Mass Migration - a plan, or just a consequence of some other plan

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
On Sott.net there was recently an article which point to there being a plan for mass migration:
EU Chief nominee: 'Uniting' Europe with Africa, meddling in Hungary and Poland's democracy
Named as the centre-left's ca
ndidate for the next EU Commission President, Frans Timmermans announced he would crush conservative governments in Europe, insisting that the continent uniting with Africa is "a matter of destiny".

Timmermans, who currently sits as the Commission's first vice-president, was nominated to lead the Party of European Socialists (PES) in next May's elections by delegates at the EU Parliament grouping's annual congress in Lisbon on Saturday.

The former Dutch defence minister, who has previously claimed Europe could "not remain a place of peace and freedom" unless mass immigration-related "diversity" is imposed throughout the continent including across "even the most remote corners", has notably spent much of his time as President Jean-Claude Juncker's deputy ordering eastern EU states toopen their borders to third world migrants.

Packed with references to "1940", "Nazi Germany", and "never again", he used his speech at the PES congress to make clear that, under his leadership, the European Commission would have zero tolerance for nations which reject any part of the globalist, 'progressive' agenda including third world migration.
 

Ursus Minor

The Living Force
FRENCH GENERALS ACCUSE MACRON OF “TREASON” OVER UN MIGRATION PACT
Open letter says "French citizens have another reason to revolt"

writes Paul Craig Roberts: The Camp Of The Saints

A group of French military generals have written an open letter to Emmanuel Macron accusing the French President of committing “treason” by signing the UN migration pact.

The pact, which was signed by 164 nations on Monday, including France, is not legally binding but greases the skids for unlimited migration to be treated as a human right and criticism of mass migration to be treated as hate speech.

A letter written by General Antoine Martinez and signed by ten other generals, an admiral and a colonel, as well as former French Minister of Defense Charles Millon, warns Macron that the move strips France of more sovereignty and provides an additional reason for “an already battered people” to “revolt”.

Read the full letter from the French generals below (translated):


Mister President,

You are about to sign the “Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” on 10 and 11 December, which establishes a genuine right to migration. It may impose itself on our national legislation through pre-existing treaties or the principle of common responsibility set out in this pact.

It seems to us that the only sovereignty that will remain with France will consist in freely setting the way in which the objectives of the pact will have to be implemented. You can not give up this new part of the national sovereignty without a public debate whereas 80% of the French population considers that it is necessary to stop or regulate drastically the immigration. By deciding alone to sign this pact, you would add an additional reason for revolt to the anger of an already battered people. You would be guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation.

In addition, the finances of our country are drained and our debt is growing. You can not take the risk of an expensive call for air migration without first showing that you will not have to resort to more taxes to meet the objectives of the pact. On the other hand, you must be able, in terms of security, to curb the consequences linked to the arrival of extra-European populations. Finally, you can not ignore that the very essence of politics is to ensure security on the outside and harmony within. However, this concord can be obtained only if it maintains a certain internal coherence of the society alone capable of allowing to want to do together, which becomes more and more problematic today.

In fact, the French state is late in coming to realize the impossibility of integrating too many people, in addition to totally different cultures, who have regrouped in the last forty years in areas that no longer submit to the laws of the Republic.

You can not decide alone to erase our civilizational landmarks and deprive us of our carnal homeland.

We therefore ask you to defer the signing of this pact and call by referendum the French to vote on this document. You are accountable to the French of your actions. Your election is not a blank.

We support the initiative of General MARTINEZ against the signature of this pact which must be adopted by the Member States of the UN at the Intergovernmental Conference of Marrakesh.

General Antoine MARTINEZ
Charles MILLON – Former Minister of Defense
General Marc BERTUCCHI
General Philippe CHATENOUD
General André COUSTOU
General Roland DUBOIS
General Daniel GROSMAIRE
General Christian HOUDET
General Michel ISSAVERDENS
Admiral Patrick MARTIN
General Christian PIQUEMAL
General Daniel SCHAEFFER
General Didier TAUZIN
Colonel Jean Louis CHANAS
 

c.a.

The Living Force
FOTCM Member

Some companies are pulling their advertising from Fox News’ primetime show “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” after host Carlson said he disagreed with “a moral obligation” to let poor people into the U.S., “even if it makes our own country poorer and dirtier and more divided.”

Carlson made the comments on December 13 and reinforced them on his show Monday night.

Online design marketplace Minted tweeted Monday night that it is “permanently discontinuing” advertising on the program. “We do not agree with Mr. Carlson’s comments and his opinions are not consistent with the values we hold at Minted. Like other advertisers, our media purchases are done broadly across a number of networks. That being said, we are permanently discontinuing advertising on this particular program,” the company said.

Personal finance website NerdWallet said in a statement to NBC News that it had “pulled its advertising and will be re-evaluating any ongoing advertising on this program,” after Carlson’s comments last week.

Financial services company Pacific Life said it would “re-evaluate our relationship with his program” and would not be advertising on Carlson’s show in the coming weeks in a tweet on December 14. “As a company, we strongly disagree with Mr Carlson’s statements. Our customer base and our workforce reflect the diversity of our great nation, something we take great pride in,” it said.

Speaking about the skills needed in the U.S., for a segment titled “What’s the economic case for mass immigration?” Carlson said on December 13: “It’s obvious that we need more scientists and skilled engineers, but that’s not what we’re getting.”

“Instead we’re getting waves of people with high school educations or less. Nice people, no one doubts that, but as an economic matter this is insane. It’s indefensible, so nobody even tries to defend it. Instead our leaders demand that you shut up and accept this. We have a moral obligation to admit the world’s poor, they tell us, even if it makes our own country poorer and dirtier and more divided.”

Carlson reinforced his comments during his show on Monday night, and posted video clips on Twitter. “Enforcers scream ‘racist’ on Twitter, until everybody gets intimidated and changes the subject to the Russia investigation or some other distraction. It’s a tactic, a well-worn one, nobody thinks it’s real. And it won’t work with this show. We’re not intimidated and we plan to try to say what’s true until the last day,” he said in one clip.

A spokesperson for SmileDirectClub, which makes teeth-straightening products, said in an emailed statement Tuesday: “We are actively working with our media buyers to confirm that SmileDirectClub is no longer running our ads around any political opinion shows.” The company did not say whether the decision was due to Carlson’s comments.


Job site Indeed.com told CNBC it had not advertised on the show in over a month. “Indeed’s mission is to help people get jobs. As a company, we are nonpartisan — our site is for everyone, regardless of background or beliefs. Indeed has not advertised on the ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ program in over a month, and has no plans to do so in the future,” a spokesperson said in an emailed statement Tuesday.
Other advertisers, such as Bayer, Sanofi and Mitsubishi are thought to be continuing their advertising during the show, according to a report on The Hollywood Reporter’s website Monday. The companies had not responded to CNBC at the time of publication.

A Fox News channel spokesperson said in a statement emailed to CNBC: “It is a shame that left wing advocacy groups, under the guise of being supposed ‘media watchdogs’ weaponize social media against companies in an effort to stifle free speech. We continue to stand by and work with our advertisers through these unfortunate and unnecessary distractions.”

 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
There was this article in the New York Times, Opinion | How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’ which I think might explain some of the issues with induced mass migration that require attention. Early in the article, the author David Reich explains what he sees as the dangers and opportunities which knowledge of genetics can offer.
I have deep sympathy for the concern that genetic discoveries could be misused to justify racism. But as a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among “races.”

Groundbreaking advances in DNA sequencing technology have been made over the last two decades. These advances enable us to measure with exquisite accuracy what fraction of an individual’s genetic ancestry traces back to, say, West Africa 500 years ago — before the mixing in the Americas of the West African and European gene pools that were almost completely isolated for the last 70,000 years. With the help of these tools, we are learning that while race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.

Recent genetic studies have demonstrated differences across populations not just in the genetic determinants of simple traits such as skin color, but also in more complex traits like bodily dimensions and susceptibility to diseases. For example, we now know that genetic factors help explain why northern Europeans are taller on average than southern Europeans, why multiple sclerosis is more common in European-Americans than in African-Americans, and why the reverse is true for end-stage kidney disease.
"Recent genetic", but it is not new knowledge, unless the author has been waiting for his own discipline to confirm, what he could himself not accept. At least the following is from a research paper from 2002:
This article reviews the genetic factors that underlie varying responses to medicines observed among different ethnic and racial groups. Pharmacogenetic research in the past few decades has uncovered significant differences among racial and ethnic groups in the metabolism, clinical effectiveness, and side-effect profiles of many clinically important drugs. These differences must be taken into account in the design of cost management policies such as formulary implementation, therapeutic substitution and step-care protocols. These programs should be broad and flexible enough to enable rational choices and individualized treatment for all patients, regardless of race or ethnic origin. (J Natl Med Assoc. 2002; 94:1–26.)

While most people will agree that finding a genetic explanation for an elevated rate of disease is important, they often draw the line there. Finding genetic influences on a propensity for disease is one thing, they argue, but looking for such influences on behavior and cognition is another.

Is performance on an intelligence test or the number of years of school a person attends shaped by the way a person is brought up? Of course. But does it measure something having to do with some aspect of behavior or cognition? Almost certainly. And since all traits influenced by genetics are expected to differ across populations (because the frequencies of genetic variations are rarely exactly the same across populations), the genetic influences on behavior and cognition will differ across populations, too.
This would mean that very mixed populations would display very mixed patterns of behavior and cognition. While one could hold this can be good for constructive creativity, there might also develop increased destructive trends within segments of the population whose body and minds have greater difficulties adjusting to the new environments, this will also affect school performance for both the children directly affected and their peers. This will lead to less trust and stability in the society. See also
https://www.dw.com/en/german-study-links-increased-crime-rate-to-migrant-arrivals/a-42006484
German study links increased crime rate to migrant arrivals
The German state of Lower Saxony witnessed a 10.4 percent increase in crime at the height of the migration crisis, according to a study. The study’s authors said age and reporting practices factored into the connection.
The author continues:
What makes Dr. Watson’s and Mr. Wade’s statements so insidious is that they start with the accurate observation that many academics are implausibly denying the possibility of average genetic differences among human populations, and then end with a claim — backed by no evidence — that they know what those differences are and that they correspond to racist stereotypes. They use the reluctance of the academic community to openly discuss these fraught issues to provide rhetorical cover for hateful ideas and old racist canards.

This is why knowledgeable scientists must speak out. If we abstain from laying out a rational framework for discussing differences among populations, we risk losing the trust of the public and we actively contribute to the distrust of expertise that is now so prevalent. We leave a vacuum that gets filled by pseudoscience, an outcome that is far worse than anything we could achieve by talking openly.

So how should we prepare for the likelihood that in the coming years, genetic studies will show that many traits are influenced by genetic variations, and that these traits will differ on average across human populations? It will be impossible — indeed, anti-scientific, foolish and absurd — to deny those differences.
I'm wondering if he will be able to prevent people denying any difference or that some will make poorly founded sweeping generalizations, considering how far he and his colleagues have gotten to bring out what for him is pretty evident.
For me, a natural response to the challenge is to learn from the example of the biological differences that exist between males and females. The differences between the sexes are far more profound than those that exist among human populations, reflecting more than 100 million years of evolution and adaptation. Males and females differ by huge tracts of genetic material — a Y chromosome that males have and that females don’t, and a second X chromosome that females have and males don’t.

Most everyone accepts that the biological differences between males and females are profound. In addition to anatomical differences, men and women exhibit average differences in size and physical strength. (There are also average differences in temperament and behavior, though there are important unresolved questions about the extent to which these differences are influenced by social expectations and upbringing.)

How do we accommodate the biological differences between men and women? I think the answer is obvious: We should both recognize that genetic differences between males and females exist and we should accord each sex the same freedoms and opportunities regardless of those differences.

It is clear from the inequities that persist between women and men in our society that fulfilling these aspirations in practice is a challenge. Yet conceptually it is straightforward. And if this is the case with men and women, then it is surely the case with whatever differences we may find among human populations, the great majority of which will be far less profound.

An abiding challenge for our civilization is to treat each human being as an individual and to empower all people, regardless of what hand they are dealt from the deck of life. Compared with the enormous differences that exist among individuals, differences among populations are on average many times smaller, so it should be only a modest challenge to accommodate a reality in which the average genetic contributions to human traits differ.

It is important to face whatever science will reveal without prejudging the outcome and with the confidence that we can be mature enough to handle any findings. Arguing that no substantial differences among human populations are possible will only invite the racist misuse of genetics that we wish to avoid.

David Reich is a professor of genetics at Harvard and the author of the forthcoming book “Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past,” from which this article is adapted.
No doubt a whole slew of gender fluid postmodernists would have an issue with his genetics based arguments, and that is why I think there is a very long way to go also for an honest discussion of issues related to mass migration of people coming from or going to very different geophysical environments.
 
Last edited:

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
The author tried to argue for some room for navigating this difficult area. I doubted he would get it, and today there was an article Nobel Prize-winning DNA pioneer stripped of titles for insisting IQ depends on race & genes :
Watson rose to international scientific fame in 1953 after helping discover DNA's double helix structure with fellow geneticists Maurice Wilkins and Francis Crick. In 1962, the team was awarded a Nobel Prize in Physiology “for their discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material.” In 1968 Watson began serving as director of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, subsequently assuming the roles of president and chancellor, before being suspended and retiring from the research lab in 2007.

Why? Because:
"While having initially issued an apology for his comments, allowing him to maintain his honorary titles at the CSHL, when asked more than a decade later whether his views about race and intelligence have changed, he told the PBS documentary they haven’t.

“Not at all. I would like for them to have changed, that there be new knowledge that says that your nurture is much more important than nature,” the scientist was quoted as saying in a recently previewed PBS documentary, titled American Masters: Decoding Watson. “There’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on IQ tests. I would say the difference is, it’s genetic.”
He qualifies it with "on the average" and says or implies he would have liked his opponents to have come up with research that could have proved him wrong, but they didn't.

The interesting thing is that if a society is taking in new people then who these people are and what they can do and contribute with is part of the future social and economic environment of that society, which is an area economists would like to plan for years in advance. If the economist has to work with blind spots or areas that are not allowed to be acknowledge or looked at, then the plan will probably be more off the intended goal. Maybe it would be possible for European countries to take in huge amounts of people, but if so it should be well researched and well planned. This is just not happening, because so many issues are not being taken serious or dealt with, whether it be statistically significant genetic differences influencing health, social and cognitive abilities, or how to deal with immigrants who feel entitled to force their cultural values on their host country leading to conflict, or how to deal with criminal elements who can't be sent back to where they came from, because the laws punishment for the crimes they have committed in their host country would lead them to be mistreated in their home country. Maybe for example this guy here would receive a few Taliban lashes, a risk which probably can't be allowed: Germany: Afghan migrant arrested after horrific knife attack on pregnant woman in hospital
 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Thierry Meyssan wrote on The 116th US Congress is preparing a new war against Syria, by Thierry Meyssan an article which shows that the refugee issue in and around Syria is likely to continue, since the US and the EU apparently have a policy of supporting chaos in Syria by economic sanctions and by sanctioning anyone related to the reconstruction of the Syria. If does sound insane and it is. Below are some excerpts:

At the opening of the new session and even before they were elected as presidents of the Committee, on 3 January 2019, Risch and Engel both presented to their respective assemblies a draft for law (S.1 and H.R. 31) which included an almost identical passage aimed at preventing the reconstruction of Syria. The two men are pretending to believe that the photographs from the Caesar Report show bodies tortured by « Bachar’s régime » (in other words the Syrian Arab Republic) and not by the jihadists (alias the « moderate rebels »). They therefore agree to punish the Syrian People for having supported those qualified as « torturers» against the authentic torturers [1].

By doing so, they are pursuing the strategy implemented by Jeffrey Feltman when he was US ambassador to Lebanon. In 2005, he created a « Special Tribunal » to try President Bachar el-Assad, who was guilty, according to Feltman and certain false witnesses, of having commandeered the assassination of Rafic Hariri. Yesterday, el-Assad was an « assassin », today he’s a « torturer ».

It is clear to everyone that beyond the rhetorical pretexts, these drafts, according to US law, apply the strategy defined by the same Jeffrey Feltman when he directed the political department of the UNO. In a secret note [2], drawn up in October 2017, this ex-assistant of Hillary Clinton instructed all UN agencies to come to the help of Syrian civilians only in cases of emergency and in the short term. The note forbade all aid in the medium or long term which could enable the reconstruction of the country. This directive exceeded his powers, and was applied behind the backs of state-members of the UN, and without the knowledge of the Security Council. Its existence was revealed ten months later by Russian Minister for Foreign Affairs Sergueï Lavrov, on 20 August 2018 [3].

This strategy clearly aims at pursuing the same objective as that of President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during the seven years of war against Syria - not by military means, since Russia is present, but by financial means. It is still not a question of overthrowing President Bachar el-Assad (which was only the war objective of Saudi Arabia), nor the Syrian Arab Republic (the war objective of certain old colonial powers), but to weaken the Syrian state to the extreme in application of the Rumsfeld-Cebrowski doctrine. What Senator James Risch and Representative Eliot Engel are preparing against Syria has already been implemented by the European Union, a further sign that this policy was not conceived by US politicians. Thus on 21 January 2019, the EU Council of Ministers for Foreign Affairs sanctioned the persons and companies responsible for the Mariota City project, a new town which is to be built in the suburbs of Damascus [4]. Only one of these people was involved in any way in the combats, and even less in the accusations of torture. They are all civilians engaged in a flagship project for reconstruction.
One wonders if apart from the US and some old colonial powers in the EU, the state of Israel which has influences in some of these countries, like France and the US also has an interest in creating economic sanctions against Syria and prevent reconstruction thus keeping their neighbour weak? The answer will be yes, but we can't say to what extend Israeli diplomacy has been involved.

The Pentagon and the Treasury
Since 2001, the United States Treasury has become a political power working in tandem with the Pentagon. This administration has availed itself of astounding powers, notably by creating a jurisprudence which allows it to extra-territorialise US laws under the pretence that certain international transactions have been made in dollars. It is not a law, but an interpretation which today is accepted by US courts. Simultaneously, the Treasury has set up financial tools which enable it to sanction persons, companies and states with a severity that has never been equaled. The most frightening example is that of the series of sanctions progressively enacted against Iran since 2005.

Contrary to what it claims, when the Treasury sanctions a state, it does not condemn either the state or its leaders, but deprives its population of all economic contact with the West.
Sounds rather medieval. or like a World War II siege of a Leningrad. We may not hear much about it but when food and medicine can not be traded people become weak and die, officially of natural courses.

Let’s remember that these political sanctions often have nothing to do with those implemented by the UN Security Council, which, in this case, are illegal in international law. They are acts of war comparable to the sieges of the Middle Ages [5]. Today, the US Treasury is applying political sanctions against Belarus, Burundi, North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Nicaragua, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Russia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe, to which we must add the Donetsk People’s Republic Ukraine), Hezbollah (Iran), the Houthis (Yemen), and many others.
One would expect some journalists in the US/European MSM to pick up on these trends, but it is not the stuff of front pages. This speech from Stefan Molyneaux, also posted in another thread), explains what the failure of MSM journalism leads to:
 

Hi_Henry

Jedi Council Member
I just read a very good article which addresses the issue of multiculturalism. I am not against it but do believe that it needs to be a gradual process. It should be a processes where those wanting to emigrate needed to go through "hoops" so as to attract those willing to work to do it. Just opening the "doors" simply invites those who ,for who knows how many generations, will simply live in the host country on welfare.

Wars started by the US and NATO countries have displaced people from all social groups. Given that many of the countries attacked by "Democracy" have large poor populations, those emigrating tend to come in the majority from the poorly educated class. Additionally they come, something most don't consider, with habits and cultural norms prevalent in that class in the given country. The collision of cultures is best seen today on the streets of Paris as to what are the consequences of such mixing of races.

Three weeks after college, I flew to Senegal, West Africa, to run a community center in a rural town. Life was placid, with no danger, except to your health. That danger was considerable, because it was, in the words of the Peace Corps doctor, “a fecalized environment.”

In plain English: shit is everywhere. People defecate on the open ground, and the feces are blown with the dust – onto you, your clothes, your food, the water. The doctor warned us the first day of training: do not even touch water. Human feces carry parasites that bore through your skin and cause organ failure.

Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that a few decades later, liberals would be pushing the lie that Western civilization is no better than a third-world country. Or would teach two generations of our children that loving your own culture and wanting to preserve it are racism.

Last time I was in Paris, I saw a beautiful African woman in a grand boubou have her child defecate on the sidewalk next to Notre Dame Cathedral. The French police officer, ten steps from her, turned his head not to see.

I have seen. I am not turning my head and pretending unpleasant things are not true.

Senegal was not a hellhole. Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures’ terms. But they are not our terms. The excrement is the least of it. Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible.

As a twenty-one-year-old starting out in the Peace Corps, I loved Senegal. In fact, I was euphoric. I quickly made friends and had an adopted family. I relished the feeling of the brotherhood of man. People were open, willing to share their lives and, after they knew you, their innermost thoughts.

The longer I lived there, the more I understood: it became blindingly obvious that the Senegalese are not the same as us. The truths we hold to be self-evident are not evident to the Senegalese. How could they be? Their reality is totally different. You can’t understand anything in Senegal using American terms.

Article
 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
There was this article which I repost, for the record:
Friday, 19 August 2016
Hacked Docs Expose Soros-Obama-UN Refugee Invasion Network
Written by William F. Jasper
Secret internal reports and memos by one of George Soros’s left-wing front groups reveals the socialist billionaire’s subversive reach within the Obama administration, the United Nations, and the governing structures European Union, especially as it relates to the manufactured refugee/migration crisis.

Among the many noteworthy points made by Soros activists in one report is the assertion that the migrant/refugee tsunami that has already swamped Europe with 1-2 million Muslim migrants should be accepted as “the new normal.” This is not surprising, but it is alarming. It is not surprising because for many years Soros and his minions have been in the vanguard of the Open Borders/Migration Lobby. It is alarming because the radical “migration rights” agenda of the Soros network is being translated into official policy, nationally and globally.

A May 12, 2016 report of the International Migration Institute (IMI), an official project of Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF), provides an important window to view the working relationships among the IMI refugee activists and their allies inside the Obama administration and the United Nations. The nine-page report, by top IMI staffers Anna Crowley and Kate Rosin, entitled “Migration Governance and Enforcement Portfolio Review,” is one of many Soros/OSF documents released this week by DCLeaks.com, which describes itself as a project “launched by the American hacktivists” who “believe U.S. citizens have the right to know how domestic and foreign policies of the United States are shaped and who the real policy maker is.”

Quite clearly, when it comes to migrant/refugee policy, Soros and his fellow globalists are the real policy makers. Soros staffers Crowley and Rosin call for “accepting the current crisis as the new normal and moving beyond the need to react.”

Their report also provides revealing details on the Soros/IMI/OSF relationship to Goldman Sachs titan Peter Sutherland, the UN’s top globalist agent in charge of designing and implementing the UN’s chaos-producing migration programs.

“The Columbia Global Policy Initiative (CGPI), which hosts the secretariat for Peter Sutherland, the UN Secretary General’s Special Representative on International Migration, has been able to take advantage of momentum created by the current crisis to shape conversations about rethinking migration governance,” write Crowley and Rosin in the leaked report. The Soros staffers continue, noting the key role played by their IMI “think tank”: “IMI provided project support for the drafting of The Sutherland Report, which aims to set the stage for institutional reforms to global migration governance, and to break new ground on protections for migrants outside the asylum system.”

The Soros/IMI report continues:

When we made the CGPI grant, even we were somewhat skeptical about the appetite for reform of the institutions that govern elements of migration at the international level, and the pace at which it might proceed. Nonetheless, we recognized the importance of starting this discussion, and the political capital Sutherland could leverage to bring high-level attention to the issue. This gamble has arguably paid off: as the September UN and President Obama’s summits on migrants and refugees have taken shape, Sutherland’s team has effectively drawn on work and thinking it had already done to influence the scope and deliverables of these two meetings.

How effective has the Soros-Sutherland tag team been? Crowley and Rosin say:

IMI’s access to the Sutherland team’s discussions has allowed us to keep civil society partners up-to-date on the latest developments, in order to inform advocacy and campaigning strategies prior to the events and to plan follow up actions.

CGPI’s elite-level behind the scenes advocacy through Peter Sutherland, has positioned its team of experts to influence policy and practical follow-up to global events. This has been complemented by MPI’s [Migration Policy Institute’s] neutral voice and ability to generate the policy-relevant research and evidence base needed to shape migration debates. This pairing has worked well and there is a natural collaboration between the experts that both centers engage.

First, a few important notes about the above-mentioned Peter Sutherland. While not a household name, he is very well known in the corridors of power, and he is having an impact on almost every household on the planet. As we reported here last October (Insider Peter Sutherland: EU-U.S. Must Take More Refugees, Get Rid of Sovereignty), Peter Sutherland is an insider’s insider; he epitomizes the uber-rich, globalist-corporatist elite. Here is a partial listing of his internationalist credentials:

• Until this past June, Sutherland was chairman of Goldman Sachs International, the global banking behemoth known to critics as the “vampire squid” for its predatory, corrupt practices;

• he is a regular attendee and former Steering Committee member of the ultra-secretive, ultra-elite Bilderberg Group;

• he was European chairman of the Trilateral Commission;

• he is past chairman of British Petroleum (BP);

• he is honorary president of the Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN), one of the principal corporatist insider organizations promoting EU-U.S. merger through the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP);

• as a principal architect of the WTO, he has been hailed as “the father of globalization”; and

• as a top Eurocrat, he played a lead role in destroying national sovereignty by replacing national currencies (and national monetary control) with the euro, as well as engineering the “borderless Europe,” which the current migrant crisis is now proving to have been so destructive.

In addition, Sutherland and Soros both sit on the Advisory Board of the Global Policy Institute (GPI), a leading think tank promoting world government under the guise of “global governance.” Sutherland forecast much of his current UN refugee agenda in an essay for the GPI journal, Global Policy, in February 2010, entitled, “The Age of Mobility: Can we make migration work for all?”

It is worth noting that the Columbia Global Policy Initiative (CGPI), which the Soros report mentions funding and collaborating with, refers to the organization established at Columbia University that has become a leading force for the radical migration agenda. The CGPI is run by Professor Michael Doyle, who, naturally, is a member of the world-government promoting Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Other prominent CFR members on the CGPI directory include Jeffrey Sachs, Joseph Stiglitz, Carol Gluck, and Lee Bollinger.

Stay tuned for more revelations from the leaked Soros documents.

Related articles:

Refugee Nightmare 2.0 — the EU’s 2nd Migration Tsunami Has Begun

Here Comes the Obama/UN Refugee “Surge” — Rebranded as “Safe Alternative Pathways”

UN, Socialist International, Obama Design U.S. Refugee Resettlement

Refugee Crisis: Using Chaos to Build Power

George Soros Touts China as Leader of New World Order

George Soros Funded by the House of Rothschild
https://www.thenewamerican.com/econ...eorge-soros-funded-by-the-house-of-rothschild
 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
In an article on Gatestone they describe what may come out of a immigration that that is forced on a country to an extent it is incapable handling. The case is a part of Athen in Greece: Greece: A "No-Go" Zone in Athens? there was:
Greece: A "No-Go" Zone in Athens?
by Maria Polizoidou
April 20, 2019 at 5:00 am
Greece: A "No-Go" Zone in Athens?

  • "[T]he neighborhood has... platoons, companies, battalions, Kalashnikovs. I don't know any more if we, as a police force, have the political mandate to clear the area. This region is a matter for the army now." — Stavros Balaskas, vice president of the Greek Federation of Police Officers, April 6, 2019.
    [*]"...[T]here are now too many illegal immigrants in Exarchia who are drug traffickers [and] gun traffickers... they have essentially taken over the whole place." — Michalis Chrysochoidis, a former Greek Minister of Citizen Protection, who was responsible for the 2002 dismantling of the "November 17" domestic terrorist organization, April 8, 2019
    [*]In Exarchia, these groups -- which conduct criminal activities and terrorize local residents -- have, in effect, created a "no-go zone," where even police are afraid to enter.
3852.jpg

According to Stavros Balaskas, vice president of the Greek Federation of Police Officers, anarchist gangs in the Athens neighborhood of Exarchia have "platoons, companies, battalions, Kalashnikovs. I don't know any more if we, as a police force, have the political mandate to clear the area. This region is a matter for the army now." Pictured: A street in Exarchia following a riot, in December 2008. (Image source: Xenos2008/Wikimedia Commons)
An assault on members of the Hellenic Coast Guard during a drug raid in Athens on April 4 highlights a growing problem in Greece. Some opponents of the far-left Syriza-led government attribute the increasing drug traffic in the country to a dangerous alliance between political anarchists and illegal immigrants. The anarchists might be considered the Greek equivalent of the "far left". According to Reuters:
"Many self-proclaimed anarchists - the word stems from the Greek 'anarchia' or absence of authority - say they are pacifist, but certain groups have few qualms about using violence. Six years of recession have fuelled a new wave of left-wing militancy, according to officials, anarchists and court testimony."
The April 4 incident was sparked when Greek authorities arrested a Syrian national on a ferry at the Piraeus Port; he was carrying 200 grams of marijuana, which he said he had purchased from an Egyptian drug dealer in the Exarchia neighborhood of Athens.
Eight members of the Coast Guard and a prosecutor immediately went to Exarchia to raid the supplier's apartment, located in one of 50 buildings in the neighborhood that are occupied by illegal-immigrant squatters. When the officers and prosecutor arrived at the building, they arrested two female suspects, a Greek-Australian and a Syrian national, and confiscated 1.5 kilograms of cannabis and a Glock pistol.

On their way out of the building, the officers were ambushed by a masked mob, wearing helmets and bulletproof vests, and armed with knives, clubs and assault rifles. Two Coast Guard officers were stabbed in the attack, and their weapons taken.
According to the authorities, the building in which the incident took place is near a weapons cache possibly connected to the "militias" of Exarchia -- a neighborhood infamous for previous violent attacks on police. As the Chairman of the Union of Police Officers, Dimosthenis Pakos, said in an interview after the assault, "You don't go for a walk in Exarchia [without being accompanied by] an army."

In an interview with SKAI TV, Stavros Balaskas, vice president of the Greek Federation of Police Officers, agreed, referring to Exarchia as "a state within a state":
"[T]he neighborhood has a structure inside. There are platoons, companies, battalions, Kalashnikovs. I don't know any more if we, as a police force, have the political mandate to clear the area. This region is a matter for the army now."
Michalis Chrysochoidis, a former Minister for Citizen Protection who was responsible for the 2002 dismantling of the "November 17" domestic terrorist organization, told SKAI TV this month:
"...[T]here are now too many illegal immigrants in Exarchia who are drug traffickers [and] gun traffickers... they have essentially taken over the whole place... f there is no immediate operational and judiciary reaction to this phenomenon, the problems will... multiply for society."

On April 11, in what appeared to be a public relations operation aimed at restoring a modicum of dignity to the security forces that had been attacked a week earlier, heavily armed police units raided two buildings in Exarchia in search of drugs and weapons. During the raid, three people were arrested for drug possession, and 90 others were brought in for questioning. Most of them turned out to be illegal or unregistered immigrants.

As of 2017, there were an estimated 3,000 undocumented immigrants living in Athens in privately-owned buildings that are illegally occupied by Greek anarchists.

In the two years since then, the number has likely increased. In Exarchia, these groups -- which conduct criminal activities and terrorize local residents -- have, in effect, created a "no-go zone," where even police are afraid to enter.
It is unclear how these groups get organized and who finances them. It is also unknown how many of the immigrants have ties to ISIS and al-Qaeda.

One thing, however, is certain: In the absence of political will to get to the bottom of the alliance between anarchists and illegal immigrants, the future of other neighborhoods across the country is in jeopardy.
Maria Polizoidou, a reporter, broadcast journalist, and consultant on international and foreign affairs, is based in Greece. She has a graduate degree in "Geopolitics and Security Issues in the Islamic complex of Turkey and Middle East" from the University of Athens.
 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
If the following is what it says then it's a plan: SHOCK REPORT: Dem Governor Turns Entire State Into 'Sanctuary City' To Protect ALL Illegal Aliens

Washington Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee signed a measure on Wednesday turning the entire state into a “sanctuary city” to protect all illegal aliens.

According to Fox News, the measure blocks local authorities from asking about a person’s immigration status because of a new “sanctuary” policy that offers blanket protections to illegal aliens.

Inslee — who is running for president as a Democrat — signing the measure means Washington is now in line with California and Oregon as having the strongest sanctuary policies in the United States.
 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
There was 'Unaccompanied minor' age assessments based on appearance for migrants ruled unlawful in UK which ends:
NGOs and so-called human rights bodies are generally opposed to age testing asylum seekers who claim to be children, with the Council of Europe demanding that such migrants "be given the benefit of the doubt and presumed to be a child" on the basis that age assessments "may be frightening and unsettling for children".

But others argue that the dismantling of checks risks putting unvetted, potentially dangerous adults into close proximity with children at services like schools and foster homes.

Fears that adult migrants are posing as children to gain access to favourable treatment and more costly services by the UK authorities have not been unfounded, according to previous Home Office figures, which revealed 65 per cent of individuals alleging they were "unaccompanied minors" in the year to September 2015 were
judged to be over 18.
Comment: So, adult migrants can identify as children and be accepted as such just because they say so. This will no doubt stir resentment and distrust among UK citizens, which seems to be the underlying purpose.
In forensic, dentistry they can narrow it down to about one year. Without looking for alternative methods, here is one result: Reliability of age estimation using Demirjian's 8 teeth method and India specific formula
The results showed that the mean absolute error for the study sample was 1.18 years; in 57.9% of cases the error rate was within ±1 year. The mean absolute error in males (7-16 years) was 1.2 years; in males (16.1-23 years) was 1.3 years; in females (7-16 years) was 0.95 years and in females (16.1-23 years) was 1.16 years.
Conclusion:
The age estimation using this method narrows down the error rate to just over one year making this method reliable. However the inclusion of third molar increases the error rates in the older individuals within the sample.
Keywords: Age prediction, children and adolescents, Demirjian's method, dental maturity, forensic dentistry
 

angelburst29

The Living Force
Turkish police said on Wednesday they had detained the leaders of what they called Europe's biggest people-smuggling ring, which helped thousands of irregular immigrants reach Europe from the Middle East.

Turkey breaks up smuggling ring that brought thousands of migrants to Europe
FILE PHOTO: Migrants in a dinghy paddle their way on the Mediterranean Sea to attempt crossing to the Greek island of Kos, as a Turkish Coast Guard ship patrols off the shores off Bodrum, Turkey, September 19, 2015.  REUTERS/Umit Bektas/File Photo

Twenty people, including ringleader Akbar Omar Tawfeeq, were detained in operations in four Turkish provinces after a year long investigation into the organization, Istanbul police said.

The network mainly helped Afghan, Iraqi and Syrian nationals cross into European countries from Turkey by land and sea, police said, adding that the group had also worked with other smuggling groups in Ukraine, Italy and Greece.

As part of the operations, police detained 569 irregular immigrants and seized six vehicles and six boats, they said in a statement. The smuggling group, whose leaders are mainly from northern Iraq, earned an average 2 million euros annually.

Video footage released by police showed special operations police breaking down the door of the suspects’ residence and seizing phones, drugs and digital material.

More than a million migrants and refugees, many fleeing conflict and poverty in the Middle East and Africa, arrived in the European Union in 2015. Turkey was one of the main launch points for the dangerous sea leg of their journey, on which thousands died.

Numbers declined sharply in the following year when Turkey, in exchange for 3 billion euros in European Union aid and a promise to ease visa restrictions for Turks, began to exert more control on migrants trying to cross to Europe via its territory.

Overall Mediterranean arrivals to the European Union, including migrants making the longer and more perilous crossing from north Africa to Italy, stood at 172,301 in 2017, down from 362,753 in 2016 and 1,015,078 in 2015, according to U.N. data.
 

thorbiorn

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
And NATO 'Deep State' And Israeli Interests Served by Ousting of Austrian Government -- Sott.net
"If Israel was behind the 'honey trap' and the subsequent downfall of the Austrian government coalition, then it seems more reasonable to suggest that, for some reason, Israel has a problem with the rise of right-wing nationalist/populist anti-immigrant and, to one extent or another, anti-Muslim governments in Europe. While this may seem counter intuitive - after all, Israel isn't exactly fond of ordinary Muslims either, and tends to have a rather nationalistic approach to its political and social life - Israel has a long-standing goal of encouraging anti-Muslim sentiment among its powerful 'friends' in Europe. If achieving that goal means it has to choose between aligning itself with governments that speak out against and attempt to curb [Muslim] immigration to Europe, and governments that encourage Muslim immigration to European nations so that anti-Muslim immigrant sentiment can continue to be stoked, it's possible that the latter is favored by the 'social engineers' in Israeli intelligence."
 

mamibio74

Jedi Master
FOTCM Member
The members of the oligarchy (Soros, Rothschild etc) had already planned in 1997 to open the doors of the westerners to an increasingly massive immigration by popping up here or there new conflicts. Their plan already envisaged that extremist groups would be part of the influx of immigrants to facilitate political, economic and social destabilizations of the targeted Nations. What for ? to bring down Europe as a ripe fruit in order and take control. They want to install a European Sovereign at first. Later when the time comes, they will impose on us the Sovereign of the World Government that they will choose among their. He will present himself as the Savior of the world for hide to the peoples that he is a dictaor. The Pact of Marrakech was signed to implement the plan.
 
Top Bottom