Superman Returns: WING TV repels Pathological Pirates AKA Rense & Co
I'm following Laura's suggestion and reposting this from here
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=1975&p=3
It's a response to someone passing judgment, without backing it up, like CyberChrist here.
Banned_Project9 said:
This is your way to ensure that all opposing views and questions will be silenced right away. If someone comes up with questions about your hypotheses that you're unable to answer (or worse, they show the falsity of it) all you do is label them as a "psycopath" (just after calling them a government agent) and just ban him/her so your claims can remain unquestioned.
Are you absolutely sure of this? Did you read anything here, or are you just passing through throwing a bomb to catch the eye of someone trying to understand what is going on here?
If I go on ANY forum and make such slanderous statements off the top of my head, you can be sure that they will NOT respect my opinion, and that I WILL be deleted.
If I go and vandalize I will be arrested no matter how much I cry out about my right to carve my view on any medium. For the record, these rules are there to keep the forum readable. If they were not people such as yourself would just post slander upon slander, and no rational human being would be able to make heads or tails of the discussion, which is probably the point of Internet vandalism you call "opposing views and questions".
This forum is FULL of opposing views and questions. I'm not a moderator, and have had the privelidge of reading a lot of them. They are still there. Think about this: You are having a conversation and a third party comes up and starts shouting accusations. What do you do? Do you just let them keep shouting, ruining the existing exchange?
I also read posts that were deleted afterwards, and I saw no showing of anything. All I saw was a series of brazen declarative statements: "you are all this and that and the other, because I say so!"
Give me a break! All I see is bullying from cronies tied to fascist forums and sites that would not give anyone the time of day or a second of that day if they don't toe the party line.
Why don't you try an experiment? Why don't you try to be rational, and pose opposing views and questions that are not just accusations designed to draw attention and sabotage the discussion. I mean, COME ON (!) its the questions that MAKE the discussion. Look at how long these threads are! They are long because of the controversy. When the controversy stops, the thread ends.
Let ANY new reader go and take a look at the patterns. There are LONG threads with a lot of disagreement, and in the end a lot of those disagreeing could not hack it, they could not admit they were wrong and started flaming like spoiled brats.
You gotta admit, if you think just anybody with a question is labelled a psychopath, you really have no clue as to what is discussed here. And that, to me, means you just snuck in, took a cheap shot, and slinked away.
I mean if you're going to just spout stuff, I might as well do the same in reply:
This is YOUR way to play a double standard and victimize this forum, so out of guilt or fear of seeming unfair its members will just bend over to take any shaft you choose to impose on them. You don't like people defending themselves in the face of completely immature behaviour, so you want to make them look wrong because they just don't sit like fools and swallow any excrement that you pass off as an "argument".
Imagine if they complied. People like you would probably laugh and call everyone on this forum a bunch of dumb suckers. Why don't you back yourself up with a few facts,
like presenting a rational opposing view that was unjustly deleted?
Hey, if it's convincing, I will be the FIRST to support you, and that's coming from one with no affiliations here, just the conviction that they're pretty much right. And that conviction is there because people like you are really not doing a convicing job of presenting the other side. So come on, be rational, be concise, BE CONVINCING.
