Libel and Defamation Against SOTT, Cass, LKJ, QFG, etc
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
H.E. said:
Oh, good grief. What I always find fascinating is how someone can at one point be exposed to the reality of all the lies and complete utter filth from Weidner, Bridges and co. but once they are given a mirror and choose to leave the group because of it, they then go all out and embrace the filth! And if I remember correctly this guy is supposedly a scientist.
Shane said:H.E. said:
Oh, good grief. What I always find fascinating is how someone can at one point be exposed to the reality of all the lies and complete utter filth from Weidner, Bridges and co. but once they are given a mirror and choose to leave the group because of it, they then go all out and embrace the filth! And if I remember correctly this guy is supposedly a scientist.
They end up thinking in reverse. "Hmmm, I don't like them now, so all those bad things VB et al. have said about her must be true!" Confirmation bias goes into overdrive and critical thinking goes out the window. It's quite fascinating.
Approaching Infinity said:Shane said:Oh, good grief. What I always find fascinating is how someone can at one point be exposed to the reality of all the lies and complete utter filth from Weidner, Bridges and co. but once they are given a mirror and choose to leave the group because of it, they then go all out and embrace the filth! And if I remember correctly this guy is supposedly a scientist.
They end up thinking in reverse. "Hmmm, I don't like them now, so all those bad things VB et al. have said about her must be true!" Confirmation bias goes into overdrive and critical thinking goes out the window. It's quite fascinating.
Yup. But in the end, it amounts to embracing the filth as opposed to the truth. And the evidence is in that sad, twisted account that bears no relation to reality.
G
Gertrudes
Guest
H.E. said:
I think that this is the one. The session happened on the 22nd of February of 2010.
Approaching Infinity said:Shane said:Oh, good grief. What I always find fascinating is how someone can at one point be exposed to the reality of all the lies and complete utter filth from Weidner, Bridges and co. but once they are given a mirror and choose to leave the group because of it, they then go all out and embrace the filth! And if I remember correctly this guy is supposedly a scientist.
They end up thinking in reverse. "Hmmm, I don't like them now, so all those bad things VB et al. have said about her must be true!" Confirmation bias goes into overdrive and critical thinking goes out the window. It's quite fascinating.
Some have probably always had reservations about Laura and the Work done here, and then it can be all too easy to give the doubts full reign and turn them into attacks when something here doesn't go the way they expected.
Ekios said:
He is not. At first it looked like he came here to ask Laura if she would like to ask Cs about his issues. He wrote his story... and his writing. I'm from Croatia and I can tell you that this guy is mixing croatian and serbian words in the same post. Like 'vreme' (serbian) and 'vrijeme' (croatian). He is mentally unstable or he is doing this on purpose. When he got some feedback, that maybe he should look at his diet etc, he opened a new thread where he again asks Laura to ask Cs about his issues. His next post was about Cs and Ra material, how he was in 4D and they call it the world of waters and how he served them for years there in transfering energy. He mensioned SIMBAD and how Cs didn't support that and he asked why they didn't support that. In one of his posts he also asked about Sai Baba, why Cs didn't mention Sai Baba in their conversations.
After that I saw this blog and I saw the source, znakovi-vremena, I saw that owner of this website has Sai Baba on his page, he also put a link to his photo and a link to his FB page and I checked that and I saw a date of birth. I connected SAI with this guy. It is just a thought, maybe I'm completely wrong, but maybe there is something.
To me, this forum is like a big house where I live, and there are rules of this house if you want to live in it. This guy doesn't care about them. He just jumped in and is talking about himself.
Gertrudes said:H.E. said:
I think that this is the one. The session happened on the 22nd of February of 2010.
Approaching Infinity said:Shane said:Oh, good grief. What I always find fascinating is how someone can at one point be exposed to the reality of all the lies and complete utter filth from Weidner, Bridges and co. but once they are given a mirror and choose to leave the group because of it, they then go all out and embrace the filth! And if I remember correctly this guy is supposedly a scientist.
They end up thinking in reverse. "Hmmm, I don't like them now, so all those bad things VB et al. have said about her must be true!" Confirmation bias goes into overdrive and critical thinking goes out the window. It's quite fascinating.
Some have probably always had reservations about Laura and the Work done here, and then it can be all too easy to give the doubts full reign and turn them into attacks when something here doesn't go the way they expected.
The best thing to do is not listen anybody about anybody at the beginning, and just judge by your-self. If I had listened or read about Laura before knowing her I would not be here nor follow the principles of the diet nor be better with my health. After, when you have a more clear idea then you can read the insanity of insane people. Also it is important, for me almost, not expect anything. You come, you listen, you see, you start to learn without expectations. The problem is always expecting something than what? You expect in love, in friendship, in work, in everything. Is like asking always something in return. Thats my idea, maybe I am wrong.
