Nević Nenad
The Living Force
Idea behind the drones is that they must be cheap and they must do some damage. Bayraktar is exspensive and can do damage only on soft targets. Plus, its slow and big, which is great for target practise. Bayraktar gained its glory during the Azerbaijan - Armenia war, where Armenia had none of the anti aerial defence. Russian Lancet is slightly better than Bayraktar.Review of Ukrainian politician Sergei Pashinsky on Turkish UAVs supplied to Zelensky's regime.
“Bayraktar has more PR and corruption than combat use. He has no combat effectiveness. All of them shot down the Russians almost immediately. They are very vulnerable.”
Ukrainian official slams Bayraktar drones in prank call
Ukrainian politician Sergey Pashinsky admits Bayraktar drones are a PR stunt in prank interview with Vovan and Lexus Read Full Article at RT.comthethreadtimes.com
Iranian suicide drones are better because of philosophy behind them. They work in "launch and forget" mode and in swarms. So, instead one lttle rocket like on Bayraktar, there is swarm of drones, and every single one is stronger than Bayraktar's little rocket.
Drone roster would be, from weak to strong: turkish, russian, chinese, irainian. And of course all of them are just funny toys comparing to US drones.
(yes, I'm in "military hardware" mode again )