Meteorite Explodes Over Russia Injures Hundreds

Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE
 
crazycharlie.1 said:
Question
Friday, December 14, 2012
Hi, would like to know if you see any asteroids that will threaten Earth? and if so when and where can you see this? Major Ed Dames is best known for remote viewing, ie THE KILL SHOT. What do you think of his research? We predicts worldwide flooding totally destroying Sydney Australia and other locations around the world before june 2013? possibly due to Asteroids or displacement? what do you see with this man and his research please?

Answer
I do see asteroids in space around Earth, I do not see them entering into our atmosphere but they are always around us. I do distinctly see the red comet that I have seen before and when I see it I envision it passing Earth and it's closest point to Earth being at the North Pole. I do see it affecting Earth a great deal. I feel like it is going to be at it's closest point...I am getting March or April of 2013. I also keep hearing this swooshing sound, likes blasts of wind and I am seeing a person standing and they are outside and the wind kind of blows so hard that I see their hair fly back and their cheeks even kind of flattens backwards, like it flattens their face out.
Q-Major Ed Dames is best known for remote viewing, ie THE KILL SHOT. What do you think of his research?
A-After watching a few minutes of The Kill Shot and understanding who he was, I believe he does have skills at remote viewing, he feel genuine to me.
I already mentioned this perfect match in semantics: "Drop Dead Date" and "Kill shot". There very well may be disinfo in Ed Dames story (3D focused survivalism, for just one example). But also there may be something useful, for example, described sequence of events:

There is one final event that they see, after that nuclear event [in Korean Peninsula - me], which relates to a meteor shower forcing a spacecraft down to earth. They can’t say if the space shuttle is NASA related or privately owned, but my guess is that it may be related to space flights for the public from what they said on the video.
Now, that craft is suspicious:
http://www.space.com/19893-military-space-plane-x37b-mystery.html

May this "April drop dead date" be hint to some electrical/plasma interaction between Earth/Comet cluster/Sun/Twin Sun. In April... (this year?). When will events indeed be getting "VERY interesting", anyway? :/
 
Pashalis said:
Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE

Nicely done. The enhanced video showing the moment of explosion was fascinating.
 
Pashalis said:
Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE

Good video - thanks Pashalis :)
 
Pashalis said:
Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE

Very interesting. I enjoyed the rational way they explained the evidence and their reasoning. I was also stunned at the impact shown through the clips of internal building cameras - it certainly was not an unmemorable non-event as some people have said to me.
 
Has this one been posted yet?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI-90pFOjXo


Has great sound. Reminds me of that series of shocks we experienced here a few weeks ago which were definitely NOT sonic booms from aircraft because there were too many of them. There's a thread about it here on the forum.
 
I also remembered some awkward thundering few weeks ago after watching videos from Čeljabinsk... not 'constant' thunders but series of loud booms... hmm :huh:
 
Laura said:
Pashalis said:
Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE

Nicely done. The enhanced video showing the moment of explosion was fascinating.

My question, based on it being estimated to have been so much bigger now, than originally thought by NASA and the other space agencies, etc.---why wasn't this object being tracked, though the other asteroid that day had been for some time, as are so many other large objects. Additionaly, as expressed by so many here, what's with the close timing of the two objects?

Relatedly, I should go back and catch up with the thread, as I know there was a discussion beginning on that subject (the possibility of a slight of hand), when last I was monitoring this thread.
 
Ghostdoghaiku said:
My question, based on it being estimated to have been so much bigger now, than originally thought by NASA and the other space agencies, etc.---why wasn't this object being tracked, though the other asteroid that day had been for some time, as are so many other large objects.

Maybe it was being tracked but someone somewhere kept that information to themselves?

Military Hush-Up: Incoming Space Rocks Now Classified

Objects apparently pass us by all the time and we don't notice them until they're here:

Bus-sized asteroid shaves Earth with one day's notice

Have you heard about Dark Comets? Imagine trying to track one of those!

I think what it comes down to is the fact there is no comprehensive, global, civilian Near Earth Object monitoring or tracking system. Lots of programs have been floated over the decades; some take off, but most flop, usually because of a lack of funding. The space threat just wasn't taken seriously enough. Clube and others tried to warn them but our Dear Leaders didn't see any profit in it. Instead, the scientific funding, research and technology was all funnelled into sustaining the Cold War, and when that ended, the War on Terror.

Additionaly, as expressed by so many here, what's with the close timing of the two objects?

You should take a look at the Fire in the Sky section of SOTT.net. It's currently raining fireballs. There was another huge one that same day over Cuba. The shock wave was felt there too. There have been two in California in the past week. There was one four days before the big one in Russia... just 250 km west of Chelyabinsk...

The way it looks to me, there isn't a square mile of the planet that isn't being rumbled and dazzled by fireballs right now.

That's one way of thinking about the two objects' close timing. Given the significantly increased rate of fireball flux, there's nothing particularly unusual about two large objects passing (and impacting) within 12 hours of each other.

I guess you could also think of the close timing as being part of the performance of a Cosmic Trickster :)

2012 DA-14 was billed by the Scientific Establishment and Mainstream Media as 'the closet fly-by ever' of a space rock. This is patently untrue of course, and as they went about reassuring people that there was absolutely no danger of impact whatsoever, they left themselves wide open for the Universe to expose their wishful thinking.
 
Pashalis said:
Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE

Is it possible that the explosion of the bolide could emit an EMP pulse strong enough to knock out power grids, electronics, etc? I know the bolide explosion is not a nuclear explosion, but if the cause of the explosion is electrical in nature, then could it emit a powerful EMP pulse?

This article, http://www.sott.net/article/258468-Fireball-explodes-over-Russian-city-Widespread-panic-and-structural-damage-Thousand-people-injured, re-posted on SOTT indicates that the exploding meteor may have produced an EMP-like effect because some people experienced cell phone disruptions. It would be useful to know what size and meteor composition would produce a significant EMP pulse. I'll continue to look around and will post any relevant info.
 
Kniall said:
I think what it comes down to is the fact there is no comprehensive, global, civilian Near Earth Object monitoring or tracking system. Lots of programs have been floated over the decades; some take off, but most flop, usually because of a lack of funding. The space threat just wasn't taken seriously enough. Clube and others tried to warn them but our Dear Leaders didn't see any profit in it. Instead, the scientific funding, research and technology was all funnelled into sustaining the Cold War, and when that ended, the War on Terror.

Yes, I'm not aware of any civilian/public effort at all other than maybe amateurs searching the skies. Even a network of ground-based telescopes (with sufficient sensitivity) would have a very low probability of detection due to the large spacial area of the search. A small network of satellites could do a great job though.
 
Pashalis said:
Some thoughts from the "Thunderbolts Project" about the event:

Russian Meteor—Another Shock to the System:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ce6Pk_0TNE

Thanks for posting it Pashalis, great video with some good questions being asked.
 
Russian Emergency Minister Vladimir Puchkov demonstrate a science belief/dogma that their ilk was living for and preaching about also - until fireball suddenly brought a kind of enlightenment :cool2:

“We thought that humanity would not have to face such an attack for another couple of thousand years, but the opposite happened and Russia was hit with a large-scale natural emergency”
:grad:

Whole article on RT:

_http://rt.com/news/meteor-attack-not-expected-284/
 
LQB said:
Yes, I'm not aware of any civilian/public effort at all other than maybe amateurs searching the skies. Even a network of ground-based telescopes (with sufficient sensitivity) would have a very low probability of detection due to the large spacial area of the search. A small network of satellites could do a great job though.
A simpler network for detecting meteors (and having statistics over the years) is possible. All it requires is modified radio equipment (because of the meteor-induced ionization in the atmosphere) and microcomputers. The military who want to keep the knowledge on atmospheric entries for themselves have unfortunately the means to sabotage such a project.
 
Back
Top Bottom