Apologies if I have repeated any observations made elsewhere - I wrote this post before reading other replies to GreyCat's recent post.
GreyCat said:
If you notice, most of your rsponses are ripe with insults.
I read the same responses from Joe and I did not see any insults. I saw honest feedback with little or no 'noise'. Perhaps that's why it looked to you like insults.
GreyCat said:
Gurdjieff died Joe, he died of alcohol related health problems. If his philosophy was sound, had he really seen into who and what he was, would he not have prolonged his life?
Amazing! The great GreyCat knows better than one of the greatest masters who ever lived on this planet, what said master should or should not have done! How do you know what G would or would not have done? Do you have access to G's soul? You are presupposing that the goal of the work is to prolong the life of the body.
GreyCat said:
[Gurdjieff's] is an incomplete system.
It does appear, from a direct comparison with the work of Mouravieff, that what you say is true. However, the system that we have from Gurdjieff is given to us, not in G's own words, but in the words of Ouspensky recollecting what G said.
GreyCat said:
I was also exhausted from an groin pull several weeks earlier
I have to wonder - if you move your own body in such a way as to allow injuries, can you truly help someone else to move in a way that prevents them?
GreyCat said:
Joe said:
Joe: "It is interesting that you chose to respond with defensiveness rather than thinking about what I said to you. It is somewhat of a classic self-calming maneuver for someone to respond to something that someone sees in us by pointing out that "well, we all have these problems. If we all have these problems, then "there is no reason to highlight mine."
I fail to see how admitting that I also run my own programs is being defensive. I wrote: "We are all loaded with programs. There is no end to that assumption. What is to say you aren't running just different programs? I have never denied that I run programs. You just observe the program and eventually it falls away, to be replaced by a more effiecient program that you need to disect to reach a higher understanding"
I fail to see how you can so so stubbornly misunderstand what Joe is saying. He is correct - what you wrote
is a classic self-calming manoeuvre.
GreyCat said:
There is a reason that physical hardship is part of most spiritual practices (Including some of Gurdjueff's exercises I might add. He should have drank less and made better use of them.).
It seems you are desperate for physical immortality and self flagellation.
How do you know G didn't make the best possible use of his exercises or what G 'should' have done? You are judging G based on your own assumptions. You keep bringing everything back to the physical level, which leads me to wonder if you are an OP? Precisely what is the reason that physical hardship is part of most spiritual practice? You offer no evidence and this sounds like self-justifying waffle designed to impress others with your esoteric knowledge, something I have noticed in other posts you have written.
GreyCat said:
Wow Joe, and I suppose picasso's stuff was all just squiggly lines as well.
Yes it was and is, and most of his work is quite disturbing to look at for any length of time. Picasso had appalling notions about women. Did you know that at one time he 'branded' his current amour with a lighted cigarette?
GreyCat said:
Humor is very powerful, Joe, and it's sad to see you belittle both it and me. It makes you seem very cold.
I agree. Humour is very powerful. Joe isn't belittling humour - have you read any of his articles on SOTT? Joe has a wonderful sense of humour. He is belittling, if that is the right word, playing the clown, which is something completely different from humour.
GreyCat said:
Mundane...so very sad Joe that you can belittle someone so.
I don't see any belittling going here. Joe is giving you feedback without noise. You are trying to belittle and insult Joe, with whom you clearly have very strong personal issues.
GreyCat said:
And it's no small chore to ready body posture, eye contact, and general mood when interacting with somone.
This shocks me. You say that it's 'no small chore' for you to read body posture etc. Why would it be hard work for you? Could it be that you are so out of touch with your own body that you cannot read the bodies of others? I get a very strange sense of disconnection between what you do and what you say. You think of yourself as a great healer and benefactor of humanity and yet you cannot even read body postures and so on without it being hard work. Perhaps this is an assumption on my part, but I would expect someone who professes the ability to help another person, in the way you suggest you can, to have the ability to understand the body of another.
GreyCat, you come across as one consumed by self importance, who cannot take simple observation delivered with clarity and honesty, without reacting with bitterness and gall. It seems your screen name is well chosen, I can just see the grey cat spitting and hissing as the fireman tries to help it out of the tree.