Failed Trump Assassination Attempt

[Altair]

Change into what?

Change into a new timeline where Trump's surviving could better serve their (changed) agenda. If we define the "program" as the last 8 years of incessant harassing of Trump and trying to get rid of him by any means possible, then the Deep State's last desperate attempt to remove him physically can be qualified as a program change (by the Quorum).

 

[Jones]

That sure is a lot to think about and most likely why it has captured the attention of so many people and got so many people thinking too.

Probably true of some, but others will have just changed their narrative because those they perceive as authorities seem to have changed their tune and they haven't really thought about it at all.

 

[candasiri]

Was Trump originally slated to die, either in this way or some other (e.g. heart attack)? And how might that achieve some level of balance?

That's a good question. The fact that he lived seems like divine intervention on the part of higher density STO for the purpose of Trump being a figurehead of resistance despite all of his shortcomings. I don't think that he will have the power, cunning or insight to change the plans of 3D/4D STS in terms of herding the population into finer controls but at least the common man will have the example of a leader with some backbone and willingness to fight for people.

Before the attempt on his life, I was so sure that the election would be rigged and Newsom was going to slide into the presidency. Now I feel that just maybe Trump will be elected somewhat fairly. I was struck by the video that has been posted on this thread several times about the Christian prophet/psychic stating that he saw Trump in office during a worldwide financial meltdown. That sounds very probable. April drop dead date in more ways than one?

But I do think if the people are "allowed" to elect Trump who is the figurehead of resistance to mass media and others of globalist ilk that will achieve some level of balance.

 

[Voyageur]

I do have a few questions that I hope some forensics experts will talk about:

1) what would shots coming from inside the building sound like compared to ones coming from outside (including the counter-sniper)?

Only making a guess, that if shots came from inside and unless under suppression (then with an open window), depending on where one was, it might sound either like muffled sound or a boombox. Anyone inside (obviously) or near a door/window, would immediatly know. Think people close to the building would also readably hear/feel - sense it. Firing inside (go to any indoor range with long arms), air is compressed against the structure with no where to go, and it sure is not quite. So, yet again, from the outside it might be either muffled or fairly loud from location (noticeable difference from an ordinary outside shot).

 

[Voyageur]

No surprise here, from the king vaccine assassin proponent:

Anthony Fauci Issues Shocking Claim About Trump's Injuries

He has got to be kidding.

resistthemainstream.com

https://twitter.com/x/status/1814646729469309364

 

[Benjamin]

Here is a ballistic recreation of the two known weapons used with excellent descriptions, imo. In its way, this supports a second shooter theory. Wild slow motion eye candy! (16:42)

Also this is a cropped version of a photo that has been posted here already. I just wanted to show the two men who were hit. As well, the roofs in the (full) photo show nobody on them, as incomplete as they are.



On a personal note, two days ago, the song Morning Has Broken foggily emerged from my memory. It was so weird. I had not sung or heard that song in 30/35 years, maybe. I don't know if haarp was turned on, or what, but for me to remember it now (or any time!) is really out of place. Strange timing. (Fyi, I didn't know that the music is actually from a Scottish folk song called Bunessan from the Isle of Mull.)

 

[Ellipse]

Now I know those calculations are mostly bunk because I'm guessing the height of the stage. But you can see why knowing heights exactly (or as close as possible) is needed to work out what angle the shot came from.
Without more data, it's a toss up as to whether it came from the roof or the window.

I needed to find all this if I hope to create an accurate 3D model, otherwise the model is useless and can show anything I want it too.

Perhaps by identifying one of those SS guys and so finding his height and so being able to deduce the height of their elbow?

Of course the contradiction here is that SS guy mean... secret. So informations about them should no be online but perhaps with other photos or videos in which they appear, their height can be deduced. Unfortunately, I guess it's not as easy to find.

The other point is, from this perspective, we don't know exactly at which distance they are from the stage.

 

[hlat]

Tying together Trump assassination attempt to Crowdstrike computer crash. Assassination evidence eliminated in computer crash.

Why I believe the global IT outage by Crowdstrike is not an accident

THE GLOBAL IT OUTAGE YOU WITNESSED WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT! IMPORTANT! The purpose of this thread is to explain non-IT and to non information/cyber security professionals why I believe the outage you are seeing around the world due to the update from...

www.sott.net

IF threat agents conspired to kill a US president, and just a few days later another non imaginable security event occurs, since digital data represents a large part of the data generated in the world, don't you find it HIGHLY PLAUSIBLE that these two are related?

 

[hlat]

Opinion of Bob Moriarty.

Jul 15, 2024 Civil War 2.0 Bob Moriarty 321gold

321gold.com ...takes no prisoners!

www.321gold.com

From the sound of the rifle to me it appears the sniper was firing a .22 caliber rifle probably with .22 Long Rifle rounds. If you make a head shot, the person hit is going down, likely on a permanent basis. I carried a .22 caliber Colt Woodsman pistol in Vietnam as a survival weapon. I could hit someone at 50 meters in the head and kill them. So, someone basically familiar with a .22 rifle at 135 meters is pretty much point-blank range.

 

[Ellipse]

Yep, all of that speaks to someone wanting chaos. But that then brings up the question of what went wrong? Why did he survive?

Since we all into "the divine" here, what's our take on the, now popular, idea that it was "divine intervention"?

Seems to me there are four general options there:

1) Just luck (see number 3)
2) Divine intervention
3)Trump's "higher self" stepping in because "it wasn't his time".

Number 2 has 2 sub options: STS or STO? STO I think would not have involved themselves. Free will and all that. So that leaves STS. Why would they have wanted to prevent the "hot heads" in the CIA etc. from killing Trump?

In the last few sessions there was a reference to the Quorum meeting and a "program change" upcoming, with previous similar program changes being cited as the assassination of JFK and 911.

If Trump had been killed, would that have qualified as a "program change"?

In the last session they said that the quorum was meeting to effect changes to control people more, but that control would lead to more resistance, and that was needed because more balance is needed. Question is: are the quorum people aware that they will achieve more resistance and therefore balance by their actions? Are they intending that? Are SOME of them intending that?

In a previous session (20 years ago or so!) the quorum were referred to as 'watchers' and that they were "keeping track of prophecies".

These days, there's a growing sense of "biblical end times" prophecies, and the 'divine salvation of Trump' certainly adds grist to that mill.

And now we have a UFO(s) spotted over the assassination attempt. Watching? Facilitating? Or preventing?

I'm for the divine intervention. I'm not sure STO force cannot intervene in an indirect way. I can't find back Trump declaration, but if I remember well, he said he turned his head due to a placard. So perhaps STO forces gave a nudge to the person with the placard. Trump choice was to ignore it or not.

About the Quorum, I'm not sure it is an entity acting as a single man. Perhaps it's the assembly of different forces which try to push their own interests. So perhaps a decision is made (the assassination) and counter forces manage to make it fail. Or the decision was to go with Trump and some forces tried to carry on with the assassination regardless and there will be some spanking? Hard to know.

Would be interesting too, to know which densities are involved in the Quorum.

As for the UFO, I vote for "watching".

 

[Niall]

Also this guy reportedly did an analysis of the audio forensics and concluded same gun for first 8 shots (published the day of the shooting, but didn't get as much coverage as the CNN report):

https://www.montanarightnow.com/montana/msu-professor-helps-with-gunfire-investigation-at-former-president-trumps-rally/article_6c6d0576-4227-11ef-89c5-a7284b6f9256.html

Videos Show Suspect Lying Motionless on Nearby Rooftop After Shooting

An audio analysis by The New York Times and an another expert suggested that eight shots had been fired by the gunman.

www.nytimes.com

I'm still not convinced by Martenson's audio analysis, BTW. The microphone moves 180 degrees between the two volleys, plus the shockwaves and reports on the other videos sound very similar - if the first three shots came from inside a building, the reports should be muffled in comparison to the later shots in all the videos.

Well then, that currently leaves us with just the official lone gunman theory. Crooks may have been 'helped' onto the rooftop by the SS temporarily 'going blind', but other than that, the titantic decade-long struggle of US, and thus global, politics came down to the accuracy and shooting skills of a 20-year-old with a scope-less "AR-style" gun.

 

[luc]

With regard to the "program change", here's a short session timeline for reference:


9th March

Q: (L) And what's the deal with the numbers?

A: Sequence of program change.

Q: (L) What program change?

A: Your reality is about to undergo one such.

Q: (L) And what would the numbers do for us?

A: Sorry, that was information code unknown to you as yet.

Q: (L) Okay. So, you were parsing some kind of... something similar to a computer code?

A: Close.

Q: (Joe) Do these program changes of the type our reality is about to undergo happen fairly frequently? Have they happened in our lifetimes before?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Do they happen frequently?

A: No

Q: (Gaby) Was 9-11 one?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Was the assassination of John F. Kennedy one?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Well, neither of those events were positive from our perspective. So, it’s probably best to assume that this next one will be the same – i.e. not positive from our perspective?

A: Close

Q: (Joe) And when they say, "is about to undergo", is that imminent or within the next year?

A: Months or so.

Q: (Joe) What are the chances of Trump being assassinated this year?

A: Possible made to look natural event.

Q: (Gaby) Like a heart attack.

A: Stroke.

Q: (Joe) Does the program change that they're talking about that's within X number of months relate to the releasing of a new virus?

A: Not yet.

Q: (Andromeda) So something else before that.

(Niall) Geopolitics. Ukraine.

(Joe) Is it related to geopolitics in Ukraine and Russia?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Should we give any credence to the European politicians' talk of Europe going to war with Russia?

A: Some, certainly. Hubris knows no bounds.

Q: (Niall) They really, really, really, really don't want Putin to win.

(L) And they really, really, really don't want Trump to win, and they're really, really, really getting desperate and the reason for their desperation seems to me that there is some big change approaching. Is that part of it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So the program change then is something other than the work or the machinations of the overt political elite in the West?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is it 4D STS?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) What is it, Laura? What is it then?

(Niall) A space threat?

A: Watch the skies and land and oceans.

Q: (L) Well, that's everything.

(Andromeda) But mostly natural.

(Niall) Earth changes.

27 April:

(Altair) Which events initiated the upcoming program change? Is it because of Ukraine losing on the battlefield?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is it because of Trump?

A: Closer.

Q: (Niall) Something to do with American politics?

(L) So, does this program change have to do with American politics?

A: Warm.

Q: (L) Is it something that we're seeing at the present moment with these massive protests that are going on at the US universities, which is basically making Israel look really, really bad?

(Joe) Because of what they're doing in Palestine.

(L) So they've got some kind of something that's got to be done about this?

A: Very warm.

Q: (L) So, it has to do with Israel, possibly with Trump and the American political scene and the mass protest against the genocide and Palestine?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So, they're going to try to do something because...

(Joe) To distract from all that.

(L) To distract from all that, or to damp that down?

A: Yes

6th July:

A: Quorum is meeting. Changes coming.

Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?

A: Nomendei of Cassiopaea.

Q: (Joe) The name of God, or the names of God...

(Scottie) That's unusual.

Q: (L) Okay. So you say the Quorum is meeting. Is that the Quorum you have spoken of in previous sessions?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And where are they meeting?

A: 4D.

Q: (L) And is it unusual for them to meet? I mean, is that why you brought this up?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) When was the last time they met?

A: 40 years ago.

Q: (L) Was that 40 years, or did I miss a number? Was it 40?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) 40 years ago was when?

(Joe) 1984.

Q: (L) 1984. Uh-oh, argh! [Laughter]

(Joe) What are they meeting to discuss or decide?

A: Future of Earth.

Q: (L) Is it a good thing they're meeting, or a bad thing?

A: Depends on perspective.

Q: (L) Okay. Is it a good thing from our perspective?

A: Probably not.

Q: (L) Does it mean that from our perspective they're going to effect, or make some nefarious plans in the direction of greater control of human beings?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Is it because there is too much resistance against the increasing control, or not enough?

A: Not enough for balance.

Q: (L) So, based on things you've said in the past, does that mean there needs to be more suffering so that more people wake up?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Well, swell!

(Joe) So the meeting that they're having, the decision that they're coming to will determine the future of Earth in a definitive way, or is it just another step?

A: Not as you suggest, no.

Q: (Gaby) It's more about the future of humanity...

(Joe) Or the future trajectory, or the next step in the...

A: There needs to be balance.

Some thoughts:
The "program change" and the "Quorum meeting" are two separate things which are only connected "indirectly".

The program change relates to American politics and Israel and the general uprising against the genocide. It appears to be initiated by 4D STS, like in 9/11, Kennedy assassination etc. One possibility would be an ideological switcheroo where they bring right-wing/conservative politics back to power, provided it's pro-Israel. (They pulled off these kinds of switcheroos many times in the past). Question is: did they intend to do that with or without Trump? Since the Cs talked about a possible "heart-attacking" of Trump, chances are they wanted to do it without Trump, probably because all the other Republicans are much easier controlled than him (he's a wildcard with too much power).

Next, the Quorum meeting: frankly all bets are off as to what this means, it could be something long-term... We should keep in mind that the Quorum is not necessarily the bad guys, but more like a consortium of good and bad guys of sorts. They say it's about balance, which is currently lacking ("not enough" resistance), so it needs to be helped along, and we probably won't like it.

So maybe the "divine intervention" and rescuing of Trump needs to be seen in a larger context of what's to come: whatever it is, it somehow needs Trump surviving. This would fit with the "quorum" idea: it's neither a STS nor a STO decision, but rather some sort of understanding that this is what needs to be done. STS probably thing that this is great for them and they can do their shenanigans, while STO has the bigger picture and sees it as restoring balance even though we may not like it initially.

This would mean that most of our PTB have no clue and they really did want to kill Trump, either to keep the Dems in office or to pull a switcheroo without Trump potentially getting in the way. But 4D forces prevented it, possibly STS forces doing the deed with the blessing of the Quorum (hence the UFO). So in that sense, it really was "divine intervention" because the decision is ultimately a higher level "God" decision, although 4D STS believes it fits their plans for the timeline they have in mind, whatever that is.

Well, I'm just trying to think this through, maybe others have a better take.

 

[Fluffy]

Yep, all of that speaks to someone wanting chaos. But that then brings up the question of what went wrong? Why did he survive?

Since we all into "the divine" here, what's our take on the, now popular, idea that it was "divine intervention"?

Seems to me there are four general options there:

1) Just luck (see number 3)
2) Divine intervention
3)Trump's "higher self" stepping in because "it wasn't his time".

Number 2 has 2 sub options: STS or STO? STO I think would not have involved themselves. Free will and all that. So that leaves STS. Why would they have wanted to prevent the "hot heads" in the CIA etc. from killing Trump?

In the last few sessions there was a reference to the Quorum meeting and a "program change" upcoming, with previous similar program changes being cited as the assassination of JFK and 911.

If Trump had been killed, would that have qualified as a "program change"?

In the last session they said that the quorum was meeting to effect changes to control people more, but that control would lead to more resistance, and that was needed because more balance is needed. Question is: are the quorum people aware that they will achieve more resistance and therefore balance by their actions? Are they intending that? Are SOME of them intending that?

In a previous session (20 years ago or so!) the quorum were referred to as 'watchers' and that they were "keeping track of prophecies".

These days, there's a growing sense of "biblical end times" prophecies, and the 'divine salvation of Trump' certainly adds grist to that mill.

And now we have a UFO(s) spotted over the assassination attempt. Watching? Facilitating? Or preventing?

I like this. If I were 4D STS I’d most certainly make deals then lie and redact promises to my own advantage.
A hypothesis- So they planned a program change, killing Trump, then he’s dead and the outcome was less than appealing, it had the opposite effect of their wishful intention. Oh shit! Well then shall we just tinker with time (again) creating an (other) alternate universe where Trump doesn’t die and the program change is incomplete… but it appears this too has backfired because it has their stinky fishy signature all over it and too many people have noticed that something is very very wrong with the whole story.
It looks like they’ve exposed themselves more that they would have if Trump had actually been killed.

 

[Jefferson]

With regard to the "program change", here's a short session timeline for reference:


9th March


27 April:




6th July:




Some thoughts:
The "program change" and the "Quorum meeting" are two separate things which are only connected "indirectly".

The program change relates to American politics and Israel and the general uprising against the genocide. It appears to be initiated by 4D STS, like in 9/11, Kennedy assassination etc. One possibility would be an ideological switcheroo where they bring right-wing/conservative politics back to power, provided it's pro-Israel. (They pulled off these kinds of switcheroos many times in the past). Question is: did they intend to do that with or without Trump? Since the Cs talked about a possible "heart-attacking" of Trump, chances are they wanted to do it without Trump, probably because all the other Republicans are much easier controlled than him (he's a wildcard with too much power).

Next, the Quorum meeting: frankly all bets are off as to what this means, it could be something long-term... We should keep in mind that the Quorum is not necessarily the bad guys, but more like a consortium of good and bad guys of sorts. They say it's about balance, which is currently lacking ("not enough" resistance), so it needs to be helped along, and we probably won't like it.

So maybe the "divine intervention" and rescuing of Trump needs to be seen in a larger context of what's to come: whatever it is, it somehow needs Trump surviving. This would fit with the "quorum" idea: it's neither a STS nor a STO decision, but rather some sort of understanding that this is what needs to be done. STS probably thing that this is great for them and they can do their shenanigans, while STO has the bigger picture and sees it as restoring balance even though we may not like it initially.

This would mean that most of our PTB have no clue and they really did want to kill Trump, either to keep the Dems in office or to pull a switcheroo without Trump potentially getting in the way. But 4D forces prevented it, possibly STS forces doing the deed with the blessing of the Quorum (hence the UFO). So in that sense, it really was "divine intervention" because the decision is ultimately a higher level "God" decision, although 4D STS believes it fits their plans for the timeline they have in mind, whatever that is.

Well, I'm just trying to think this through, maybe others have a better take.

Thanks for bringing this up Luc and pulling together those excerpts from the C sessions.

When the concepts of program change and the Quorum came up, I also see these as two different matters but only with an indirect relationship to each other.

 

[Nachtweide]

As I understand it, our fate is determined in the great cycle. Events in the short cycle in 3D change timelines, but these can also be adapted to the large cycle by changing the program. In the last few days, the idea of Edward Lorenz's butterfly effect has been forming in my head: Does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? Some changes of direction or flapping of wings can probably only be triggered by the intervention of 4D.