angelburst29 said:What if ... "the big miscalculation" ... turns out to be "a tie" between both Candidates?
Don't see how that would expose the "man behind the curtain". That's already being done in a BIG way.
angelburst29 said:What if ... "the big miscalculation" ... turns out to be "a tie" between both Candidates?
Laura said:angelburst29 said:What if ... "the big miscalculation" ... turns out to be "a tie" between both Candidates?
Don't see how that would expose the "man behind the curtain". That's already being done in a BIG way.
In an presidential election campaign that has had virtually every possible surprise, only one thing was missing: a terrorist attack.
Alas, even that may be on the horizon because as CBS News reported moments ago, the news station has learned about a potential terror threat for the day before the election: "Sources say U.S. intelligence has alerted joint terrorism task forces that al-Qeada could be planning attacks in three states for Monday.
CBS adds that it is believed New York, Texas and Virginia are all possible targets, though no specific locations are mentioned.
A senior FBI official told CBS News, ““The counterterrorism and homeland security communities remain vigilant and well-postured to defend against attacks here in the United States. The FBI, working with our federal, state and local counterparts, shares and assesses intelligence on a daily basis and will continue to work closely with law enforcement and intelligence community partners to identify and disrupt any potential threat to public safety.” During holiday seasons and when big events are approaching, intelligence about potential threats always increases.
While CBS tried to moderate the warning by noting that the "sources stress the intelligence is still being assessed and its credibility hasn’t been confirmed, but counterterrorism officials were alerted to the threat out of abundance of caution", such a threat may lead to a depressed turnout in these three states and potentially impact the outcome of the presidential election.
They might have threatened to kill him and/or his family.artofdream said:https://www.rt.com/usa/365568-fbi-charges-clinton-emails/
This just came an hour ago, while I was checking the news. Wonder what bargain or event happened to convince the FBI director ;)
#art
griffin said:They might have threatened to kill him and/or his family.artofdream said:https://www.rt.com/usa/365568-fbi-charges-clinton-emails/
This just came an hour ago, while I was checking the news. Wonder what bargain or event happened to convince the FBI director ;)
#art
Despite wikileaks leaks, initially FBI said "nothing to see here" until late October. Suddenly FBI goes behind Hillary and All the MSM and every body seems to be covering and now he drops it?. When FBI went behind Hillary, it looked some high disagreement between PTB and Hillary for what ever reason. Now nothing?. Probably damage is already done with just one day left.Puck said:griffin said:They might have threatened to kill him and/or his family.artofdream said:https://www.rt.com/usa/365568-fbi-charges-clinton-emails/
This just came an hour ago, while I was checking the news. Wonder what bargain or event happened to convince the FBI director ;)
#art
Seeing this story all over my feed from the Hillbots, and this was my first thought. Just like Bernie, they likely threatened to kill him or have some other dirt on him. There's so much smoke and hot air floating around now it's really difficult to determine what's going on.
I was suspecting the same. out of 2 candidates, only clinton can benefit, if any. Probably shock of it may erase all the email scandals Hillary is under. But that can backfire, as people are under democrats for 8 years and there is no sign of reduced terrorism. Probably they are betting on changing the trajectory with the shock.Puck said:This is also interesting, another dot on the radar:
_http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-04/us-intel-warns-possible-al-qaeda-terrorist-attack-targeting-ny-texas-and-virginia-mo
In an presidential election campaign that has had virtually every possible surprise, only one thing was missing: a terrorist attack.
Alas, even that may be on the horizon because as CBS News reported moments ago, the news station has learned about a potential terror threat for the day before the election: "Sources say U.S. intelligence has alerted joint terrorism task forces that al-Qeada could be planning attacks in three states for Monday.
CBS adds that it is believed New York, Texas and Virginia are all possible targets, though no specific locations are mentioned.
A senior FBI official told CBS News, ““The counterterrorism and homeland security communities remain vigilant and well-postured to defend against attacks here in the United States. The FBI, working with our federal, state and local counterparts, shares and assesses intelligence on a daily basis and will continue to work closely with law enforcement and intelligence community partners to identify and disrupt any potential threat to public safety.” During holiday seasons and when big events are approaching, intelligence about potential threats always increases.
While CBS tried to moderate the warning by noting that the "sources stress the intelligence is still being assessed and its credibility hasn’t been confirmed, but counterterrorism officials were alerted to the threat out of abundance of caution", such a threat may lead to a depressed turnout in these three states and potentially impact the outcome of the presidential election.
Could just be hot air, or perhaps the Clinton-backing intelligence community is somehow betting that another false-flag is just what is needed to secure a win for her. Frankly I don't see how a false-flag could help her cause, but given the discussion about a big miscalculation revealing the man behind the curtain I thought it could be relevant.
Joe said:Then, before the FBI can possibly have thoroughly scrutinized the 650,000 potentially incriminating new emails, he says "nothing to see here".
NormaRegula said:Just saw this headline and story from the Washington Post newspaper: FBI Director Comey Says Agency Won't Recommend Charges Over Clinton's Email. Article says members of Congress were notified a few hours ago.
_https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-director-comey-says-agency-wont-recommend-charges-over-clinton-email/2016/11/06/f6276b18-a45e-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html#comments
Perhaps the Clinton Machine got to him. Very strange timing all around.
A forum thread was created while I was posting: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,43032.0/topicseen.html
Beorn said:Maybe that was the plan all along. Appear to be concerned about truth and justice and give the impression that Hillary has to follow the same rules as everyone else. Then a few days later come out and say "It's all Ok. We checked it out and there's nothing to see here." Hillary gets some sympathy and those who have used WikiLeaks to condemn Hillary are discredited.
With the election so close they had to speed through the "investigation". From what I'm hearing on the MSM today they're buying it, as expected.
On the other side those who do want the truth to come out are given false hope and then betrayed. Comey's revealed his hand so maybe the powers that be are sticking with Killary for pres.