Japan - 8.9 Earthquake - Fukushima Meltdown

Mr.Anderson said:

Yes, and it is inspiring to see more people discuss the problems of nuclear energy and the cover ups regarding the different nuclear sites safely records around the world. It's a big mess, but for the Residents of Japan more so. Unfortunately the Japanese culture is ill equipped to respond on a psychological level but perhaps the Fukushima incident will change that. The following article refers to what I am indicating here...
_http://www.scribd.com/doc/51736410/Castration-the-HIV-Scandal-and-the-Japanese-Bureaucracy-MASAO-MIYAMOTO-M-D

And why is the Frenchman in Tokyo still there? I would move. Same thing with the people of Christchurch NZ who were continually bombarded by quakes before the big one or should I say big two or three. Logic would dictate that swarms of quakes lasting over a year were a huge warning of impending danger. And they sit right next to a volcano! They have not only lost the ability to think logically, whether it is "cognitive dissonance" or a combination of factors, they seemed to have lost their intuition too! Personally, man cannot rely on logic and science if the science and dissemination of information has been corrupted. And there are no Shamans for these groups of pale skinned tribes to guide them.
 
I can't remember where I found the exact reference, but Arnie Gunderson mentions that it will take a long time in this interview:

http://fairewinds.com/content/gundersen-speaks-chris-martenson-current-status-fukushima-part-i

[...]

Arnie Gundersen: I think eventually they may get to the point of throwing up their hands and pouring the concrete on. They can’t do that yet, because the cores are still too hot. So we are going to see the dance we’re in for another year or so, until the cores cool down. At that point, there’s not anywhere near as much decay heat and you probably could consider filling them with concrete and just letting sit there, like we have it at Chernobyl, as a giant mausoleum. That would work for units 1, 2, and 3. Unit 4 is still a problem, because again all the fuel is at the top and you can’t put the concrete at the top because you will collapse the building and it's so radioactive, you can’t lift the nuclear fuel out. I used to do this as a living and Unit 4 has me stumped.

Chris Martenson: So what do they do, do you think?

Arnie Gundersen: I think they will be forced to build a building around the building and then, because you need heavy lifting cranes – cranes that lift a hundred and fifty tons, which are massive cranes, to put the put the nuclear fuel into canisters, which then can get removed. That is sort of what happened at TMI, but all of the fuel at TMI was still at the bottom of the vessel. But it was a three-year process to get the molten fuel out of Three Mile Island – four years actually. So the problem here is that all of the cranes that do that have been destroyed, at least on units 1, 3, and 4. And you can’t do it in the air. It has to be done under water. So my guess is that they will have to build a building around the building to provide enough shielding and water, so that they can then go in and put this fuel into a heavy lift canister.

Chris Martenson: Okay, all right, I hadn’t considered that. That’s a great insight.

So let me summarize here – we have these four reactors, three of them have melted through – one of them is – Unit 4 – is probably one of the more dangerous ones in the sense that it is going to be years to build a building around it. It's going to be years until really the situation is contained. And in unit four though, we are still concerned that in the year or two or however it takes to build a building and really stabilize that, another aftershock could come along. Or in the case of Unit 3, if another aftershock comes along and the pressure vessel is full of water there’s a chance here that we could see other event. That this situation is not yet fully stabilized in the sense that there are still surprises to be found. It's surprising where the water shows up. There might still be some surprises left in how the building behaves or systems hold up or fail. What else would you add to that summary?

Arnie Gundersen: The groundwater. I am very concerned – I am hearing nothing about ground water monitoring. We know the ocean – we know there have been leaks into the ocean. I am not convinced that there are not cracks in the structures that are allowing this highly radioactive water to get into the groundwater. And I have been talking to people in Japan and my recommendation there is that they should build a moat all the way around the reactor, down to bedrock, which is sixty feet or twenty meters, and about four and a half feet wide, which is a meter and a half wide. And fill it with a material called Zeolite. It's a very good absorber of radioactive material and it would prevent the outward migration of any of this radiation. That’s not happening and I don’t understand why.

So now we look at the building and we look at stopping the heat and the radiation that is going upward, but this is an enormous amount of radioactive material in the soil right now. And one of the prefectures nearby had radioactive sewage sludge. Someone who watches our site is an executive at a sewage business and he said it's not uncommon after an earthquake for groundwater to infiltrate a sewage system and that frightened me a lot, because if the groundwater is already contaminated out in these prefectures it could be a serious problem that is receiving no attention right now.
 
From Natural News .TV: http://naturalnews.tv/Browse.asp?categoryid=all

Los Alamos, Ft Calhoun, Fukushima nuclear plant Coverups: A Repot from James Corbett
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=4675B6550F007BB17627900C5D9EA578 :shock:
 
7.0 quake hits northern Japan, Fukushima workers evacuated

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/10/japan-quake-idUSL3E7IA01320110710

A strong earthquake jolted northeastern Japan on Sunday, and workers at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant were evacuated after an alert for a half-metre tsunami was issued by the Japan Meteorological Agency.

The quake monitoring agency said the earthquake had a magnitude of 7.0 and occurred at a depth of 10 km (6 miles) off the northeastern coast.

Broadcaster NHK later reported a tsunami of 10 cm along the northeast coast.

There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage from the quake, NHK said in an earlier broadcast.

The same area was hit by a massive earthquake and tsunami on March 11 that left at least 21,000 dead and missing. The March disaster cut power to the Fukushima power plant and triggered a radiation crisis.

Tokyo Electric Power said all of the workers at Fukushima had been evacuated to higher ground, adding that there was no sign of any immediate further damage at the nuclear plant where workers have been struggling to build a cooling system to stabilize the reactors.

Tokyo Electric said it would be monitoring a massive barge moored just offshore from the Fukushima nuclear power plant that has been used as a temporary storage depot for radiated water for any damage.

The U.S. Geological Survey initially estimated the quake's magnitude of 7.3, but then revised that estimate down to a magnitude 7.
 
It was a tsunami warning given for the coastal area with high between 10 cm- 50 cm.

Here from the news:

heute%25252011.07.10.JPG


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7OPELMj-es
 
Below is a video produced by NHK. It tracks the efforts of individual Japanese scientists and their attempts to map the spread of radiation. It's over an hour long and very informative. Some of the radiation readings they got are truly hair raising.

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/08/nhk-special-mapping-radioactive-fallout.html
 
Hi RobbinHoodz,

Thanks for the news link. Is the Google translation accurate? In any case, welcome to the forum. :) We recommend all new members to post an introduction in the Newbies section telling us a bit about themselves, and how they found their way here. Have a read through that section to get an idea of how others have done it. Thanks.
 
Google translator is awful! I should do a translation by myself since I now started to share information abroad also.

I think they do not have a clue what to do with all the radiation in Japan!

And so they are burning it and then it comes to America and Canada.. Very sophisticated.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPxCLJQ5tj0


That video is crazy.. Here is also video from Canada:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBfvkCEr-Is

And check out also the latest news from Japan, the radiation on Tokyo is as high as Chernobyl evacuation zone:

http://enenews.com/tokyo-area-soil-testing-finds-radioactivity-at-chernobyl-relocation-levels-at-least-550000-bqm%c2%b2-map
 
**HIGH RADIATION** California Manure-Aug 15, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoW7YQNjI-k&feature=related

This manure was purchased in Redlands, Ca at the local home improvement store. Thankfully I tested this before I used it in my yard.
 
c.a. said:
**HIGH RADIATION** California Manure-Aug 15, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoW7YQNjI-k&feature=related

This manure was purchased in Redlands, Ca at the local home improvement store. Thankfully I tested this before I used it in my yard.

Thanks c.a.! -- Scarey - I wonder if this is a prelude to more of these.
 
Fukushima news update:

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=fi&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=fi&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fhenrilentonen.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi%2F81481-fukushima-paivitys-268

- Henri
 
Update to the situation:

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=fi&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=fi&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fhenrilentonen.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi%2F81790-fukushima-paivitys-308
 
Back
Top Bottom