Libel and Defamation Against SOTT, Cass, LKJ, QFG, etc
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Guardian
The Cosmic Force
starmie said:Guardian said:starmie said:
Ya think?
_http://www.youtube.com/user/WickedJohn666#p/a/u/0/-Qt_Ya7AZjA
"VINCENT BRIDGES RULES! "
What a total lunatic!!!
More like a total liar. In case you missed it on the other thread, here's proof that Bridges, Weidner and Horlatcher have been lying about the "criminal charges" in their Raffle Rant too...there were/are none.
Guardian
The Cosmic Force
Laura said:
Anything in particular you need? I dug into ALL Vinnie's claims/lies about you before I decided to stick around. No offense, but I didn't know diddle squat about you at the time, and he could have been telling the truth. As it turned out, every single thing he said about you was a blatant lie, but I didn't know that until I checked. Of course I kept screenshots of everything.
Guardian said:
Excellent! Just load it all on a CD and mail it! I guess a lot of that has disappeared, but never fear, we'll be connecting it all to the current crop of defamers and include them all in the same suit.
And thanks be that a Frenchie DID join in to make such a suit possible!
Guardian
The Cosmic Force
Laura said:
I'm fairly sure it's Horlatcher....he took over hosting for the slander site "Jean" created. I've got screenshots of that too, once the whole "Jean" thing is out in the open.
You mean like your new buddy Alex Berta being publicly exposed as a Narc? AWKWARD :P
Really??
Gee, I'm such a "vulnerable" person, I need "Anonymous" to tell me who I should and should not hang out with.
The last thing Laura SUGGESTED I do was use a progesterone cream to help with menopause. Quick, call the Internet cult police....Laura is interfering with my hot flashes.
I can attest to that too, because I've CAREFULLY watched how you respond to the needy, submissive "fawning fan, I want to dedicate my life to you" personalities. EVERY group leader and/or author gets them, and I didn't have to look hard to find yours. I've watched you go to great lengths to empower beaten, ill, insecure, disenfranchised people who would have been used, abused and taken for everything they had by someone like Bridges.
Laura I've been doing this for 30+ years, before we had computers, and stored data on index cards and in file folders. Our first digitized database was stored on a Realistic cassette recorder attached to a TRS-80 and a black and white TV. I KNOW what you could be making if you wanted to hop on the Guru gravy train. You have all the natural skills to be everything they accuse you of being, but anyone with a keyboard can see proof you're not.
We can't take credit for our inborn skills and abilities, whatever they are...they came with the meatsuit. What's up to us is what we do with them, that's all that really matters....what we do with whatever we got. Bridges, Weidner, Horlatcher, etc. try to muddy the water by repeatedly (and falsely) accusing you of doing things that you would be quite able to do if you so desired. The point is, you don't.
What REALLY ticks me off is that the accusations are EASY to either prove or disprove....because this is mostly all happening on the Internet. Why people just don't LOOK AT FACTS is what makes me crazy. Just click your mouse a few times and find out who's lying for yourself before you start running off at the mouth. How hard is that??
At one point, Horlatcher actually says "That is what I heard anyways"
These are the people who're accusing us of being "influenced" and "manipulated?"
I use little stones with symbols on them called "Runes" to (hopefully) communicate with the Aesir...and if you don't like it, you can bite my Thor's Hammer.
You bet your sweet bippy it does, and some of what's being done to Laura and the group in France would be considered a religious based HATE CRIME in the US.
Please tell me ONE false accusation Bridges, Weidner, Horlatcher or "Jean" have raised that we haven't acquired the documentation on? What have I missed? Which of the lies told by the Three Stooges 2012 have not been exposed by easily verifiable documentation?
Well it is on this forum, and on SOTT, but I can't say the same for Bridges and Weidner's overpriced ego fests. You gotta pay big bucks just to hear them talk about themselves.
No you're not, I know exactly who you are.
No you're not. Vincent Bridges, Jay Weidner, Colleen Johnson, Chris Horlatcher, "Jean" ...most recently joined by Barbara Camwell and Mary McGrannahan. That's not even a Centuria
We've got at least a Cohort on this forum alone that thinks yawl are idiots.
Me either.
Me either.
Yeah well, I expect a bowel movement every day too.
combsbt
Jedi Master
Is this a new one? I did a search on the forum for various key terms and came up with nothing.
_http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Laura_Knight_Jadczyk
The site calls itself rationalwiki and apparently intends on being as far from rational as possible. They proclaim a "scientific point of view" (but also interchange the definition of their abbreviation SPOV with "snarky point of view"), demanding "evidence" to back up claims but I see nothing of the sort on the various pages. It looks like a skeptic site that intends to "debunk" anything that is claimed to be "pseudoscience". The style of the writing in the pages is blatantly sarcastic and obviously no effort is put into research.
The page on Laura looks as though it was written by someone who glanced briefly at two or three other defamation sites and wrote a review of what they could remember and made up the rest.
By the way, I found this by typing "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" into google to get a quick link to his blog. This page is the third result. Entering "Laura Knight Jadczyk" does not return this on the first page of results.
Here is the only thing they say about Ark:
It appears the page was started Sept. 1st 2011, and was last edited Jan. 20, 2012.
_http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Laura_Knight_Jadczyk
The site calls itself rationalwiki and apparently intends on being as far from rational as possible. They proclaim a "scientific point of view" (but also interchange the definition of their abbreviation SPOV with "snarky point of view"), demanding "evidence" to back up claims but I see nothing of the sort on the various pages. It looks like a skeptic site that intends to "debunk" anything that is claimed to be "pseudoscience". The style of the writing in the pages is blatantly sarcastic and obviously no effort is put into research.
The page on Laura looks as though it was written by someone who glanced briefly at two or three other defamation sites and wrote a review of what they could remember and made up the rest.
By the way, I found this by typing "Arkadiusz Jadczyk" into google to get a quick link to his blog. This page is the third result. Entering "Laura Knight Jadczyk" does not return this on the first page of results.
Here is the only thing they say about Ark:
It appears the page was started Sept. 1st 2011, and was last edited Jan. 20, 2012.
combsbt
Jedi Master
Vulcan59 said:
By being behind "this", are you referring to the website as a whole, or just the content on Laura? As far as I can tell, the person who started the page on Laura has the user name "Tyrannis" and seems to be a young fellow named Christopher Steinmuller. The ex-member appears to have been French/not the same person?
Edit: He appears to be basically the sole contributor of the text on that page. All other user revisions were minor, or limited to a few lines.
Guardian
The Cosmic Force
Ask_a_debtor said:
I happen to already have a file on the owner of the website Rationalwiki, "Trent Toulouse." Do we want to expose him, or the person who made the entry about Laura?
It' a private Wiki, and there's no way to rebut the lies about Laura and the group, so I think the honors should go to Trent?
Edited to Add:
Oops I was wrong, it appears RW has changed and individuals can edit a page? Checking it out because it did NOT used to be open.
