Novak Djokovic detained in Australia

In the former socialist countries there is custom to give kids packages with sweets and toys on New year's day. Djokovic's foundation are giving those packages in tens of thousands every year.
There were masks, as the rules say, and also vitamins and sweets.

The things is: if you want to succed in anything in this world, you must play by the rules of this world. The rules are such as they are, take it or leave it.

More important thing: Djokovic beat them playing by their own rules. That is why he is bigger than other tenis players, and why is he heard louder.

Thats much better than just ignoring those rules. With ignoring them he would be just some ordinary guy (like me, for example), complaining on some forum and do nothing.
 
Deckard said:
Just saw this
View attachment 53508
Click to expand...
To make some clarification on this and why I laughed. Those are medals given by Republic of Serbia, Republic of Srpska (Serbian entity in Bosnia) and Serbian Orthodox christian church.

So, if those are free masons' then I live in total free mason country. In that case free masons are quite poor and clearly are not running the world ;-D
 
@Hi_Henry Maybe you felt in the trap of countermeasures the PTB raised about this increasing story and i agree with Ryan.

Don't you think it's suspicious that within 2 days, starting around the 6th January, tons of articles were posted in the MM worldwide trying to get Novak down ? The twitter link, do you see how many information "this guy" posted in just one day, the 6th January ? Do you really think it's the act of an individual person, when you link this with the vast campaign of Novak bashing in all MM ?

Also, one of your key point about mask, i do not agree at all with your conclusion. You seem to jugde him as he should know all we know here on the forum and who followed the covid-story since almost 2 years. Do you think he was aware of the dangerosity of the mask at begin ? So your main concern is that as he gave masks to children via his fundation he's a bad guy ? My mother too also is a bad person, because she sewed masks, as many other did, for the village. Also, once you have 90% of the population strongly believing that you should wear a mask, are you going to go against their beliefs frontally ?

About Silver in mask, what about colloidal silver then ? I found a quick article differentiating nano silver from colloidal silver, it's a matter of size of the particles :
www.differencebetween.com

Difference Between Nano Silver and Colloidal Silver | Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms

The key difference between nano silver and colloidal silver is that the nano silver refers to nanoparticles of silver having the particle size between 1 an
www.differencebetween.com www.differencebetween.com

The conclusion is :
Summary – Nano Silver vs Colloidal Silver​
The terms nano silver and colloidal silver are used to name different sizes of silver particles that we use for different purposes. The key difference between nano sliver and colloidal silver is that nano silver refers to the nanoparticles of silver having the particle size between 1 and 100 nm whereas colloidal silver refers to the silver particles having the particle size higher than 100 nm suspended in a liquid.​

From what I learned a couple of years before when i studied the colloidal silver, is that the smaller the particle is the better it is. I also found another article that may be worth to read, even if it comes from a reseller of colloidal silver, it's just to show you that what you posted is maybe simply corrupted science trying to get down the colloidal silver because all know here (or almost) that colloidal silver is a miraculous substance which allow you to get rid of many medicines.

So to come back to Novak, having added silver particles in the masks he gave to the children is maybe one of the best ideas ever imagined in order to reduce the bad effects of wearing one and when you see that whatever you do people will get their children to wear one, so here he maybe simply acted as doing his best to reduce the dangerosity of this.

About his wife, his wife is his wife and Novak is Novak, these are 2 different persons. Haven't you noticed that many good people have always the good idea to marry/attach with someone who is there to prevent them to grow ? Do you remember what the C's said about the intense "monitoring" of the 4D STS of us in 3D who are on the path of the SDA candidate, and not only monitoring, interferring also. Laura's life is a good example.

If you read all the infos posted here, what he says regarding Tesla, spirituality, his connection with Wim Hof, his diet ... don't you see here that you have one public figure that the PTB does not control and who endangers them ?

From my point of view all what you posted is a good summary of what the PTB produced to try to keep the high hand on this story but also on Novak popularity, but the more they are trying, the harder they'll fail. "Enjoy the show !", indeed
 
Niall said:
Fun-facts: Djokovic went ketogenic many years ago, after which he became World No.1. He's also Serbian, and Serbians are awesome!
Click to expand...
Very true! I source free range meat from an elderly Serb-Croat couple and I help out here and there in return. They gave me a bottle of their moonshine the other day. It's incredible, it was buried for 28 years! Smooth as, I know where Novax gets his powers from!
 
Came here after quite some time absence and sorry, but I must disagree with all of you, who are thinking Novak Djoković is great, good or anything of freedom fighter, he is a puppet and tool of worlds rotten elite, not to talk about his wife ... Sorry, again, but I can't post the videos here, since they are not in mp4 format and I can't zip them from my mobile phone. Djokovic foundation is a part of WEF, he deleted the informations abouth it from the site of his foundation, but too late, some of us saved it and is now shared on telegram channel.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220112-025507_Telegram.jpg
    Screenshot_20220112-025507_Telegram.jpg
    178.5 KB · Views: 26
Natalija8 said:
Came here after quite some time absence and sorry, but I must disagree with all of you, who are thinking Novak Djoković is great, good or anything of freedom fighter, he is a puppet and tool of worlds rotten elite, not to talk about his wife ... Sorry, again, but I can't post the videos here, since they are not in mp4 format and I can't zip them from my mobile phone. Djokovic foundation is a part of WEF, he deleted the informations abouth it from the site of his foundation, but too late, some of us saved it and is now shared on telegram channel.
Click to expand...
If you can spare ten minutes and read the last two pages of this thread, you will see that we've already discussed that.

And now, I really considering to ask where's my cut, dough, loot! Since I live in freemasons' and "WEF" country . . .
 
Yup .. I don't think they were ever going to let him play because he could win and as a result humiliate them. This is a reflection of how far down Australian society has sunk. All this over a flu like illness which he has recovered from in the past and which he doesn't currently have. It's ridiculous if you think about it but we're now living in absurd times. I admire Novak for being so composed and trying his best to play but to be honest I think he should boycott Australia for the rest of his career - he won't though as he doesn't seem to be that kind of person. As for the money from the Australian open, he doesn't need it, he's rich enough to retire already.
 
SOTTREADER said:
Yup .. I don't think they were ever going to let him play because he could win and as a result humiliate them.
Click to expand...
I think there's more to it than that. If they wanted to keep him from playing they could have just denied his visa application from the beginning. The evidence seems to indicate that Novak was deliberately allowed into the country and then subjected to political pressure to "recant his heresies." When he didn't do that, the only remaining option for the Australian government was either a dose of humble pie, or to throw out the rule book with an outright abuse of executive power. Clearly, they've chosen the latter option.

I think it's time now to ask the question, is Alex Hawke, minister for Home Affairs in Australia, ideologically possessed? Given that Novak still has the option of challenging the decision in court (and from the latest reports, his legal team are preparing to do so), it seems that Hawke acted in a way that won't provide any significant benefit for the government regardless of how this turns out. If Novak wins, he still gets to stay in the country and compete. If he loses, he can be deported or worse, jailed for up to 5 years for allegedly "lying" regarding the information provided on his entry documents. The latter would almost certainly provoke an international incident; the former only potentially so.

Regardless of what happens, this is only going to boost public support for Novak Djokovic, and lead to further serious questions on the part of many people around the world, especially within Australia, about how mentally unstable the Australian government is.
 
Ryan said:
I think there's more to it than that. If they wanted to keep him from playing they could have just denied his visa application from the beginning. The evidence seems to indicate that Novak was deliberately allowed into the country and then subjected to political pressure to "recant his heresies." When he didn't do that, the only remaining option for the Australian government was either a dose of humble pie, or to throw out the rule book with an outright abuse of executive power. Clearly, they've chosen the latter option.
Click to expand...

I have a good friend who whilst he doesn't tend to believe the PTB he doesn't always ascribe bad intentions to them but rather incompetence.

In the case of Novak he put forward a good argument when I mentioned Novak could have been lured in deliberately. He said it could easily be explained by bureaucracy i.e. the government doesn't function as a unified whole. Novak could have got his exemption without the other ideologically driven part of the government knowing it. Now the ideologues are imposing their will.

It's hard to disprove that this isn't just a series of clusterf*cks as that can explain the seeming uncoordinated nature of the thing. Also we need to remember that we humans crave a coherent story and this sometimes could lead us to underestimate how things can happen by themselves in a sort of uncoordinated way with no ultimate person or group in control of the situation.

I mean, look at the decision from the US Supreme Court yesterday - surely if the PTB were unified and connected into a coherent whole them they'd have pushed through the mandates?
 
Ryan said:
If he loses, he can be deported or worse, jailed for up to 5 years for allegedly "lying" regarding the information provided on his entry documents.
Click to expand...
Novak may be an internationally recognized star and have many fans, but he is not immune to PTB abuse.
It is very nice that he fights the system and their stupid rules and sets a good example for people by not submitting. But they will not stop at its notoriety. Perhaps even on the contrary, to make an example of it.
Like Julian Assange, although in another area, I'm afraid they'll end up locking him up without anyone being able to do anything to it.
I believe that in his place I would take to one's heels. I would flee the country while there is still time, although I respect his perseverance.
 
trytofly said:
Novak may be an internationally recognized star and have many fans, but he is not immune to PTB abuse.
It is very nice that he fights the system and their stupid rules and sets a good example for people by not submitting. But they will not stop at its notoriety. Perhaps even on the contrary, to make an example of it.
Like Julian Assange, although in another area, I'm afraid they'll end up locking him up without anyone being able to do anything to it.
I believe that in his place I would take to one's heels. I would flee the country while there is still time, although I respect his perseverance.
Click to expand...
I can't help to have in mind terms like "blindness" or "hubris" when thinking about the PTB and this story, or also "wishful thinking". I mean, they, the PTB, think that acting as they do right now will give a strong example to all the ones who dare to oppose them, that, this is in their "wishful thought world", or say otherwise : in their matrix version of what they try to desperatly maintain ((at least some of the PTB because i figure that they do not all agree on how to react). In the real world, this will only help many to even see further the global corruption of our elites and help people in general to see the truth.
I have in mind one term used by the C's during 2020 session : expose, or exposed/exposition. But they (PTB) seems not to see this, they are blind to this fact.
 
SOTTREADER said:
In the case of Novak he put forward a good argument when I mentioned Novak could have been lured in deliberately. He said it could easily be explained by bureaucracy i.e. the government doesn't function as a unified whole. Novak could have got his exemption without the other ideologically driven part of the government knowing it. Now the ideologues are imposing their will.
Click to expand...
I agree that "never ascribe to malice what can be explained by incompetence" is generally a good rule of thumb. However, in this situation, Novak's attendance at the Australian Open was contentious long before he actually arrived in Australia. It's hard to imagine that the ideologically-driven part of the government wasn't paying attention to this from the beginning.

trytofly said:
I believe that in his place I would take to one's heels. I would flee the country while there is still time, although I respect his perseverance.
Click to expand...
That would definitely be an understandable course of action. I've seen other commentary suggesting the same. From my perspective though, I don't think Novak is ideologically-driven regarding this. I think he's approaching it exactly as he stated it - he just wants to compete in the tournament as his job and for his fans. So he's fighting for the very reasonable outcome of being able to do that. I don't think he sees it as being part of some "struggle for a greater purpose", except insofar as standing up for oneself and requesting justice as a moral duty. So in that sense, he probably isn't fully aware of just how far an ideologically-driven government might go - although I'm sure he's now getting something of an education in this regard!
 
A policeman sits on a bench. After five minutes the bench breaks. In conclusion, the smartest one gives up first.

Novak should take the apparent defeat like a man and live to fight another day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom