REVIEW OF ALAN WATT interview -- Part 1 of 3
Review of Alan Watt's two appearances on the Godbox Cafe Podcast
Part 1 of 3.
The MP3s of these interviews are posted on his site _http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.ca
This is paraphrased, not quoted unless quotes appear. There's a little commentary that I did, too. Alan does a lot more sourcing of claims in these appearances, and also goes into his own background, which may answer some questions. It came out near the end of the interview that his "strategy" (as called by the host) is to use the elite's own words, their books, papers, meeting notes, and other documents and publications of their cited heroes, so that his claims cannot be denied by them. I'll also toss in relevant commentary I've heard him do in some of his own podcasts, in which he references, for example, military publications down to the volume and page number. I'll italicize where he names a source. You can note for yourself what is not sourced and I hope that readers (or listeners to the interview) can comment here on whether they know whether something unsourced is true or likely true or whatever. Let's use the power of the network.
Alan Watt's talks are very powerful and have that good old "ring of truth," however, we've learned not to reach conclusions based on "resonance" and "feeling," but rather by critical analysis. We're just trying to discover what the sources are for some of Alan Watt's statements and conclusions. He says basically that he arrived at his understandings through reading and researching old books as well as new, all modern media, correlating information, "connecting the dots" of material encountered with personal experience, interactions with people, etc. Sounds good, so here we go. Preview: he does indeed touch upon the New Age and related topics near the end of this one.
He lived as a child in a mining community in Scotland and noticed the same arguments in every household: food and rent money. With all the centuries of looting and conquest by the British Empire, he wondered how could this be? Where did the money go? He says it all goes to a couple of hundred families in London.
Watt observed early on that the vast majority of working class Britons rented and lived paycheck to paycheck. "I couldn't figure that out," he said. He started looking for answers by studying history from old books dating back to 1700s in local libraries and discovered that history was being changed -- that is, what was in the books was not taught in schools or had been changed in schools. Teachers were astonished when he brought up historical tidbits that they had not been taught either.
He remembered a terrible miner's strike that caused financial hardship and recalled the local MP, an English lord, coming on TV and telling everyone they'd never had it so good, which made him start asking why.
In the UK the class system was clearly alive and well but been exported wherever Britain had gone, including the US and Canada where it was much more camouflaged (claims of classless democratic societies). He discovered that Freemasonry runs Britain, and every major character in his town, where there was a 300-year-old lodge, was a member. His precociousness attracted their attention and he was eventually offered scholarships, a means of recruitment, he says. He turned them down despite the hard sell of "don't you want a good income and your future assured?" He explains his resistance as intuitive -- a negative feeling about the people and a sense that there was more that didn't meet the eye. He said he'd read the biography of someone who attended Oxford who explained being "taken over" by the feeling of entering those hallowed halls -- the astonishing power of the history of the place, such a revered institution. The rituals induce a psychological bonding with the institution and its values. MI5 and MI6 are drawn from Oxford and Cambridge circles.
Note: this reminded me of Noam Chomsky who says that there are great "inducements" to students at top schools to join the system. I say, these inducements of income and status take advantage of the natural STS leanings we have. Most jump at the chance to be guaranteed income and relatively high standing and not to think about the applications of their work. Obviously, most are effectively useful idiots who contribute to expanding the technological and economic power of the PTB. A few are vetted and recruited into inner circles in which higher levels of knowledge about what really goes on are required to do the work or supervise others.
Watt says that wherever Britain went (in its empire-building), it left behind "initiated" institutional leaders involved in Freemasonry -- and if any place was ruled for at least 40 years, it left behind a class system like its own, British culture instilled in the natives, and its preferred "democratic" system. This system is preferred because it appears, on the surface, to be chosen by the people -- excellent cover for a control system. Personal observation: I know this is true of people from, for example, Singapore, which was British, and speaks English today, although the population is 70% ethnic Chinese. I wonder if Singapore, wealthy as it is, desires to align with China given that they strongly promote the learning and speaking of Mandarin.
The origins of this British "democratic" system, truly a class system ruled by an elite, are old. Take for example the libraries that exist for the public and contain only certain kinds of material, and archives that exist for elites -- big difference, says Watt. Professors told him that maybe 1 in 50 profs is given access to an archive. At this point the host stated that in her own research she found certain books in the library database system but were in sealed rooms to which access was prohibited. Watt said that certain authors, approved and "bonded," get access when they are allowed to publish certain information in their books. Watt explained later that certain authors, artists, musicians, poets, etc., are actually funded by the PTB to put out material that assists in predictive programming of the populace.
He says John Dee (sp?) wrote books on the Rosicrucians, the Christian Kaballah, and coined the term "British Empire" back in the 1500s. He approached Queen Elizabeth I with the idea of creating such to be based on a system of "free trade" for those client states who would cooperate. Those who didn't would be blacklisted, economically disadvantaged, and even subject to attack. However, with the free trade came the merging of the local legal system with Britain's to facilitate the "trade," because legal systems revolve primarily around economic systems. Watt says John Dee was also a spy for Elizabeth, "bonded," and his code number was 007. He had the largest library in Britain and did encryption of Masonic codes into books that could be understood by Masons anywhere.
A means of building the navy necessary for empire-building was crown-sanctioned piracy. These "privateers" like Francis Drake helped the queen build wealth to make the empire.
Francis Bacon was another elite who, in his utopian novel, "New Atlantis," envisioned the rise of a new country in the west that would give a new value system to the world. On the surface it would be independent and have a Republican system, but would truly be ruled by an elite living inside mountains or in underground abodes. Bacon wrote that the elite could create any form of vegetable or animal by combining their minutest parts in their laboratories, foreseeing genetic manipulation, and could also control the weather via enormous machines. Watt thinks this was a blueprint for America.
Watt says these ideas sound like Plato, who was a member of the Greek aristocracy who studied in Egypt, where they knew a thing or two about how to govern people. He said Plato's "Republic" envisions the ideal of a guardian elite that intrabreeds, followed by a helper class recruited (for psychopathic traits, says Watt) from a lower class. Out of the helpers would be formed a military class, which in future could be sustained by intrabreeding for qualities of aggression, etc. Plato talked about selectively breeding people to perform specific jobs, such as tall people for apple-picking and short-people for mining -- but it was not only physical traits that Plato believed could be bred, but also mental qualities. I believe it was probably standard for educated elites to study Plato as well as, of course, many other "classical" authors. Watt goes to Plato again and again as the man who envisioned official, top-down, active culture creation by the elite. The culture that is created by the elite, is, of course, pathological in nature.
Watt says Rhodes scholarship was created to recruit the brightest into training for usefulness to the elite in their quest for world unification. (BTW, Cecil Rhodes, for whom the order is named, was one of the great British psychopaths, IMO. He's the guy who exploited British South Africa by mining, started the De Beers diamond corporation, deceived and then massacred the natives of what became Rhodesia, and envisioned slashing a British path from South Africa all the way up to Egypt, butchering whomever necessary. He said that God favored the civilized, epitomized by the white race and the British in particular, which gave Britain the moral authority to take what they wanted in Africa. Heck of a guy, eh?) Rhodes Scholars are chosen not just for brains but for aggressiveness, dispassionate nature, leadership qualities, power of persuasion, etc., and that psychopaths fit the bill best. Psychopaths don't feel empathy, but they study and watch others to become the best actors imaginable. He says such Rhodes scholars are in influential positions everywhere now. (Bill Clinton is one, famously.)
Watt mentioned Henderson & Gillespie Psychiatry studies printed in the '70s among other twentieth century research that identified psychopathy first in street-level psychos who got in trouble with the law because of their need for instant gratification [sounds like Cleckley's case studies]. Progressive research identified the same personality types in politicians [sounds like the concept of successful psychopaths], at which time governments stepped in to cover up this info [resulting no doubt in the lumping of true psychos under the misleading "sociopathic personality disorder" banner. I wish Alan had sourced this gov't action claim.] Brighter psychos tend toward politics and economics because they desire to control and can do it best from such positions. Their Achilles heel, though, is boasting and arrogance. He says that psychopaths worship only those more powerful than they -- the people whose positions they want.
Asked about the Illuminati and Adam Weishaupt, Watt explained that Weishaupt (he who was quoted as saying, "Oh, foolish man, what can you not be made to believe") was but one member of one branch of masonry who "got caught at it." The movement was already in place and much larger than what those Bavarians represented, though often the term Illuminati is used to describe the worldwide elite today.
He says he has some of the old books of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (effectively a royally chartered corporation that plans the future, and the parent organization of the US-based Council on Foreign Relations and others) from the 1930s that spell out "the plan" for our time -- more on that later. He says that research really works because the truth is often told in books that are assumed will be ignored because they are dry, boring, and contain no sex, violence, or happy endings.
He says that no one in the public eye [or behind the scenes, presumably] (that is involved with the grand plan of the Royal Institute and all its affiliate organizations) and with influence hasn't been vetted, trained, tested, etc., over and over. They take their orders and get a time frame for carrying them out. [That statement reminded me of the suggestion that the last space shuttle blow-up over Texas may have been a "hurry it up" warning to the US administration.]
*** TO BE CONTINUED ***
Review of Alan Watt's two appearances on the Godbox Cafe Podcast
Part 1 of 3.
The MP3s of these interviews are posted on his site _http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.ca
This is paraphrased, not quoted unless quotes appear. There's a little commentary that I did, too. Alan does a lot more sourcing of claims in these appearances, and also goes into his own background, which may answer some questions. It came out near the end of the interview that his "strategy" (as called by the host) is to use the elite's own words, their books, papers, meeting notes, and other documents and publications of their cited heroes, so that his claims cannot be denied by them. I'll also toss in relevant commentary I've heard him do in some of his own podcasts, in which he references, for example, military publications down to the volume and page number. I'll italicize where he names a source. You can note for yourself what is not sourced and I hope that readers (or listeners to the interview) can comment here on whether they know whether something unsourced is true or likely true or whatever. Let's use the power of the network.
Alan Watt's talks are very powerful and have that good old "ring of truth," however, we've learned not to reach conclusions based on "resonance" and "feeling," but rather by critical analysis. We're just trying to discover what the sources are for some of Alan Watt's statements and conclusions. He says basically that he arrived at his understandings through reading and researching old books as well as new, all modern media, correlating information, "connecting the dots" of material encountered with personal experience, interactions with people, etc. Sounds good, so here we go. Preview: he does indeed touch upon the New Age and related topics near the end of this one.
He lived as a child in a mining community in Scotland and noticed the same arguments in every household: food and rent money. With all the centuries of looting and conquest by the British Empire, he wondered how could this be? Where did the money go? He says it all goes to a couple of hundred families in London.
Watt observed early on that the vast majority of working class Britons rented and lived paycheck to paycheck. "I couldn't figure that out," he said. He started looking for answers by studying history from old books dating back to 1700s in local libraries and discovered that history was being changed -- that is, what was in the books was not taught in schools or had been changed in schools. Teachers were astonished when he brought up historical tidbits that they had not been taught either.
He remembered a terrible miner's strike that caused financial hardship and recalled the local MP, an English lord, coming on TV and telling everyone they'd never had it so good, which made him start asking why.
In the UK the class system was clearly alive and well but been exported wherever Britain had gone, including the US and Canada where it was much more camouflaged (claims of classless democratic societies). He discovered that Freemasonry runs Britain, and every major character in his town, where there was a 300-year-old lodge, was a member. His precociousness attracted their attention and he was eventually offered scholarships, a means of recruitment, he says. He turned them down despite the hard sell of "don't you want a good income and your future assured?" He explains his resistance as intuitive -- a negative feeling about the people and a sense that there was more that didn't meet the eye. He said he'd read the biography of someone who attended Oxford who explained being "taken over" by the feeling of entering those hallowed halls -- the astonishing power of the history of the place, such a revered institution. The rituals induce a psychological bonding with the institution and its values. MI5 and MI6 are drawn from Oxford and Cambridge circles.
Note: this reminded me of Noam Chomsky who says that there are great "inducements" to students at top schools to join the system. I say, these inducements of income and status take advantage of the natural STS leanings we have. Most jump at the chance to be guaranteed income and relatively high standing and not to think about the applications of their work. Obviously, most are effectively useful idiots who contribute to expanding the technological and economic power of the PTB. A few are vetted and recruited into inner circles in which higher levels of knowledge about what really goes on are required to do the work or supervise others.
Watt says that wherever Britain went (in its empire-building), it left behind "initiated" institutional leaders involved in Freemasonry -- and if any place was ruled for at least 40 years, it left behind a class system like its own, British culture instilled in the natives, and its preferred "democratic" system. This system is preferred because it appears, on the surface, to be chosen by the people -- excellent cover for a control system. Personal observation: I know this is true of people from, for example, Singapore, which was British, and speaks English today, although the population is 70% ethnic Chinese. I wonder if Singapore, wealthy as it is, desires to align with China given that they strongly promote the learning and speaking of Mandarin.
The origins of this British "democratic" system, truly a class system ruled by an elite, are old. Take for example the libraries that exist for the public and contain only certain kinds of material, and archives that exist for elites -- big difference, says Watt. Professors told him that maybe 1 in 50 profs is given access to an archive. At this point the host stated that in her own research she found certain books in the library database system but were in sealed rooms to which access was prohibited. Watt said that certain authors, approved and "bonded," get access when they are allowed to publish certain information in their books. Watt explained later that certain authors, artists, musicians, poets, etc., are actually funded by the PTB to put out material that assists in predictive programming of the populace.
He says John Dee (sp?) wrote books on the Rosicrucians, the Christian Kaballah, and coined the term "British Empire" back in the 1500s. He approached Queen Elizabeth I with the idea of creating such to be based on a system of "free trade" for those client states who would cooperate. Those who didn't would be blacklisted, economically disadvantaged, and even subject to attack. However, with the free trade came the merging of the local legal system with Britain's to facilitate the "trade," because legal systems revolve primarily around economic systems. Watt says John Dee was also a spy for Elizabeth, "bonded," and his code number was 007. He had the largest library in Britain and did encryption of Masonic codes into books that could be understood by Masons anywhere.
A means of building the navy necessary for empire-building was crown-sanctioned piracy. These "privateers" like Francis Drake helped the queen build wealth to make the empire.
Francis Bacon was another elite who, in his utopian novel, "New Atlantis," envisioned the rise of a new country in the west that would give a new value system to the world. On the surface it would be independent and have a Republican system, but would truly be ruled by an elite living inside mountains or in underground abodes. Bacon wrote that the elite could create any form of vegetable or animal by combining their minutest parts in their laboratories, foreseeing genetic manipulation, and could also control the weather via enormous machines. Watt thinks this was a blueprint for America.
Watt says these ideas sound like Plato, who was a member of the Greek aristocracy who studied in Egypt, where they knew a thing or two about how to govern people. He said Plato's "Republic" envisions the ideal of a guardian elite that intrabreeds, followed by a helper class recruited (for psychopathic traits, says Watt) from a lower class. Out of the helpers would be formed a military class, which in future could be sustained by intrabreeding for qualities of aggression, etc. Plato talked about selectively breeding people to perform specific jobs, such as tall people for apple-picking and short-people for mining -- but it was not only physical traits that Plato believed could be bred, but also mental qualities. I believe it was probably standard for educated elites to study Plato as well as, of course, many other "classical" authors. Watt goes to Plato again and again as the man who envisioned official, top-down, active culture creation by the elite. The culture that is created by the elite, is, of course, pathological in nature.
Watt says Rhodes scholarship was created to recruit the brightest into training for usefulness to the elite in their quest for world unification. (BTW, Cecil Rhodes, for whom the order is named, was one of the great British psychopaths, IMO. He's the guy who exploited British South Africa by mining, started the De Beers diamond corporation, deceived and then massacred the natives of what became Rhodesia, and envisioned slashing a British path from South Africa all the way up to Egypt, butchering whomever necessary. He said that God favored the civilized, epitomized by the white race and the British in particular, which gave Britain the moral authority to take what they wanted in Africa. Heck of a guy, eh?) Rhodes Scholars are chosen not just for brains but for aggressiveness, dispassionate nature, leadership qualities, power of persuasion, etc., and that psychopaths fit the bill best. Psychopaths don't feel empathy, but they study and watch others to become the best actors imaginable. He says such Rhodes scholars are in influential positions everywhere now. (Bill Clinton is one, famously.)
Watt mentioned Henderson & Gillespie Psychiatry studies printed in the '70s among other twentieth century research that identified psychopathy first in street-level psychos who got in trouble with the law because of their need for instant gratification [sounds like Cleckley's case studies]. Progressive research identified the same personality types in politicians [sounds like the concept of successful psychopaths], at which time governments stepped in to cover up this info [resulting no doubt in the lumping of true psychos under the misleading "sociopathic personality disorder" banner. I wish Alan had sourced this gov't action claim.] Brighter psychos tend toward politics and economics because they desire to control and can do it best from such positions. Their Achilles heel, though, is boasting and arrogance. He says that psychopaths worship only those more powerful than they -- the people whose positions they want.
Asked about the Illuminati and Adam Weishaupt, Watt explained that Weishaupt (he who was quoted as saying, "Oh, foolish man, what can you not be made to believe") was but one member of one branch of masonry who "got caught at it." The movement was already in place and much larger than what those Bavarians represented, though often the term Illuminati is used to describe the worldwide elite today.
He says he has some of the old books of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (effectively a royally chartered corporation that plans the future, and the parent organization of the US-based Council on Foreign Relations and others) from the 1930s that spell out "the plan" for our time -- more on that later. He says that research really works because the truth is often told in books that are assumed will be ignored because they are dry, boring, and contain no sex, violence, or happy endings.
He says that no one in the public eye [or behind the scenes, presumably] (that is involved with the grand plan of the Royal Institute and all its affiliate organizations) and with influence hasn't been vetted, trained, tested, etc., over and over. They take their orders and get a time frame for carrying them out. [That statement reminded me of the suggestion that the last space shuttle blow-up over Texas may have been a "hurry it up" warning to the US administration.]
*** TO BE CONTINUED ***
