Failed Trump Assassination Attempt
- Thread starter Tristan
- Start date
Well, I saw the interview with the most clear and direct mentioning from the woman who saw the water tower shooter and also his death going around pretty early on, with the delicate difference that those parts were she talked about the tower and the shooter were not included in that video.
Now they are floating that Iran, though not involved in Saturday's shooting, wants to kill Trump... has had a plot to kill him. Could be 'they' are setting up another event and/or second attempt on Trump's life, which would then be blamed on Iran. Could also be that they are trying to muddy the waters. Isn't it BS that Trumps security was beefed up? From what I remember, they had pulled off most of his normal SS protection to protect Jill Biden, etc.
If I was Trump I would go to ground for a time...
If I was Trump I would go to ground for a time...
Last edited:
That's three shots all in a line from Crooks's location.
At least one of the injured victims was close to where the fireman was killed, from what I could tell from the witnesses nearby. Haven't heard anything about the location of the second person who was injured.
Yeah, the spray thing could very well have been done by the bullets from the rooftop shooter or that hypothetical other guy near there. So, not much there that can give us further clues. As for the dead guy in the crowd, I‘m also pretty sure that he was located at approximately the same possible line of sight with the roof building. So, not much there that can give us further clues either. So far there is only one shot we can really work with quite precisely: The one that hit Trumps ear.
Thanks, I for one hadn't heard of this.
One of the big things that stood out for me reading Gavin de Becker's "Gift of Fear" was just how common this is. Every celebrity has stalkers and would-be assassins. You rarely hear about them. So for every one that makes the news, there's a ton that don't. E.g., we probably wouldn't have known about the two would-be assassins that went after Musk if he hadn't tweeted about it:
Guilty... INSIDE JOB!!??
I've heard some whoppers over the years, but this about takes the cake. GUILTY your honor!
Secret Service boss cites hazard of putting agent on 'sloped roof'
Embattled Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle said in an interview the 'buck stops' with her, and said a decision was made not to post an agent on a 'sloped roof' that a shooter used to fire on Trump.www.dailymail.co.uk
Just for a sanity check, notice just how sloped the roof was that actually had the snipers on it compared to the one with the kid. This doesn't add up at all.
For me, the unsecured building which Crooks used remains the gaping hole in the lone wolf story. I mean, look at this clown shoes stuff, "the decision was made to secure the building from the inside". The building with a ladder propped against it, the building with a corrugated metal roof and the best shooting position (unless you intended to actually survive this assassination attempt). The investigation of this team, and how it was designated its area of responsibility is probably going to be the most interesting.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Secret Service boss cites hazard of putting agent on 'sloped roof'
Embattled Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle said in an interview the 'buck stops' with her, and said a decision was made not to post an agent on a 'sloped roof' that a shooter used to fire on Trump.
Here's a video that shows where he was in the stands (about 2/3 up, close to the far edge):
I think it would have been perfectly possible for that sniper on the roof and the other next to him to not be able to see the sniper if he was inside the roof building (if they didn’t use infrared tools) if that shooter positioned himself and the gun further inside the building behind any of the openings/windows we see on that building. In fact, it is likely that the hypothetical sniper in the building did just that.
Indeed, that is the evidence that is the most obviously fishy thing about that whole thing. I think it couldn’t get much clearer that there was that glaring hole in security and other similarly crazy security mismanagements put into place on purpose and beforehand. That also means that whoever ordered it likely wanted it to succeed, so it is quite improbable that they would leave the kill shot up to an amateur, especially given the history of many similar things in the past.
Last edited:
Is it possible that Trump is protected to carry out an “important mission”? And for that reason, the 4D STS powers would want to kill him then. Just pure speculation...
Official word is that the SS team inside the building were using it as a spotting location. The fact that this was released means, IMO, that it unlikely to be them. My experience of previous "lone shooter" events that obviously had multiple shooters is that there is only ever oblique or vague eyewitness references to them, plus circumstantial evidence pointing to multiple shooters. Even if they get caught by local cops, they never really get caught.