Killary Clinton, The Donald, or Jill Stein: The US Election

[Ruth]

Killary as president will only enlighten more anti-establishment sentiment.

Do the PTB don't care about that? Or do they need more anti-establishment sentiment to create a climate where a new Hitler can flourish?

What's wrong with the time is now and Killary is the new (souped up and even better) Hitler? Anti establishment sentiment can just be used to kill and/or disable/intern more people. Everywhere. She's an equal opportunity nut bag and not just in the United States.

I don't know. 60% of Americans don't vote. Maybe it's just because the majority of them is not upset with the system. They are just far to busy chasing Pokemon. Or whatever soulless endeavor they keep themselves busying with.

Anyhow, it will be interesting to observe how the American public will react with Killary as president.

If people don't get upset by the system now. I don't know what will.

Makes me wonder how 'upset' the German people were with Hitler before and after and during his stint in power. And how much they 'cared'? Maybe not at all? It's pretty hard to get upset with something you don't see, and even more so, don't acknowledge.

Maybe to many people in the Western World have a far to comfortable life to ever revolt. They simply can't look beyond their own lives because they simply don't care. Which makes it kind of scary to think about what empty shells such as those people will do when their comfortable lives are taken away when the economy goes under. They don't care about others or the World, but they sure will be angry and looking for someone to blame when that happens.

Point is, I suppose that any anti-establishment ''revolution'' can only succeed when many Westerners lose their comfortable lives. 'Color revolutions' can only happen with mass unemployment, massive economic crisis etc..?

Things are bad now, but we haven't reach the bottom quite yet..?

Well they can be made to suffer and therefore, care. I'm not sure where the bottom is yet. Especially as this seems to be such a cyclical thing, only this time, global. Or, perhaps again, it's global. Somebody recently said to me "we are in End Times". It's looking pretty accurate to me at the moment.

 

[bjorb]

[quote author= Turgon]You hit the nail on the head with that. Comfort, and having everything at their beck and call has made people complacent in the West.[/quote]

Yes, and pretty dumb I missed that one. 'Color revolution' won't happen when there is comfort. So for now, it's simply out of the question. I should have noticed that earlier.

I still think it's a good possibility that 'The Elite' are going to be sacrificed to usher in a revival of a whole new set of evil. And Hillary inauguration will certainly set up the right climate to let that flourish.


So we are basically missing 2 things for a 'color-revolution' :

1. Economic depression

2. A people champion with a strong 'cult of personality' who fights against the establishment

It wouldn't surprise me if 4STS has some good stock ready to take that role on.

If they ever want to steam ahead with their agenda of a second holocaust, they need to arise a new kind of open fascism.


Trump has proven that there is a room for an anti-establishment make believe 'revolution' And with his defeat. This sentiment will only grow stronger.

We will see what happens.

 

[mkrnhr]

The good thing with this "election" is that the dirty laundry of the PTB has been exposed to all to see. The bad thing is that the dirty laundry of the PTB has been exposed to all to see. What I mean is that there might be something "karmic" about all this agitation in the sense that people vote knowing how corrupt the system is. There are no more excuses. If people unconsciously deserve those who govern them, in this case they consciously ask for it, with or without cognitive dissonance. And the PTB is all happy to oblige. OSIT

 

[Turgon]

BTW, Google is the fastest on the results:

https://www.google.rs/?gws_rd=cr&ei=rX8iWOr3FYPDgAbei4n4AQ#q=us+election

For now, Trump is in the lead with 137 seats to Clinton's 104 seats... But the night is still young.

It's now 150 to 109 in favour of Trump, but if there's major rigging that's going to happen, I suspect we'll see it in California. It holds 55 seats, which could be enough to push things in Killary's favour if that's the plan.

 

[bjorb]

[quote author= Ruth]What's wrong with the time is now and Killary is the new (souped up and even better) Hitler?[/quote]

Killary isn't a people champion. You need to have this 'cult of personality' to be the new Hitler. If selected she will propably be the most hated upon president ever in office.


[quote author= Ruth]Well they can be made to suffer and therefore, care.[/quote]

I know, suffering can also be a path to growth. But I am not holding my breath with these people.


[quote author= mkrnhr]The good thing with this "election" is that the dirty laundry of the PTB has been exposed to all to see. The bad thing is that the dirty laundry of the PTB has been exposed to all to see. What I mean is that there might be something "karmic" about all this agitation in the sense that people vote knowing how corrupt the system is. There are no more excuses. If people unconsciously deserve those who govern them, in this case they consciously ask for it, with or without cognitive dissonance. And the PTB is all happy to oblige. OSIT[/quote]

Yes, and to add. It's kind of a litmus test isn't it? I mean, there are indeed no more excuses like you mentioned. So it's time for everyone to make their choose. Either dance with the Psychopaths or go against the tide.

 

[meta-agnostic]

News journals usually come out with two versions if there's a tight contest people want quick results for, and only roll out the actual one if true. The maker of this meme probably just only showed the Hillary one to stir the pot among conspiracy theorists. The election definitely has rigging in it, but I don't think this specific item indicates that.

Did you read the zerohedge article? Newsweek apparently printed the Killary versions in anticipation of her "win" but had the Trump ones electronically ready to go to press in the case of his victory. Just a simple matter of hedging their bets, costs vs. copies sold, allegedly, but of course it makes the whole thing look shady.

I'd copy-quote the article but I'm too busy trying to keep up with the live inundation of media nonsense. Is everyone else still up and posting getting the same info? Doesn't look like it. Trump may well pull this off. For whatever good it does. But I thought the general sentiment here lately was to root for him.

 

[JonnyRadar]

So it begins... Violence at the polls... Greenbauming or a regular ol' nutjob?

_http://usuncut.com/news/heavily-armed-man-just-shot-several-people-outside-california/

 

[meta-agnostic]

BTW, Google is the fastest on the results:

https://www.google.rs/?gws_rd=cr&ei=rX8iWOr3FYPDgAbei4n4AQ#q=us+election

For now, Trump is in the lead with 137 seats to Clinton's 104 seats... But the night is still young.

It's now 150 to 109 in favour of Trump, but if there's major rigging that's going to happen, I suspect we'll see it in California. It holds 55 seats, which could be enough to push things in Killary's favour if that's the plan.

Not sure what you mean here but California was never anything close to contested. It's as "blue" as can be. Ugh, I hate this moronic red/blue terminology! What a stagnant, binary psy-op for them to stop switching the colors in 2000!

 

[griffin]

Trump just topped 200 electoral votes with 201, and given the partial results showing in other states right now, I'm tentatively calling it for Trump to win. Here's the electoral map I used to predict this win: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/page/2016_election_president_result.html#incart_big-photo .
If Trump wins all the states where he's leading right now by several points, he ends up winning with 285 electoral votes, 15 more than the 270 needed to win.

 

[Marina9]

BTW, Google is the fastest on the results:

https://www.google.rs/?gws_rd=cr&ei=rX8iWOr3FYPDgAbei4n4AQ#q=us+election

For now, Trump is in the lead with 137 seats to Clinton's 104 seats... But the night is still young.

It's now 150 to 109 in favour of Trump, but if there's major rigging that's going to happen, I suspect we'll see it in California. It holds 55 seats, which could be enough to push things in Killary's favour if that's the plan.

Well, California did go to Killary.. :/ Still Trump has the lead but now im getting the sense that tables will turn and she will win..

 

[WIN 52]

Trump just topped 200 electoral votes with 201, and given the partial results showing in other states right now, I'm tentatively calling it for Trump to win. Here's the electoral map I used to predict this win: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/page/2016_election_president_result.html#incart_big-photo .
If Trump wins all the states where he's leading right now by several points, he ends up winning with 285 electoral votes, 15 more than the 270 needed to win.

215 to 197 for Trump

216 to 209

 

[mabar]

Trump just topped 200 electoral votes with 201, and given the partial results showing in other states right now, I'm tentatively calling it for Trump to win. Here's the electoral map I used to predict this win: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/page/2016_election_president_result.html#incart_big-photo .
If Trump wins all the states where he's leading right now by several points, he ends up winning with 285 electoral votes, 15 more than the 270 needed to win.

215 to 197 for Trump

For some strange reason Foro TV (mexican news is more quicker?) Clinton 209 Trump 237

Updated

 

[Pierre]

Trump just topped 200 electoral votes with 201, and given the partial results showing in other states right now, I'm tentatively calling it for Trump to win. Here's the electoral map I used to predict this win: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/page/2016_election_president_result.html#incart_big-photo .
If Trump wins all the states where he's leading right now by several points, he ends up winning with 285 electoral votes, 15 more than the 270 needed to win.

215 to 197 for Trump

For some strange reason Foro TV (mexican news is more quicker?) Clinton 209 Trump 237

Updated

Each media has slightly different figures but they all give a lead to Trump this far. According to the WP, it's now 232 for Trump and 209 for Clinton.

The financial market seems to anticipate a republican victory with Dow Jones futures and Peso dropping sharply.

 

[mabar]

The good thing with this "election" is that the dirty laundry of the PTB has been exposed to all to see. The bad thing is that the dirty laundry of the PTB has been exposed to all to see. What I mean is that there might be something "karmic" about all this agitation in the sense that people vote knowing how corrupt the system is. There are no more excuses. If people unconsciously deserve those who govern them, in this case they consciously ask for it, with or without cognitive dissonance. And the PTB is all happy to oblige. OSIT

Yep! this collateral karmic agitation also is revealing by the drop in the mexican peso Markets jolted as Trump wins Florida and Ohio
Sharp swings in peso and gold as Clinton struggles in critical swing states _https://www.ft.com/content/1f58d530-a5a9-11e6-8898-79a99e2a4de6

 

[irjO]

If you check Google right now it says that: Donald 232 and Killary 209 this is kind of a surprise for me, if Donald gets elected I guess is because the PTB have something pretty dark prepared, obviously with Killary would be the same but maybe with Donald it could create a "revolution" in the sense of creating a perfect scenario for an open totalitarian system. As some folks mentioned before.

Here is the link https://www.google.rs/search?q=us+election&cad=h