There is an
article on Ynet, presenting Israel's side of the story in such a "poor soldiers" way, it is frankly unbelievable even for Israel and their usual whining.
So we are to believe that "poor Israeli highly trained fighters" underestimated the "mighty powers of protesters" (whom they called "trained street fighters", btw) and brought only paintball rifles (there is a small remark about personal handguns used under extreme circumstances) only. But even if so, the crux of the matter is that they blame protesters for fighting back while they are the ones who performed an act of piracy. As one of the commenters' remarked: "if the ships were attacked while in international waters, then activists had yet to commit any crime but IDF did by boarding ships and could be charged with murder and piracy in the country the ship was flying. Once the soldiers landed on the ship they were in another country since ships were still in international waters."
Israel knows that the entire act was illegal, so instead they capitalize on protesters fighting back (how dare they!) and doing anything possible to get the pirates..soldiers off their ship. They are like a bully who beats the crap out of a child, and when this child makes an attempt to fight back and punch the bully in the face, he starts to scream and point at the child saying: "You see, I was right. The child is a danger! He deserves more beatings". Actually, here is one of the "pro-Israel" responses to the article to demonstrate the analogy:
The response by these "humanitarians" only indicates further the need by Israel to take the actions that it must. Frankly, I believe they should take further and stronger actions.
The rest of the comments are also "interesting", for their pathology and also because there were many people who called Israel's actions for what they are.
Added later:
Found this in one of the comments:
"According to the San Remo Manual that governs international humanitarian law, it is permissible under rule 67(a) to attack neutral vessels on the high seas when the vessels "are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search or capture."
So since Gaza is under blockade, and since in interests of Israel is to prevent any aid reaching Palestinian people, they will do anything to twist and present things in the way to further justify the genocide. Oh, and minor detail about
the blockade, clearly showing (and as if we didn't know it) that it isn't about preventing weapons or terrorists reaching Gaza strip.
Although Israel does not publicly confirm what is and what is not allowed in, aid groups point to numerous absurdities: zaatar, an Arabic spice mix, is allowed, but cumin is banned. All exports are stopped.
Perhaps cumin is a highly dangerous bomb component?