Divine intervention. The bullet that hit Trump's ear may not have been fired by crooks.
Failed Trump Assassination Attempt
- Thread starter Tristan
- Start date
Divine intervention. The bullet that hit Trump's ear may not have been fired by crooks.
Amazed at the number and depth of the holes in the story. Worst than other "lone gunman" events. There would've been a national revolt if this had gone the way they wanted. Thinking about it, there should be one either way. No accountability whatsoever from the SS or LEOs.
Liliea
Jedi Council Member
Here is a theory of a target triangulation by forensic experts:
Forensic Analysis Reveals Multiple Guns Fired at Trump RallyForensic analysis indicates that up to three firearms were discharged during the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.An audio analysis conducted by Catalin Grigoras and Cole Whitecotton from the University of Colorado's National Center for Media Forensics suggests that the initial three shots matched a suspected weapon A, followed by five shots from suspected weapon B, and concluding with an acoustic signature potentially from weapon C.According to the FBI, the shooter acted independently.
Forensic Analysis Reveals Multiple Guns Fired at Trump RallyForensic analysis indicates that up to three firearms were discharged during the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday.An audio analysis conducted by Catalin Grigoras and Cole Whitecotton from the University of Colorado's National Center for Media Forensics suggests that the initial three shots matched a suspected weapon A, followed by five shots from suspected weapon B, and concluding with an acoustic signature potentially from weapon C.According to the FBI, the shooter acted independently.
Attachments
That matches our speculations here. I think weapon A was possibly from the hypothetical professional sniper near the rooftop shooter, probably inside the building. The first shot hit Trump bullseye fashion averted by him slightly turning his head just in time. A pretty definite sign of a professional shooter. Weapon B was probably the amateurish rooftop patsy, presumably Crooks. And weapon C the shot that killed Crooks. The shot that maybe killed the tower shooter was probably too far away and/or later to be noticed in the videos. And/or it was done with a silencer.
Last edited:
Trump wants to stop US wars for profit, and the CIA want to kill him for it.
I think I know what that is - notice how fast the crane holding the giant black speaker descends it to the ground? I think they shot the hydraulics hose of the crane, releasing the pressure. I dunno if it was the bullet directly or shrapnel/ricochet, but it's more evidence to help narrow down where the shooter may have been shooting from exactly. If you draw a straight line from Trump to that hydraulic hose, theoretically that should point to the shooter.
Failed Trump Assassination Attempt
The chart with US immigration statistics that Trump credits with saving his life (he was referring to it, displayed on a giant screen to his right, when he was shot): So in a round about way, Biden saved Trump. If Biden hadn't let in tens of millions of illegal immigrants, then Trump wouldn't...cassiopaea.org
2:12 in the video above.
Here are a few videos of a hydraulic hoses bursting:
Some of my friends have sent me memes calling this female SS agent Paula Blart while using clips from the Paul Blart: Mall Cop film series.
One of my favs is this inept woman portrayed as a Disney animation DEI hire.
That's my thinking. You should be able to get the elevation/angle from the video of the spray, but for the angle between Trump and the hydraulics (looking from above) that's more difficult. So I'm playing with turning drone footage/footage/photos into 3D models to try and make it simpler to work that out.
We have Trump as the target and three people hit + the hydraulics. So I may be able to work out some probable angles from a 3D reconstruction. Hopefully.
Metrist
The Living Force
I don't know what kind of campaigning itinerary there was - how much in advance everyone had to know the rally's location, but it looked like a rural location, where only few people would know intimately - unless it was a fairground type location that routinely holds gatherings, but in absence of that, how could a hit on Trump take place with security - the security itself would have the best intelligence, and authority over the area where the attempt took place.
So it was a failure. What's left? Intimidation.
So in all but declaration, we are shown that this was a set up. And if a failure happened, the apparatus for it to happen again is still in place - weighing on Trumps mind, as well as those around him. It's like a terrorist aftermath which strikes fear that looms over the present course of this country. Well, that's nothing new, but it has reached the level of assassinations of leaders.
So we know as well, without declaration, who they are, and we too strike fear in return to them, by not being afraid.
So it was a failure. What's left? Intimidation.
So in all but declaration, we are shown that this was a set up. And if a failure happened, the apparatus for it to happen again is still in place - weighing on Trumps mind, as well as those around him. It's like a terrorist aftermath which strikes fear that looms over the present course of this country. Well, that's nothing new, but it has reached the level of assassinations of leaders.
So we know as well, without declaration, who they are, and we too strike fear in return to them, by not being afraid.
Yeah and we can see the building have windows. Would be interesting to know if the windows had glass (or if one hadn't). So it would be handy to for the shooter to be a bit inside the building, in the dark, hidden from view, without a glass breaking when doing the shoot. Is there a risk that the flame of the weapon will be filmed? Is it a concern? I know nothing about this point
And this make think it would be interesting to know who organized the meeting, I mean who said we will place the podium here and it will be at this angle and so on.
There are now reports that officers have shot a man outside the RNC security perimeter.
It sounds like a homeless man attacked police with steak knives. Pretty hard to claim that he is another assassin, but I'd bet there is an increase in beaming setting people off.
Source: Suspect wielding knives shot dead ‘in the back’ by cops near RNC: sources, witnesses
It sounds like a homeless man attacked police with steak knives. Pretty hard to claim that he is another assassin, but I'd bet there is an increase in beaming setting people off.
Source: Suspect wielding knives shot dead ‘in the back’ by cops near RNC: sources, witnesses
There was a video posted here, (sorry can't remember the exact one), that said that handlers would put some sort of encryption on the phone of their patsy, so that after the fact, no one could get anything off it. So another clue to this guy having handlers, and being set up to being a patsy.
Yeah that's a good point, how can he be comfortable knowing it's an inside job, and not knowing who the insiders were? They could still be around him waiting for another opportunity to present itself. I only hope that the "impossible oversight" is seen by the majority for what it is - an inside job. Even without the perps being caught, that knowledge alone, if widespread, would rally the people against the PTB.
I listened to a former secret service member talk on the radio as he outlined ways their security protection totally messed up coverage. Two things in particular: When he was in the service they would have either rotated the stage to block a path from the metal building roofs, and/or parked a big tractor trailer truck and trailer bed in the path with something on top of it, like a flag or whatever, to obscure the view to the stage; and/or they would have positioned people (possibly local law enforcement) at those metal buildings with specific instructions that do not require decision making, for example "no one goes up on the roof, period", and similar instructions.