I don't get it.... why not destroy evil?

[Fluffy]

"May be Jacygirl can translate for you if she has time, she has magic skills that understand you it seems ;)"

Lol. My ex husband was Portuguese (born Azores). He spoke English fluently but he wrote in what I called 'short form'. I find Ricardo's comma's somewhat like pauses, like I tend to use the ellipsis...to pause but continue.
Or I am completely misunderstanding his point but agreeing anyways, haha.

I think it’s the detail that’s being omitted that is causing lack of understanding from my part and I think may be in Ricardo’s mind he thinks we are all able to ‘read between the lines’ but I can’t do that very well, I like analogies and metaphors because they help explain the point.
And I also don’t have time to analyse every little thing, I appreciate Ricardo and would like to be able better engage with him, in person I would find his use of language interesting because then we can read with body language and energy signals, and I could more easily ask for (lots of) clarification but in written form where we have to try to bridge the gap of understanding it’s very hard with minimal output of words and a lot of needing to fill in the gaps.

Everyone will notice I write very simplistic and don’t use big words or add any obscure thoughts without trying to give them context. I might be a few beers short of a case when it comes to comparing intellect with others and I accept that, I find some others style of writing here a bit hard to follow too at times, I think being understood is paramount and if we can’t explain what we mean then don’t say anything until it can be explained like we’re telling a child.

And furthermore, there are lots of non English speakers who might want to engage but can’t do so if they can’t translate what’s been written.

May be I’m completely missing the point too, but I don’t want to be.

 

[Wandering Star]

somewhat impressed as , to how words , are usually used,, that are read as , far , awway from truth , as they can be , read

Well, buddy, you must be very close to the truth, because you can't save more words.

English is not my language and yet I understand what you say better than the Spanish translation that the translator offers me.

The translator starts to sweat every time he has to translate something yours. What he returns is meaningless gibberish.

Despite everything, sometimes something is understood.

 

[jacygirl]

Well, buddy, you must be very close to the truth, because you can't save more words.

English is not my language and yet I understand what you say better than the Spanish translation that the translator offers me.

The translator starts to sweat every time he has to translate something yours. What he returns is meaningless gibberish.

Despite everything, sometimes something is understood.

I do agree. I was surprised to see my name mentioned because I've never interacted directly with said member. I do, however usually grasp most of what is said, and find him to have valuable insight. I was mostly thinking that it's an "English as a second language" situation (like with my ex).

 

[Fluffy]

I do agree. I was surprised to see my name mentioned because I've never interacted directly with said member. I do, however usually grasp most of what is said, and find him to have valuable insight. I was mostly thinking that it's an "English as a second language" situation (like with my ex).

I only mentioned you because you loved a comment that was written. Meanwhile, I was busy being confused about said comment.

 

[Nienna]

@Ricardo in order to make things more easier to read, would it be possible for you to write what you want to say in your native tongue and, then, use an online translator to translate it into English and post that translation?

I, too, find many of the things you post very interesting, but as others have said, sometimes I have a it of difficulty in understanding every thing you are saying.

 

[Ruth]

Both of my questions refer to the 6D abductions, which I think are convincingly debunked by you and @Nienna . I was searching for what I may have been remembering, but only found something about even Nordics rarely abducting people (and when they do so, it is permanent).

6D does not abduct, as they do not violate free will. You are thinking of 4D STS. They are the density above us, and we are 3D STS. Think of how we treat our 2D bretheren. Therefore, it must be similar to how we are treated. I don't believe these dudes can penetrate 5D. It's where we go when we die.

 

[T.C.]

@Ricardo I think you’re probably in the right place here on the forum.

On the one hand, I think your way of writing is a genuine attempt to try to sum up deep ideas in few words. But I just don’t think you’re very good at doing it.

Maybe that is a bit extreme and harsh and I mean no offence, I just think that if I can help point out what I mean and how you can adjust your style, that everyone here would benefit from your ideas and insights more.

There are forms of philosophy and literature, especially in esotericism, that are written in an intentionally obscure way in order to force the reader or student to work hard to understand the meaning. There is an element of this in your writing.

So you see, if your intention in being brief in what you write is to convey important things with few words, then you’re falling short of that, because those of us who want to give you the benefit of the doubt that you do have useful things to say, have to spend excess energy in order to understand them. That is actually a drain on us, and that type of drain is one of the things that a genuine STO network is working to learn how to stop and change and reverse.

So this comes down to the effort on your part, the effort that you put in - i.e., to give.

I think there is a small amount of insecurity on your part about your own ideas and that your way of writing is a kind of insurance policy or defence, in case you’re wrong about something, or if what you are saying really doesn’t make much sense. Well, if it’s obscure, then it won’t matter too much because then the problem is with the reader’s interpretation and not what you ‘meant’. Does that make sense?

I also agree that how we write is a good indicator of how we think, and I think that you are doing yourself (as well as us) a disservice by not putting in the effort to expand on your ideas and ‘flesh them out’, so to say.

So by putting in more energy in this way and making less work for everyone else, you could achieve what you seem to really be aiming at - contributing valuable insights into discussions - while at the same time, conserving and multiplying everyone else’s energy, assisting in the growth of their knowledge and being, and on top of all that, improving yourself and your own understandings of everything you have studied and learned and verified for yourself, by 1) thinking more with a hammer, and 2) exposing the real meat and potatoes of your thoughts and ideas to feedback from everyone else here: since we cannot give back to you if your ideas aren’t fully and freely given to us.

That’s my opinion on your writing style, anyway. I’m not saying I’m fully correct about everything I’ve written - it’s just my impression. I hope you take it all in the best of faith, as that is how it is meant.

 

[BlueKiwi]

Everyone will notice I write very simplistic and don’t use big words or add any obscure thoughts without trying to give them context.

Personally, if it means you will be more accurate with conveying your thoughts, I think being more simplistic is better, even if it takes more words. Accuracy is more important, I think. That way, there's less chance of confusion.

 

[T.C.]

Personally, if it means you will be more accurate with conveying your thoughts, I think being more simplistic is better, even if it takes more words. Accuracy is more important, I think. That way, there's less chance of confusion.

I fully agree. Having spent many years teaching children and always trying to achieve the ability to convey complex ideas in simple and easily understandable ways, the main thing I think I learned is how important it is not to confuse brevity with simplicity.