Meteorite Explodes Over Russia Injures Hundreds

Laura said:
Endymion said:
That’s a LOT of energy being put out at 30-50km up!

. . . is NOT an understatement!

And if these things are getting bigger the complete destruction of a large city like London or Manchester is easily possible. :scared:

From: http://www.sott.net/article/151954-Meteorites-Asteroids-and-Comets-Damages-Disasters-Injuries-Deaths-and-Very-Close-Calls

(the list desperately needs to be updated; any volunteers?)

I updated the list until June, 2012. I'll work on getting 2012 finished.

If anyone wants to lend me a hand, let me know. For 2008-2012, I've been keeping tallies of: total fireball sightings, multi-state fireball sightings, daytime fireballs, sightings with sonic booms, 'mysterious' sonic booms, meteorite landings. And of course, short descriptions of notable events, e.g., where property was damaged, people hurt, etc. So basically, going through the sott archives and keeping a list as I go.
 
mabar said:
Pashalis said:
Well now we have allegedly the first video that shows the cuba Meteor that was spottet on the same day as the russian one:
_http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/second-meteor-video-cuba-two-1712957

parallel said:
Pashalis said:
Well now we have allegedly the first video that shows the cuba Meteor that was spottet on the same day as the russian one:
_http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/second-meteor-video-cuba-two-1712957
I recognize the clip and image from this article, a 2010 event I think. And I don't think it was cuba, aren't those trafficlights US style?

EDIT: That type of trafficlights are used in Cuba it appears, the scene and framing I remember may just be very similar.

Although, from the comments in that website, at least tree people refere to the image to a video posted here: ¬_http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f8a4de8a13, from, Guadalajara, Mexico, 2006. It looks to me to Alcalde Avenue, and/or another avenue in down town center of Guadalajara. It is here also:_http://senalesdelostiempos.blogspot.mx/2007/07/meteoro-sobre-guadalajara-mxico.html ...and here: _http://cambios-planetarios.blogspot.mx/2007/08/meteoro-sobre-guadalajara-mxico.html, and here:_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c57KbPEI0i8

Yes, this is not the recent fireball in Cuba, I remember seeing that video years ago.
 
Following the meteorite that fell in Russia, now the Spanish media report a meteorite that crashed in Madrid last summer. Scientists talk of "bolide" because there were no remains of the celestial body.

http://www.lavanguardia.com/ciencia/20130218/54365513042/nuevas-imagenes-de-la-caida-del-meteorito-que-ilumino-madrid-en-verano.html (In Spanish)
 
I had started another thread, but it was moved here- see reply #190. It would seem that several years ago the idea of using infrasound detection of meteors entering the atmosphere was already underway-

http://meteor.uwo.ca/research/infrasound/infra_pub/arrowsmith-paper.pdf

Here's an excerpt-

Global Detection of Infrasonic Signals from Three Large Bolides

Stephen J. Arrowsmith Æ Doug ReVelle Æ Wayne Edwards Æ Peter Brown

Received: 28 June 2007 / Accepted: 29 November 2007 / Published online: 13 December 2007
 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Abstract- We present the infrasonic observations of three large bolides that were
observed at numerous International Monitoring System (IMS) infrasound arrays on a
global scale. First, a simple procedure for the global association of infrasound detections
from large infrasound events is outlined. Infrasound signals are associated with large
events based on arrival time, backazimuth and uniqueness at a given IMS array. Next, we
apply the algorithm to three bolides and investigate some of the factors affecting the
detectability of infrasound from large events. Our findings suggest that site-noise effects
significantly degrade the capability of the IMS infrasound network, suggesting that more
effort is required to reduce ambient site noise. These results have implications for the use
of infrasound measurements (in particular those from IMS stations) as a tool for evaluating
the global flux of near-Earth objects.

Infrasound is acoustic energy that propagates at frequencies below the 20 Hz hearing
threshold of the human ear. Unlike audible sound, infrasound can travel for long distances
with relatively little attenuation. Large meteors generate infrasound as they enter Earths
atmosphere (ReVelle 1976), which can propagate across the globe. The purpose of this
paper is to outline a simple method for identifying infrasonic signals from large events on a
global scale, and to apply the method to three superbolides. Following Docobo et al.
(1998), a ‘‘superbolide’’ has a peak optical luminosity that exceeds -17 stellar magnitudes
(referenced to an elevation of 100 km in the zenith). We also provide an assessment of the
effect of site noise on the detectability of these large events. There have been relatively few
studies of multi-station infrasound signals from large events on a global scale. Long before
the advent of the present-day IMS, Wexler and Hass (1962) documented the global
detection of infrasound signals from a large Soviet nuclear test. More recently, Brown
et al. (2002) present the observations of infrasound at numerous IMS stations from two
large bolides. Finally, Garces et al. (2005) and Le Pichon et al. (2006) document multistation
infrasonic signals from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami and the 2005
Chilean earthquake respectively. In contrast with earlier studies, this study focuses on the
more general problem of associating infrasound signals with global events, and on an
assessment of factors that affect the global detectability of large events. We report on the
global detection of three superbolides which entered Earths atmosphere on September 3rd,
2004 over Antarctica; on October 7th, 2004 over the Indian Ocean; and on December 9th,
2006 over North Africa.

I am still searching for more on this, but there are mobile arrays used by the ANF which have somehow greatly reduced ambient noise in a compact setup. If this is not really the proper thread for this, feel free to move it to avoid noise in the current thread.

Addition edit- I just found a large amount of papers concerning this-

This paper talks about bolides being recorded by the US Air Force back in 1960-1974.
http://www.astro.uwo.ca/~esilber/Publications/reanalysis%20of%20the%20historic%20AFTAC%20bolide%20infrasound%20database.pdf

This one discusses plotting trajectory using infrasound, but I cannot access the full pdf, only the abstract.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2003GL017947/abstract

This is a general page(not a paper) that discusses meteor infrasound.
http://meteor.uwo.ca/research/infrasound/is_advantages.html

More to come after I read these and digest them.
 
Here's even more papers on the subject of infrasound detection and tracking of meteors/bolides-

http://meteor.uwo.ca/research/infrasound/infra_pub/bolide-energy-estimate-from-infrasound-EMP.pdf

http://l2a.ucsd.edu/pub/degroot-hedlin_2011b.pdf

http://gravity.ucsd.edu/pub/2010_walker.pdf

http://www.meteorites.com.au/odds&ends/Vitim%20Bolide%201.pdf

http://www.tornadochaser.net/research/infasonicdetector.pdf

http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/314136-Iplp7t/webviewable/314136.pdf

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110016611_2011017625.pdf

http://meteor.uwo.ca/research/infrasound/infra_pub/infra-elfo-weak-shock-edwards.pdf

It would seem that this ability to detect and track meteors entering the atmosphere has been in use for some time and has been updated with newer technology to the point of being real-time. If this is true, it would mean they simply do not want us to know about them and are willing to sacrifice lives unnecessarily- presumably due to the psychopathic leaders who run the show.

Why am I not surprised one bit...
 
I am trying to find that table someone kindly prepared, showing the increasing numbers of meteor reports over the last few years, based on the American Meteor Society's reports. I saw it on the internet somewhere around here a few days ago, but now I can't find it. Does anyone remember which article or page it was on? Thank you,
Mal
 
Mal7 said:
I am trying to find that table someone kindly prepared, showing the increasing numbers of meteor reports over the last few years, based on the American Meteor Society's reports. I saw it on the internet somewhere around here a few days ago, but now I can't find it. Does anyone remember which article or page it was on? Thank you,
Mal

Hi Mal7, this Sott article may be what you're looking for (statistical graph in the comment part)

http://www.sott.net/article/258480-NASA-invents-explanation-for-recent-fireball-cluster-Its-fireball-season
 
Thank you un chien andalou!

I remembered a table with the actual numbers in, but that article and graph will serve my purposes just as well. I just wanted to post it on a friend's Facebook page where there is a discussion going on about the Russian meteor.

I am 20% through Horns of Moses in Kindle format. Maybe I saw it there, but with Kindle it is so hard to flip through and find something you were looking at, compared with a paper book. (I still love my Kindle though.)

regards,
Mal
 
I saw this article on sott this morning and found it interesting that they make the possible connection with the meteorite that landed in Russia http://www.sott.net/article/258583-Is-mysterious-green-slime-found-in-Somerset-wildlife-park-linked-with-meteor-strike

A mysterious green 'slime' said to come from outer space has left boffins baffled at a wildlife park.

The unidentified jelly-like substance has been found at the RSPB Ham Wall Nature reserve in Somerset.

And according to folklore, a similar slime known as 'astral jelly' is deposited after meteor showers.

The jelly has turned up at the park just three days after a giant meteor streaked over the city of Chelyabinsk in central Russia.

Tony Whitehead, an RSPB spokesman for the South West, said: "Although we don't know what it actually is, similar substances have been described previously.

"In records dating back to the 14th Century it's known variously as star jelly, astral jelly or astromyxin.

"In folklore it is said to be deposited in the wake of meteor showers."


Mr Whitehead added: "It's great that in this day and age that there are still mysteries out there.

"We've read a few articles now and much speculation.

"One suggested it was neither animal nor plant, and another that it didn't contain DNA, although it does give the appearance of something 'living'.

"Our reserve team will be looking out for the slime over the next few days, but if anyone can offer any explanations we'd be glad to hear."

The public are being warned not to touch the mystery substance, and to inform nature reserve staff.

Steve Hughes, the RSPB site manager at Ham Wall, said: "This past week we've been finding piles of this translucent jelly dotted around the reserve.

"Always on grass banks away from the water's edge.

"They are usually about 10cm (4in) in diameter.

"We've asked experts what it might be, but as yet no one is really sure.

"Whatever it is, it's very weird."

Scientists are split on what the slime is, with some saying it is a form of cyanobacteria called Nostoc, others suggesting it is the remains of the regurgitated innards of amphibians and that it is related to the intriguingly named crystal brain fungus.

Interesting reference to the 14th century as that was when the last plaque raged and decimated the worlds population.
 
Mal7 said:
Thank you un chien andalou!

I remembered a table with the actual numbers in, but that article and graph will serve my purposes just as well. I just wanted to post it on a friend's Facebook page where there is a discussion going on about the Russian meteor.

I am 20% through Horns of Moses in Kindle format. Maybe I saw it there, but with Kindle it is so hard to flip through and find something you were looking at, compared with a paper book. (I still love my Kindle though.)

regards,
Mal

I guess you mean the table within this SOTT Focus piece ?
http://www.sott.net/article/258468-Fireball-explodes-over-Russian-city-Widespread-panic-and-structural-damage-Thousand-people-injured

Here is the relevant data wich is behind this table:

Pashalis said:
Just a correction that you mind want to point out.

You said that this statistic from American Meteor Society is from comets worlwide:
http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireball_event/2012/&&page=9

2005= 463 Events
2006= 517 Events
2007= 588 Events
2008= 726 Events
2009= 694 Events
2010= 951 Events
2011= 1628 Events
2012= 2219 Events

But those are just the reports from the US alone
 
QuantumLogic said:
Infrasound is acoustic energy that propagates at frequencies below the 20 Hz hearing
threshold of the human ear. Unlike audible sound, infrasound can travel for long distances
with relatively little attenuation. Large meteors generate infrasound as they enter Earths
atmosphere (ReVelle 1976), which can propagate across the globe. The purpose of this
paper is to outline a simple method for identifying infrasonic signals from large events on a
global scale, and to apply the method to three superbolides. Following Docobo et al.
(1998), a ‘‘superbolide’’ has a peak optical luminosity that exceeds -17 stellar magnitudes
(referenced to an elevation of 100 km in the zenith). We also provide an assessment of the
effect of site noise on the detectability of these large events. There have been relatively few
studies of multi-station infrasound signals from large events on a global scale. Long before
the advent of the present-day IMS, Wexler and Hass (1962) documented the global
detection of infrasound signals from a large Soviet nuclear test. More recently, Brown
et al. (2002) present the observations of infrasound at numerous IMS stations from two
large bolides. Finally, Garces et al. (2005) and Le Pichon et al. (2006) document multistation
infrasonic signals from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami and the 2005
Chilean earthquake respectively. In contrast with earlier studies, this study focuses on the
more general problem of associating infrasound signals with global events, and on an
assessment of factors that affect the global detectability of large events. We report on the
global detection of three superbolides which entered Earths atmosphere on September 3rd,
2004 over Antarctica; on October 7th, 2004 over the Indian Ocean
; and on December 9th,
2006 over North Africa.

Maybe it is not related, but it attracted my attention the dates of those two superbolides in late 2004 over Antarctica and Indian Ocean, and shortly later the 12/26/04 tsunami (in the indian ocean too), all in less than fourth months.
 
Thank you Pashalis,

I found what I had been originally looking at also, funnily enough not very far away, in the thread labelled "Fireball tally from American Meteor Society" in this Earth Changes folder:

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,29604.msg379287.html#msg379287

I am still in the process of finding my way around the different sections of this forum.

Mal
 
In the discussion on Facebook I was following, someone had posted a link to a Wikipedia list of Meteor Air Bursts from 1899 till the present:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_meteor_air_bursts

This may not be a particularly statistically significant list of course, I am not sure how thoroughly it was prepared. But for what it is worth (maybe not much) there are 19 meteor air bursts in the list, from 1899 till 2013. 10 of those are in the last 25 years. 4 are in the last 5 years.
 
Yesterday I got to check out some of the YouTube videos of this Russian meteor. There were one or two pretty amazing ones taken from dash-cams. How did the drivers stay on the road?

What struck me most forcibly about its appearance was first of all, the way it appeared 'out of no where' and just grew. It seemed to be coming from some extra dimension, aiming straight at the viewer, growing brighter and bigger, but giving you time to think "What can this be?" Then really quickly getting enormous and incandescent and appallingly dangerous before shooting overhead and disappearing behind a huge tail of smoke. It made me wonder just how much brighter it need of got before it started setting stuff on fire and some real harm occur ed.

My daughter and grandchildren stopped by later yesterday and the 9-year-old said they had been discussing it in class. It is obviously having an affect on their minds and imagination. Like me, my daughter had been impressed by the 'suddenness'
if its appearance, its speed and the arresting way in which its brightness kept on increasing for the few seconds of its flight. She too got the sense of how easily that exponential increase in brightness could have grown and the potential it must of had for the fiery destruction of the areas in its path.

Basically, I thought "Yeah, That was a video of a dragon"
 
Back
Top Bottom