Jordan Peterson: Gender Pronouns and Free Speech War

Once in awhile you get the side from individual Trans Activists who does not like what is going on:


Here was something said I was not aware of:

Smith, a 57-year-old child protection advocate, says frightening statistics from B.C. show that half of the 1,000 young patients seen by the province’s leading gender psychologist come from the foster system.

Here is a talk:



About 7.7% of all children in care in B.C. identify as transgender – extremely high considering only 1 in 300 in Canada consider themselves transgender.

She says that as a child of the foster system herself, she can understand how these kids might be looking for a new identity. Many suffer from autism, in addition to all kinds of psychological issues.

“A lot of these people come from difficult backgrounds and have psychological issues,” Smith said.

The trans activist has been speaking out about the dangers of trans ideology and the use of harmful pharmaceutical drugs on children for six years.

She has also fought B.C.’s Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) curriculum.

“Schools have romanticized the transgendered ideology while ignoring that kids (who transition) can end up sterilized for life,” she said.
 
Years ago I talked to a psychologist specialized in children. Basically what she said was that there are people (at that time we were talking about prostitution cartels) who subjected children to traumatic sexual experiences. The victims then, as a defense mechanism, internalize those practices and normalize them so that later they adopt that "lifestyle" as an imperative to protect their shattered psyche. I can't help but view this playing out at an unprecedented scale almost everywhere with the tacit encouragement of the PtB. There is a special place in hell for those who do this to children, including the parents who allow this to happen.
Quite literally, I think I expressed it earlier in this thread, but such influences can lead to a child grow into an adult who finds abuse pleasant and even desirable.
 
If there is an emergency, what is the first item SJWs put in their bag?
Their pronouns.

A comet wipes out an entire city. What do SJWs say?
"Comets have rights too."

A volcano erupts. What do SJWs infer?
"Vol/ca/no was offended!"

Three meters of snow fall in one day. What do SJWs conclude?
"Nature is racist!"

Inflation reaches new highs. What do SJWs worry about?
Discrimination against future prices.

The financial markets collapse. How do SJWs react?
They buy more neutral stocks.

A new virus spreads among the population. What do SJWs project?
Equality of outcome.
 
How can anyone stand in front of anyone else and say those words, specially a teacher...

If not mistaken, the education system is the initial influencer, the curriculum receivers, holders and gatekeepers. The initial focal point of child grooming is writ large on chalkboards and then passed along into society to those who will help make this pathology grow. It is already horrible in schools in many aspects, and if this is what they are saying now (is it sanctioned in curriculums?), God help our worlds children.

The fact that this thread exists boggles my mind, however because it exists and people like Mr. Peterson shone a light on it, it became a point of fact in society that can't be ignored when before it was a rarity. It boggles my mind that arguments are made into laws and flipped around philosophically - pulling in all sorts of rational and word play constructs to help justify, when the fact remains that mental illness is running rampant in society (and people will use mental illness to do what they are doing, use people up and make a buck on the side). I'm sorry for people who do not know who they are, for any trauma that may have pushed them into a sad mental place, for the help that should have been there and was not. For poor parenting and our more than obvious abject poor leadership. I'm furious that there even could be allowed a supply chain set-up that sees children placed upon a conveyor to be, as Peterson himself says, carved up. That is a stark statement, and today it stares us all in the face.

I don't know what to say; cry, scream - they are either doing it to a) see how far they can push society - to see how pliable and crazy people become in their acquiescence, or b) how violent people will become countering. They are already shutting down parents at school board meetings, associating whoever speaks out as a terrorists. Moreover, they have cut us off form each other; using media and their frightened journalist, using the debasement of medical oaths, civilization lockdowns, lack of food, inflation, poverty and exponential divides. If it is not macrosocial evil, I don't know what else it could be (hyperdimensional influences notwithstanding).

I try to stay optimistic that someone upstairs will get it, will Stand, and how hard is it for leadership to Stand; this will not be tolerated in our society, period, they easily could say. Would not the majority agree? It is pretty easy (look at Russia trying). But they don't say it, they don't stand. No, they seem to be unified, beyond decency and beyond true societal ethics and law - morally bankrupt and corrupt to the bone. Thus, sadly, and unless people start to gather their voices (and it won't be easy), it may be that this ☄️ will be the only universal law that will wake us up and unify and correct the course of those who may remain.
 
You will need a strong stomach to get through this horrifying article:


In at least two districts, the activists at Lurie Children’s Hospital also recommended that teachers offer a series of sexually explicit resources to children as young as 11. At the end of the “Beyond Binary” presentation circulated to teachers in District 75 and District 120, the hospital recommended a “Binder Exchange Program” to assist teenage girls in binding their breasts, a “kid friendly website for gender affirming gear,” which sells items such as artificial penis “packers” and female-to-male “trans masc pump,” and an “LGBTQ friendly sex shop for teens” that sells a range of “dildos,” “vibrators,” “harnesses,” “anal toys,” “trans-friendly toys,” and “kink & BDSM” equipment. The links include graphic descriptions of sadomasochism, bondage, pornography, and transgressive sex.

It just keeps getting worse and worse. I would definitely pull my kids out of school, arrange perhaps a group of kids to study at home together; it's high time parents took over the up-bringing of their kids permanently.

Edit: I don't know why this has lines through it, and I don't know how to fix it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You will need a strong stomach to get through this horrifying article:


In at least two districts, the activists at Lurie Children’s Hospital also recommended that teachers offer a series of sexually explicit resources to children as young as 11. At the end of the “Beyond Binary” presentation circulated to teachers in District 75 and District 120, the hospital recommended a “Binder Exchange Program” to assist teenage girls in binding their breasts, a “kid friendly website for gender affirming gear,” which sells items such as artificial penis “packers” and female-to-male “trans masc pump,” and an “LGBTQ friendly sex shop for teens” that sells a range of “dildos,” “vibrators,” “harnesses,” “anal toys,” “trans-friendly toys,” and “kink & BDSM” equipment. The links include graphic descriptions of sadomasochism, bondage, pornography, and transgressive sex.

It just keeps getting worse and worse. I would definitely pull my kids out of school, arrange perhaps a group of kids to study at home together; it's high time parents took over the up-bringing of their kids permanently.

Edit: I don't know why this has lines through it, and I don't know how to fix it!
enter the box for writing post, then 3 vertical dots and after that turn off icon with letter s and horizontal line.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220901_123036.jpg
    IMG_20220901_123036.jpg
    77.8 KB · Views: 3
It just keeps getting worse and worse. I would definitely pull my kids out of school, arrange perhaps a group of kids to study at home together; it's high time parents took over the up-bringing of their kids permanently.
I agree. It’s just institutionalized abuse and the ending won’t be pretty. I also agree that the only hope for humanity is in a sane group of people coming together to weather the coming changes.
 
b) how violent people will become countering.
I actually think this is probably going to be the outcome, sadly.

Because of how loud they are in their closed network, and Hollywood and publications and so on. They probably feel like they're being victorious, but the response will brew and eventually boil violently. And the trouble is that it has become so prevalent, the woke ideology that is, that people, feeling like they're backed into a corner will only lash out in violence.

And that is a perfect breeding ground for pathological leaders to come in and take advantage of that anger and start a new movement... and the cycle goes on and on.
 
I actually think this is probably going to be the outcome, sadly.
A violent backlash is possible. But it's hard to know if it's a likely scenario and in what context.

I'm thinking that if it's going to happen it'll likely be what comes after some initial period of serious economic stagnation and food shortages. If people start attacking their politicians over the fact that they can't work or eat, then they might also go after the people that supported the monsters whom they consider as being responsible for bringing this strife on them.
Because of how loud they are in their closed network, and Hollywood and publications and so on. They probably feel like they're being victorious, but the response will brew and eventually boil violently. And the trouble is that it has become so prevalent, the woke ideology that is, that people, feeling like they're backed into a corner will only lash out in violence.
Maybe. It's just that without a significant enough disruption to their daily life, such as facing starvation and prolonged unemployment, I just don't think masses of otherwise non-violent and well-adjusted people will spontaneously be violent.

Like, having a black, beardless, dwarf queen in a LOTR spin-off isn't going to make normal people wanna hurt someone. Though it does irk Tolkien fans such as myself greatly. Taking children away from parents who don't support the child's identity disorder, on the other hand, may cause some sparks. Though it'll have to be a pretty wide-spread policy and even then the wider context will have to be taken into consideration as well.
And that is a perfect breeding ground for pathological leaders to come in and take advantage of that anger and start a new movement... and the cycle goes on and on.
No disagreement here.
 
Like, having a black, beardless, dwarf queen in a LOTR spin-off isn't going to make normal people wanna hurt someone. Though it does irk Tolkien fans such as myself greatly. Taking children away from parents who don't support the child's identity disorder, on the other hand, may cause some sparks. Though it'll have to be a pretty wide-spread policy and even then the wider context will have to be taken into consideration as well.
I hear you there.

And you're right about the impact needing to be a lot closer to home for a backlash, although it seems like the woke policies are coming from the same place that the green agenda is coming from, and I do think that people will eventually make that connection, and that green agenda is slowly turning into policy, like it has in Canada and France and the Netherlands.

But you're correct, even in that scenario, it might not turn into a violent response from the people, some of that response might simply be in the results of elections.
 
Back
Top Bottom