Jeff Rense EXPOSED!!

[Niall]

Re: Jeff Rense - Racist?

Unfortunately, as we have learned, it is the nonsense that subtly distorts the good stuff and keeps the seeker from the truth. You might enjoy reading this thread:

Jeff Rense EXPOSED!!

 

[Laura]

Looks like another temporary dupe has awakened to the reality of Rense:

[urlhttp://www.henrymakow.com/many_feuds_of_jeff_rense.html]Jeff Rense's Abuse of Power & Trust[/url]

February 8, 2012

No Readers for You!!!

No one can hold our movement hostage, especially someone with US Secret Service connections.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Jeff Rense rants about our politicians' abuses but behaves like a petty tyrant. He postures as a champion of free speech but bans a long list of articles, writers and websites.

He condemns censorship and propaganda but in fact may be controlled opposition. All the while, he grosses over $400,000 a year. (To be fair, he does work 24/7.)

His website is an important center of opposition to the New World Order. In the face of this mortal threat, we expect someone in his position to unite instead of divide us.


BANNED BY RENSE


I was banned by Rense after a 12-year collaboration for posting this synopsis of Jim's Stone's theory about Fukushima on my web site.

Rense didn't even link to it. As a result, Jeff said he would post my articles on his site, but would no longer link to my site for me or my freelance contributors. I got half my readers from him, and he knew it.

I make my modest living from advertising and books on my site. Of course, I would not continue to send him my work.

My many contacts and contributors were an important tributary of information flowing into his mighty Amazon. Irrationally, he shut it off.

Jeff claims to sell $300,000 a year in advertising. He makes another $150,000 from his radio show archives. He pays about $400 a mos to his web provider.

I don't know if Jim Stone is Jesus Christ-returned or a CIA operative. I do know he made a plausible argument which deserved to be evaluated. I have a right to make a potential mistake without being mugged by my supposed friend and longtime ally.

This was a minor disagreement, just one of hundreds of important stories Jeff posted by me over the years. Jeff posts stories about UFO's for heaven's sake!

He wrote hysterically: "ANY story claiming some sabotage or military operation caused the disaster is, OBVIOUSLY, serving the dark side and the nuclear power industry. Nuclear power is destroying the planet. The entire Pacific is gone as a food source.... "

Then in his most patronizing tone: " I have tried to help you see the bigger picture but I am not succeeding. I can't refer people to your site anymore. You are disparaging me and essentially mocking my entire baseline position on this and other areas."

One article out of hundreds? What other areas? (I don't share his admiration of Adolf Hitler. Is he referring to that?)

He could have sent a rebuttal to Stone's theory. If he were proven correct, I would have tipped my hat. Instead, he dumped me and asked if I "had an autographed picture of Abe Foxman in [my] office? You are acting like an arch Zionist now. Maybe you always were. "

Insane.

ENOUGH ABOUT ME

Jeff's email is screened. He depends on a handful of contacts to provide him with news items. Thus, I was tutored in his many feuds and hatreds.

I learned who was "banned" and who was "OK." Banned meant no information from this source can be posted no matter how important to the reader or the cause.

Here is a partial list of the sites Jeff "banned."

Rixon Stewart -- Jeff thinks Rixon "plagiarized" his site. He goes ballistic every time Rixon's name is mentioned. He forbade Brother Nathaniel and myself from appearing on Rixon's site after Rixon criticized him publicly. He said we had to be loyal to him. This ban did not apply to Gilad Atzmon or Israel Shamir or Smoking Mirrors. But I accepted it out of "loyalty" and the belief that Jeff was doing a lot of good.

Mark Glenn -- An eloquent critic of Zionism, banned after Mark protested some anti-Islam articles Jeff posted.

Alex Jones -- Dueling egos, Jeff feels "the fat man" reneged on an agreement to exchange links. {Can't say we disagree with banning Alex Jones. However, we think that this is just a pretend opposition and that they are really buddies behind the scenes.}

Ken Adachi -- Banned in early 2011 after 14 years, for disagreeing with Jeff over "the driver shot JFK" theory. Jeff sided with Jim Marrs who suspiciously downplayed this view. {Can't disagree with banning Ken Adachi either. He's got a site loaded with disinfo including some defamation of yours truly. So, again, I wonder if this is just pretended opposition?}

MIke Adams (Natural News) and Activist Post - Both disinformation agents, according to Jeff: "Activist post is the enemy and supports the FAT MAN. It is a globalist site being run out of Costa Rica...the CIA playground...by two guys. It is another part of the 'alternative news saturation' ploy." {We have noticed issues with Mike Adams and possibly "activistpost", though we have less data on the latter.}

The late Joe Vialls -- Joe hit the nail on the head on several occasions, particularly in his research into the murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. He really hit home with that and it unnerved the powers that be. Rense gave it minimal coverage and actually posted material alongside Joe Vialls work that disputed his findings. {I always liked the work of Joe Vialls though I'm still not decided about him. I think he had some good info but went paranoid, maybe.}

Mike James -- Rense removed all Mike James' work from his website after Mike was attacked by two thugs in Germany. Coincidence? {Don't know who this is.}

NewswithViews - Jeff resolved never to link to this site because they banned Rev. Ted Pike for his outspoken analysis of the Zionist factor. {Well, if they banned Ted Pike, they are okay in my book! Ted Pike is a total nutjob!}

JEFF RENSE AND THE US SECRET SERVICE

Larry Sinclair, the man who claims he had sex with Barack Obama, was cracking under the pressure. He called Jeff and told him he had swallowed enough pills to commit suicide. To his credit, Jeff kept him on the line and then had the call traced. Sinclair was found and taken to the hospital where he recovered.

I asked Jeff who traced the call? Who did you call?

Rense: "The US Secret Service"

Makow: "Why would the Secret Service, charged with protecting Obama, save the life of Larry Sinclair who could blackmail the President?"

Rense: "He was a person of interest."

???? ( My guess is they have to keep him alive to control Obama.)

The fact that one of America's "leading dissidents" has the number of the US Secret Service on his Rolodex is troubling. Quite frankly, real dissidents don't call the men who wear shades.

{I dunno. This story sounds fishy to me. How do we know for a fact that the events even happened? Maybe Rense was trying to sound more important than he is. After all, he does make a lot of claims about himself that aren't true.}

During his dust-up with Mark Glenn, Rense threatened to call the FBI and charge Glenn with harassment. Seems to me, Jeff Rense is entirely too friendly with law enforcement.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt because he helped get my message out. I am not controlled opposition. But apparently Jim Stone touched a nerve. If I could no longer be controlled, I had to be curtailed. This is why I am speaking out now.

IS JEFF CONTROLLING OPPOSITION?

I am finding that the alternative media is just as controlled and compartmentalized as the mainstream. If you do not catch on with some large aggregator, your audience is limited. {No kidding! You just figured that out?}

The jury is out on Jeff Rense. Certainly his hysterical reaction to Jim's Stone's thesis is very suspicious.

On the other hand, the biggest argument in his favor is: He has been trying to sell his website for a year and can't. No one will pay the exorbitant sum Jeff thinks it's worth. (He actually made comparisons with The Huffington Post which got $315 M.)

The bottom line is we can't afford to let egos or money interfere with the dissemination of information and opinion. The future is ominous and we need to put differences aside and unite on the basis of what we agree on.

But if a key figure is guilty of erratic, arbitrary or suspicious behavior, he should be exposed. No one will hold us hostage, certainly NOT someone we trusted.

Related -- Ex-Employer called Rense "congenital liar." {Links to Lisa Guliani's piece which is, I believe, already in this thread.}

Ho-hum.

 

[Laura]

So, Rense is going to destroy Henry Makow (who is easy to destroy because he's a nutcase himself). Gonna chronicle it here in case any of it disappears.

Who Turned Henry Makow? _http://pauldrockton.com/Makow2.html

In order to "turn" someone from an enemy into an intelligence asset, leverage is required. In Henry Makow's Canadian world, such leverage is easy to come by.

"Canada’s constitution guarantees freedom of speech — but there are two limits. First, laws prohibit incitement of hatred of people based on their color, race, religion, ethnic origin, or sexual orientation. Second, it is illegal to communicate by phone or Internet any material “that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt.’’ These are the loopholes through which all the country’s controversies enter." (Source)


Canada is not the United States.

"a lead investigator for the Human Rights Commission was asked what value she gave to the freedom of speech. She responded: “Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don’t give it any value. It’s not my job to give value to an American concept.’’ Various speakers in recent years have been forced to cancel their talks because of possible violence. Not surprisingly, there has been a lot of pushback against the speech laws, with Liberal Members of Parliament suggesting that the Human Rights Commission be shut down." (Ibid)


In other words, Henry Makow could easily be threatened with prison time and worse because of his anti-homosexual articles and other subjects he has covered in the past. In fact, according to his archives, the last anti-homosexual article he wrote was June of last year. (Source) This used to be a recurring theme on his website. Not anymore.

In fact, he was brought up on charges for another theme, anti-Zionism.

"ATTACK ON HENRYMAKOW.COM

This website is the subject of a Tribunal. The CJC goal is to silence my criticism of Zionism and the New World Order. The pretext is that I foment hatred against Jews. But this website does not criticize Jews, only organized Jewry i.e. Zionism and their sponsors, Illuminati bankers. It also alerts Jews to a possible hidden agenda in Judaism that puts them in jeopardy." (Source)


"Exactly one year ago, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal issued two rulings (Henry Makow and Arthur Topham) which effectively stopped all enforcement of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Section 13 is Canada’s pernicious censorship law, which outlaws Internet postings by controversial writers, bloggers and internet commentators. Victims of Section 13 could be hit with fines up to $10,000 (to $30,000 for hurt feelings) and a lifetime gag order, which if violated could result in a prison sentence up to 5 years." (Source)


One can only imagine what leverage MAY HAVE BEEN applied to get the Human Rights Commission to give SOMEONE a pass. Or what SOMEONE MIGHT gave up in return for his or her freedom. Defending such a case could easily bankrupt ANYONE. This situation could have easily turned into a carrot or a stick. I believe JUST SUCH A SITUATION MIGHT HAVE TAKEN the fight OUT OF Henry AND GIVEN HIM A NEW UNIFORM TO WEAR. Some of us can handle opposition. Some of us cannot.

Perhaps the threat of prison time was motivation enough. Now for the carrot.
In another interesting article, Makow admits he lost the fortune he made on the boardgame "Scruples" playing stock options. Not really a fatal blow,but it exposes another vulnerability that could be easily manipulated. Love of money is the root of all evil. It is also a source of desperation. The Satanic Psychopaths know this and do everything they can to bankrupt their detractors. Then they offer them payment for their services.

In this manner, Benedict Arnold was "turned" by the British in the Revolutionary war.

I delivered newspapers for a year when I lost everything. Perhaps Henry found an easier way to make money by selling out his friends. Greater men than Henry Makow have turned Judas over less.

Henry also admitted on his site that he has a thing for younger women. While apparently in his 60s, Henry wrote the following:

"I am attracted to women under 35 who think I am too old. Sexual attraction is an important element in a male-female relationship." (Source)


Whether this led to his recent divorce, or was just another way to compromise Henry Makow is irrelevant. What is relevant is the fact that the shadow government often provides sexual companions for the lonely, in exchange for their services. Henry has decided to launch a ridiculous crusade against a long-time benefactor who never did him any harm

Stating that this individual, who lives in a very rainy climate, built an electric train around his property (which would be destroyed by the rain), is an act of a desperate and apparently controlled intelligence asset. Not a rational man who never betrays loyalties for his own selfish purposes.

Think about that next time you read an articlewritten by Henry Makow.


Please feel free to comment in the New Paul Drockton Forum.

More in the Next Article. Buy Silver/Gold Bullion email pdrockton@aol.com

 

[Laura]

Henry Makow's Punch and Judy Show _http://pauldrockton.com/Makow3.html

Henry Makow's ship has been sinking for quite a while it seems. According to Alexa.com, Makow's site, which used to be ranked right around 19,000 in the world, is now ranked 145,000. This data is from before Jeff cut ties. (Source) Makow abandoned the pen a while ago and now prefers to publish guest articles, which are much lower quality than his own writings.

The data from Alexa.com seems to agree with Jeff's assessment of the decline in quality of Makow's writings. More research demonstrates that other websites have also declined to link to Makow. (Source) When you replace high quality with low quality you are bound to lose readers and supporters. You can blame that fact on others, or you can realize its your own fault.

Makow prefers to blame others.

Rense.com is still ranked 6,272 in the world without Makow. Contrary to what Henry would like people to believe. Jeff Rense still puts out a very high quality product. It shows in his massive readership. It also shows in the fact that Rense.com made Henry Makow, not the other way around. (Source)

The numbers don't lie. Out of hundreds of millions of websites out there, Rense.com is one of the premier websites in the world, with a global following.

In a macabre twist, Makow has decided to publish a series of photos of Jeff Rense from when he was younger. Only a stalker, or someone who is being fed misinformation as an intelligence asset, would bother. From what I understand, Makow has never been to Jeff's home or met the man face to face. Trying to portray himself as a Jeff Rense expert means that he is having credibility problems.

Makow just makes things up as he goes I guess.

Which now makes him an object of ridicule in my book. Since Makow is publishing comments, which may or may not be imaginary in their nature, expressing their undying loyalty to him and his now worthless website. I feel that maybe I can help him out by suggesting a few comments of my own.

Suggested Comments for Makow's website:

"Hi Henry, I have been a follower of your writings since my fat Elvis days. Just wanted you to know that I let Jeff Rense borrow one of my motorcycles (wink, wink)." Signed, Elvis Pres____.

"Dear Henry, We read your stuff all the time. It is front page news here at Hogwarts. What I like best is that it can be recycled in the cage of my owl, Hedwig. He seems to prefer your articles as well." Signed, "The Boy Who LIved".

"Mr Makow, I have been living with multiple personalities for many years now. They all seem to agree that you are the best. The one holdout is Jenny the axe murderer. But, don't worry, she doesn't like anyone. Signed, Sybil."

"Mr. M. Its a good thing we created you on the 8th day. Otherwise, our creation would never be perfect. Signed, God."

"Henry, we are working on tidal waves for the other 70 Japanese nuclear reactors. Hopes were high when Bush said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction." Waiting on Iran to build a few nukes." Signed, The teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.


Conclusion:

I just added this part of the article to make you think I actually put some effort into it. Or did actual research. Its a Henryism I adopted to make things a little more official. Is this what you've become Henry, a sad, old joke?

 

[Laura]

ANONYMOUS for Responsible Internet Journalism {now they are trying to convince us that Rense is affiliated with "Anonymous"!} _http://anonymousforresponsiblejournalism.blogspot.com/2012/02/using-our-internet-platforms-to-defame.html

Using Our Internet Platforms To Defame (by Libel or Slander) Is Character Assassination
An Open Letter to Henry Makow

Dear Henry,

We publish this open letter out of great concern for your recent actions on the internet. We have attempted to write it with respect, objectivity and consideration for all parties involved. However, when the explicit intention of a writer's piece is defamation of character by way of libelous statements, then we have a situation which ought to be prosecuted as character assassination. Character assassination is a crime, Henry, pure and simple.

May we pose the following scenario to every reader of this letter?

All of us have our opinions, beliefs and strongly held convictions about the state of the world today, don’t we? Because of the human ego, we all think “we know what time it is”, don’t we? Many of us are truly brilliant; some are certified geniuses. The quality of internet writing and video production on the alternative side is quite awesome, yes? The analysis of political, economic, financial, social, scientific, religious, spiritual, and cosmic events and developments is really quite amazing, much of it done in real time (Intuition is really sharpening!).

What’s the point? The smartest among us will always have disagreements whether philosophical in nature or about mundane matters. Einstein and Newton would have debated endlessly were they contemporaries, as could Stephen Hawking and Garrett Lisi easily disagree today.

What do the ethical and moral giants among us do when they disagree … really fight it out through intellectual combat, scientific battle or philosophical debate? The true gentlemen and/or gentlewomen simply agree to disagree. They part ways amicably and recover their own ground always reflecting on the possibility that the other guy or gal just may have something very important, perhaps even revolutionary, to say.

In the present case before us, rense.com is Jeff Rense’s website, not yours. By your own admission Jeff promoted you and your work for many years. He has only helped you and never hurt you. He offered you a worldwide platform with which to share your exhaustive research and speak your truth. You have a simple disagreement about an extremely important issue to Jeff and the entire relationship devolves into a one-sided screed.

It’s VERY important to bear in mind that Fukushima became Jeff’s personal study and enviro advocacy. Rense.com covered the Japanese nuclear disaster like none other on the net. He has more articles, essays, videos, audios, and interviews on this global catastrophe than anyone else in the galaxy! Perhaps you could have afforded him the respect and credit due to an individual who has given nearly a year of his life to educate and enlighten his audience about this extraordinary global environmental catastrophe.

Anyone reading the “Stone” article could spend a year fact-checking and still be no closer to the truth. So complicated and convoluted is the whole event that even those scientists who are in the know dare not render a fully integrated synthesis. Clearly, there are different reasons – all quite legitimate – why any of us might shy away from some of Stone’s premises or conclusions. And we speak from the position of those who have been intimately involved with Fukushima from day one though our own research, investigation, consulting and blogging with people on the ground in Japan and elsewhere. We’re far from being uninitiated and much closer to the genuine experts, so we understand the subtleties and complexities involved in making an accurate assessment.

Do you let people dictate to you what will or will not appear on your website? We think not! By all appearances (as well as anecdotal evidence) your gate-keeping is as stringent as it gets. You took advantage of a privilege for many years at rense.com which many others do as well. However, when a profound difference of opinion emerged you chose to betray your friend, fellow journalist and truthseeker. Is this the way you reciprocate because of a simple disagreement around content?

Friends, professional associates, fellow journalists simply don’t treat each other this way. NEVER! Such profound betrayal is inexcusable. Malicious defamation of character is serious business. Character assassination is even more serious when you consider that the victim cannot fully recover what has been stolen from him. What if your reputation was cast about on the internet with such wanton disregard for the context or all the facts? How would you feel ... or your family feel, having to suffer such ongoing humiliation for what amounts to one man's jealous rage, unjustified anger, and revenge for being ... ... ... supported???

Here's one example of your purposeful misrepresentation of Jeff's history. Your site contains false information in a linked article written by Lisa Guliani from Wing TV. It references comments by Jeff's former employer which were deceitfully elicited from her, and then withdrawn by the same individual, Patricia Smullin. Here's the actual letter of apology issued by Ms. Smullin to Jeff Rense acknowledging that misleading information was published by the WingNuts.
http://www.rense.com/general92/smullin.htm

What would the internet be like if everyone spewed their rage and vengeance and hatred and frustration all over the place? See some of the Facebook pages that are covered with this type of venom and vitriol. Is this where the public discourse is heading… or already gone? Is this where Henry Makow wants to lead his many readers and fans? No, this is not the kind of Pied Piper you are known to be.

By the way, is it ever appropriate to disseminate information which was obviously given in confidence? To share highly personal thoughts, feelings or delicate matters, which were allegedly rendered during the course of strictly private conversations, on the world wide web constitutes a profound betrayal of trust. Of course, when these purported comments are then taken egregiously and self-servingly out of context, or otherwise twisted and changed, how are the rest of us ever to believe, or trust, Henry Makow again?!

Henry, how would you feel if the private, confidential details of your life, your business – some totally misrepresented, others taken out of context – were plastered all over the internet. Dear reader, you might ask yourself the very same question before you participate in the next internet lynching. It is not a place anyone ever wants to be, and any behavior contributing to this state of affairs is completely unacceptable.

What is really ironic and remarkably hypocritical is that your recent conduct is completely inconsistent with what you have counseled in a previous post regarding this exact issue as it concerns Jeff Rense, Editor of rense.com. Here's a quote from your article in support of Jeff posted at henrymakow.com on October 23, 2010:

"My policy is to never criticize fellow patriots. I cooperate with people on the basis of what we have in common. I don't expect we'll agree on everything. If I can't say something nice, I won't say anything. I focus on what we have in common, and recognize the real good they are doing."

Henry, you created a board game called SCRUPLES for God’s sake! On the website that sells this marvelous game it begins with the following question:

In life we ask ourselves: “What’s the right thing to do?”

When your special box at rense.com was taken down did you ask yourself this question? If not, please know that it is not too late. Any reaction can be too quick, too impulsive, or too uninformed by one’s own scruples when tempers are flaring. On the other hand a patient and reasoned response is what each individual is challenged to fashion every day of their life.

You know this, Henry. You know this well …very well. So please put into practice what the rest us tried to learn growing up playing your aptly named game. We (the growing multitude of internet users) need role models – desperately. Walking your talk has never been so important, so please give us your best, and fix this situation now. Only you can do it.

Very sincerely,

ANONYMOUS for Responsible Internet Journalism

"There is no witness so terrible and no accuser so powerful as conscience which dwells within us."
~ Sophocles

 

[Laura]

Now, slimeball Jay Weidner pitches in. Remember Jay? The guy who defamed me on Rense and I have an email from Rense claiming that he knows Weidner... and Lisa Guliani had a chat with Rense who claimed to her that he did NOT know Weidner and she recorded the conversation... Jay Weidner, who has more than 15 blogs devoted to defaming me and is pals with Vincent Bridges of Crowley/Golden Dawn/OTO/Enochian magick (bring on the apocalypse!) fame? Jay Weidner who hooked up with Clif High of halfpasthuman fame shortly before Clif went off the deep end??? Anyway, here's Jay:

Smoking Out The Monster _http://rense.com/general95/smokngout.html

“There’s a monster on the loose,
It has our head in a noose”
'The Monster'
--Steppenwolf

By Jay Weidner
2-17-12

A Message From David Icke...

A very clear theme is emerging that I can see in my own life and in that of many others who work in my field to a larger or lesser extent. We are seeing ever more obviously people who claim to be one thing revealing themselves to be quite another by their own actions. It seems that they can't stop themselves from doing so.

Good, it is about time their mask was lifted and how appropriate that they are doing it themselves while thinking they are harming others trying to do some good in the world. Poetic justice tends to 'do' irony.

I have been threatened with the same attempt to destroy me and my work and I absolutely can't wait for those involved to make themselves known (again) as they try to do so (they are only wasting their time - they have plenty - and exposing their true self, but they are too stupid and consumed by hatred to see it).

'The agents of the Monster are used to hiding and doing its will in solitude and anonymity. That day is ending. The agents of the Monster are being forced out into the open. Because a few brave humans have stood up to the Monster the beast is being forced to come out in the open, if for nothing else than to attempt to devour its enemies.

---

There is something in the air. Those of us who have been around for a while can almost smell it. It is the smell of the Monster. It is putrid and greasy. The Monster hides its ugly face from all of us.
It fears to show itself.

None of us have actually ever seen the Monster, only the aftermath of its work. We know its there and we know it lurks in a million different places at once. More fearfully we know it lurks in a million people at once. It is difficult to tell who works for the Monster and who does not.

Although it is difficult to see the Monster, the enemy of all humanity, it is getting easier every day.

The agents of the Monster are used to hiding and doing its will in solitude and anonymity. That day is ending. The agents of the Monster are being forced out into the open. Because a few brave humans have stood up to the Monster the beast is being forced to come out in the open, if for nothing else than to attempt to devour its enemies.

Now with the smoke of war on the horizon the Monster has been forced to show its teeth and claws. Will it expose its entire body next?

If so that is also when it will expose its soft underbelly - where the sharp stick gets pointed.

In the last few days a number of coincidental(?) events have occurred that bear discussion.

1.) Yesterday, out of the blue, Three of the four Republican candidates for President decided to not do the CNN debate. Ron Paul was the only one willing to debate. CNN canceled the debate.
Neither Gingrich nor Santorum have any money. Why would they renege on a chance for a national audience?

2). Judge Napalitano was coming out fiercely for Ron Paul on his great show Freedom Watch. He was fired last week by Fox Business Channel. It should be noted that the Judge was also fiercely anti-war.

3.) Stephen Colbert came out, in a serious manner, for Ron Paul.
Yesterday his show was ‘suspended’.

4.) Pat Buchanan was fired from MSNBC yesterday. He was against the current wars and would surely be against an attack on Iran. He was probably a secret Ron Paul supporter also.

5.) Jeff Rense, who runs a popular anti-war and anti-corruption website (Rense.com) was unexpectedly and unfairly attacked by a former contributor, Henry Makow, a few days ago. It what can only be described as bizarre behavior by Mr. Makow, the attacks have zero merit. Interestingly, Makow was one of the few alternative researchers to trash Ron Paul and claim that he is an agent and a freemason. I have looked into the last charge and ­ so far- there is no evidence that Ron Paul is a freemason.

What is going here?

War is coming. The Monster is attempting to get rid of and/or silence anyone who is against the corrupt criminal warmongers that rule this country.

It is coordinated, performed by agents both covert and overt. And it is not over.

The second wave is starting now.

The good news is that we are smoking them out, one by one.

Now, if only the Monster would expose its belly. I have this stick here and ...

When Rense has been interrogated by the police, had a 10 month investigation into his activities, is facing a Fisc audit, I'll consider that he might be a threat. But right now, he just looks like controlled opposition and this whole thing with Makow is a bagatelle.

 

[Laura]

Now, along comes Les Visible - another who has defamed SOTT and then acted nice, but took it back. Are we beginning to see a pattern here? (SOTT even gets a mention in this one...)

Friday, February 17, 2012
Jeff Rense and Impasse City.
_http://zippittydodah.blogspot.com/2012/02/jeff-rense-and-impasse-city.html
Dog Poet Transmitting.......

May your noses always be cold and wet.

Every time I get on my white charger and dash off to the defense of someone, I wind up impaling myself on my lance. Different people are kind enough to link to my work and I am grateful for that. They see some value in what I do, apparently most of the readers do as well. The only person that doesn't see much value in me, is me. I've never liked myself very much. I don't care if I live or die; please don't take that the wrong way. I don't mean it like it sounds. I suppose I'm just weary of this world and long to be somewhere but I don't know where somewhere is. My upcoming novel sits there, finished but not entirely transcribed and I find reasons not to do that. I have these other works in progress. They're sitting there too. My music site at Soundclick disappeared. They took exception to my not wanting to pay for the premium features anymore and got nasty with me, citing rules that actually permitted me to have it set up the way it was, as an argument for the reverse. They're not very nice people and I was glad to be gone. I've got at least six albums waiting for me to record them but I can't get it up (grin) to do that. I'm waiting for something to change inside me but it's not time for that just yet.

I know that first paragraph sounds depressing. I don't mean it to be. I'm usually in a good mood. I've got a roof over my head and food to eat. I've got a bunch of wonderful dogs and a great companion, though I live in exile and don't have any associates. My language skills are not the greatest and most people don't want to hear what I like to talk about, which is what you generally see here at the blogs and I don't want to talk about the things they want to talk about, which is mostly pedestrian twaddle for which I have zero interest. So, here I sit, one day following the next and fully aware that there is little I can do to accelerate what I'm waiting on. I just have to wait and try to be useful in the meantime.

I've been debating talking about what it looks like I am about to talk about. That hasn't gone well in the past. I jumped the shark with my SOTT commentary. I posted some high minded tripe about all of us seeking to get along when Mark Glenn and Jeff Rense had a falling out and Mark has never spoken to me since. I've defended a few other people and caught a decent ration of shit about it. Some of the people I am tangentially connected to are at serious odds with each other. I just keep my head down and try to go about my business. If I have a problem with someone, I try to resolve it and if I can't, I just go my way. I've got a conflict going on with some people at the moment that's partially based on my acting out in a certain way, due to telepathic influences that required some action on my part; possibly not the action I wound up taking but that's road kill at this point. Some of it has to do with money but that's easily fixed and will be. Essentially it has to do with my not meeting certain expectations but from my POV that would have been a bad move. Regardless, my Anti-Guru 1.0 kicks in and I can't defeat the software. I need a high end hacker for that and no one wants to mess with the force that installed it. We're looking at Impasse City in that respect.

I've been interacting with Jeff Rense for awhile now. I've always liked him; right from the beginning. He's been good to me and he's encouraged me in various ways and at various times. I'm pretty familiar with his professional background and some of what he's been through. Given some of the people he's been associated with over time and the degree of his personal prominence, I would have to say that he's come through it all very well. A lot of mud could have attached itself to him; given what most of us think of Alex Jones but a careful study of that time slot shows Jeff walking the high road through different amounts of negative crap, as well as being setup in unpleasant ways and then taking the highway out as a result.

The man works all the time. He's about the hardest working man I know. He's got high standards. He's also highly reasonable and forgiving and he can be reached and reasoned with; should one want to engage in that sort of thing. For some reason, a lot of people don't. The combustion level of unevolved ego that operates in the theaters where all of us are employed is pretty low. Many of us think too much of ourselves and the idea that we could be wrong about something is usually not an immediate consideration. There's far too much self importance going around and that's a terrible cross to bear. It really is, especially since, in fact, we are not, any of us, that important. We only think we are and it gets us in trouble because we make unreasonable demands on others, when we ought to be more aware of who we are dealing with and how they view things and what is important to them.

Anyone who interacts with Michael Rivero knows that you don't argue with him about no planes at The Pentagon, or about HAARP (grin). You also need to know that you can't be dragging God into the equation beyond maybe a casual mention because Michael doesn't do God. If you are determined to have your way in these matters, you're not going to show up on his site.

Jeff Rense is seriously informed about Fukushima. It's an area of inquiry that he has put a lot of time and attention into. You don't go to Jeff with stories about planned nuclear explosions causing the Fukushima disaster. I don't know what Jeff thinks about Sorcha Faal or Ben Fulford. Personally I think they're intentional disinfo. They make shit up but they weave some truth through the fiction. I don't know Jim Stone. I just know he's got his name in big letters on his site and there's a certain amount of innuendo about mysterious forces keeping him from being heard. I don't want a man I don't even know, angry at me for mentioning him but if I'm gong to have that feta cheese omelet, with olives and herbs and olive oil, or whatever I'm going to put in it, I have to break some eggs. Now, I haven't had an omelet in several years but that's beside the point. I have had Pop-eyed eggs and poached eggs from free range chickens so, I know what I'm talking about here. For some reason, I don't care if Faal or Fulford are angry with me and I would rather that some people were angry with me rather than my having to work with them and then wind up angry with myself. I'm dealing with that feature in real time at the moment.

I don't know Henry Makow but I generally disagree with a lot of what he has to say when he's talking about women. That's fine. I don't talk about him in my posts but now I am. I can't see any reason for jumping on Jeff just because he doesn't want to print something. That's his inalienable right. He's not the only one who doesn't want to print what Jim Stone says. What he says is highly controversial and speculative at best. Sure, TPTW are capable of anything but they are not doing half the shit that is attributed to them. Now, I don't really know if this did or did not happen but I don't think it did because it doesn't make sense for these creeps to poison their own wells. I don't get there being nuclear explosives in the Twin Towers either. Where's the radiation? And they wouldn't have fallen like they had if there had been basement nukes. But once again, I don't know. I wish more people didn't know because too many people know too much these days and most of the time a lot of what they know is wrong.

None of this has anything to do with Jeff not wanting to link or post something and none of this has anything to do with someone not wanting to be reasonable after being in a working relationship of some years. That's just stupid if you ask me. Why toss a long term relationship in the ashcan? The sensible thing here is to back up and mend that fence.

These days people are tense and getting tenser. There is a plague of anonymous making the rounds, where people are going around ambushing anyone and everyone because they are deeply unhappy and have become mean as a result. We live in a world of acrimony and bad spiritedness. People are rude and cruel as an avocation. There's way too much schadenfreude. I've found nasty behavior in the most unexpected places. I'm almost past being surprised at anything at this point. That's a sad commentary, I know.

Jeff is a decent guy, according to my standards. Imagine his situation. He works all the time. He has no doubt fought a long battle through his life in the face of so many wrong choices he could have made and didn't make. He's still a warrior for the truth, which can't be said for many people in this game. There's a cost for this kind of thing. It's a testimony to the way he's lived his life that so little of a negative order can be ascribed to him. You hear picayune things that don't amount to much at all. You see people try to associate him with Alex Jones but there's no there, there. The truth of that whole matter has been detailed elsewhere and I've linked to it here before. Meanwhile he has to live with accusations like he's got some connection to the Secret Service, the truth is that at the same time he was saving someone's life. You hear he's got some kind of model train that surrounds his house and that he's got a fleet of Harleys. What's wrong with a man having a motorcycle?

This is what happens when there's not enough truth to serve the interests of those who want to paint someone in a really bad light. They have to make shit up. I have just gone through this myself. Isn't the truth enough? Apparently not. I can understand how Jeff feels. I've had to hear things about myself that are as false as false can be and there's not much you can do. The people who want to believe that garbage will. When I beat a life sentence in Hawaii; being the only person who ever managed it, some people said that I bought off the jury. A friend of mine said, “With what? He doesn't have any money. He had a court appointed lawyer. He works for eight dollars an hour at a fruit stand”. Good grief.

What this whole thing is, is stupid. No other word covers it. Jeff works all the time bringing you the news. You don't pay him for it. You don't pay any of us for it and we get by as best we can. The least we can do is defend these friends that serve us when someone has an axe to grind just because they don't get their way. You hear talk about Jeff making 400,000 dollars a year. Jeff has BIG bills and expenses. How much of that do you think he gets to keep; not much. He raised his daughter all by himself against some terrific setbacks since she was a baby. A man in his position could have cut all kinds of deals on the road. He could have compromised endless times. He didn't. The people with serious money want no part of him. You know who they are. One of them relentlessly sues him for no reason except to bring him down. You don't hear Jeff crying about it. You probably don't even know about it. He just soldiers on. I wish I was as determined and together as he is. I'm not.


End Transmission.......

Beamed from the Saucer Pod By Visible on Friday, February 17, 2012

 

[Laura]

Here, Jeff Rense proudly posts the "apology" he got from Patsy Smullin after threatening her with legal action...

_http://www.rense.com/general92/smullin.htm


This was in response to what Smullin told Lisa Guliani and Lisa published the interview. If you read the apology with your eyes open, you'll see that Patsy isn't really taking back what she said about Rense, she is rather carefully saying that she just regrets that it was published and caused her problems with Rense's atty breathing down her neck.

Like I said, Rense is trying to make the most of this poor guy Makow, turning on him, that he can... it's a plot to destroy him... like anybody really reads Makow? Like anybody takes the guy seriously with his anti-homosexual, anti-semitic rants?

Sheesh.

 

[Cosmos]

Jay Weidner was recently interviewed by Kerry Cassidy along with another guy called Anthony Sanchez.
I refused to watch it because I'm not in the right mood at the moment to hear a lot of pathology speaking......


__http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a36AhnP08o4&feature=g-all-u&context=G21f4252FAAAAAAAAAAA

Edit: spelling

 

[Guardian]

I think we should change the title of this thread to "Jeff Rense EXPOSED.. again, and again, and again"

If I recall correctly, the last time this agent was exposed, 100 meg Zip Drives were all the rage

 

[Joe]

O....M....G...

Rense is looking for 'love'....vegan or veggie-brained non-smokers, 36-43 (rense is 66!) to share in his life, his 5 acre ranch and his bizarre hair-doo.

http://rense.com/1.mpicons/jsrch.htm

"Our lady will be non-smoker, and who has no serious hidden emotional baggage or anger, repressed or otherwise."

Rense is a bit loopy, to say the least...

Who wants to be his 10th wife? Any takers?

 

[SeekinTruth]

Never know where you'll find the next hearty laughter.... :P

 

[JonnyRadar]

[quote author=_http://rense.com/1.mpicons/jsrch.htm]To participate is easy. Just email several current photos...portrait, casual and full body...of you having fun and being who you are...and a few paragraphs about yourself and why this 'event' is of interest. We will screen everything for Jeff and send along those who seem to resonate within our search parameters. Those Invited - if any - will receive an all expense paid weekend trip to gorgeous Ashland, Oregon. The 'winner/s' will have their own bedroom and private bath in a beautiful mountain home in a true storybook setting. Lots to do and see![/quote]

So this is like "The Bachelor" starring JR? Weird...

 

[Lilou]

OMG....this is too funny! Thanks for the belly laugh this morning.

 

[cassandra]

Come on ladies! Any "kind vegans" interested here?