I already mentioned this perfect match in semantics: "Drop Dead Date" and "Kill shot". There very well may be disinfo in Ed Dames story (3D focused survivalism, for just one example). But also there may be something useful, for example, described sequence of events:crazycharlie.1 said:Question
Friday, December 14, 2012
Hi, would like to know if you see any asteroids that will threaten Earth? and if so when and where can you see this? Major Ed Dames is best known for remote viewing, ie THE KILL SHOT. What do you think of his research? We predicts worldwide flooding totally destroying Sydney Australia and other locations around the world before june 2013? possibly due to Asteroids or displacement? what do you see with this man and his research please?
Answer
I do see asteroids in space around Earth, I do not see them entering into our atmosphere but they are always around us. I do distinctly see the red comet that I have seen before and when I see it I envision it passing Earth and it's closest point to Earth being at the North Pole. I do see it affecting Earth a great deal. I feel like it is going to be at it's closest point...I am getting March or April of 2013. I also keep hearing this swooshing sound, likes blasts of wind and I am seeing a person standing and they are outside and the wind kind of blows so hard that I see their hair fly back and their cheeks even kind of flattens backwards, like it flattens their face out.
Q-Major Ed Dames is best known for remote viewing, ie THE KILL SHOT. What do you think of his research?
A-After watching a few minutes of The Kill Shot and understanding who he was, I believe he does have skills at remote viewing, he feel genuine to me.
Now, that craft is suspicious:There is one final event that they see, after that nuclear event [in Korean Peninsula - me], which relates to a meteor shower forcing a spacecraft down to earth. They can’t say if the space shuttle is NASA related or privately owned, but my guess is that it may be related to space flights for the public from what they said on the video.
Pashalis said:Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:
Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
Pashalis said:Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:
Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
Pashalis said:Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:
Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
Laura said:Pashalis said:Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:
Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
Nicely done. The enhanced video showing the moment of explosion was fascinating.
Ghostdoghaiku said:My question, based on it being estimated to have been so much bigger now, than originally thought by NASA and the other space agencies, etc.---why wasn't this object being tracked, though the other asteroid that day had been for some time, as are so many other large objects.
Additionaly, as expressed by so many here, what's with the close timing of the two objects?
Pashalis said:Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:
Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
Kniall said:I think what it comes down to is the fact there is no comprehensive, global, civilian Near Earth Object monitoring or tracking system. Lots of programs have been floated over the decades; some take off, but most flop, usually because of a lack of funding. The space threat just wasn't taken seriously enough. Clube and others tried to warn them but our Dear Leaders didn't see any profit in it. Instead, the scientific funding, research and technology was all funnelled into sustaining the Cold War, and when that ended, the War on Terror.
Pashalis said:Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:
Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
“We thought that humanity would not have to face such an attack for another couple of thousand years, but the opposite happened and Russia was hit with a large-scale natural emergency”
A simpler network for detecting meteors (and having statistics over the years) is possible. All it requires is modified radio equipment (because of the meteor-induced ionization in the atmosphere) and microcomputers. The military who want to keep the knowledge on atmospheric entries for themselves have unfortunately the means to sabotage such a project.LQB said:Yes, I'm not aware of any civilian/public effort at all other than maybe amateurs searching the skies. Even a network of ground-based telescopes (with sufficient sensitivity) would have a very low probability of detection due to the large spacial area of the search. A small network of satellites could do a great job though.