Killary Clinton, The Donald, or Jill Stein: The US Election

[bjorb]

[quote author= bjorn]To them the Left/Elite are destroying the US through their greed and selling out to Muslims to destroy Western culture. In other words the Elites and Muslims are in cahoots, (''Just like how Nazi propaganda told how the German Elite sold out and were in cahoots with the Jews to destroy Germany'') [/quote]

Assange: Clinton & ISIS funded by same money, Trump won't be allowed to win (JOHN PILGER EXCLUSIVE)
https://www.rt.com/news/365299-assange-pilger-saudi-clinton/

Remember what the C's told us about wikileaks being cointelpro.

So why do they keep pointing out that Clinton (The Establishment &) ISIS are interconnected. This is of course true, but what is really their agenda behind it?


Here are some dangerous parallels, just replace the 'Jew problem' of the Nazis with the 'Muslim problem' propaganda of today :

Infowars and many other cointrolpro, extreme right Trump supporters keeps spinning it like the Muslim brotherhood has infiltrated the US and 'The Elite' are selling out to them. In cointelpro land, the US/Western World needs to be destroyed so that the UN can take over and form One World Government/dictatorship.

But for that to happen, Westerners need to lose their Christian Judaisms identity because only this can supposedly promote freedom. That's why according to them we are flooded with Muslim immigrants. To lose our Western identity and culture, So they can destroy our sense of 'freedom loving culture' Only then can the Elite call in an ever lasting dictatorship.

- But Trump will prevent this and ''Make America great again'' But the US/Western World needs to be cleansed first. Of the Elites, Muslims and immigrants.


Also Imagine when Trump will reveal that not only Muslims carried out 9/11, but that this was done with the help of 'The Elite.' (They alreadly are pointed out that 'The Elite' are in cahoots with ISIS) Imagine when not only Hillary will go to prison, but also Bush and a whole bunch of them. What other purpose do they serve anyhow since they are so hated upon.

And when Trump reveals 9/11, or at least a bit of it and spin it. This pressure that was looming over them is also gone and this energy is even directed in favor of the true PTB. I mean, if you look at certain polls. Many people believe that the government had some role in 9/11. And many people keep believing this.

Could it work to use 9/11 truth for global control. ? I think when executed perfectly, it can serve them very well. Allthough, to make it work it should be a global deception. It sounds problematic and extreme, but keep in mind that hysteria will become the new normal. Especially when the economy crashes, those Nukes the C's mentioned goes of and probably many more horrendous false flags. When hysteria takes over, things will escalate very quickly and people can be easily molded and manipulated by a strong Leader trying to 'save' them.


Besides, did we really thought that 4STS will follow some easily foreseen playbook to get global control. They know how to give a show, and this will be their last and final. Nazi Germany was a trail run after all. The real show is about to start.

Nothing scares me more at the moment than to think about the possibility that the Inauguration of Trump will be the inauguration of the Fourth Reich. There are only a few days left.


Quote from Assange:

https://www.rt.com/news/365299-assange-pilger-saudi-clinton/
''My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment,” said Assange. “Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.''


[quote author= 12 December 2010]Q: (L) Our next question is about Julian Assange and Wikileaks. Is Wikileaks what it presents itself to be? A grassroots, document leaking organization formed by a bunch of activist hackers and so forth?

A: It was briefly.

Q: (L) You say it was briefly; that means it was probably co-opted fairly early on. So, can you tell us if Julian Assange is an agent?

A: This is a question that you have already answered.

Q: (L) What I mean is, is he consciously an agent?

A: To some extent, yes. But remember programming of both the human and 4D varieties.

Q: (Perceval) Is it true that he had that meeting with the Israelis to agree that he would not release damaging documents about them?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And what is the objective of this Sideshow?

A: You guessed it this afternoon; preparation to accept global control. Or so it is planned.

Q: (L) I guess that means it may or may not turn out the way they expect?

A: It will get close. But remember the ”X” factor.

Q: (L) What is the X factor?

A: Earth changes.[/quote]

 

[Cosmos]

With people like Assange saying that Trump can't win against Killary, more people will probably think "I have to vote/support Trump" and will probably do so, in order to stick it to the establishment. So maybe that is reason behind Assange and Co. saying stuff like that?

 

[Cosmos]

With people like Assange saying that Trump can't win against Killary, more people will probably think "I have to vote/support Trump" and will probably do so, in order to stick it to the establishment. So maybe that is reason behind Assange and Co. saying stuff like that?

I guess the same applies to the supposed "leak" of the election results, that shows Killary will win. It will probably have the same effect.

 

[Aeneas]

Re: Presidential election 2016: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

This guy makes the case that the Elite had wanted Trump all along. Perhaps that is true or partially true as it could also be a late plan or it could show that there are power struggles within the ruling elite.
_http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-02/why-us-presidential-election-has-entire-world-confused

Pretty much what I've been saying. And notice I compared Trump to the Hitler "clown" scenario VERY early in this thread. Everybody was calling him a clown, all the conservative authorities were against him, but he won anyway and only afterward, did people learn by inference from the process of history, that Hitler was WANTED by all of them to do what he did.

Yes, I actually thought of you when I found this, precisely because you voiced the same thing a little while back. We, the sheeple might have been led to willingly and consciously back a new Hitler, though the choice between Trump or Killary never was a real choice. Reminds me of Obama's slogan in 2008 which was something about being the man with "change we can believe in".

 

[Yozilla]

This whole soap drama of SuperTrump The Businessman Our Savior reminds me of former major of Split who is also quite colorful dude. After first mandate he was running for second (of course) and will be remembered pulling his trump PR card - he actually landed a slice of smoked ham on his forehead. Also attentive observers shall notice a kind of similar dedication for picking a hair style - in a kind of abstract manner

 

[aragorn]

In case someone has missed the latest Wikileaks leak on 'Podesta emails' that's going viral, check out #spiritcooking. It's now the no. 1 trending thing on Twitter. Seems like Podesta et al. are into weird "satanism" practices. I see this is also published on SOTT, have a look:

https://www.sott.net/article/333042-Sickos-Wikileaks-reveals-Podesta-bros-participate-in-disturbing-occult-themed-spirit-cooking-involving-copious-bodily-fluids

At the very least, this seems to get peoples attention - people are (re)tweeting this like crazy.

 

[mabar]

In case someone has missed the latest Wikileaks leak on 'Podesta emails' that's going viral, check out #spiritcooking. It's now the no. 1 trending thing on Twitter. Seems like Podesta et al. are into weird "satanism" practices. I see this is also published on SOTT, have a look:

https://www.sott.net/article/333042-Sickos-Wikileaks-reveals-Podesta-bros-participate-in-disturbing-occult-themed-spirit-cooking-involving-copious-bodily-fluids

At the very least, this seems to get peoples attention - people are (re)tweeting this like crazy.

That was just sickening and disgusting .... if you want to be cleared of those images, this is a good laugh: Today's Electoral Map from Pepe Escobar FB _https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154592270916678&set=a.10150294029661678.381794.775051677&type=3&theater

 

[seek10]

In case someone has missed the latest Wikileaks leak on 'Podesta emails' that's going viral, check out #spiritcooking. It's now the no. 1 trending thing on Twitter. Seems like Podesta et al. are into weird "satanism" practices. I see this is also published on SOTT, have a look:

https://www.sott.net/article/333042-Sickos-Wikileaks-reveals-Podesta-bros-participate-in-disturbing-occult-themed-spirit-cooking-involving-copious-bodily-fluids

At the very least, this seems to get peoples attention - people are (re)tweeting this like crazy.

It's becoming bizare during these last days. It seems some rape victim of Trump is going to make a public statement soon.

 

[Woodsman]

Re: Presidential election 2016: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

If Trump wins, such social engineering could instead be used to accelerate any plans toward eliminating Semitic blood lines. -If he buys into that narrative.

Woodsman, I know you're just speculating, but please try to have at least some reality in your speculations. Why would Trump "buy into" eliminating Semitic blood lines? Do you know that his own daughter married a Jewish man and converted to Judaism?

"Semite" means a great deal more than "Jew".

I assumed that was generally accepted knowledge around here, but I can understand why clarification might have been needed given the charged nature of the term.

Not really. "Eliminating Semites" includes Jews, unless you meant only Muslim Semites.

It's been a while since I read "Secret History", but the impression I recall coming away with (and please somebody correct me if I am wrong here), was that the DNA which 4D was eager to stamp out due to its incompatibility with their plans, and which was carried by the Jews, had through history been spread far and wide throughout much of the Arab world and while concentrated among many Jewish populations, was not exclusive to just people of that religion.

My thought was that during WWII, the people carrying these genes in Germany and the countries immediately within military reach were largely Jews and so were targeted, but that Germany and Europe didn't have a great deal of population integration with other people broadly understood as "Arab".

Perhaps I am mistaken, but I had assumed that much of the push by the West to annihilate everybody in the Middle East was drawn from the same source of inspiration that drove the Nazi machine, to "mop up" the rest of this DNA, as it were.

 

[Carl]

Here are some dangerous parallels, just replace the 'Jew problem' of the Nazis with the 'Muslim problem' propaganda of today :

Infowars and many other cointrolpro, extreme right Trump supporters keeps spinning it like the Muslim brotherhood has infiltrated the US and 'The Elite' are selling out to them. In cointelpro land, the US/Western World needs to be destroyed so that the UN can take over and form One World Government/dictatorship.

But for that to happen, Westerners need to lose their Christian Judaisms identity because only this can supposedly promote freedom. That's why according to them we are flooded with Muslim immigrants. To lose our Western identity and culture, So they can destroy our sense of 'freedom loving culture' Only then can the Elite call in an ever lasting dictatorship.

- But Trump will prevent this and ''Make America great again'' But the US/Western World needs to be cleansed first. Of the Elites, Muslims and immigrants.

Exactly. The Right have it completely backwards. And the Left just have it upside-down, not-even-wrong.

What you described below the quoted bit does sound plausible, especially given the C's warning that Hitler was just a 'trial run'.

But I don't know, maybe they are not so clever to plan another Nazi scenario. Analysing from a more 3D perspective, maybe the more accurate explanation is, they just want to create chaos. Look at how perfectly everything is set up to just create chaos and division. They are reaaally pushing it. Hitting all of those hot buttons over and over and over.

Trump vs Clinton is the ultimate epitome of this. Assuming all of this is planned in some way, I often wondered why they couldn't pick better, more reasonable candidates. But the truth is, these 2 candidates are absolutely perfect.

In the eyes of the left, trump is the ultimate Right Wing Bad Guy. Racist, homophobic, against the Muslims, extremely inflammatory in speech, anti-immigration, anti-abortion. He's a rich white man, the Patriarchy personified, he is coming to get you, and all your brown and muslim friends, and there will be no trigger warnings.

And in the eyes of the right, Hillary is the opposite. Totally for all the social welfare, liberal values, she's gonna open our borders and let the horde roam in, she's gonna put a gay couple on a street corner near you. And she's a woman for gods sake! She's an agent of the Muslims, and she's coming to get you.

Among the mass-shootings, the police brutality, and the never-ending war of terror, it's a perfect recipe for chaos.

The only sticking point is: Hillary is so obviously polished, sleazy and conniving, and many see the truth that she is nothing but a lizard essence in human skin. Let's not even start on the health problems. So many who otherwise would not vote for Trump, are going to vote for Trump. Was that also planned? Or did the elite really not see that coming, in all of their wishful thinking?


EDIT: Oh yeah she's also now outed as basically a devil worshipper as well.

 

[Neil]

I thought this election was just going to be mainly more smoke and mirrors for distractions, with the esoteric agenda only indirectly involved in the background, but this "spirit cooking" thing definitely leads one to consider the STS walk-in idea. I wonder if Trump is involved in similar things. It's just totally bizarre. I casually knew some people who were into some Wicca spellcasting stuff, but never anything like drinking blood and semen.

As for the "this is not a normal election" remark, I think the candidates were acknowledging that America is at a crossroads and a crisis of civilization. If Hillary wins, the momentum would have her wage an all or nothing war against Russia. The faction of the establishment who supports her has literally gambled the entire future of the imperial project on Russia backing down and giving up or being beaten into submission. If that fails, America fades into irrelevance. If Trump wins, he must rally the people behind him, rebuilding America's nationalist pride, and then after brokering some sort of imperialist renaissance/economic revival, go out and prove to the world why America is the greatest. If Trump can't get the people to believe in the empire again, and get it to function well enough to maintain its position as a superpower, then America fades into irrelevance and the imperial project fails. The American people are aware of this at some level "something has to give" and the candidates' primary intention was to address that in order to garner support. Hillary probably knows more about future plans than she let on, but I don't think she was letting this slip when she made that comment. Since she appears to have fallen out of favor now, it really makes one question how much she actually knows because I don't see a psychopath like her being a willing fall guy. I don't think Trump knows much of anything, he probably thinks he can be some kind of Hollywood hero and save the country while the Quorum manipulates his emotions to make him twirl and dance beautifully to their agenda.

I don't know if Trump has the right constitution for 4D STS to turn him into Emperor Palpatine. It seems like they would primarily go after people with a great deal of intellectual capacity and some psychic ability to be able to seat themselves in this reality and dominate it. Trump almost seems weak from that perspective, but perhaps his position of ceremonial influence would offset this and make it worthwhile. Then again, the smarter you are, the harder you are to control; only the overlords can "afford" the really good bodies.

 

[Jtucker]

The "spiritual cooking" element is getting a lot of traction - in Canada anyway. None of the private server, State Department legality or non-legality doesn't really get a lot of mainstream news coverage. What I'm getting out of my American friends is that no matter who wins, is that there is a feeling that there might be civil unrest going to chaos and /or resistance either way. If Trump loses, it's a rigged election. If Killary loses then the racist, xenophobes have won.

I think, either way, this is the beginning of the collapse of an empire. If these two are the best you have to produce from your "democratic" system of 300 million people, then you are in a lot of trouble.

As much as the Russian angle of McCarthyism is coming out daily on CNN, I don't think it's really sticking. Putin has been consistent on everything he's said since long before he was an "enemy" of the U.S. I don't think this has been completely ignored with the American public.

-http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/25/poll-americans-like-vladimir-putin-more-than-clinton-trump/

I think if you go through the Wikileaks hacked emails of Houma and Killary, regardless of the official criminality, there is a complete world of "wishful thinking". Notice how none of them mention the human cost of their actions, they only correspond about profit and power. I think this is STS action on the high level. The joke in NYC is that you can stand on the balcony of a Park Ave condo and everything you can see with binoculars equals the GDP of Russia. I don't know if that's true, but when I've been there, it sure feels like it.

"They" probably are drinking blood and killing the innocent as C's have alluded to in their description of STS - 4D. I wish that wasn't true, but it becomes clearer everyday with actual news items. Trump has no constitution to be anything close to STO. He's a dirtbag, racist Jersey real estate developer. But does he have the unpredictable, self-centered STS mentality to screw the whole system - maybe. I see the American political system as a slow collapse that becomes more degraded and disgusting on a slow burn. The elements that "Murica" has thought were dead are re-viving - from our Northern point of view - the Sioux/Dakota nation is at least trying to re-establish sovereignty.

http://www.carbonated.tv/viral/herds-of-wild-buffalo-join-standing-rock-protestors

There weren't enough bullets produced by Winchester or Remington to kill all the herds.

 

[Cosmos]

[...]So many who otherwise would not vote for Trump, are going to vote for Trump. Was that also planned? Or did the elite really not see that coming, in all of their wishful thinking?
[...]

[...]

I think if you go through the Wikileaks hacked emails of Houma and Killary, regardless of the official criminality, there is a complete world of "wishful thinking". [...]

The above is also what I'm wondering. How much of what we see is really "planned" in the way normal people usually think of planning? I'm currently reading "the secret team", and from what I get so far, it seems like that most of what was done even back in the days when the original book was written (70ies), is a self propelling STS machine, with a lot of wishfull thinking involved, that basically runs amok on its own, when there is nobody in the position to do so, that actually says "no". From the outside and even from the inside, it can appear like very elaborate and mischievous planning operations are going on, but it might be just the opposite.

The original draft of the book was written around 1972 I think and was later updated by L. Fletcher Prouty in 1992 and 1997, a couple of years before his death just before 9/11.

Here are some relevant excerpts from the book. First what the term "secret team means":

The "Secret Team" -- The Real Power Structure

For the purposes of this historical study, the choice of the word "Team" is most significant.
It is well known that the members of a team, as in baseball or football, are skilled professionals under the direct control of someone higher up. They do not create their own game plan. They work for their coach and their owner.
There is always some group that manages them and "calls the plays". Team members are like lawyers and agents, they work for someone. They generally do not plan their work.

[...]

So "the secret team" (the shadow people that influence the policies and actions of the government) is just a team, and above it are higher controls. Notice the last sentence above.

Now more about that secret team and how they work and think:

Thus, the Secret Team is not a clandestine super-planning-board or super-general-staff. But even more damaging to the coherent conduct of foreign and military affairs, it is a bewildering collection of semi-permanent or temporarily assembled action committees and networks that respond pretty much ad hoc to specific troubles and to flash-intelligence data inputs from various parts of the world, sometimes in ways that duplicate the activities of regular American missions, sometimes in ways that undermine those activities, and very often in ways that interfere with and muddle them.

[...]

Such events -- and there have been so many during the past fifteen to twenty years – show how easily intelligence becomes clandestine operations, and how clandestine operations are usually the result of a reaction or a response mechanism and are not a part of any planning or policy.

[...]

One of the most significant aspects of ST work is its control of operational planning by need-to-know secrecy. And as we stated earlier, such control seriously limits the level of competency that can be brought to a major operation such as the Bay of Pigs.

[...]

One of the really secret techniques of the ST is to cellularize and play by ear the development of some scheme. It would be hard to say that they planned it that way, because one of the things that the Team understands and practices the least is planning.

So assuming that the secret team is just the team on the ground for higher "elites", and they do not really plan what they do (at least in the way we would think of planning), then that begs the question how much actual planning is involved in higher echelons of power. When we assume that wishful thinking is the main criterium of that STS structure and that it becomes more pronounced the higher you go up in that network, then the question arises how much of it is even more "STS wishful thinking run amok", the higher you go up?

In other words: When even "the secret team" is defined by a lack of planning capability (long term planning I think), then how much worse is that actually at the stages higher up that secrecy ladder, at the level of the "coach" and the "owner"?

 

[Woodsman]

[...]So many who otherwise would not vote for Trump, are going to vote for Trump. Was that also planned? Or did the elite really not see that coming, in all of their wishful thinking?
[...]

[...]

One of the really secret techniques of the ST is to cellularize and play by ear the development of some scheme. It would be hard to say that they planned it that way, because one of the things that the Team understands and practices the least is planning.

So assuming that the secret team is just the team on the ground for higher "elites", and they do not really plan what they do (at least in the way we would think of planning), then that begs the question how much actual planning is involved in higher echelons of power. When we assume that wishful thinking is the main criterium of that STS structure and that it becomes more pronounced the higher you go up in that network, then the question arises how much of it is even more "STS wishful thinking run amok", the higher you go up?

In other words: When even "the secret team" is defined by a lack of planning capability (long term planning I think), then how much worse is that actually at the stages higher up that secrecy ladder, at the level of the "coach" and the "owner"?

I think you're spot on with these observations, Pashalis.

The impression I get is that this recent shift of focus from Hillary to Trump within (at least some of) the halls of power was a rather scrambled together and very recent reactionary move. -Possibly to her being ill, or more power hungry than predicted, or simply because everybody on her staff is sick of her crap, -as well as seeing where the wind is blowing. Maybe some of the establishment is genuinely swayed by Trump's speeches. Who really knows?

However, the population when assembled in groups (as described by Gustave le Bon in "The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind"), is like a discrete being run entirely on lower brain impulses. Mob psychology applies. -I think this might also be observed today across social media in some similar form.

In any case, from a 4D perspective, I wonder if it might not be possible to inhabit such a 'being' and direct its movements and thoughts in a manner similar to, if not exactly alike, the way it is able to inhabit and direct a single individual?

So what might seem the chaotic actions of a 'Secret Team' which can't get itself together enough to even write its own plot effectively, might be rather more deliberately controlled from 4D. This turnabout of elitist support may have little to do with what the black hats in 3D think they want and more to do with what 4D was has been putting together all along. -Bearing in mind that in 4D, it's all happening "now" and has been since the beginning of this cycle.

 

[Windmill knight]

According to Fox News, an indictment against Hillary was "likely". You can see the video on the link. The Independent adds that the reports were debunked. However, on the article all they say is that the FBI declined to comment:

_http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-indictment-clinton-foundation-fox-news-donald-trump-us-election-2016-a7395666.html

Fox News claimed that an indictment is "likely" for Hillary Clinton in the alleged "pay-for-play" scandal surrounding the Clinton Foundation.

The reports remain unverified, as Fox News has continued to call Ms Clinton's credibility into question.

Anchor Brett Baier claimed that "barring some obstruction in some way" that the FBI will pursue an indictment for the Democratic presidential nominee.

A spokesperson for the FBI declined to comment, citing Bureau policy.

The FBI came under fire last week for the timing of director James Comey's announcement that investigators discovered a new trove of possibly pertinent emails linked to a previous investigation into Ms Clinton's use of a private server – only 11 days before the presidential election.

But agents in the New York field office wanted to keep a separate investigation into alleged corruption within the Clinton Foundation alive, according to the Wall Street Journal. The agents were reportedly in preliminary stages of examining allegations of conflicts of interest and corruption that surrounded the charitable organisation during Ms Clinton's time as Secretary of State.

Still, public integrity section investigators – who are not political appointees – did not find that the FBI have strong evidence for a case against Ms Clinton.

It remains unclear if the anonymous agents in the WSJ report are the same sources who spoke to Fox News.

The news station has been a major proponent of Donald Trump's candidacy – despite friction with anchor Megyn Kelly stemming from Mr Trump's sexist remarks directed at her. The network's top pundit, Sean Hannity, has actively supported the Republican candidate.

This other article says the Fox anchor "stepped back" his claims. There is also some hearsay about how they are really not close to an indictment.

_http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-indictment-clinton-foundation-fox-news-us-election-2016-a7397956.html

Hillary Clinton FBI indictment story reported by Fox News widely debunked

FBI agents based much of their preliminary investigation on a book publicised by far-right website Breitbart

Claims that an FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation would ‘likely’ lead to charges against Hillary Clinton were widely debunked after Fox News first reported the story.

Several news outlets took Fox anchor Bret Baier to task, as he later stepped back his claims that criminal charges were in store for the former Secretary of State, saying he spoke “inartfully”.

The FBI has dominated news cycles for the past week, as the Bureau’s rift with the Department of Justice becomes public fodder. Director James Comey came under fire from both Republicans and Democrats for announcing further inquiry into Ms Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time in the State Department, following the apparent discovery of “pertinent” emails on longtime aide Huma Abedin’s computer.

The timing of Mr Comey’s announcement – a break in protocol as it was made 11 days before the election – has been criticised as a politically motivated attack on the Clinton campaign.

Baier’s report added to the ferocity of an already hostile election.

FBI agents rooted their investigation into the apparent “pay-for-play” scandal involving the Clinton Foundation, wherein Ms Clinton was said to afford special access to high-level donors while Secretary of State. The agents based their preliminary investigation on the controversial book Clinton Cash, according to NBC’s Pete Williams.

Mr Williams added there was no investigation that matched Fox News’ claims.

“There really isn’t one,” Mr Williams told Chuck Todd on Thursday. “Few [FBI officials] want to call it an investigation. That’s a term of art in the FBI. There was an initial inquiry that was opened a couple months ago based largely on media reports and a book called Clinton Cash.”

"The idea that indictments are near or something like that," he said, "I'm told that's just not true."

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow pointed out the book was heavily promoted by far-right website Breitbart – for whom Trump campaign CEO Stephen Bannon served as chief executive.

One FBI source told ABC news that the agents’ presentation of their findings against Ms Clinton was “not impressive”.

“I was not something that [prosecutors] felt they could authorise additional steps for,” the official said. “They were not impressed with the presentation or the evidence – if you could even call it evidence at that point.”

And last but not least, alleged child sex abuse victim of Trump was going to hold a press conference but cancelled due to threats:

_http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/donald-trump-child-rape-victim-speaks-out-13-year-old-jane-doe-accusations-allegations-sexual-a7394356.html

Donald Trump child sex abuse claims: Woman who accused Trump of raping her at 13 to speak for first time

Lawyers for "Jane Doe" have said the Republican nominee will see his day in court

Update, 2 November, 6.12pm ET: Jane Doe cancelled the press conference citing "great fear" after receiving "terrible threats", per attorney Lisa Bloom.

The woman who accused Donald Trump of child sex abuse is expected to speak out for the first time since filing a lawsuit against the Republican presidential nominee.

Mr Trump has faced numerous sexual assault allegations following the release of audio that captured him bragging about groping and kissing women without their consent. In the last month of his presidential campaign, Mr Trump was accused of sexual misconduct by nearly a dozen women.

First reported over the summer, Jane Doe alleges that Mr Trump raped her at a 1994 party at a New York apartment belonging to Jeffrey Epstein – a billionaire investor convicted of soliciting an underage prostitute in 2008.

She is expected to hold a press conference in Los Angeles Wednesday afternoon.

"More than four months ago a woman using the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' sued DT for a series of sexual assaults that she alleges occurred at parties in New York in 1994. Jane Doe was just 13 years old at the time," a statement from the law offices of Lisa Bloom, who is now representing the accuser, reads. " Jane Doe will break her silence today and speak out about her allegations."

Cheney Mason, an attorney who represented Jane Doe, filed a complaint in New York court and said that Mr Trump will have to face these allegations while under oath.

"This case, based on the sworn declarations of the victim and two corroborating witnesses, will be tried in court, where the defendants will be required to answer questions under oath and pursuant to the rules of evidence," Mr Mason said in a statement.

Mr Mason filed two witness statements on behalf of women identified as Joan Doe and Tiffany Doe in support of the New York businessman's accuser.

Joan Doe said that Jane Doe shared her accounts of the alleged assault a few months after she said they occurred between 1994 and 1995, according to court documents.

Tiffany Doe claims she acted as a "recruiter" to find young women and girls for Epstein's apartment parties. She claims to have witnessed Mr Trump rape the accuser multiple times.

Mr Trump has vigorously denied the claims.

"The allegations are reckless, irresponsible and categorically untrue," said his attorney, Alan Garten.

Additionally, Mr Garten called the allegations "an obvious publicity stunt aimed at smearing my client".

For his part, Mr Trump disavowed the numerous sexual assault allegations that surfaced against him from the campaign trail.

"These claims are all fabricated. They're pure fiction and they're outright lies. These events never, ever happened," he told supporters at a 13 October rally in Florida. "These vicious claims about me of inappropriate conduct with women are totally and absolutely false."

Jeffrey Epstein, btw, is reported to have organized sex parties in his private island with underaged boys and girls for members of the elite, which apparently included Bill Clinton himself. This would explain why the Clinton campaign has not exploited the rape case vs Trump - cause they may end up in trouble themselves.

The things that are coming out in the context of the election campaigns are like a competition to see who is more evil and disgusting. A sign of an empire in the process of collapse, no doubt. How can anything good come out of this election? Except if both parties are so badly exposed that the whole US political system crumbles and people are forced to create something new out of the rubble. But even if so, it is not going to get any better before it gets worse, I think.