I agree that the official Russian reaction to this makes it all seem deadly serious, but I also consider that it could be an elaborate ruse.
Note what Prigozhin said in the above video update from this morning, purportedly filmed at the Russian military's Southern Command HQ in Rostov-on-Don, which Wagner troops have 'taken over without a single shot fired', and from where Russian aviation attack and medical retrieval flights into the warzone continue as normal:
Not even Kiev and Western media have claimed such an extremely negative scenario for the Russians this last month! The Western media has been - overall - unanimous in its verdict that Russian defenses are holding. So Prigozhin is 'protesting too much': he is painting a farcically dire scenario that resonates only with Ukrainian Nazis and NAFO trolls.
Recall also that the last time Prigozhin 'went nuts', Wagner captured Bakhmut within a week, and then were swapped out from the frontline by regular Russian troops, a switch that was almost certainly planned well in advance and had nothing to do with Prigozhin's shrill antics about threatening to 'abandon Bakhmut if we don't get more military support'.
IF Prigozhin was angling his narrative towards 'ending this awful war started by and for oligarchs', THEN this 'mutiny' would contain within it the seeds for genuine civil war. But instead he's always ranting about ESCALATING the war against Ukraine. In his TV address this morning, Putin alluded to the tragedy of 1917, but back then you had mutiny which fed on growing public desire for PEACE. Here, Prigozhin is 'further to the right' than even Igor Strelkov: he demands TOTAL WAR.
Note what Prigozhin said in the above video update from this morning, purportedly filmed at the Russian military's Southern Command HQ in Rostov-on-Don, which Wagner troops have 'taken over without a single shot fired', and from where Russian aviation attack and medical retrieval flights into the warzone continue as normal:
"Huge parts of the [Russian-occupied] territories [in southern Ukraine, where Kiev's counter-offensive is concentrated] have been lost. Numbers of [Russian] soldiers killed is 3 to 4 times more than what is being reported in the documents to the top..."
Not even Kiev and Western media have claimed such an extremely negative scenario for the Russians this last month! The Western media has been - overall - unanimous in its verdict that Russian defenses are holding. So Prigozhin is 'protesting too much': he is painting a farcically dire scenario that resonates only with Ukrainian Nazis and NAFO trolls.
Recall also that the last time Prigozhin 'went nuts', Wagner captured Bakhmut within a week, and then were swapped out from the frontline by regular Russian troops, a switch that was almost certainly planned well in advance and had nothing to do with Prigozhin's shrill antics about threatening to 'abandon Bakhmut if we don't get more military support'.
IF Prigozhin was angling his narrative towards 'ending this awful war started by and for oligarchs', THEN this 'mutiny' would contain within it the seeds for genuine civil war. But instead he's always ranting about ESCALATING the war against Ukraine. In his TV address this morning, Putin alluded to the tragedy of 1917, but back then you had mutiny which fed on growing public desire for PEACE. Here, Prigozhin is 'further to the right' than even Igor Strelkov: he demands TOTAL WAR.