Libel and Defamation Against SOTT, Cass, LKJ, QFG, etc

[Bluestar]

Wow! That account is SO far from what actually happened that it's almost funny. He must have gone through quite a bit of mental gymnastics to distort te facts in such manner. Fascinating, indeed!

It is rather fascinating. How one person in a room filled with people can have a different story than all the others truly is a form of mental gymnastics or seeing through a kaleidoscope or something.

Some have probably always had reservations about Laura and the Work done here, and then it can be all too easy to give the doubts full reign and turn them into attacks when something here doesn't go the way they expected.

Sometimes as we all know, the truth hurts and how many times have we witnessed people on this forum respond in such a way with their feelings hurt. To manipulate the truth and then try and use it to hurt Laura is more then appalling. Having reservations is one thing, but to come here and if they are not cuddled and spoke to with "oh, poor baby", to then go out and slander because their feeling are hurt is pathological. This to me, is not an easy to give the doubts full reign thingy, it is vengeance.

 

[Persej]

When I was 9 years old...

Godinama about the event, I did not talk to anyone, and it was 1979 years.

That means that he is born in 1969. He was 9 years old in 1979, and 43 in 2012. For example, if he was born in June, and that event was in March, and now is November, it all fits.

I connected SAI with this guy. It is just a thought, maybe I'm completely wrong, but maybe there is something.

Maybe. I agree with all the other things that you said about him.

 

[Argo]

He is not. At first it looked like he came here to ask Laura if she would like to ask Cs about his issues. He wrote his story... and his writing. I'm from Croatia and I can tell you that this guy is mixing croatian and serbian words in the same post. Like 'vreme' (serbian) and 'vrijeme' (croatian).

It is common for people who grew up in Croatia and lived for years in Serbia to mix those "two" languages. At least in my experience.

When I was 9 years old...

Godinama about the event, I did not talk to anyone, and it was 1979 years.

That means that he is born in 1969. He was 9 years old in 1979, and 43 in 2012. For example, if he was born in June, and that event was in March, and now is November, it all fits.

I connected SAI with this guy. It is just a thought, maybe I'm completely wrong, but maybe there is something.

Maybe. I agree with all the other things that you said about him.

I'm also had the same impression.

 

[Cosmos]

There we have it.

Psychopath Roundtable, Thomas Sheridan, James Corbett, Jay Weidner, Vinny Eastwood 17July2013:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1878aerllI#at=25

The name of the show is quite fitting isn't it "Psychopath Roundtable"

 

[Laura]

There we have it.

Psychopath Roundtable, Thomas Sheridan, James Corbett, Jay Weidner, Vinny Eastwood 17July2013:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1878aerllI#at=25

The name of the show is quite fitting isn't it "Psychopath Roundtable"

What is really pathetic is those slimeballs never do anything creative or original of their own; they just steal other people's work and re-package it with twists and distortions.

I doubt that any of them have enough of a readership (due to the previously mentioned issue) to even create a "disturbance in the force."

 

[Arwenn]

If I had listened or read about Laura before knowing her I would not be here

That's interesting, because if I hadn't listened or read about Laura before knowing her, I would not be here.

I totally agree. It was in reading the vitriol, that my curiosity was piqued, and so of course, I just had check it out for myself...and here I am! In a roundabout way, COINTELPRO and their nut jobs sent me here! :D

 

[Gawan]

There we have it.

Psychopath Roundtable, Thomas Sheridan, James Corbett, Jay Weidner, Vinny Eastwood 17July2013:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1878aerllI#at=25

The name of the show is quite fitting isn't it "Psychopath Roundtable"

What is really pathetic is those slimeballs never do anything creative or original of their own; they just steal other people's work and re-package it with twists and distortions.

I doubt that any of them have enough of a readership (due to the previously mentioned issue) to even create a "disturbance in the force."

I did listen a bit into it and they used phrases from Lobaczewski that it is a virus, people need the knowledge... (actually, about these sick-bags). Well without citing and talking about Archons and energy and making something mystique about it.

 

[Alejo]

Hey guys,

Has anyone taken a look at this? The date of publication according to google is August 16th 2013 the second result when you google Laura's name

_http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Laura_Knight_Jadczyk

Beyond poorly written, I'd also say rushed and quite frankly a truly sad attempt.

 

[Psalehesost]

Hey guys,

Has anyone taken a look at this? The date of publication according to google is August 16th 2013 the second result when you google Laura's name

_http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Laura_Knight_Jadczyk

Beyond poorly written, I'd also say rushed and quite frankly a truly sad attempt.

It was discussed earlier beginning here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,20628.msg366376.html#msg366376

It doesn't seem to have changed much since then - some minor edits made by various people on the wiki.

Laura's last comment on it then was that "Well, maybe I'll just send the info to our atty in California and see what he thinks."

 

[Boza48]

Since a new episode of libel and defamation was reported to me overnight, I thought that maybe it would be useful to have a thread in the Newbies forum devoted to that topic. I'll be hunting up the other threads that relate and merging them as time goes by. For now, here's the latest:

From: _The War on Terror is a Fraud - Paul Craig Roberts

Hm, why do You care?
I would not.

 

[T.C.]

Hm, why do You care?
I would not.

So easy to say when you are not the target.

 

[Boza48]

So easy to say when you are not the target.

Am i not? How do You know?
OK, i learned from Ms. Laura (and Datre, Elias, Seth too) some things.
- Realize any idea but not at the expense of the others.
- Act, do not Re-Act.
I do believe that these two statements are enough to "shade" oneself from attack.

 

[Glenn]

Am i not? How do You know?
OK, i learned from Ms. Laura (and Datre, Elias, Seth too) some things.
- Realize any idea but not at the expense of the others.
- Act, do not Re-Act.
I do believe that these two statements are enough to "shade" oneself from attack.

You have to be a little bit patient with us. We haven't got it all figured out like you have...

 

[Michael B-C]

Hm, why do You care?
I would not.

Hi Boza. I assume you noticed that you are commenting on an opening post Laura wrote back in 2010 - that's all of 13 years ago, so I'm unsure as to the purpose of your response now? Also, beyond slander and defamation, over the years before and since there have been all kinds of threatening incidents (including to life ) aimed at Laura and those closest to her as well as attempts by various authorities to apply undue pressure via extremely invasive and demanding financial audits. So it might be worth considering a little deeper than just saying you wouldn't care on how you would respond if these were a regular occurrence in your life.

 

[benkostka]

Am i not? How do You know?
OK, i learned from Ms. Laura (and Datre, Elias, Seth too) some things.
- Realize any idea but not at the expense of the others.
- Act, do not Re-Act.
I do believe that these two statements are enough to "shade" oneself from attack.

Boza,

You propose two ridiculous questions in response:

Am I not? No you are not in any way the target of the defamation, how could you be. Just asking this question shows you somehow view reality differently or are just mentally scrambled.

How do you know? Well we know because we can read and think. We can also look at other facts like the date of when the original post happened. The facts are fairly straightforward for everyone here except you.

I can’t follow any of your logic and if it’s true that you confused Darte’s talks with the early Cass sessions then you won’t understand why this forum was formed and what the purpose is. So you have a choice, you can begin the process of evaluating all the information on this forum and perhaps learn something and change or you can continue in your current state. One leads to growth and the other will most likely end with you getting banned from the forum.

Regardless of your choice, I wanted to say that your responses tend to show a lack of respect for the person you’re engaging with. I don’t see how anyone could have a conversation with you in person, when you can’t engage reasonably through text.