Meditation and Inspiration

[Phill4]

Numerous engineered conditions of our usual external world has so many ways to effectively keep us under continuous and heavy stress and pressure. And when we are consciously or unconsciously identified with the external world reality at an extreme extent, we are gradually depleted of our vital resources, weakened, traumatized, and controlled.

I believe that we should each have a subjective/inner/personal field of reality to protect ourselves against many certain external instrusive and manipulative influences. Don't we already try to do this all the times naturally and automatically?

But, of course, we have our own "internal" negative thought/belief programs. I try to observe those of mine and try to figure out what exactly they are, how they function and what to do with them. I'm still in the process of questioning these. I feel or believe that as long as I can't create and maintain an inner/subjective reality of profound confidence and joy, I'll not be at peace with myself and with the external world. Interestingly, when I try to extend my concept of "external world" further to include my concept of objective/external Universe, the latter imaginatively tends to curve and blend with my individual/subjective universe. This also intersects with my subjective concept of "I'm the Creator" in connection with the Branch/Tree relationship and/or "I'm All there is. There is nothing but me. I'm existence itself. How can there be anything further than me?"

Frist, thank you for sharing your experience bozadi, i have been trying to figure this out, and as all have issues that contribute to certain biased thinking from submerging in life and lacking the unity to sustain the state of uniform attention in and out of a meditative state.

It is a process, to try an acheive unity within.

I picked this portion of what you wrote because this is one of the programings that build certain comvictions and false beliefs about reality, we all have been lied to, for christians, calling god a being sitting somewhere is limiting the creator to human form in their minds. Some people visualize him as a person in a cloud, which is a limited perception.
Thiis is an illusion.

Thinking we are not an expression of God, because of the indoctrination we all suffered from people who were also unaware of the lying, is also an illusion,
The first thing is to discover what we believe God is as an illusion, and start looking at the idea that we all are an expression of the creation, and an expression of God. And that inclueds STS and STO beings from every density.

Density, inplisitly tells us the state in which we, as a vibration of God.
Like energy in different states.
I don't have the quote at hand where the C's explained how matter and light are an expression of energy in different form, in different density And in different expression of the same thing, and light, as bjorn quoted, is love is knowledge..

We need to address these illusions, to be able to see better.

This illusion can prevent us from looking at things in the perspective that One, the Logic of God in unreachable to us on our level of awareness and two that we are separate, what separate us is the big illusion which is 3D and smaller illusions that correspond to our inner world.

If the mind contains all, we need to rid the illuions that form these perceptions and assumptions, in order to see beyond them.


Something that came to mind while reading the avobe is an idea i that came up after certain experiences,
One is addressing problems while in the state of normal life
Two is the silencing of the voice in the head
Third the voice in the head in itself.

Addressing the porblems while in normal life:
When we deal with our personality in normal life by means of learning or deal with certain blockages that affect our personality we grow in awareness.
Dealing emwith certain blockages is very important and we should pursuit the discovery of them, be research, therapy, or whatever the means depending on the life situation of the individual, in order to be able to have better awareness of ourselves.

Silencing the voice in the head:
When i was learning about meditation the idea was sold to me as keeping the mind silent... Whatever that meant, so i made efforts to silence every thought and word and it took me some time to get it..
I did this in conpmete unawareness of the process, how we produce an inaudible voice in thought?
What is the process?
From what G. Said it is a function of the intellectual center the emotinal center in a certain configuration which express themselves in the person as, visual images, voice in the head, daydreaming etc etc.
these are the centers used in such way.

So what about arranging them in a way that allows the person to access this state at will?

This is why the work is important and spend some time internalizing or learning the concepts, because then we can have a framework to explain what "the voice in the head" is.



I linked a thread avobe about "silencing the mind", i think there are some important clues there.
Just some thoughts

 

[bozadi]

Thank you, Felipe4. You made me contemplate more on the discussed issues.

Even when we know or believe that all existence consists of seven levels of consciousness, that we are at 3D and that what we have tended to believe in as God is largely a misrepresentation of 7D, our deeply programmed linearity leads us to measure the distance/time between 3D and 7D and conclude that we are not 7D / God. It seems that this conclusion can be both true and false. I'm just speculating based on the material we have been blissfully provided with. It was said that "only 7D is true", that all other levels are just illusion. I conclude that 7D is the "Self". And all the other "levels" are what is "created" by 7D. Relatively, anything created is illusion and the creator is non-illusion / true. I'll further my wild guess by claiming that all the density levels, that is, the Illusion, could be various levels of the "Mind" of the "Self".

So, when we say we are 3D, question arises "Are we just illusion / non-real?" Both yes and no, probably. The discussion of "identity" is the discussion of "Self/Godhood/7D".

 

[Oxajil]

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, bozadi. Here are my 2 small cents:

In my daily reality, most of the times, I find myself submerged in negative thoughts and feelings. And, in my efforts for meditation, I mostly lack the patience to silence my active thought process, which is mostly under the influence of daily life experiences, expectations, etc. So, when I feel that I'll not be able to show that patience, for which I'm somehow angry at myself, I try to find the most suitable subject to try to focus on.

I was wondering, have you tried the Éiriú Eolas breathing and meditation program? During the meditation part of the program, Laura recites the Prayer of the Soul, and it's a great way to practice your focusing ability. You breathe in with the first phrase, out with the second and so forth, while keeping your mind focused on each phrase. Focusing on a seed word like confidence is a good approach too I think, I would recommend doing a couple of pipe breaths beforehand which can help with getting into a meditative state. I think it's not so much about silencing your active thought processes, but more about redirecting your focus from those thoughts to something else (more fruitful, i.e. the prayer or poem, or a seed word). Based on my experience, it takes practice. Once you notice your thoughts drifting away you redirect your focus again, and so on. If you haven't tried it already I highly recommend trying out the EE program.

I just experimented with the belief that confidence and joy are not the goods of someone. They are everywhere and you either access them or not. And I can very well be their creator. If I want to have them, I'll just have them and nothing can prevent this. This is as natural and even essential as the air I breathe.

Maybe. A tiny side-note on the above: I don't think that joy is something that one can have at all times, though perhaps you see joy in a different way. Sometimes negative feelings are not bad and they can help us grow or learn things about ourselves or they can be useful to react to that which causes us to feel sad. The state of the world for example, if we see atrocities being committed, the sadness we feel can prompt us to help in any way we can. When we make a mistake, being jolly wouldn't help either, but to be a little 'real' with ourselves, to admit the mistake and try better next time. It's possible we'll feel bummed out about it, but sometimes it's that pain and realization of the mistake that can help us not to make it again.

Having said that, when you tend to have negative feedback loops in your mind it can help to network, and maybe seeded meditation or the POTS can help to break out of those loops as well.

I've experienced very interesting and helpful effects from POTS and seeded meditation, in the way of gaining a bit more energy, encouragement or insight. I also notice that you can't wish for confidence and have it created in you, I think that some effort is necessary as well. For example, if you are going to speak in front of a big crowd and all you want to do is hide away, you have to make the effort to go through it, and act against the fear. So maybe, people can access it, but it doesn't go without (continuous) energy input and networking, and of course it depends on the person and the situation.

The C's have also mentioned the importance of continuing to gain knowledge when it comes to practicing the EE program. While we take time to meditate and practice discipline, I also think it's important to keep up with what happens around us as well; politics, earth changes, etc. and to stay aware as much as possible.

IMO your sudden NEED for knowledge is just a bait made up by your mind. Put your thoughts together and rest in the needlessness, good silencing !

Seeking knowledge and trying to understand things better or more objectively is always a good thing, not necessarily a bait made up by the mind, after all, knowledge protects!

FWIW.

 

[bjorb]

Maybe setting a set of examples and categorizing what Love isn't and what Love is could help?

What is the difference between Self-Love (subjective) and Objective Love?

When do we cause disconnect (Ego) and when connection (Love) with others?


If we work with these burning questions and meditate on it. I think it helps us to keep moving in the right direction.

I think self-love implisitly intells the separation inside the entity from the rest , or maybe a effect of the separation in our minds from the all.
We can't see each other beyond ourselves.

The illusion and the human condition as 3D beings, this illusion that we are separate is sustained within our personality, personality in the esoteric sense not in the comon sense.

Our personality is a structure form by programs, crystalized, and under the influence of the social structure gives this illusion its reality.

I think of dogs, how we do all we do and dogs just are, regardless of what we wish to believe we are supposed to do, a dog is, this is just an observation, and the reality of the dog is built in his instinctive and biological needs corresponding to his body of dog.

We consntantly invest energy in this illusion, and we chose to grow and learn or 3D lessons, but there is other ways. We just need to remind ourselves all the time it seems...


Well, love can be a virtude of knowledge about our connection to the all, maybe..

I think that is well said but to explain it more in practical terms.


Self-love (personality/Ego) only sees others as tools to uplift their Self-importance.

Objective-love sees others as they are. And only when we can see others as they are can we help them. And by that love them. But to get there Self-knowledge and knowledge in general is required. To love you must know. And to know is to have light. And to have light is to love. And to have knowledge is to love.

Our connection to all there IS can only happen through Objective Love. (Knowledge) Only when we can see things as they are, can we be connected to All there IS.

Personality (Ego) only sees things as it wants it to see it and this separates our connection to All there IS.


Maybe the following trick can proof itself to be helpful :

When you are with others, it's more like trying to respect their higher self and not their personality. It's not about creating synergy between personalities, but between souls.

And yes, more than often it doesn't seem to be present with people. But if you keep this Higher Aim in mind. Our programs won't run that easily amok when you are with others. At least for me, I find it helpful.

 

[bozadi]

I was wondering, have you tried the Éiriú Eolas breathing and meditation program? During the meditation part of the program, Laura recites the Prayer of the Soul, and it's a great way to practice your focusing ability. You breathe in with the first phrase, out with the second and so forth, while keeping your mind focused on each phrase. Focusing on a seed word like confidence is a good approach too I think, I would recommend doing a couple of pipe breaths beforehand which can help with getting into a meditative state. I think it's not so much about silencing your active thought processes, but more about redirecting your focus from those thoughts to something else (more fruitful, i.e. the prayer or poem, or a seed word). Based on my experience, it takes practice. Once you notice your thoughts drifting away you redirect your focus again, and so on. If you haven't tried it already I highly recommend trying out the EE program.

Hi, Oxajil. I surely did Eiriu Eolas meditation several times after I became aware of it. Then, I soon rapidly lost my interest in it just like I do with many other things including the POTS. I think this is an important problem with me; a significant amount of disconnection, isolation, despair, impatience, various egotic problems. But I must mention that I have never completely got away from the pipe breathing exercise. A few pipe breaths at various times of a day, almost every day. As I get results very quickly with it, I value it highly although some days, or sometimes, I will have an inner resistance against doing it, as I have an inner resistance against doing many other valuable things including a general meditation. I sincerely try to observe and address these problems.

Recently, after a long time, I've begun meditation practices again, almost regularly each night other than short sporadic daytime relaxation/meditation efforts accompanyed by pipe breaths.

I remember, years ago, after reading books or passages about meditation, I had done some "silent" meditations as good as I could (focusing on a specific thought or thoughtlessness and refocusing again and again after distractions). And some of them had produced very good results including a deep relaxation, joy and inspiration to be shared. I feel that if I tried my best, I would have similar results now as well. Although I can't deny the heavy influence of my ego, I feel that I should ordinarily (not just through special practices like meditation) be able to bring the awareness of whatever is the source of confidence and joy into the daily life reality. Like consciously bridging in myself two different realities, being aware of the normally incompatible natures of them. Currently, I'm not very successful at this but I intend to persist developing myself at that. I think I've also got a great help from lugol's. But the best help I've had in this sense is the body of knowledge/beliefs about the nature of universe/life from the Ra, the Pleadians and especially the C's.

I don't think that joy is something that one can have at all times, though perhaps you see joy in a different way. Sometimes negative feelings are not bad and they can help us grow or learn things about ourselves or they can be useful to react to that which causes us to feel sad. The state of the world for example, if we see atrocities being committed, the sadness we feel can prompt us to help in any way we can. When we make a mistake, being jolly wouldn't help either, but to be a little 'real' with ourselves, to admit the mistake and try better next time. It's possible we'll feel bummed out about it, but sometimes it's that pain and realization of the mistake that can help us not to make it again.

Sure, I have no problem about the didactic benefits of any negative experience or reaction. Our lives have been full of them, haven't they? I'm not really uninterested in the state of the world, atrocities, extreme inequality, torture; the "psychopathic status quo". I administrate a very small Turkish forum where I regularly share and comment on various news reports about what is going on in Turkey, in the Middle East and around the world. I don't imagine that any time soon I or anyone I know will soon get rid of being an addressee of this psychopathic world order other than by disincarnation, which might not by itself provide a permanent solution in this regard. We have a vital need to get aware of the situation, resist and counteract by networking.

So I never mean to disregard what is going on in the world although sometimes I might sound like that in some certain types of discussions like above.

 

[Oxajil]

Thank you for elaborating, bozadi. And no worries, I didn't think you were disregarding what is going on in the world, as I noticed your contributions in the recent thread about events in Turkey. I mentioned it as just a general reminder. :)

 

[bozadi]

Thank you for elaborating, bozadi. And no worries, I didn't think you were disregarding what is going on in the world, as I noticed your contributions in the recent thread about events in Turkey. I mentioned it as just a general reminder. :)

I feel lucky that you created a good opportunity for me to make some clarification in this regard. Thank you! :D

 

[Zar]

Maybe setting a set of examples and categorizing what Love isn't and what Love is could help?

What is the difference between Self-Love (subjective) and Objective Love?

When do we cause disconnect (Ego) and when connection (Love) with others?


If we work with these burning questions and meditate on it. I think it helps us to keep moving in the right direction.

I think self-love implisitly intells the separation inside the entity from the rest , or maybe a effect of the separation in our minds from the all.
We can't see each other beyond ourselves.

The illusion and the human condition as 3D beings, this illusion that we are separate is sustained within our personality, personality in the esoteric sense not in the comon sense.

Our personality is a structure form by programs, crystalized, and under the influence of the social structure gives this illusion its reality.

I think of dogs, how we do all we do and dogs just are, regardless of what we wish to believe we are supposed to do, a dog is, this is just an observation, and the reality of the dog is built in his instinctive and biological needs corresponding to his body of dog.

We consntantly invest energy in this illusion, and we chose to grow and learn or 3D lessons, but there is other ways. We just need to remind ourselves all the time it seems...


Well, love can be a virtude of knowledge about our connection to the all, maybe..

I think that is well said but to explain it more in practical terms.


Self-love (personality/Ego) only sees others as tools to uplift their Self-importance.

Objective-love sees others as they are. And only when we can see others as they are can we help them. And by that love them. But to get there Self-knowledge and knowledge in general is required. To love you must know. And to know is to have light. And to have light is to love. And to have knowledge is to love.

Our connection to all there IS can only happen through Objective Love. (Knowledge) Only when we can see things as they are, can we be connected to All there IS.

Personality (Ego) only sees things as it wants it to see it and this separates our connection to All there IS.


Maybe the following trick can proof itself to be helpful :

When you are with others, it's more like trying to respect their higher self and not their personality. It's not about creating synergy between personalities, but between souls.

And yes, more than often it doesn't seem to be present with people. But if you keep this Higher Aim in mind. Our programs won't run that easily amok when you are with others. At least for me, I find it helpful.

Great thread everyone, I had thoughts on self-love/love and wanted to see what you guys think about it. Let me now if I'm not rationalizing this correctly.

I recognize that this discussion is focused on subjective vs objective love but I don't particularly agree that self-love is the same as subjective(ego) love, I'm not even sure we can have subjective love. If love is light is knowledge then the only way to love the self is to see the self objectively, see (have knowledge on) the essence, the ego, and our connectivity to all there is. If we see ourselves objectively then we should see that we are indeed connected to all there is so self love would be love of all reality. I think self love can't be attained without love of everything else and knowing we are one, which means having objective knowledge of all. And this leads us to being prime creators.

And inversely if we are all indeed prime creators and are unified than having that knowledge would be the precursor for self-love or would be self-love itself, knowing the all is knowing the self which is loving the self/all.

As I understand it subjective love is misguided and not real love at all, which stems from false knowledge and fake "I's".

Hope this helps as I'm still learning.

 

[bozadi]

Hi Thinkingfingers. Thanks for the input.

The C's had said: "STO flows outward and touches all including point of origin, STS flows inward and touches only origin point."

This is the astronomical/astrological symbol of the Sun:

I think this symbol also represents the entire sphere of existence. I think the point in the middle represents 7D and it is also what the C's mentioned as the point of origin. Accordingly, the external surface represents 1D and the space between covers all the other density levels.

I come to believe that whenever we talk about selfhood, we refer, in this or that way, to 7D. Accordingly, I believe, Godhood is Selfhood. The very sense of Self/Identity is exclusively originated in 7D.

Hypothetically, the self-love of an STS being is such that, the being says "Only I'm the God, and nobody else in the entire existence." But the self-love of an STO being is such that, the being says "Everybody in the entire existence is God". An STO being's recognition of (and, love for) an STS being as God might appear a little problematic. I think that this recognition and love will have some strict limitations in parallel to the STS being's imposition of significant limitations on Goodhood.

 

[bjorb]

[quote author= Thinkingfingers]Great thread everyone, I had thoughts on self-love/love and wanted to see what you guys think about it. Let me now if I'm not rationalizing this correctly.[/quote]

Self love here means as loving the Ego more.

I know sometimes this word is used differently so it can be confusing. We should all be able to Love ourselves of course.

But it isn't about worshipping the Ego. Loving yourself in a healthy way is about being able to Be comfortable with yourself.

If you are needy for certain attention or stuff to be comfortable with yourself. You don't love yourself for example.


[quote author= Thinkingfingers]I'm not even sure we can have subjective love[/quote]

Subjective love seeks out people, status and stuff in order to love the Ego more. Subjective love is Ego love.

Objective Love sees through this and realizes it's emptiness of all that. It sees everything and everyone as they are.


[quote author= Thinkingfingers]As I understand it subjective love is misguided and not real love at all, which stems from false knowledge and fake "I's".[/quote]

Yes, subjective love for all it's intent and purposes is part of evolution. But we are meant to overcome that. When we learn, Objective Love comes more natural. Which is part of the Real ''I'' Everything else is False.

OSIT.

 

[Zar]

Hi Thinkingfingers. Thanks for the input.

The C's had said: "STO flows outward and touches all including point of origin, STS flows inward and touches only origin point."

This is the astronomical/astrological symbol of the Sun:

I think this symbol also represents the entire sphere of existence. I think the point in the middle represents 7D and it is also what the C's mentioned as the point of origin. Accordingly, the external surface represents 1D and the space between covers all the other density levels.

I come to believe that whenever we talk about selfhood, we refer, in this or that way, to 7D. Accordingly, I believe, Godhood is Selfhood. The very sense of Self/Identity is exclusively originated in 7D.

Hypothetically, the self-love of an STS being is such that, the being says "Only I'm the God, and nobody else in the entire existence." But the self-love of an STO being is such that, the being says "Everybody in the entire existence is God". An STO being's recognition of (and, love for) an STS being as God might appear a little problematic. I think that this recognition and love will have some strict limitations in parallel to the STS being's imposition of significant limitations on Goodhood.

Ah, so subjective love/knowledge vs objective love is better thought of as an expression of flow/connectivity (inwards or outwards) per se.

Can you elaborate on why it would be problematic? My thinking is that everything exists in balance(not sure if that applies to all parallel realities) and an STO should recognize that for creation to truly experience itself it must have a being and a nonbeing. In that regard love shouldn't be limited since love is knowledge and there is knowledge created by interaction with STS. The range of experiences would be halved or nonexistent if STO didn't have STS, I think the polarity is what creates the means for all experiences to take place.

Hope this makes sense.

 

[bozadi]

Ah, so subjective love/knowledge vs objective love is better thought of as an expression of flow/connectivity (inwards or outwards) per se.

Can you elaborate on why it would be problematic? My thinking is that everything exists in balance(not sure if that applies to all parallel realities) and an STO should recognize that for creation to truly experience itself it must have a being and a nonbeing. In that regard love shouldn't be limited since love is knowledge and there is knowledge created by interaction with STS. The range of experiences would be halved or nonexistent if STO didn't have STS, I think the polarity is what creates the means for all experiences to take place.

Hope this makes sense.

About the "problematic" issue, I think that the issue will probably appear complicated to us because we don't directly observe an STO being's recognition and/or love for an STS being. This is all very hypothetical to us even if we happen to conceptualize things sufficiently accurate for ourselves.

In that regard love shouldn't be limited since love is knowledge and there is knowledge created by interaction with STS.

Yeah, when we take "love as light/knowledge", I'm sure that an STO being can abundantly "love" an STS being whom the STO being does or can interact with, in that, the STO being(s) will do much to "get to know about" the identity and behaviors of the STS being(s). In this sense, I don't think that there would be any certain limitation of light and love. But when we take "love" as "service", there would be that strict limitation. But, eventually, an interaction between them will inevitably be an indirect service for both parties because it will certainly provide some new data.

 

[Temperance]

(L) Right. Okay, next question: What type of belief do you need in order to effect positive change?

A: Full understanding of the nature of your connection to all that is will get you there.

Q: (L) That's a pretty tall order. I mean, you have to really... How do you get there, that is, gain an understanding of your connection to the All?

A: Meditation.

Perhaps using "As Above, So Below" as seed we might be able to access the that feeling of our connection to all? Just a thought, fwiwi, I'm gonna try this :)

So, I've been using the seed I spoke about above lately in meditation, and just pondering these questions the past few days, coupled with my readings of Gnosis I and II, and here are my results:

I probably don't have a full understanding of the nature of my connection to the all, but I think I have a clue as to some parts of the connection. First, the understanding that we affect those around us by our growth, which hopefully inspires others to follow suit, and they influence or inspire others in the same way, we are creating an exponential change around us. Our growth can thus lead to a positive effect to those around us, in a localized way, although the effect can spread. If I understood properly, this is the sort of effect we need to gain a critical mass in changing the world around us, or move to a different reality. Furthermore, our individual development, in the context of this network and tribal unit, helps others within the tribal unit to grow, and they help us grow, producing an effect on the whole tribal unit, which will try to extend the effect to the world at large(or have us shift to a parallel reality where the global state isn't in such a chaotic state?).

Second, I had the thought that if we bring order to the system of our individual selves, or decrease the entropy of our system, we can decrease the total entropy of the greater cosmos, even if by a very small amount, in the large scale of things. In a linear way, the sum of our individual decrease of entropy (by each becoming more coherent systems), we get a larger net change in the cosmos, which is in addition to the exponential changes that I discussed above.

So, meditating on our connection to the All can help us internalize the need for our individual growth in that it will affect everything around us, which may add up to a positive change. Internalizing that connection could lead us to not feel as isolated, and that our efforts, as small as they may seem, have greater importance than we might attribute to them. This can lead to a greater motivation to keep working, since the results become more tangible, or at least the mechanism in which it happens may be more visible to us.

Now to try to put this in G's terms, if we are connected in the sense of three octaves, the first one coming from the Absolute I, second from Absolute II, and our's from Absolute III, our individual growth(by filling the interval of the Absolute III) allows energy to continue it's flow through the interval in the second octave (of Absolute II), furthering the growth of our Ray of Creation. Here I'm taking a positive change to mean the continuation of the flow of energy from Absolute I through the Ray of Creation. So I think it may be our understanding of this flow, through learning about it and internalizing it through meditation, that can help us in bringing about a positive change by understanding that our own growth is what is necessary for effecting a positive change, osit.

It's admittedly much tougher than I thought to put these thoughts down in text, but I hope it makes some sense, fwiw.

 

[bozadi]

Sometimes we refer to "burning questions", "a burning desire for knowledge".

I think one of the most consistently and fiercely burning questions ever is "who/what am I?" Of course, any answer provided to this question can and most probably will improve and refine by time. We talk about "densities" that goes further to 7D. And, interestingly, the C's seems to allow no ambiguity regarding who/what we eventually are. They say "You are the Prime Creator" / 7D, just like everything else eventually is. Sure, this information or suggestion does not smoothly apply in our 3D STS reality. And I believe this is where the "belief" factor steps in. Belief is maybe an investment in knowledge. And I believe that the most precious knowledge we can possibly invest in is that about who/what we really are. And interestingly, whether or not we like it, anything we do or experience or think about actually, directly or indirectly, serves to get us closer to know about what/who we absolutely are.

We don't really need to reach 7D (or any density higher than 3D) specifically before we can know about who/what we are. We can know and do experience what we absolutely are, of course with certain serious limitations of our current environment/level/density. But limitation does not mean that we can take no taste or experience of our absolute identity/reality sufficiently for our current level.

They said: "All of us have a long way to go, but getting there is half the fun."

The light of the absolute truth reaches every density in some amount, surely by some distortion but we already do not need (nor can we bear) the pure and absolute experience of 7D with zero distortion. What we can have here will suffice for us. And because we live under some crushing STS pressure and because this STS control will try to do anything to prevent us from finding our true identity and thus power, we are very much in need knowledge, belief, intuition and work for finding the direct insight and experience of what/who we absolutely are, which is also what anything absolutely is.

Our STS programs and the STS-dominated external world status quo might be effectively prevent us from directly focusing on seeing or experiencing what/we absolutely are based on our knowledge, intuition and beliefs and, of course, on the best avaible sources of knowledge like the Cassiopaean sessions and else.

 

[bozadi]

In the same context, the C's: "Where you are is not important. Who you are is and also what you see."