Killary Clinton, The Donald, or Jill Stein: The US Election

Aeneas said:
Is this an omen?

What do you mean by an omen, and of what do you think it might be one? I would have thought that a 'large scale' omen would usually be seen or heard about by a lot of people.
 
Alana said:
Scottie said:
I'm still wondering how we went from a wobbly-kneed, zoning out, incoherent-at-times, freaky-faced Killary to a totally "normal" looking and sounding Killary during the debates. That was quite a miraculous recovery...

Maybe not, because I just happened upon this video, from last night (Monday) apparently:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/10593/heres-video-hillary-staggering-eve-election-james-barrett

Bloomberg Politics correspondent Jennifer Epstein posted a video of Hillary Clinton getting off her "Stronger Together" airplane in Philadelphia on Monday that's gone viral. As the presidential frontrunner walked to the motorcade vehicle, she appeared to be staggering, Bill having to steady her as she crossed the tarmac
.


Was just thinking how dementia might not be a problem for those that covertly pull the strings. In fact you've got a more pliable puppet and a great distraction and excuse if and when things get too exposed. The puppet need only be propped up long enough for the next false flag so the wheels continue to be set in motion to deal with Russia and China asserting their sovereignty.
 
Would Newsweek have put the cash into this if they thought there was any doubt?
 

Attachments

  • newsweek.jpg
    newsweek.jpg
    409.1 KB · Views: 203
Joe said:
Would Newsweek have put the cash into this if they thought there was any doubt?

Holy Crum. The PTB don't even care if the curtain is pushed aside to show the man behind it. They are that arrogant.

Ugh. Turned on CNN for a few minutes and the pundits are sayings Clinton's in the lead and will win. Not that I'm surprised what with Soros voting machines and certain election officials probably helping her along. I'm going to cringe every time I see Killary's gloating face and hear her shrill voice while the MSM acts as a Greek Chorus and refuses to find fault with her antics. Ain't no way justice will be served to this witch once she gets into the Whitehouse. I doubt if the opposition will impeach her unless they want to be politically marginalized or added to the kill list. Argh.
 
Joe said:
Would Newsweek have put the cash into this if they thought there was any doubt?
Hey, let's not give up hope! As zerohedge illustrated in their write-up of it, a stooge president from the mid-20th century got to have the last laugh in a similar situation:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-07/newsweek-calls-it-madam-president-clinton-hits-shelves-due-business-decision

dewey%20defeats%20truman.jpg


plus it could all just be another part of the grand psy-op...
 
meta-agnostic said:
Joe said:
Would Newsweek have put the cash into this if they thought there was any doubt?
plus it could all just be another part of the grand psy-op...
Well this is a good point. If the grand scheme is a world gov't. out in the open - whoever wins this US election could be the chump who gets to take a fall in some way when they pull the plug on Amurrica.
 
Killary as president will only enlighten more anti-establishment sentiment.

Do the PTB don't care about that? Or do they need more anti-establishment sentiment to create a climate where a new Hitler can flourish?

I don't know. 60% of Americans don't vote. Maybe it's just because the majority of them is not upset with the system. They are just far to busy chasing Pokemon. Or whatever soulless endeavor they keep themselves busying with.

Anyhow, it will be interesting to observe how the American public will react with Killary as president.

If people don't get upset by the system now. I don't know what will.


Maybe to many people in the Western World have a far to comfortable life to ever revolt. They simply can't look beyond their own lives because they simply don't care. Which makes it kind of scary to think about what empty shells such as those people will do when their comfortable lives are taken away when the economy goes under. They don't care about others or the World, but they sure will be angry and looking for someone to blame when that happens.

Point is, I suppose that any anti-establishment ''revolution'' can only succeed when many Westerners lose their comfortable lives. 'Color revolutions' can only happen with mass unemployment, massive economic crisis etc..?

Things are bad now, but we haven't reach the bottom quite yet..?
 
Very interesting article on Katehon:

http://katehon.com/article/clinton-war-trump-freedom

Seems that Russia finally open said whom they want for the US president. Don't forget that Katehon is officially owned by Russian ministry of telecommunications.
 
Bill Clinton was on the stage in Philadelphia last night, but he didn’t look like he was all there.

As both Chelsea Clinton and Michelle Obama spoke, the former president appeared spaced out, frequently chewing on his tongue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diVIFiecFkk (1:57 min.)
 
Avala said:
BTW, Google is the fastest on the results:

https://www.google.rs/?gws_rd=cr&ei=rX8iWOr3FYPDgAbei4n4AQ#q=us+election

For now, Trump is in the lead with 137 seats to Clinton's 104 seats... But the night is still young.

bjorn said:
Maybe to many people in the Western World have a far to comfortable life to ever revolt. They simply can't look beyond their own lives because they simply don't care. Which makes it kind of scary to think about what empty shells such as those people will do when their comfortable lives are taken away when the economy goes under. They don't care about others or the World, but they sure will be angry and looking for someone to blame when that happens.

You hit the nail on the head with that. Comfort, and having everything at their beck and call has made people complacent in the West. What do they have to complain about? They have central heating, endless food at the grocery store that get's tossed into the dumpsters by the tons daily. Running water that can be left on as long as you want, and some of the most ridiculous apps and forms of entertainment to keep them entranced. So the idea of having criminals and psychopaths in charge of the country isn't enough, I don't think, to actually shock very many people to take a glance as to what's going on. Take away some of those creature comforts though, and a lot of people will start to lose it very quickly and will look for someone to blame. I see that especially with the younger generation. It's really sad but a lot of them seem helpless and unable to think or do even the most basic of tasks without serious struggle. So the mixture of vaccines, GMO's, media programming, etc. has been very effective in dumbing down the population and creating this state of complacency.
 
BHelmet said:
meta-agnostic said:
Joe said:
Would Newsweek have put the cash into this if they thought there was any doubt?
plus it could all just be another part of the grand psy-op...
Well this is a good point. If the grand scheme is a world gov't. out in the open - whoever wins this US election could be the chump who gets to take a fall in some way when they pull the plug on Amurrica.

News journals usually come out with two versions if there's a tight contest people want quick results for, and only roll out the actual one if true. The maker of this meme probably just only showed the Hillary one to stir the pot among conspiracy theorists. The election definitely has rigging in it, but I don't think this specific item indicates that.

Puck said:
Laura said:
whitecoast said:
[quote author=Joe]
I don't think Comey was 'caught', he was simply doing what he was told to do, which in this case I think was to serve warning to Hillary that she is now a 'kept' woman and will need to follow the continuing game plan of the 'deep state'.

This seems like an odd thing for the deep state to do... I mean it's not like Hilary has shown indications of acting with conscience or in defiance in any way right? That's less than what Trump threatens, but he's received less harassment from the FBI. I suppose they still intend to train him, if it turns out he gets in.

Don't know why you don't see that especially when the entire context is considered. It seems like the most logical inference to me.

I think it makes perfect sense, this is exactly how handlers would manage her. Prodding via intermediaries, and she's crazy enough to need some prodding.
[/quote]

I guess looking at the evidence it does seem like the FBI was playing a game with Clinton, Trump, and everyone. To me it just seemed like there's less compromising ways to threaten someone than by releasing compromising emails that implicate the person you're pushing into office... I'm not even sure she has the mental capacity to question her masters anymore. Maybe it was just a trial balloon to see how many people would check out Wikileaks (if indeed it is a honeypot), and also perhaps to feign some semblance of impartiality on the part of the FBI, or to also sidetrack the attention of voters away from things like Clinton's foreign policy record. Lots of possibilities.

I agree with Ark that even if she does get in she won't last the 4 years. I wonder if they'll still go with the Putin poisoning Hillary thing if she expires in office? That would be more politically useful than an impeachment, and could even serve to shame Clinton's critics into burying the Wikileaks incident.
 
Avala said:
BTW, Google is the fastest on the results:

https://www.google.rs/?gws_rd=cr&ei=rX8iWOr3FYPDgAbei4n4AQ#q=us+election

Thanks Avala! RT is also having a great coverage on the whole thing :D I was astonished today seeing all the mexican newspapers literally saying that Clinton had the win in her pockets, and how the markets are going to be better etc,. All the media here even the "leftie" ones support her :/
 
Back
Top Bottom