Mother of all gushers - BP Oil Disaster in Gulf of Mexico

Jerry said:
[quote author=latimesblogs]High-pressure readings for at least 48 hours would indicate that the well casings are relatively undamaged

Is this credible in light of the fact that oil and dirt has been spewing at up to 70,000 psi for 90 days?

[/quote]

To the best of my knowledge, after hours of reading technical discussions, the pressure at the wellhead is between 8-9,000 PSI.
One story circulating at the moment, which I cannot verify with credible sources, is that though they have capped the well, there is a fissure spewing oil a short distance away from the well. Perhaps they have always been aware of this and this is the reason they felt they could cap the well, since the pressure is actually being relieved through the fissure? That would fit with corporate thinking, so now they can absolve themselves of further responsibility? Will be interesting to see what happens next.
 
Agreed. I'm not holding my breath (although I should be, it's raining again - good news is, the storms are coming from the north not the south east).


Jerry said:
Will be interesting to see what happens next.

Yes. I'm unwilling to accept just yet that these liars were successfully able to cap it.
 
venusian said:
To the best of my knowledge, after hours of reading technical discussions, the pressure at the wellhead is between 8-9,000 PSI.

If that's true, oil is definitely spewing out elsewhere - perhaps lots of 'elsewheres'. Can you get confirmation on that?
 
If you can believe this...

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2010/07/gulf-oil-spill-no-oil-gushing-from-well-for-the-first-time-since-april-.html

Gulf oil spill: No oil gushing from well for the first time since April
July 15, 2010 | 1:20 pm

For the first time in months, no oil is flowing into the Gulf of Mexico from BP's troubled well.

BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells said Thursday afternoon that the last of a series of valves on a cap atop the well was fully closed around 12:25 p.m. PDT, shutting off the flow.

The total seal is a temporary measure while BP tests the integrity of the well to determine if the pipes below the sea floor are in good enough shape to allow the seal to stay in place.

The test could also show that the well is too compromised to withstand the seal. In that case, the valves would be opened, releasing oil into the ocean again. BP would use a series of pipes and ships to suck up some -- and perhaps all -- of the leaking oil, estimated to be 60,000 barrels per day.

"As you can imagine, it felt very good not to see any oil going into the Gulf of Mexico," said Wells, who has been a prominent face of the beleaguered oil company since the April 20 blowout of the Deepwater Horizon rig. "What I'm trying to do is maintain my emotions. Remember, this is the start of our test."

-- Richard Fausset in Atlanta
 
Laura said:
They are lying through their teeth.

Yup...I "wish" you weren't right...but I think you are :(

Wonder how many people will buy the new "we've stopped the leak" campaign?
 
Laura said:
They are lying through their teeth.

I couldn't agree more.

The 9,000 PSI number is the one that has been consistently used in all the tech discussions I've seen as the number which needs to be hit and hold for 48 hrs in order to call the well 'shut in'. A lot of the discussion in the media the past few days questioning the wisdom of trying this latest capping procedure has centered on the fact that one component of the new cap assembly is only rated at a maximum of 6,000 PSI. It doesn't take a brilliant mind to realize that component would likely fail at pressure higher than 6,000 PSI, so why would they even do the test with that kind of risk? Something about the whole thing stinks, in my mind anyway. The most obvious conclusion is that they have been able to cap the well because the actual pressure at the wellhead is less than what everyone has been led to expect. That is my conjecture at this point, though. I am also deeply suspicious of the whole procedure since about a week ago the only possibility of stopping the well was in the relief wells. Then suddenly there is this whole new plan which has 'succeeded' in a very short time. BP's stock went up dramatically at the announcement of the capping this afternoon.

I have seen numerous reports that there are fissures spewing oil elsewhere on the sea floor- the most notable being those coming from Matt Simmons, who is on TV saying this today, but so far no one is connecting this to the successful capping. The problem again is lack of actual, verifiable data, since no public research vessel has been allowed to have a look at the sea floor and report what is going on.

One very consistent complaint which has been raised from the technical observers since this thing started is the absolute lack of data being given out by BP and the govt agencies about almost everything. As a result, there has been a great deal of guessing going on due to the lack of actual facts.
 
Now it's not even BP's fault :mad:


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-15/gulf-oil-spill-caused-by-firefighters-flooding-deepwater-rig-suit-says.html

Gulf Oil Spill Caused by Firefighters Flooding Deepwater Rig, Suit Says
By Laurel Brubaker Calkins and Margaret Cronin Fisk - Jul 15, 2010


The worst oil spill in U.S. history was triggered by firefighting boats that flooded the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig with water, causing it to sink into the Gulf of Mexico and damage BP Plc’s well, a lawsuit claims.

Commercial fishermen, waterfront property owners and oil industry workers who have lost jobs because of the oil spill yesterday sued 17 companies whose fireboats responded to the explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon on April 20. The rig was still attached to the subsea well when it sank two days later.

“It was the flooding of the Deepwater Horizon and the resulting sinking of the rig that directly caused the piping to break and begin spewing millions of gallons of oil into the ocean,” Lloyd Frischhertz and Gerald Maples, lawyers for the spill victims, said in a complaint filed in federal court in New Orleans.

The lawsuit doesn’t seek damages from BP, rig-owner Transocean Ltd. or the U.S. Coast Guard, which helped direct the firefighting effort. The plaintiffs claim the fireboats violated industry standard procedures that warn against using water cannons to attack pressurized oil fires aboard marine vessels.

“Any request or encouragement by U.S. Coast Guard, British Petroleum or Transocean to pump water and use water cannons’’ for extended periods to fight the fire “should have been met with protest and refusal,’’ according to the complaint.

50,000 Gallons

As many as eight fireboats each shot “10,000 to 50,000 gallons of seawater on the rig per minute,” according to the complaint. They flooded the rig’s upper compartments and destabilized it, causing it to tip over and sink, the plaintiffs said.

The fireboats should have used their “dynamic positioning systems” to hold the Deepwater Horizon in place while fighting the fire with industry-approved methods, the complaint alleged. That would have kept the rig connected to the well with an intact riser, “greatly enhancing the ability to manage and control the discharge of oil,” the complaint said.

The plaintiffs asked to proceed on behalf of all commercial fisherman, charter-boat operators and other businesses affected by the spill; property owners whose land was fouled; and oil workers who lost work because of the U.S.-imposed halt in offshore drilling. They’re asking the court for compensatory and punitive damages.

Molly Hottinger, a spokeswoman for Seacor Holdings Inc., parent of defendant Seacor Marine, declined to comment. Les Van Dyke, a spokesman for Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc., a unit of which is also a defendant in the suit, didn’t immediately return a call for comment.

The case is Robin v. Seacor Marine LLC, 2:10-cv-01986, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).

To contact the reporters on this story: Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston at laurel@calkins.us.com; Margaret Cronin Fisk in Southfield, Michigan, at mcfisk@bloomberg.net.
 
Now it's not even BP's fault Angry


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-15/gulf-oil-spill-caused-by-firefighters-flooding-deepwater-rig-suit-says.html

Gulf Oil Spill Caused by Firefighters Flooding Deepwater Rig, Suit Says
By Laurel Brubaker Calkins and Margaret Cronin Fisk - Jul 15, 2010
-snip-

Unbelievable. :jawdrop:
 
What??

:O

:shock:

But.... they already took the blame... Why change the story now? Who caused the methane bubble? The Gulf Ocean itself?

Wow, this will be interesting.

Edit: For lack of words previously, and finally getting a thought together.


Jerry said:
Now it's not even BP's fault Angry


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-15/gulf-oil-spill-caused-by-firefighters-flooding-deepwater-rig-suit-says.html

Gulf Oil Spill Caused by Firefighters Flooding Deepwater Rig, Suit Says
By Laurel Brubaker Calkins and Margaret Cronin Fisk - Jul 15, 2010
-snip-

Unbelievable. :jawdrop:
 
July 15: Matt Simmons says BP covering up MASSIVE HOLE miles away, cap test is “absurd”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scl2dgK_-Nw&feature=player_embedded
 
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h6UbqaQJdafaNnZAs6D3HMu4knuQ

BP 'accelerating' asset sales after Gulf oil spill

(AFP) – 1 hour ago

LONDON — British energy giant BP is speeding up the sale of up to 20 billion dollars (15.5 billion euros) of assets in a bid to boost funds after the Gulf oil spill, the Financial Times reported Friday.

The company is finalising details of the sales, including the disposal of American assets to Apache Corporation worth up to 12 billion dollars, said the paper, citing people close to the situation.

Announcements are expected in the next few weeks and an unnamed senior BP figure said the company could "easily" raise 20 billion dollars from the asset sales, according to the report.

This is double the amount the oil giant originally said it wanted to sell off when it announced plans to offload assets last month.

BP is seeking to build up a disaster fund of 20 billion dollars to cover the clean-up costs for the disastrous oil spill.

The news came as BP said Thursday it had stopped oil flowing into the Gulf for the first time in three months and was beginning key tests hoping to stem the spill for good.

A sale to US oil and gas firm Apache would include a stake in Prudhoe Bay, the largest oil field in North America, according to reports.

Apache has done smaller deals with its British rival in the past but acquiring a stake in Prudhoe Bay would be a major coup.

BP also wants to sell some or all of its 60-percent share in Pan American Energy of Argentina, valued at nine billion dollars, said the FT.

A deal with Royal Dutch Shell to buy BP's minority stake in the Mars field in the Gulf of Mexico is also on the cards, added the paper.

The Gulf oil spill, the worst environmental disaster in US history, started on April 20, with an explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig which sank two days later.

It has so far cost the company some 3.5 billion dollars and compensation claims from devastated residents of the region could reach 10 times that.

Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved.
 
Laura said:
They are lying through their teeth.

This has been my thinking too. They've had that video of the spewing well and now the pictures of that formerly spewing well now capped off. I think it's distraction...and a majority of Americans are easily distracted..."see what we have done, we've saved the day, now pay no attention to anything outside of that screenshot." People here are celebrating and praising "Oil Free Gulf Friday".

Yeah right
 
I just saw a TV report about the Nigerdelta
What happend and still happens there, is probably bigger and more worse than what is happening in the Golf of Mexico ! (The forgotten Oil Pest , now for ca.50 years!)

And olso I heard a few weeks ago that a oil leak or something is a head of Egypt!
 
Back
Top Bottom