Ellipse said:
Laura said:
Ummm.... I guess while this was being posted, I was formatting that session to publish it. The actual time given was not 1.6 years but 16 according to the notes and since the session was in October, I guess they only missed it by about 5 months.
Anyway, here is the checked session with commentary:
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=22347.0
Make sens as 1.6 year would lead to a complicate calculation ((12/10)*6) to know the number of months they was refering.
Not to mention it seems odd that they would correct Laura's guess by such a seemingly insignificant amount. She guessed within a year, and they corrected to 1.6 years rather than simply saying "close" as they often do when something is close enough.
Eboard10 said:
Does this mean that there's the possibility of an even stronger earthquake of magnitude 9.7 taking place under Tokyo in the future??
Given the recent activity on this planet I'd say that is not so unlikely. Which also means LA is probably going to "go" soon, so I probably ought to get the heck out of here, and anyone else on the forum living on a fault line should consider that too. Earthquakes can happen in a lot of places, but it makes no sense to live on a huge fault line, especially during a time of global upheaval as we're experiencing now. Cuz that's just asking for trouble!