Laura said:It really is amazing to see how her energy/mood has improved and her inflammation has quieted down with just getting rid of some blood.
Very
Laura said:It really is amazing to see how her energy/mood has improved and her inflammation has quieted down with just getting rid of some blood.
Megan said:Also, remember that taking repeated blood draws to measure iron status can have a "normalizing" effect, so that "full iron panel" might not tell the full story.
Psyche said:That iron is really messing up with your metabolism. Yeah, decanting iron is a priority.
voyageur said:Today my physician left a message for me and called her back; she said she had good news; however i'm a little confused.
So the initial Ferritin test came out high at 341 ug/L (range less then 300 being their comfort level). Here is what came back today on the second test related to what this blood panel tested for:
"Iron & Iron Binding Capacity Panel"
Iron: 22 umol/l - References Range (9 - 32)
TIBC: 53 umol/l - References Range (33 - 78)
Iron Saturation Index: 0.42 - References Range (0.15 - 0.45)
Hemoglobin was still at 6.1 percent, Sodium 143 mnol/l (137-145), and Potassium dropped to 5 mnol/l (3.5 - 5)
Based on this, she said no worries. When questioned about the Ferritin reading being high, this came back as inflammation markers or other type influences like cold, infection etc. So although the panel on Iron looks ok, i'm left thinking something is not correct in the Ferritin assessment that was given, unless i'm missing something?
Megan said:Also, remember that taking repeated blood draws to measure iron status can have a "normalizing" effect, so that "full iron panel" might not tell the full story.
The first test, if remembered correctly, had a draw of 5 vials. The second test with those latter results was a week later and contained another five vials (don’t know how many cc’s that equates to, so is that what is happening, it is not registering the correct markers?
Psyche said:That iron is really messing up with your metabolism. Yeah, decanting iron is a priority.
Based on the latter test, decanting a pint locally is not going to happen and will now have to travel a great distance to do so. Any advice on what you see here would be appreciated.
voyageur said:So although the panel on Iron looks ok, i'm left thinking something is not correct in the Ferritin assessment that was given, unless i'm missing something?
If the patient has an elevated transferrin iron saturation percentage greater than 45% with an accompanying elevated serum ferritin, iron overload is present and phlebotomy can commence.
Stoneboss said:Also, for the iron test with the Naturopath, the blood was taken at the time of the visit, so there was no fasting prior to the drawing of blood. Would this affect the accuracy of the results?
Stoneboss said:Since the last doctor I saw refused to give me a blood test for more than just the ferritin level, I decided to see a Naturopath. By going with a Natuopath I was able to get a more in depth test for iron, but had to pay for it. Anyway, the results were: iron 55.8, TIBC 329.6, and saturation at 17%. For some reason he didn't include the ferritin level, so I went to see another doctor yesterday to get another blood test for ferritin. It took a bit of convincing for him to give me a requisition for another test for ferritin because he felt that my last test at 286.4 was perfectly okay, and I should just leave it alone. However, I got the requisition and will get the results in a couple of days. (He told me that if the ferritin level came back below the 300 marker that he wouldn't bother calling me, but I insisted that I wanted to know the exact number no matter what it was!)
Also, for the iron test with the Naturopath, the blood was taken at the time of the visit, so there was no fasting prior to the drawing of blood. Would this affect the accuracy of the results?
Psyche said:Stoneboss said:Also, for the iron test with the Naturopath, the blood was taken at the time of the visit, so there was no fasting prior to the drawing of blood. Would this affect the accuracy of the results?
I think in your case is okay. I read in the book that if the initial test to determine transferrin iron saturation percentage has not been performed fasting and the finding is greater than 55%, the test should be repeated fasting. They advice against vitamin C and A supplementation a week prior to the blood test, and they suggest that people should be sufficiently hydrated prior to blood work. That is water, no tea or other drinks.
As a side note, lets keep in mind that high cholesterol levels in the presence of iron overload is really a very BAD combination. Excess iron will oxidize it. It is the iron that has to go either through decanting or chelation.
Megan said:Stoneboss said:Since the last doctor I saw refused to give me a blood test for more than just the ferritin level, I decided to see a Naturopath. By going with a Natuopath I was able to get a more in depth test for iron, but had to pay for it. Anyway, the results were: iron 55.8, TIBC 329.6, and saturation at 17%. For some reason he didn't include the ferritin level, so I went to see another doctor yesterday to get another blood test for ferritin. It took a bit of convincing for him to give me a requisition for another test for ferritin because he felt that my last test at 286.4 was perfectly okay, and I should just leave it alone. However, I got the requisition and will get the results in a couple of days. (He told me that if the ferritin level came back below the 300 marker that he wouldn't bother calling me, but I insisted that I wanted to know the exact number no matter what it was!)
Also, for the iron test with the Naturopath, the blood was taken at the time of the visit, so there was no fasting prior to the drawing of blood. Would this affect the accuracy of the results?
There is a reason IOD says to do all the tests from the same blood draw (and while fasting). I have to leave right now and I don't remember the reason, but I think you should be cautious about drawing conclusions from numbers taken from different blood draws.
voyageur said:Laura said:It really is amazing to see how her energy/mood has improved and her inflammation has quieted down with just getting rid of some blood.
Very
nicklebleu said:nicklebleu said:Gawan said:Gawan said:I did order EDTA calcium disodium from the suggested page nicklebleu wrote about _purebulk.com today.
They did send me today the money back without further notice, so I'm ordering the lesser evil edta capsules with maltodextrin to give it a try.
That's weird ... especially given their slightly aggressive advertisement style.
I was never a fan of Purebulk in the first place anyway.
[...]
PubMed said:EDTA chelation therapy, without added vitamin C, decreases oxidative DNA damage and lipid peroxidation
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19364193
Abstract
Chelation therapy is thought to not only remove contaminating metals but also to decrease free radical production. However, in standard ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA) chelation therapy, high doses of vitamin C with potential pro-oxidant effects are often added to the chelation solution.
The authors demonstrated previously that the intravenous administration of the standard chelation cocktail, containing high amounts of vitamin C, resulted in an acute transitory pro-oxidant burst that should be avoided in the treatment of pathologies at risk of increased oxidative stress such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
The current study was designed to determine the acute and chronic biochemical effects of chelation therapy on accepted clinical, antioxidant variables. An EDTA chelation cocktail not containing ascorbic acid was administered to six adult patients for five weeks (10 sessions of chelation therapy); antioxidant indicators were monitored.
Immediately after the initial chelation session, in contrast with the data previously reported with the standard cocktail containing high doses of vitamin C, none of the oxidative stress markers were adversely modified. After five weeks, plasma peroxide levels, monitored by malondialdehyde, decreased by 20 percent, and DNA damage, monitored by formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) sensitive sites, decreased by 22 percent. Remaining antioxidant-related variables did not change.
In summary, this study demonstrates that multiple sessions of EDTA chelation therapy in combination with vitamins and minerals, but without added ascorbic acid, decreases oxidative stress. These results should be beneficial in the treatment of diseases associated with increased oxidative stress such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.
adam7117 said:I've just gone through the first round of EDTA - interesting, I feel different already. There is a definite improvement in mental clarity and sleep. I can also speak better - yes, this sounds odd but it's true. I tend to mumble a lot but these past two days I could express myself better and more clearly. Almost like a fog is lifting from my speech and thought centres. Let's see how that progresses.
From day one, I could taste a slightly metallic flavour in the mouth. By today (day three), this became more intense and there is acetone-like smell to it, too. Almost as if I was in ketosis... weird, though ALA every morning on an empty stomach would have pushed my body in that direction.