SolarMother said:...
Diarrhea once or twice a day, and occasional intestinal cramps are still with me due to upping Vit C and Mag probably, but at least this mostly keeps the constipation away. Once the colon problems are remedied, I probably will weigh at least 10 lbs less when all the gunk comes out. I have noticed all my clothes are looser.
It smells like bad/old stuff is coming out in the bowels, but not all at once. I might have to do this enema thing. I am guessing that back in May when I was stressed out with preparations to move, I was lowering carbs and having a lot of protein, but not enough fat, and this may have been the start of the constipation problem along with still eating a goodly amount of veggies. (Now I realize I should not have started a dietary change when stressed out, reading this recently in the New Atkins.)
Gertrudes said:Jefferson said:I dropped carbs mid April (with gluten, dairy, sugar, caffeine dropped already last year) and have still not gone into ketosis according to the test which showing levels of more than 4mmol/l but not as high any higher than 6-8mmol/l according to the color.
Jefferson, I don't know whether I understood you correctly, but do you mean to say that your test is showing 4mmol/L? If so, that, according to my bottle, is already a state of ketosis.
RedFox said:Jefferson said:I assume this means I am without doubt burning ketones?
My understanding is this means you are producing ketones, but have yet to start fully utilising them (your cells are in transition to burning ketones).
Once you go fully into ketosis, your score on the urine test will drop to almost nothing as all the ketones are being used up before they can be excreted.
Aragorn said:How much carbs are you getting in average per day? Are you getting enough protein and fat?
Thor said:SolarMother, I can highly recommend the coffee enema and in particular while transiting to the new diet. Not only does it help to get the clear out what's in the bowels but I have also found that on the days when my energy is very low and I do the enema it is as if my fatigue lifts considerably. I noticed this after it had been happening for at couple of days and can now say that it is a consistent result. I'm guessing that the transition to a high-fat low-carb diet puts some additional stress on the liver and gall bladder's detox capabilities and the detox enema helps in making those work better.
Jefferson said:Gertrudes said:Jefferson said:I dropped carbs mid April (with gluten, dairy, sugar, caffeine dropped already last year) and have still not gone into ketosis according to the test which showing levels of more than 4mmol/l but not as high any higher than 6-8mmol/l according to the color.
Jefferson, I don't know whether I understood you correctly, but do you mean to say that your test is showing 4mmol/L? If so, that, according to my bottle, is already a state of ketosis.
Hi Gertrudes,
Yes my test is showing somewhere around 4-6mmol/l, and I too thought that would be ketosis as I have strictly eaten protein and lots of good lard, duck fat, ghee, and coconut oil, with limited carbs for 3 months.
However Redfox mentioned when I first posted my test results of 4-6mmol/l:
RedFox said:Jefferson said:I assume this means I am without doubt burning ketones?
My understanding is this means you are producing ketones, but have yet to start fully utilising them (your cells are in transition to burning ketones).
Once you go fully into ketosis, your score on the urine test will drop to almost nothing as all the ketones are being used up before they can be excreted.
So I pose the question, what is the mmol/l level that shows one is in ketosis? Does a low mmol/l level show one is in ketosis or a high mmol/l level?
I think I have to read the books a bit more carefully. Or forget the urine test altogether
Jefferson
Jefferson said:So I pose the question, what is the mmol/l level that shows one is in ketosis? Does a low mmol/l level show one is in ketosis or a high mmol/l level?
Thor said:RedFox said:Thor said:I was thinking to make a vegetable broth to ensure that I get some nutrients.
You might want to consider a bone and/or organ meat broth instead (add some salt). No carbs and as many nutrients as the vegetable one (plus lots of fat from the bone marrow).
Thanks, RedFox - that's a good idea. I hadn't thought of that. Unfortunately, I won't be able to get organic bones today from the organic butcher but if this persists I will get some tomorrow.
dugdeep said:Everyone is different, so you may end up with more residual ketones in your urine than others do. I don't think this is a big deal. If you start to get up over 8mmol/L, then it might be time for concern (although I think this is unlikely unless you're type 1 diabetic).
Laura said:Mr. Premise said:Are we still recommending fish oil supplementation? I remember some questions were raised about it so I stopped it for a while.
Well, these guys recommend it because, as they point out, most meat is too high on the 6s due to grain feeding of cattle. I'd say it wouldn't hurt to take one or two a day or so.
Blood Clots
Animal fat that contains abundant saturated fatty acids has certain effects on the body's clotting system. This seems to be connected, on the one hand, with the heparin requirements (a protein that inhibits clotting of the blood) and, on the other, the formation of the clotting enzymes. The occurrence of thrombosis in occasional instances of a too-rapid changeover to a low-carbohydrate diet might be due to the state of starvation in which the body finds itself—expecting carbohydrates, for which it is prepared, it instead receives fat and protein, for which it is not immediately equipped, or not ready to handle in high quantity.
Thrombosis often occurs in stressful situations. For example, there is a tendency for thrombosis to occur following surgical procedures, childbirth, and severe physical exertion. Likewise, the changeover to the genetically correct diet of high fat and protein can be a stressful situation to the body. And the bigger the change, the greater the stress.
Those who are reducing their carbohydrate intake from, say, 40 percent down to 72 grams per day (10 to 20 percent of total calories) will experience fewer problems than those who have been consuming 80 percent of their daily calories as carbohydrates. The same holds true for age and existing health conditions. Thus, the people who eat the most carbohydrate often are the ones who have the most health problems, so they would naturally experience the most difficult transition, just as a person addicted to the highest dose of a drug will have the most difficulty in the early stages of reducing the drug.
Dr. Robert Atkins was accused of provoking heart attacks with his low-carbohydrate diet back in the early 1970s, and he was even invited to a hearing of the U.S. Senate because of it. In principle, Atkins's diet is the same as ours; however, his suggested procedure radically differs from the one used by us: Atkins initially withdrew all carbohydrates and relaxed the restriction afterward, whereas we never go below 6 BUs (72 grams of carbohydrates) out of caution, and hold the reins rather more loosely at the beginning. We don't know just how many heart attacks have been caused by the zero-calorie diets that became popular a few years ago. We do know that every sudden change in the body raises the blood-clotting tendency and can therefore elicit a clot at an already damaged place in the circulatory system, hence a catastrophe. Our low-carbohydrate program is by far the safest and most effective. We are confident in saying this because it is based on data from thousands of patients with diseases who have been treated by Dr. Lutz since the late 1950s.
One could exclude from dietary treatment those individuals whose age places them at increased risk for heart attacks (men over fifty and women over sixty), but that would not be doing them a favor, since they would be barred from a fundamental healing of their illness. Only a low-carbohydrate lifestyle is capable of putting a stop to arteriosclerosis and, therefore, to subsequent heart attacks.
People who are overweight with a sedentary lifestyle, who have diabetes, high blood pressure, or heart problems, should ease into carbohydrate restriction (e.g., beginning with 9 BUs [108 grams of net carbs]) and only try to reach the desired 6 BUs over a few months. If you have any of these conditions, we urge you to be completely up front with your physician about your desire to begin a low-carbohydrate program. The intention should be that you work together to observe the results. Some intermediate medications may be necessary during the transition, such as blood-thinning agents like aspirin or coumarin. If you're taking cholesterol-lowering drugs, you will probably find that you're able to slowly reduce the amount taken as your health improves. These drugs are not particularly useful anyway, since low cholesterol is not a good marker for heart disease, and they suppress the levels of CoQ 10.
Unfortunately, there are some people whose health is already compromised to the point of no return. If nothing is done, they have a heart attack; if something is done, the attack can occur through side effects of the low-carbohydrate treatment, as discussed above.
Gertrudes said:dugdeep said:Everyone is different, so you may end up with more residual ketones in your urine than others do. I don't think this is a big deal. If you start to get up over 8mmol/L, then it might be time for concern (although I think this is unlikely unless you're type 1 diabetic).
Would that be considered approaching ketoacidosis? I should be at about 8mmol/L right now, although I'm not diabetic.