Israel-Palestine War: Hamas Breaks Out of Gaza, Israel Responds With Genocide

[Wandering Star]

Sometimes they refer to the sun as a sub-logos and sometimes a logos. The context of kindness being a bias of our logos was a discussion of the archetypal mind. Here are some other parts I think are relevant:

I can see why axj listed the three options: "your peoples" seems to imply planetary mind (but the question was in reference to "this system" which seems to imply solar system or greater), the references to "bias" and "evolution" seem to be in reference to the solar logos, but there's usually some ambiguity between solar and galactic logoi in Ra.

I thought there was another excerpt clarifying the "bias towards kindness" as showing up in our religions and philosophies as a weighting of good over evil, but I can't find it, so maybe that's just something I thought when I read it.

Very good job.

Thank you.

 

[Aeneas]

"Hit the nuclear first, and worry about the rest later": Trump is supporting nuclear war between Israel and Iran.

Yes, it appears as if Trump actually said that and what to say. It is very misguided and extremely dangerous. You don't go around encouraging a psychopathy to do outrageous inhumane acts of evil on a grand scale.

Here is a bit more from Fox News:

The former president said he rebuilt the "entire military, jets everything, I built it, including nuclear" while he was president. "I hated to build the nuclear, but I got to know firsthand the power of that stuff, and I’ll tell you what: we have to be totally prepared. We have to be absolutely prepared."

He said when Biden was asked about Israel and Iran: "His answer should have been "'Hit the nuclear first, worry about the rest later.'"

Trump made similar comments in an interview with Fox News on Thursday, telling correspondent Bill Melugin Biden's response on Israel attacking Iran was the "craziest thing I’ve ever heard. That’s the biggest risk we have. The biggest risk we have is nuclear."

TRUMP NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORS MOCK BIDEN'S WARNINGS TO ISRAEL TO STICK TO ‘PROPORTIONAL’ IRAN RESPONSE

Many rockets, fired from Iran, are seen over Jerusalem from Hebron, West Bank, Tuesday. The Israeli army announced that missiles were fired from Iran towards Israel and sirens were heard across the country, especially in Tel Aviv. (Wisam Hashlamoun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

He continued, "I mean, to make the statement, ‘Please leave their nuclear alone.' I would tell you that that’s not the right answer. That was the craziest answer because, you know what? Soon, they’re going to have nuclear weapons. And then you’re going to have problems."

Former deputy director of national intelligence Kash Patel, who served under Trump, said this week: "Iran launched a war into Israel, so to say that the Israelis who are defending themselves and our hostages shouldn't attack sites in Iran that could kill them – especially when you're the one who gave Iran $7 billion as a commander in chief and then allowed them to acquire nuclear materials – is wildly political."

So worry about the rest later, huh

He says that he knows about the "power of that stuff". Really and that a nuclear strike by Israel will kill a few hundred thousand people instantly and millions long term in the region. Iran is a huge country, 1.6 million km2 or 2.5 times the size of Texas. Israel might be able to do serious damage if they hit Israeli nuclear facilities, but it will not hit all and Iran will retaliate and Israel will be history. US bases will be history or in permanent danger of becoming history. Israel will have no good will there after in the world community. But I guess that is inconsequential and not something to worry about now. Just do it and see what happens, right?

Will Israel do it? Who knows, but I find it irresponsible of Trump to make such a statement while Israel is seen throwing matches all over the place. That gives Israel the idea that the US will have its back if it continues doing stupid things.

ADDED: I forgot to put in that the size of Israel is about 21000 km2 equal to 1.3% of the size of Iran.

 

[MJF]

sToRmR1dR said:
"Hit the nuclear first, and worry about the rest later": Trump is supporting nuclear war between Israel and Iran.

I would just query here that where Trump is saying "Hit the nuclear first", this does not necessarily mean using nuclear weapons to strike Iran but rather I think he means targeting their nuclear facilities with conventional weapons such as missiles. Of course, hitting a nuclear facility such as a power plant with conventional weapons could result in a Chernobyl or Fukushima style melt down that could then endanger nearby population centres. Depending on the prevailing winds, fall out from such a melt down could reach Israel. When Chernobyl went into melt down the resulting fall out reached as far afield as the hills of Wales and Scotland. To this day, the UK's Department of Agriculture still routinely test sheep grazing on those hill for lingering signs of radioactivity. Hence, there is the real threat of blow back here but then what do maniacal Zionist psychopaths with a thirst for revenge care?​

 

[MJF]

The latest video from Alexander Mercouris 3/10/2024 on his personal channel. He speaks about the Iranian attack and gives conjecture on Russian involvement in the situation.

He acknowledges the truth of the story behind the F-35’s being destroyed is unclear, current photos do not seem able to confirm or deny the claims in his opinion. If the Iranians are not lying/exaggerating the destruction and actually have data to support their claims Alexander theorizes their conclusions may be based on data provided by the Russians.

The attack seemed to attempt to avoid civilian casualties resembling the Russians conduct in the Ukraine war. Alexander postulates this was in part done to keep their Russian allies happy but might also hint at greater Russian involvement in the planning of the attack.

He points out the presence of a number of significant Russian officials currently present in Tehran, possibly meant to act as a deterrent to attacking Iran. Sergei Shoigu and Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin are among those present in Terhran, the latter for discussions on economic issues. Could this be connected to Israel backing away from immediate retaliation? The dialogue from Israel just following the attack suggested they may have originally intended an immediate response.

Indications Netanyahu may be angry at the Russians. Trying to get a phone call with Putin and the attack on Syria close to Russian warehouses might be meant as a warning to the Russians. Even with the involvement in the attack being unclear the Russian cooperation with Iran and provision of anti air systems is clearly intended to strengthen Iran and a show of Russian support.



I will just give a few thoughts of my own.

It seems likely to me that Israel is certain of Russian involvement, regardless of the actual truth of the matter.

The attempts to avoid civilian casualties mirror the Iranian attack earlier in the year. It does make me think to mentions of Caesar introducing the concept of Mercy on a wider scale. We see the Russians exercising restraint in conducting warfare and now other nations doing the same. The situation is more complex with Iran motivated by a desire to avoid serious escalation, but I do feel they may be parallels. Russia in a way has set an example, people can now see that in conducting war you don’t have to bomb the enemy into the stone age or flatten cities. Though on the mention of flattening cities, I had a sudden thought of comets doing the same.

My brother is a keen follower of Alexander Mercouris's podcasts on the war in the Ukraine but his computer recently crashed and is now beyond repair. Hence, thank you for the links which will allow him to see Mercouris's latest update.

I agree that just as the USA is clearly getting more involved in supporting Israel's war effort (and is apparently helping the Israelis in the selection of possible Iranian targets for retaliation), Russia is at the same time stepping up its material support for Iran. This brings the danger of direct super power conflict in the region ever closer. Just think what may happen if an Israeli airstrike accidently (or otherwise) kills a significant number of Russian servicemen. Could Russia sit idly by and shrug its shoulders this time as it did when the Israelis shot down a Russian transport aircraft in Syria a few years ago, as confirmed by the C's.

Your mention of flattening cities makes me think of Apocalyptic prophecies in the Bible involving the war of 'Gog and Magog' and the part Russia may possibly play in this. There is a prophecy specifically concerning the Syrian capital city of Damascus, a very ancient city which has certainly been struck by warfare down the millennia but to date has never been utterly destroyed. However, the Bible does include a prophecy that Damascus will be destroyed, which suggests this event has still to be fulfilled. The prophecy concerned is found in Isaiah chapter 17 verses 1-3:
​

“(1) The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap. (2) The cities of Aroer are forsaken: they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down, and none shall make them afraid. (3) The fortress also shall cease from Ephraim, and the kingdom from Damascus, and the remnant of Syria: they shall be as the glory of the children of Israel, saith the LORD of hosts.”

Some biblical scholars believe the events of this chapter occurred in the 8th century B.C. when Assyria attacked Syria and northern Israel. However, verse 1 clearly states that Damascus will be “taken away from being a city” and it can be forcefully argued, therefore, that this level of desolation has not occurred yet. It should also be noted that biblical prophetic passages often have a “near and far off” application or a “dual fulfilment”, as is the case for example with Jesus's prophecy concerning the destruction of Jerusalem (subsequently fulfilled by the Romans) and the end of the world, which were given together.

This prophecy in chapter 17 of Isaiah is often linked with another prophecy concerning Damascus in chapter 49 of the Book of Jeremiah:​

“Against Damascus. ‘Hamath and Arpad are shamed, for they have heard bad news. They are fainthearted; there is trouble on the sea; it cannot be quiet. Damascus has grown feeble; she turns to flee, and fear has seized her. Anguish and sorrows have taken her like a woman in labour. Why is the city of praise not deserted, the city of My joy? Therefore her young men shall fall in her streets, and all the men of war shall be cut off in that day,’ says the Lord of hosts. ‘I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-Hadad.’ "

These prophecies in turn may be linked with the reference to 'Gog and Magog' in the Apocalypse chapter 20 verses 7-9:

“(7) And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, (8) And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. (9) And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.” (Revelation 20:7-9)

Many biblical scholars link the battle of Gog in Ezekiel chapters 38 and 39 as the same event as the battle of Armageddon, which is linked to the ancient town of Megiddo, which is close to Israel's border with Lebanon and its border with Syria.

Biblical prophecies like these are, of course, hard to tie down but if Israel continues to expand her air and missile attacks to Syria as well, will Russia simply stand by and watch Damascus levelled to the ground like Gaza and Beirut are currently being without intervening at some stage? Will Russia ultimately call time on Israel's genocide in the region?​

 

[axj]

Will Russia ultimately call time on Israel's genocide in the region?

I think this is more of a question about what Iran will do in response to Israel. Iran probably has the capability to defeat Israel, but would get destroyed in return too - a regional MAD. Especially since the US would likely fight on Israel's side against Iran.

Maybe Russia and its influence in the region can indeed become the deciding factor on what happens.

 

[sToRmR1dR]

The US and Israel are preparing attack on Iran.

 

[Ben]

Here's a good overview of Iran's situation. The main point that Trump (who I am rapidly tiring of making excuses for) and Neocons alike, are missing when they casually throw out ideas about striking Iran's nuclear capabilities is that they are mostly underground. They can be damaged but, like Iran's vast missile storage sites, they are not that vulnerable. Israel has very vulnerable and tiny infrastructure, so they are truly insane to escalate this conflict beyond their limited ability to absorb damage. Much more likely that they want to find a way to drag the US in, while somehow escaping destruction themselves. Also totally insane and delusional.

The biggest unknowns here are Israel's capabilities in advanced tech, cyber warfare and intelligence. We shouldn't underestimate their either their psychopathy or their capabilities. I just don't know what they might have up their sleeve, besides just destroying things and 'Samson option' type stuff.

 

[MJF]

And so it goes on: MSN

Israel-Iran latest: Dozens killed after bombs hit Gaza mosque as heavy airstrikes target Hezbollah in Beirut​

At least 24 people have been killed and 93 others wounded after Israeli airstrikes targeted a mosque and a school sheltering displaced people in the Gaza Strip, the Hamas-run government media office has said.

The strikes on the mosque and the school, near the Al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip, came as the war between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas in the enclave approaches its first anniversary tomorrow.

In its own statement, the Israeli military said it conducted “precise strikes on Hamas terrorists” who were operating within command and control centers embedded in Ibn Rushd School and the Shuhada al-Aqsa Mosque in the area of Deir al Balah.

​

In Beirut, meanwhile, air strikes lit up the skyline and loud explosions echoed across the southern suburbs, known as the Dahiyeh, as Lebanon suffered one of the most intense nights of Israeli aerial attacks since the start of this conflict last month.

Footage showed a huge fireball exploding against the night sky in what was believed to be a petrol station in the Lebanese capital.

However, is support for Israel's actions in self defence draining away when even Emanuel Macron suddenly develops a conscience:

ICYMI: Macron calls for arms embargo to Israel​

05:30 , Vishwam Sankaran
French president Emmanuel Macron called for the end of weapon shipments to Israel following IDF’s incursion into Lebanon.

“The priority is that we return to a political solution, that we stop delivering weapons to carry out fighting in Gaza,” Mr Macron said, adding that “terrorism should not be fought by “sacrificing a civilian population”.

​

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticised leaders calling for an “arms embargo on Israel”.

“Israel will win with or without their support, but their shame will continue long after the war is won,” he said.

A bit rich coming from a man who has no shame himself when it comes to orchestrating genocidal attacks on Gaza and Lebanon, which target hospitals, mosques and schools.

 

[taratai]

A bit rich coming from a man who has no shame himself when it comes to orchestrating genocidal attacks on Gaza and Lebanon, which target hospitals, mosques and schools.

Isn't that normal, though? The shameless are always the first to shame others. (because they know it works)

I'm only wondering why is Macaroni saying what he's saying, I would expect that he (or whoever is telling him what to do) knows invoking Israel's wrath means Mossad creates widespread muslim protests and plunges France into a civil war.
Maybe he really believes that appeasing the muslim will save France from that scenario?
Or does he side with the muslim to save his butt when the inevitable comes?

...actually, no, i think he simply prefers that the ones to... umm... explore his backside... to be the muslim, not the isrealites.

 

[zak]

I'm only wondering why is Macaroni saying what he's saying, I would expect that he (or whoever is telling him what to do) knows invoking Israel's wrath means Mossad creates widespread muslim protests and plunges France into a civil war.
Maybe he really believes that appeasing the muslim will save France from that scenario?
Or does he side with the muslim to save his butt when the inevitable comes?

Macron's words are nothing more than dangerous noise to serve his ego than some values or influence at international level.
He has a habit of speaking faster than his shadow and what he says today, he will say everything and its opposite the next day.
As for France's support for the Zionist government, just listen to T Meyssan:

"The French government has just committed itself to absolute support for Netanyahu."

According to the journalist, the appointment of Benjamin Haddad as Minister for European Affairs is an unmistakable signal:
Benjamin Haddad worked (Podcast: Benjamin Haddad on Why Europe Is Becoming More Pro-Israel) for nearly ten years for the Tikvah Fund, which is the educational association of revisionist Zionists in the United States.
It is chaired by the diplomat Elliott Abrams - who has been involved in all the wrong moves in Latin America - who "organised the seizure of power by the current government of Benjamin Netanyahu and the Kahanists".

Agent Haddad would therefore be part of the Zionist strategy aimed at convincing Europeans that the people Israel is murdering in Gaza and Lebanon are terrorists.

"This is what we are witnessing in the press and in the discourse of our government.

Moreover, following Macron's statement opposing the delivery of arms, the Elysée has since stated that it is Israel's "unfailing friend".

 

[zak]

The news is a little far from what follows, but the Ben-Gurion Canal project is well worth revisiting.
This is a fairly short article that manages, on the whole, to achieve its aim: to inform.

Frank Musmar The Ben Gurion Canal; The Old New Project​

The first ideas about connecting the Red and Mediterranean seas appeared in the middle of the 19th century by the British, who wanted to connect the three seas: Red, Dead, and Mediterranean. Since the Dead Sea is 430.5 meters below sea level, such an idea was not feasible, but it can be carried out in another direction. Accordingly, the U.S. and Israel have discussed plans to build a canal to rival the Suez Canal for over 50 years. On February 15, 1956, Israel held up work on the Jordan Valley project pending another attempt by the United States to obtain an Arab political agreement on joint development of the plan.

The 160-mile-long sea-level Ben Gurion Canal project was a proposal in the 1960s by Israel to connect the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea through the Negev Desert (Israel) and the southern end of the Gulf of Aqaba (coastline shared by four countries: Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia) bypassing the Suez Canal and challenging Egypt’s monopoly on the shortest Europe-Asia route. The passage would start by the port city of Eilat in Israel through the Gulf of Aqaba, crossing the Jordanian border and flowing through the Arabah Valley before entering the Dead Sea and heading north around the Gaza Strip. The estimated cost is USD 100 billion, and the imperative of political stability and the constant military threat are significant security concerns. Speculations suggest that Israel’s desire to control Gaza and eliminate Hamas is linked to unlocking economic opportunities tied to the Canal. The economic gain from the Ben Gurion Canal would undoubtedly far outweigh the expense as the project will turn profitable quickly. When the co-developers share the expense for the construction of the Canal, it would be minimal and affordable. The Canal is projected to generate 10 billion a year soon as international trade between the East and the West continues to soar.

In July 1963, H. D. Maccabee of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, under contract to the U.S. Department of Energy, wrote a memorandum exploring the possibility of using 520 underground nuclear explosions to help dig about 250 kilometers of canals through the Negev desert. The document was classified as secret until 1993. “Such a canal would be a strategically valuable alternative to the current Suez Canal and would probably greatly contribute to the economic development of the surrounding area,” the declassified document states.

Moreover, after the Abraham Accord, on October 20, 2020, the Israeli state-owned company Europe Asia Pipeline Company (EAPC) and the Emirati Company MED-RED Land Bridge signed an agreement on the use of the Eilat-Ashkelon oil pipeline to transport oil from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean. Accordingly, On April 2, 2021, Israel announced that work on the Ben Gurion Canal was expected to begin by June 2021 and may take several years.

The project is driven by the need to restrain the rise of China’s economic power and to hold back its ongoing project known as “The Belt and Road Initiative.” The Chinese project aims to build a train line that starts from the provinces of China in the West towards West Asia and secure water routes worldwide. It is a multi-billion-dollar investment project. Therefore, the U.S. is trying to hamper the Chinese trade route by creating an alternative competitive route. So, the new stage of struggle will witness an economic war aiming to control seaports and global trade routes. Moreover, In light of the current Arab pivot to Israel, most Middle Eastern countries, especially Saudi Arabia, would also benefit highly from the Ben Gurion Canal as it undoubtedly places Neom, Riyadh’s new ultra-modern business and technological city, at the center of international trade.


Suez Canal Vs Ben Gurion Canal

The Suez Canal was opened in 1867, making it possible to shorten the shipping route between Europe, Africa, and Asia. Instead of sailing around Africa’s southern coast (Cape of Good Hope), ships can use the Suez Canal as a faster and more economical route. The Canal is crucial for transporting oil and gas from the Middle East region to European and Far Eastern markets.

Recently, 12-13% of world trade moves through the Suez Canal, which Egypt controls. The Suez Canal was initially jointly controlled by French investors and Egypt. Isma’il Pasha was forced to sell Egypt’s shares to Britain amid a liquidity crisis in Egypt. Former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser reclaimed the lucrative trade route in 1956, sparking the second Arab-Israeli war, also known as the Suez Crisis.

Due to a sudden sandstorm on March 23, 2021, the supertanker Ever Given was diagonally caught across the Suez Canal. The incident blocked the waterway for six days, disrupting billions of global trade. The incident demonstrated the need for a passageway other than the Suez Canal.

Over the years, several shipping companies have complained that Cairo keeps exponentially increasing the toll rate and relevant docking charges for passing through ships over the Canal. The price hike is arguably perceived as a result of Egypt’s total monopoly over the Canal, among other things. The world has no option except to pay whatever the Egyptian Canal authority demands.

The Ben-Gurion Canal would be more efficient than the Suez Canal because, in addition to accommodating a more significant number of ships, it would enable the simultaneous two-way navigation of large ships through the design of two canal arms. Unlike the Suez Canal, located along sandy shores, the Israeli Canal would have rocky walls that require almost no maintenance. Israel plans to build tiny towns, hotels, restaurants, and cafes along the Canal.

Each proposed branch of the Canal would have a depth of 50 meters and a width of about 200 meters. It would be 10 meters deeper than Suez. Ships with a length of 300 meters and a width of 110 meters could pass through the Canal, the size of the world’s largest ships. The Ben Gurion Canal is one-third more extended than the 193.3 km long Suez Canal – 292.9 km.

The Western powers, the USA and the European Union have motives to create alternatives to the Suez Canal. The Suez channel is narrow and shallow and can become blocked very quickly. There are frequent traffic jams. Moreover, Egypt is an essential partner of China. The Americans and their partners want to block the Chinese New Silk Road megaproject, in which Egypt has an important role. In 2014, Beijing and Cairo signed the “Strategic Partnership Agreement,” agreeing to cooperate in defense, technology, economy, and the fight against terrorism and cybercrime.

The Ben-Gurion Canal as a traffic route does not necessarily have to be a wrong solution. The Canal could be a good solution in an optimistic scenario in which the countries of Israel and Palestine have previously agreed on the two-state model, the union of two independent states, or some third solution. Then, the Canal that would pass through the Israeli and Palestinian territories could be an element of economic connection between the Jewish and Palestinian people who would profit from its use.

The Ben Gurion Canal; The Old New Project – Center of Arabic Eurasian Studies

"Then, the Canal that would pass through the Israeli and Palestinian territories could be an element of economic connection between the Jewish and Palestinian people who would profit from its use."
Faced with the current facts, the Zionists have decided that neither today nor tomorrow will the Palestinians benefit in any normal way.

 

[mantle]

"Narodnaja Volja" ie :" The Will of the People." That is how the Zionist Bolshevik's death squads , the Jewish State Terrorism , always signed the orders for their torture and assassinations. Today is the same as yesterday's "realite". These are radio active truths. The reality that we call Eartly is always administered , but never by benevolence. It is administered by High Councils of Servers to Self Consciousness and by their disciples of parasites and predators vying among themselves with much pushing and shoving for who first climbs the greasy poles to more extreme predatorial levels. Those are eaten in turn by those who are above them . " Hell is empty, all the devils are here " is how the savant Shakespeare phrased it. True but only to a point. There are higher realms , higher hell and higher demons. And there is a malevolence utterly dedicated to the extermination of life itself. It is on the lose again and salivating for its slice.

 

[Joe]

ICYMI: Macron calls for arms embargo to Israel

https://twitter.com/x/status/1842631521070669937

Bibi responded with a short message criticizing Macron for suggesting that there should be a arms embargo on Israel.

In it, he states that Israel is "defending civilization on seven fronts". What are the "seven fronts"?

Hamas, Hezbollah, Shi'ite militias in Iraq and Syria (that' four) terrorists in Judean Samaria (that's Palestinians in the West Bank to the rest of us) the Houthis, and of course, Iran.

Netanyahu really had a get creative to come up with 7 'distinct entities'

Here's why: The Tanakh (Jewish Bible) contains commandments that require the Israelites to exterminate seven Canaanite nations, and describes several wars of extermination that annihilated entire cities or groups of peoples.

The targets of the "extermination commandments" were the seven Canaanite nations explicitly identified by God in Deut 7:1–2 and Deut 20:16–18.Explicit instructions are given by the Jewish "god" to:

Not to keep alive any individual of the seven Canaanite nations (Deut. 20:16)To exterminate the seven Canaanite nations from the land of Israel (Deut. 20:17)The extent of extermination is described in the commandment Deut 20:16–18 which orders the Israelites to "not leave alive anything that breathes… completely destroy them …." and on 1 Samuel 15 "Now, go and crush Amalek; put him under the curse of destruction with all that he possesses. Do not spare him, but kill man and woman, babe and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and donkey."

 

[Joe]

We noticed a 4.6 mag quake East of Tehran last night, and thought it interesting. This guy, however, suggests it may have been an "explosion" instead, possibly a nuke test.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1843004514544259129

 

[Ellipse]

Bibi responded with a short message criticizing Macron for suggesting that there should be a arms embargo on Israel.

In it, he states that Israel is "defending civilization on seven fronts". What are the "seven fronts"?

Hamas, Hezbollah, Shi'ite militias in Iraq and Syria (that' four) terrorists in Judean Samaria (that's Palestinians in the West Bank to the rest of us) the Houthis, and of course, Iran.

Netanyahu really had a get creative to come up with 7 'distinct entities'

Here's why: The Tanakh (Jewish Bible) contains commandments that require the Israelites to exterminate seven Canaanite nations, and describes several wars of extermination that annihilated entire cities or groups of peoples.

The targets of the "extermination commandments" were the seven Canaanite nations explicitly identified by God in Deut 7:1–2 and Deut 20:16–18.Explicit instructions are given by the Jewish "god" to:

Not to keep alive any individual of the seven Canaanite nations (Deut. 20:16)To exterminate the seven Canaanite nations from the land of Israel (Deut. 20:17)The extent of extermination is described in the commandment Deut 20:16–18 which orders the Israelites to "not leave alive anything that breathes… completely destroy them …." and on 1 Samuel 15 "Now, go and crush Amalek; put him under the curse of destruction with all that he possesses. Do not spare him, but kill man and woman, babe and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and donkey."

Retaliations did not took long to came:

IDF Targets French Oil Facilities in Lebanon as Tensions with President Macron Escalate​

Israeli forces have reportedly attacked a gas station in southern Beirut. This station is owned by the French company TotalEnergies. The strike led to a large fire, but no one was hurt. This event has increased tensions between Israel and France, especially with French President Emmanuel Macron.

IDF Targets French Oil Facilities in Lebanon Amid Rising Tensions with Macron - Oneindia

Israeli forces strike TotalEnergies gas station in Beirut, escalating tensions with France and President Macron amid ongoing conflict.- Watch Video on English Oneindia

www.oneindia.com