterns from the past that interfere with being present and in contact with self and others in the here and now. It brings an active process of inquiry to clients’ relational and adaptive survival styles, building on clients’ strengths and helping them to experience agency in the difficulties of their current life. While it is true that a psychotherapist must be able to traverse difficult affects with the client, in order to avoid regression the NARM therapist always supports a mindful dual awareness of past and present—staying anchored in the bodily experience of the present moment, NARM supports the awareness of the distinction between what was then and what is now. The focus is less on why people are the way they are and more on how their survival style distorts their experience and their life in the present. Avoiding the trap of making the past more important than the present, NARM uses a dual awareness that is anchored in the present moment while exploring cognitive, emotional, and physiological patterns that began in the past.

But, of course, this is related to personal experiences in the past, and having the present as anchor. In the context of this discussion, my guess is that this dual awareness would be more like being able to see and experience the present horror, while still keeping the awareness of the cosmic bigger picture, which I see similar to the example about the surgery given before:

But there's a way to see it through the "previous life" lens without it becoming 'mechanical' and uncaring, no?

If you substitute

"we know that they need that surgery because they have a given condition"

for

"we know that they need to experience this suffering because they have a given condition called "karma"

and we can still feel sorry for the person having to go through the pain of the surgery despite having that knowledge.

With the idea of dual awareness, we can understand that it is possible to still feel sorry for and horrified by the suffering we are witnessing, and that is actually how it is supposed to be at our level, 3D, but, at the same time, we can do our best to have one of our feet in the knowledge (and perhaps faith at our level) provided by that cosmic bigger picture awareness.

Just a thought, fwiw...
 
So perhaps, one thing we can achieve at this level is to sort of have a dual awareness. Much like what some therapists try to encourage in their clients in some trauma therapies, which allows them to look at the painful memories, while keeping some perspective of the present, sort of like having one foot here and now, and the other foot in the painful memory.

It reminded me what Joe said in another thread as a response to the following:

Woodsman said:
The one thing the video gets right is in the closing remarks about the ideal position being one where you are internally strong enough to take the world at face value and generally be happy and loving as an individual who is also wise enough to react appropriately when things get dark.

Joe: I agree, and also to be open-minded enough to consider possibilities without accepting them as hard truth. The hardest thing, they say, is to hold two opposing ideas in our minds at the same time, and be cool with it. In fact, I think someone said that is the hall mark of genius. Not sure about that bit, but it sure is difficult to do given the tendency to want to lock things down and keep them that way in order to feel secure. So I suppose the thing we have to master is, as Don Juan said, (more or less) to be able to face the infinite with impunity or calm, i.e. face the inherently creative and limitless nature of reality, and not freak out.
 
Ecstasy comes from Greek ekstasis. It did't originally mean 'good feelings', it was a reference to a state in which one is removed from the normal daily life way of Being or Seeing.

late 14c., extasie "elation," from Old French estaise "ecstasy, rapture," from Late Latin extasis, from Greek ekstasis "entrancement, astonishment, insanity; any displacement or removal from the proper place," in New Testament "a trance," from existanai "displace, put out of place," also "drive out of one's mind" (existanai phrenon), from ek "out" (see ex-) + histanai "to place, cause to stand," from PIE root *sta- "to stand, make or be firm."

Used by 17c. mystical writers for "a state of rapture that stupefied the body while the soul contemplated divine things," which probably helped the meaning shift to "exalted state of good feeling" (1610s). Slang use for the drug 3,4-methylendioxymethamphetamine dates from 1985. Formerly also spelled ecstasie, extacy, extasy, etc. Attempts to coin a verb to go with it include ecstasy (1620s), ecstatize (1650s), ecstasiate (1823), ecstasize (1830).

So that resonates with Yas' point about the (very difficult!) maintenance of a dual awareness of our current existence as both creatures of the Flesh and creators of the Spirit.

Or another way of putting it, borrowing from Tolle, is that we are human beings. We are both human and Being. Our humanity is in a time-bound evil 3D world, with all that entails, but we are also working on developing Being, the part of us that is somehow above and beyond all that. Maintaining a bridge between the two, in my view, is one way of talking about being an effective transducer of higher energies, or maintaining the conduit. Kinda like a practice of Grace - to neither become lost in the temptations of the Flesh, nor to escape into the realms of the Spirit when the world sucks, but balance both.
 
But there's a way to see it through the "previous life" lens without it becoming 'mechanical' and uncaring, no?

If you substitute

"we know that they need that surgery because they have a given condition"

for

"we know that they need to experience this suffering because they have a given condition called "karma"

and we can still feel sorry for the person having to go through the pain of the surgery despite having that knowledge.
The C's also repeatedly said we can learn lessons without suffering. I always understood karma as a "lesson delivery system", and the suffering is optional. It's a double-edged sword. It's hard to avoid suffering because that requires some amount of "conscious suffering" in a way - you gotta do the Work, network, and be willing to re-evaluate your perspective on just about everything, and probe deeply. This is hard. But if you don't do it, you'll suffer, and that can sort-of "force" that re-evaluation on you. The more stubborn you are, or the worse your "karma", the more suffering or conscious suffering. Either way, karma basically says you're not here on vacation, you're here to learn, and if you refuse, you will experience increasing levels of discomfort until you sort of remember your purpose and start learning.


Q: (L) Well, I like living on earth a great deal, but I don't like pain and suffering, and I don't like man's inhumanity to man and I don't like to see other people suffer.

A: Do you live on earth for amusement?

Q:
(L) I would like to live on Earth for amusement but I haven't had a whole heck of a lot of laughs since I have been here this time. I would like to have a life on the planet where things were pleasant...

A: You misunderstood.

Q: (L) I see what you are saying. That's where they live because that's where they live.

A: Yes.

And another thing about karma - the universe is infinitely able to provide karmic lessons. But just as not everyone needs the same amount of suffering to learn the same lessons, not every "place/time" needs to accommodate every level of suffering that some soul might need. "That's where they live because that's where they live" I think is important. Let's say there's a bunch of Hitlers out there trying to find a place to incarnate and clear some serious karma. They can't go to an STO world - because in all likelihood, those Hitlers aren't ready to consciously suffer and simply have a profound set of realizations about their choices through serious self-work and reflection. They're too lazy/mechanical for that. They need suffering. And an STO world won't offer the needed "mechanical suffering".

So they have to go to some level of STS world - basically they need to decide what level of "ass kicking" they think they need to truly learn what they need to learn, and then choose the world or place that offers it based on their karma and/or stubbornness/mechanicalness. "That's where they live because that's where they live" is true for worlds but also specific places/times in a given world.

On our planet some places/times certainly provide a lot more ass-kicking than others. Seems like soon the whole planet and all of humanity will undergo increasing suffering with very little refuge (well it's already escalating). And I guess that's because the Wave is coming, and by delivering the appropriate level of suffering suitable for humanity, you can maximize the "harvest" to 4D. So in a certain sense, 4D STS is being "used" by the universe to maximize our harvest. If we were 3D STO, we wouldn't need any amount of ass-kicking, or maybe very little.


Q: Can you comment on the Luciferian consciousness and what part it may play in our evolution and reality?

A: It is part of the lesson plan.

Q: That was my thought as well, but he says that because of this problem with the Luciferian consciousness, the "higher levels of creation began to intervene because Lucifer was imposing its misunderstandings on others and breaking the universal law of free will. Is this true?

A: No.

Q: I have read about this 'decision to intercede' by higher levels of consciousness who look down upon mankind and feel sorry for our terrible suffering, and that somehow, if something isn't done, the whole universe will be overcome by this evil... so it has got to be 'stopped.' A number of sources promote this idea, which then leads, generally, to claims that this or another alien group is part of the 'good guys' or bad guys, or whatever. Is any of this idea accurate?

A: No.

Q: So, what is, IS, and we only suffer exactly as much as we need to learn? Is that it?

A: There is more to it than that, but at this point, you would be unable to comprehend.

Q: Icke says "this Luciferian consciousness is a large aspect of Divine Consciousness which chose to work against the Source. Is this true?

A: Not really.

Q: Well, it SEEMS that the Luciferian Consciousness is working against the Source. If it is not, what is it doing?

A: Balancing where needed.

Also, there are no supervillains. Yeah there are psychopaths, but they're harmless unless a bunch of people believe their lies and do their bidding. So it's ultimately not even the psychopaths to blame, but the people who obey them. And you can't even blame them because if they could do differently, they would. They're doing what's "in them to do" at the moment. And they inflict suffering on a bunch of "bystanders", who are innocent, but of course chose to be here now knowing the situation.

So for me it comes down to - how can we stop being a planet that offers this kind of suffering? There are plenty of other planets that can serve the same function, why does ours need to be one of the painful ones? There are plenty of STO planets that don't provide those kinds of experiences, why can't we join their ranks? It's like "who is on first". I don't think it's fair to say our planet has this "designation" from up above - that wouldn't be in line with free-will. It seems to be a result of the kinds of souls incarnating here, and their inability to choose love and conscious suffering en-masse. Which creates a specific kind of environment that involves suffering, which in turn attracts more souls who need that kind of environment to grow. It also attracts 4D STS and is psychopath-friendly, and here we are.

The question is - who is on first? It doesn't seem like 4D STS or psychopaths are the initiators of this mess - they are exploiting the ready and willing FRV already here. And of course, the planetary FRV continues to attract more souls that need this, so we can't just ask the universe to stop the flow and only send STO souls, who wouldn't fit.

So our only choice is to have a planetary change of heart. And I'm not even sure it's possible at that scale without a "cleansing", and even then, at best, it looks like there will be a split. Those who dig their heels in and join the STS forces, and groups who are tired of this crap. So we create our own planet in 4D, and split off from those who aren't ready to give up the feeding cycle.



Q: I have this book, this Marcia Schafer thing: "Confessions of an Intergalactic Anthropologist," and its a bunch of channelled stuff; one thing she says: "the snake is associated with the sign of wisdom and higher learning, and is often regarded quite highly in mystical circles." She had an interaction with a rattlesnake, for which she felt sympathy, and she also has sympathetic interactions with Lizzies. I would like to have a comment on the idea of the snake as a "sign of wisdom and higher learning." Does this, in fact, represent what the snake symbolizes?

A: Snake is/was reported in context of the viewpoint of the observer.

Q: Are you saying that when the observer's viewpoint is that the snake is a symbol of higher learning, maybe...

A: Maybe the observer was just "blown away" by the experience.

Q: Clarify, please.

A: If you were living in the desert, or jungle, about 7,000 years ago, as you measure time, would you not be impressed if these Reptoid "dudes" came down from the heavens in silvery objects and demonstrated techno-wonders from thousands of years in the future, and taught you calculus, geometry and astrophysics to boot?!?

Q: Is that, in fact, what happened?

A: Yup.

Q: Well, this is one of the problems I am dealing with in trying to write this history of mankind. As I understand it, or as I am trying to figure it out from the literature, prior to the 'Fall in Eden,' mankind lived in a 4th density state. Is that correct?

A: Semi/sort of.

Q: Please be more specific.

A: 4th density in another realm, such as time/space continuum, etc.

Q: Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle; various choices were made: the human race went through the door after the 'gold,' so to speak, and became aligned with the Lizzies after the 'female energy' consorted with the wrong side, so to speak. This is what you have said. This resulted in a number of effects: the breaking up of the DNA, the burning off of the first ten factors of DNA, the separation of the hemispheres of the brain...

A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you're gonna get dirty.

Q:
What was the motivating factor for playing in the dirt? What essential thing occurred? You said once that it was 'desire based imbalance.' What was it a desire for?

A: Increased physicality.

Q: What was the objective sought for in this desire for increased physicality?

A: Sensate.

Q: How was sensate experienced so that these beings had an idea that they could get more if they increased their physicality?

A: Not experienced, demonstrated.

Q: Demonstrated how, by who?

A: Do you not know?

Q: It was demonstrated by the Lizzies?

A: Basically.

Q: Demonstrated in what way? Did they say: 'here, try this!' Or did they demonstrate by showing or doing?

A: Closer to the latter.

Q: They were doing, experimenting, playing, and saying: 'look, we are doing this, it's so great, come here and try it?'

A: Not really. More like: "you could have this."

Q: What seemed to be so desirable about this increased physicality when they said 'you can have this?'

A: Use your imagination!

Q: Was there any understanding, or realization of any kind, that increased physicality could be like Osiris lured into his own coffin by Set? That they would then slam the lid shut and nail him in?

A: Obviously, such understanding was lacking.

Q: Sounds like a pretty naive bunch! Does the lack of this understanding reflect a lack of knowledge?

A: Of course. But more, it is desire getting in the way of...

Q: Okay. The 'Fall' occurred. It seems like, and some of the archaeological studies indicate, that for many thousands of years, there was a peaceful existence and a nice agrarian society where the goddess or female creative forces were worshipped. At least, this is what a lot of present-day books are proposing...

A: No. These events took place 309000 years ago, as you measure it. This is when the first prototype of what you call "modern man" was created. The controllers had the bodies ready, they just needed the right soul matrix to agree to "jump in."

Q:
So, prior to this time, this prior Edenic state...

A: Was more like 4th density.

Q: But that implies that there was some level of physicality. Was there physicality in the sense of bodies that look like present-day humans?

A: Not quite.

Q: What did these pre-fall...

A: Cannot answer because it is too complex for you to understand.

Q: Does this mean that the are experienced... that the bodies we possibly would move into as 4th density beings, assuming that one does, would also be too complex for us to understand? You are saying that this 'sort of 4th density' pre-Fall state, in terms of the physical bodies, is too complex to understand. If going back to 4th density is anything like coming from 4th density, does that mean that what we would go back to is something that is too complex to understand? This variability of physicality that you have described?

A: Yes.

Q: So, was there any kind of worship of God, or religious activity in this pre-Fall state; this Edenic, 4th density state?

A: No need when one has a clue.

Q: What I am trying to get at here, what I am trying to understand, is the transition from the goddess worship to the god worship; the change from the understanding of cyclical time as expressed in the feminine cycles, and expressed as the goddess; to the concept of linear time, expressed as the masculine principle. It seems to me that these were stages of inversion of concepts which gradually led to the ideas that the Lizzies are imposing on us, and seem to have been working in this direction for millennia - the dominator experience which expresses as: believe in something outside yourself that will save you, otherwise you are damned because the world is gonna end, and you are going to get judged. This is the concept I am trying to deal with here. I am trying to understand what was worshipped. Okay, we had these guys; they fell from Eden, but they were still fairly close to the original concepts, in some terms. Once they jumped into the physical bodies, as you put it, what was their level of conceptualization regarding the universe? Did they still retain some understanding at that point?

A: Kind of like the understanding one has after severe head trauma, vis a vis your normal understanding in your current state.

Q: So, they were traumatized; they may have had bits and pieces of ideas and memories, but they may also have lost a great deal altogether. There may have even been a sort of "coma" state of mankind for many millennia. But, after they woke up, with the bits and pieces floating around in their heads, they may have begun to attempt to piece it all together. So, they started putting it all back together. What was the first thing they put together regarding the cosmos around them?

A: Sex.

Q: What did they decide about sex? I mean, sex was there. They were having sex. Is that it? Or, did they understand the cosmos as sex?

A: More like the former. After all, that is what got you guys in this mess in the first place! Just imagine the sales job if you can: "Look how much fun this is! Want to try it?!? Oops, sorry, we forgot to tell you, you cannot go back!"

Q: I really fail to understand - and I know it is a big issue that has been hinted at and alluded to, and outright claims have been made regarding sex in all religions and mythologies - but I fail to understand the mechanics of how this can be the engineering of a 'fall.' What, precisely, are the mechanics of it? What energy is generated? How is it generated? What is the conceptualization of the misuse of this energy, or the use of the energy?

A: It is simply the introduction of the concept of self-gratification of a physical sort.

Q: On many occasions you have said that the ideal thing is to have perfect balance of physicality and ethereality. This has been said on a number of occasions. Now, I don't understand how it can be that gratification of a physical body can be the mechanics by which one is entrapped? Is it not gratifying to look at something beautiful? Is it wrong, sinful, or a form of a fall, to look at beauty, to hear something beautiful such as music, or to touch something that is sensually delightful such as a piece of silk or the skin of a loved one? These various things that the human being derives pleasure from very often elevate them to a spiritual state.

A: Possession is the key.

Q: What do you mean?

A: In STS, you possess.

Q: That's what I am saying here...

A: If you move through the beautiful flowers, the silk, the skin of another, but do not seek to possess...

Q: It seems to me that it is possible to experience all of these things, including sex, without the need or desire to possess; only to give. In which case, I still don't understand how it can be a mechanism for a 'fall.'

A: If it is desired, then the mechanism is not to give. Do you eat a piece of chocolate cake because it is good to give to the stomach?

Q: Well, you could!

A: No, in STS, which is your realm do not forget, one gives because of the pleasant sensation which results.

Q: Could it not be said that, if everything that exists is part of God, including the flesh, that if one gives to the flesh, without being attached to the giving, that it could be considered a giving to the 'All?'

A: Explain the process.

Q: For example: there are some people who like to suffer, because they believe that the flesh is sinful. That is a big thing that the Lizzies have instituted. For centuries they have wanted people to suffer, and they have made this big deal about sex and anything that might be considered pleasant or desirable should be denied, and that a person should suffer, and revel in their suffering. And, actually, making a person...

A: If one seeks to suffer, they do so in expectation of future reward. They desire to possess something in the end.

Q: What I am saying is: if a person can simply BE, in the doing and being of who and what they are, in simplicity; to become involved in doing everything as a meditation, or as a consecration, whether they are walking down the street and being at one with the air, the sunshine, the birds and trees and other people; in this state of oneness, doesn't that constitute a giving to the universe as giving oneself up as a channel for the universe to experience all these things?

A: Not if one is "feeling this oneness."

Q: We are what we are. Nature is nature. Progression is progression. And if people would just relax and be who and what they are in honesty, and do what is according to their nature without violating the Free Will of others, that this is a more pure form of being than doing things out of any feeling of expectation, or desire; to just BE, not want... just BE?

A: Yes, but STS does not do that.

Q: (A) From which I draw conclusions: if there STS around us, we cannot just...

A: You are all STS. If you were not, you would not be where you are.

Q: (A) There are those who are happy in the STS mode; and there are those who are trying to get out of the STS mode...

A: STO candidate.

Q: (A) These STO candidates cannot just simply BE, even theoretically, because then, STS would eat them.

A: No.

Q: Why not?

A: STS does not eat according to protocol.

Q: What does that mean?

A: What do you suppose?

Q: I have no idea!

A: STS "eats" whatever it wants to, if it is able.

Q: That's what we said. If you are STO in an STS world, you are basically defenseless and they eat you.

A: No.

Q: Why? What makes STO unavailable or 'inedible?'

A: Frequency resonance not in sync.

Ok so it seems like it all comes down to making yourself as inedible/unpalatable as possible. And hope others join you. And everyone else will just have to figure it out through a bit more suffering and maybe they join a bit later. And some will never join.

For those who are "victims" of psychopaths (of their followers anyway) - certainly there are cases where the receivers seem less responsible for their plight. But for example, when the US collapses and people are starving and there's roaming gangs doing who knows what to people, can we truly say the US population is a "victim" of circumstance that was outside of their control? Can we not see the obvious contribution of the populace to its own circumstances? I mean we've been watching this train wreck unfold for years and screaming from the hilltops.

Now take the Palestinians - yes, they're victims of genocide. But I think it's some sort of irony of fate that genetically the Israelis are their brothers and sisters, same as Russians and Ukrainians. But in both cases one side of the family allied itself with the West STS hierarchy/mentality and the whole family is paying the price. The lesson is not just for Palestinians, who probably made a lot of mistakes dealing with their neighbor as well that would be more apparent to someone who lives there and has their eyes open, but also for Israelis, and the whole world. Right now it's Palestine who is suffering, and perhaps in the future it will be Israelis when the wrath of the world is upon them. Are we going to feel a certain sense of satisfaction when that happens? What about all the millions of Israelis who might suffer and/or die in the process? Would we feel just as sympathetic with their fate as we do towards Palestinians?

It's interesting because we clearly see what process led to Israeli or US destruction, so it's easier to have a "big picture" mindset when the West is suffering, but because we're not super clear on what the hell Palestinians possibly did to warrant their genocide, we only see the suffering, not what led up to it (which we may not even be privy to). And maybe it wasn't anything - maybe it's literally them sacrificing themselves so the whole world can see the evil of Israel and do something about it. Maybe on STS planets some people incarnate just to make the evil of the planet become increasingly apparent for everyone else. If they could properly defend themselves, there wouldn't be such a wave of increasing anti-Israeli sentiment. So it's almost like sometimes you have to let a bully bloody your nose for everyone else to see the bully for what they are and do something about it.

For me, the saving grace of all this - is that humanity as a whole have a choice. If we were powerless victims of a cosmic supervillain, I'd call foul and say this is bullshit. But because humanity chooses to play in the dirt, and theoretically can simply "opt out" any time they wish, at least I don't see this as completely unfair or senseless. It still sucks, but to me this whole Israel/Palestine thing is similar to when the whole family looks away when an uncle is molesting the kids. He's now doing it in front of everyone, and while I'm so sorry for the kids, I also know that their suffering can lead to someone in the family finally doing something about it. I'm more upset with the family looking the other way than the uncle doing "what's in him to do". But if them looking away is also them doing "what's in them to do", well then EVERYONE needs to suffer a bit more, and I totally get why.
 
I think this ties in with the idea of "limiting emotions". I was thinking about my empathy for the Palestinians and thinking that if I drew it as a pie chart, how much of that is empathy for them, and how much of it is anger at the Israelis? And that then raises another question: are either or both my empathy and anger limiting emotions?

I think they probably are, especially if they are tied together. The empathy is mixed up with feeling anger at the depravity of the Israelis that is the source of suffering that causes the feeling of empathy. The empathy is not "pure" in that case I suppose. There's a difference between spontaneously wanting to ease the suffering of someone who just hurt themselves by accident, for example, and wanting to help someone who is being actively abused by someone else. In that 2nd scenario, the person is suffering and CONTINUING to suffer and you can't do anything to ease it because of the abuser. This was already mentioned here, the feeling of powerlessness to stop the suffering.

But then we get back into the requirement to find some way to rationalize such a situation, and we have to do that if we're going to continue being a witness to it. And the only obvious way to do that is to fall back on philosophical ideas (although they may be very real) of 'lessons' or 'karma' and, in that way, try to project that suffering onto a 'higher' (and ultimately positive) 'cause'.

It's like Victor Frankl said, that 'as long as a person has a WHY, they can bear any HOW', i.e. as long as a person can ascribe meaning to their suffering, they can bear a LOT of suffering. But it's not so easy to come with valid meaning in the face of suffering, either your own directly, or your own indirectly, i.e witnessing that of others, which while different, can lead to despair just as easily. That's why the idea that suffering can actually be beneficial (learning, growing, 'turning on DNA etc.) is very valuable....as long as you can find a way to believe it, which presents another problem!

Atheists would have us believe that we have to shoulder the burdren of the 'ultimate meaningless of human existence'. But I think that's a cop out that can easily and obviously lead to despair. I think it's a much harder (and more courageous) task to shoulder our inability to understand the true meaning of life in logical or rational terms (which we are kind of trying to do here): to believe (have faith) in a positive meaning to suffering (and a conscious plan to creation) when we cannot really prove to ourselves that it really exists.
 
And maybe it wasn't anything - maybe it's literally them sacrificing themselves so the whole world can see the evil of Israel and do something about it. Maybe on STS planets some people incarnate just to make the evil of the planet become increasingly apparent for everyone else. If they could properly defend themselves, there wouldn't be such a wave of increasing anti-Israeli sentiment. So it's almost like sometimes you have to let a bully bloody your nose for everyone else to see the bully for what they are and do something about it.

Yeah, that's another philosophical angle to add to our list.

What about all the millions of Israelis who might suffer and/or die in the process? Would we feel just as sympathetic with their fate as we do towards Palestinians?

No. At least not right now.
 
The hardest thing, they say, is to hold two opposing ideas in our minds at the same time, and be cool with it.

Kinda like a practice of Grace - to neither become lost in the temptations of the Flesh, nor to escape into the realms of the Spirit when the world sucks, but balance both.

Been thinking along similar lines. The Cs have mentioned "balance" again and again in various contexts. We are faced with all these paradoxes: "sitting back" vs. taking action; empathy for the oppressed vs. bigger spiritual picture; creating energy via movement in this realm vs. the traps and dead ends of 3D; not "shutting out" reality vs. transcending the "fleshly" reality, and so on.

All those contradictions we are faced with also "open up a space" between them, where one may find a sort of finer energy - tension produces all sorts of results, after all (like the bow shooting an arrow, a string generating music...). How this plays out in practical terms is somewhat different from person to person I suspect, but for example, when looking at the Palestine situation, part of "balancing" might simply mean to take breaks from staring at the situation and instead try to look beyond the daily carnage. Use that energy on doing something or learning something - which might ultimately honor the victims of those psychos in its own way. Our very discussion here is just such a thing. Looking into the history of Zionism to comprehend what's going on in a wider context might be another (it did help me, although it certainly can increase the anger too).

Another aspect to the idea of balance is that creation is vast, and there is a lot of beauty, insight, growth, compassion etc. in it as well. Allowing ourselves to be drawn to the dark aspects of reality exclusively or lopsidedly in a sense means "shutting out reality" too. And, again, there is a tension here that might actually produce a useful and "higher" energy. This, too, is part of the "show" - not only the suffering and cruelty. There was a LOT of suffering just over the last 5-10 years alone, and yet there has been an acceleration of the transformation of our world that is nothing short of breathtaking, and it is grand and necessary. Another one of those perspectives that can't exist on its own - only as a part of a wider picture, a picture we can only attain via skillful balancing and conscious work with all these paradoxes, as opposed to just being hammered back and forth by them.
 
Back
Top Bottom