Rogozin responded to Johnson, who threatened Russia with a nuclear strike without NATO approval
21st April 2022
Head of Roscosmos" Dmitry Rogozin reacted to the statement of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
The British Prime Minister said, in particular, that if Russia uses weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine as part of a special operation, the UK reserves the right to strike back independently, without consulting other countries of the North Atlantic Alliance.
This is Johnson’s reaction to the recent Russian military test of the Sarmat missile.
Boris, in the case of Sarmat, none of you will consult each other. And your hair, Mr. Prime Minister, there will be no one to put. And there will be nothing to lay", - Rogozin commented in his Telegram channel, punctuation and spelling of the author are preserved.
Note that the fake about the alleged intention of Russia to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine, appeared not in an empty place. It was invented by Western intelligence agencies and distributed through controlled media. Russia has repeatedly stated that this is not true, Moscow does not consider any options for the use of nuclear weapons during a special operation.
And the West knows that this is a fake. And Johnson also knows this perfectly well, as he knows that if London launches any missile towards Russia, Russia will respond in such a way that it will not seem much. And he made a statement for his Kiev “ally”, so that Zelensky knew how London cares about him, and did not interfere with laundering huge funds through Ukraine. And also to fight with Russia by the hands of the Ukrainian army, as they say, “until the last Ukrainian”.
Military-technical assistance of the West to Ukraine is a complex event with the solution of purely mercantile tasks.
First, NATO is helping its new members to adopt Western weapons standards “under an accelerated program.”
At one time, during the period of the "Warsaw Treaty Organization", Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, the GDR, Hungary, Poland and Romania accumulated a huge amount of weapons, which now you just need to get rid of.
Everything that could not be sold to Africa, Asia and Latin America can now be sold / transferred to Ukraine.
The same story with the disposal of ammunition, the shelf life of which is coming to an end.
The US partially unloaded its warehouses during a number of local conflicts in the Middle East. Now Washington and its European friends use Ukraine to sell their “delay”.
The same applies to the supply of armored vehicles. Under the requests for the supply of new equipment from the United States and Germany, Australia, Poland, the Czech Republic, etc. are actively unloading their stocks.
Against this background, Western corporations for the production of weapons, equipment and military and dual-use equipment, sign new contracts and multiply their profits.
The whole process is not going to stop. According to statements from the West, it is clear that the EU and the United States no longer even imitate the “game of diplomacy”, but see the solution to the Ukrainian issue only in the military plane.
And truly shocking, considering SBU's history. I was very concerned about him for the past several days. But I think that my happiness of his return is being spoiled by what I learned about his past occupation and behaviour. And because of that now I wonder why he couldn't share more, and how exactly he was let go without harm? Is it possible that SBU was indeed told to leave him alone and not do anything to him? Was he told to seize his activities, and this was the condition of his release? I hope he will be able to share more details. And it is definitely good news that he is alive and well.
