G
Gertrudes
Guest
Carlise said:This thread has been a fascinating study for me, a real time example of how such a seemingly well-intentioned person can hide much narcissism beneath the surface and completely choose not to see it.
For me as well, really interesting.
There is often a trend for a person supposedly pursuing spiritual growth to start to identify with the pursuit itself, and to create a self image of an enlightened person, or of someone in the path to enlightenment at the very least. The way I see it, the act of creating a self image with which we identify ourselves is often at the root of the problem, we think we're enlightened, we work towards projecting that image, whilst being oblivious to that internal process all along. Behind the mask of a spiritual individual self importance and narcissism are often hidden, and insidiously so. Because for the average person that's not easily seen, most people will support the projected image further confirming to the individual in question that he is indeed advanced in his spiritual path, while in fact he, or she, is only really feeding himself of his own self aggrandizing image. Speaking for myself I used to be very gullible, still am, but perhaps less so than in the past (not yet sure). But I do remember how easy it was for me to simply support whomever seemed "spiritual". By god, I even admired them!
If being a teacher is what you do to earn a living, that puts you in the role of conveying to others a message, nearly everyday. That, in itself, can easily grow into an extreme where you feel that you've got to have an answer for everything, or if not everything, for things for which you really better stay quiet as you don't really know what you're talking about that well. As a teacher myself, I find that people tend to look up to you and try to get answers for all sorts of questions, and it is very easy to incorporate the "teacher role" and answer with what you think it's true when in fact, you really don't know it that well, if at all. If you let it escalate, this is the perfect receipt for building a very strong ego on a foundation made of sand.
The title of master within the context of Tai Chi principles has been discussed, and Gregory mentioned that his title simply follows a tradition. I don't agree. I was trained as a Tai Chi teacher and my own "master" never allowed us to call him master. In fact, the title was never even mentioned. Looking back, it would have been ridiculous to do so, he simply didn't put himself in that role, and I can almost say with certainty that every single person in my course would have laughed at the thought of calling B (our teacher) by master. Not that he wasn't knowledgeable, quite the contrary, but simply due to the fact that he was so down to earth, so...on our level, so to speak. There was no need for titles, no need to think of him as more knowledgeable then ourselves, because that's what the title really implies. Sure, he knew the technique better, but that was really it. I will also add that I really enjoyed being his pupil, maybe because of that "down earthedness", that lack of ego games.
Spiral Out said:There are no "accidents" in the way you present yourself, nor is anything "misunderstood".
I fully agree. Words don't just come out by accident, particularly if you're not being overly cautious so as to not convey the message you don't want other people to see. They can well reveal our innermost attitude towards life, ourselves, and other people.