Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine


The guys at the Duran made a great show the other day, looking at how China and Saudi Arabia are moving closer together. They call it the most dangerous pivot in history.

According to them, this would be an absolute disaster for US foreign policy interests, and threaten the primacy of the US dollar on the world stage, due to the BRICS nations' plan to develop a new form of currency a la Glazyev. If Saudi Arabia adds its weight to that initiative, it would be a huge step for the multipolar team.

The Druan dudes speculate that this possible alliance may cause a downturn or (even abandonment!) of the conflict in Ukraine by US interests in order to turn up the pressure on Saudi Arabia to stay away from China, not become a BRICS member, just keep on pumping oil. Or else.

Mercouris advises MBS to be very careful with his personal security. This kinda stuff is why they went after Ghaddafi and destroyed Libya, after all. There's also mention of the US Deep State turning on all of their sleeper assets in the region to make the Saudi economy scream until they get back in line - actions that may make the Nord Stream bombings look pale in comparison.
 
Surovikin delivered a report to Shoigu. By Kherson.

Shoigu: The defense in the Kherson direction is stable, but there are some peculiarities
Surovikin: From August to October, the Ukrainian army lost more than 9.5 thousand people killed and wounded in the Kherson direction - the advancing side suffers more losses there than the one that is on the defensive. Losses of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in the Kherson direction are 7-8 times less than those of the Armed Forces of Ukraine The city of Kherson and adjacent settlements cannot be supplied and function. The most expedient option is to organize defense along the barrier line of the Dnieper River.
Shoigu: I agree. Start withdrawing troops

The withdrawal of troops and the remaining civilian population will be carried out as soon as possible. In the next few days, Kherson will come under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
 
f1esk said:
Surovikin delivered a report to Shoigu. By Kherson.

Shoigu: The defense in the Kherson direction is stable, but there are some peculiarities
Surovikin: From August to October, the Ukrainian army lost more than 9.5 thousand people killed and wounded in the Kherson direction - the advancing side suffers more losses there than the one that is on the defensive. Losses of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in the Kherson direction are 7-8 times less than those of the Armed Forces of Ukraine The city of Kherson and adjacent settlements cannot be supplied and function. The most expedient option is to organize defense along the barrier line of the Dnieper River.
Shoigu: I agree. Start withdrawing troops

The withdrawal of troops and the remaining civilian population will be carried out as soon as possible. In the next few days, Kherson will come under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Click to expand...

Here’s the video of the briefing with English audio translation:

 
As some of the high profile analytics predicted-that is the scenario of New Khazaria. Ukrs will now massacre most of the Russian NOW people, who left on that territory. Thus cleansing ‘ark’ for the exodus of the jews/creating a new ‘state’.
Have a look on today’s map, we are withdrawing from the biggest part of the territory.
And couple of hours ago Zhacharova was pleading for the negotiations on today’s disposition🤦‍♂️
 

Attachments

  • 07F4142C-8E5A-4E1B-82CF-38414F4F010D.jpeg
    07F4142C-8E5A-4E1B-82CF-38414F4F010D.jpeg
    336.6 KB · Views: 28
One tactic preserves manpower and equipment, the other does not.

Let Ukraine attack again and again. The attacking side always is prone of loses more men.

Now the Ukinazis have to cross the river. Which is even more suicidal than attacking your opponent in open terrain. This way the war will end even sooner.
 
Kadyrov - about leaving Kherson:

Surovikin saved a thousand soldiers who were actually surrounded. After weighing all the pros and cons, General Surovikin made a difficult but right choice between senseless sacrifices for the sake of loud statements and saving the priceless lives of soldiers.

Kherson is a very difficult area without the possibility of a stable regular supply of ammunition and the formation of a strong, reliable rear. Why was this not done from the first days of the special operation? This is another question. But in this difficult situation, the general acted wisely and far-sightedly - he evacuated the civilian population and ordered a regrouping.

The fact that Kherson is a difficult combat territory was known to everyone from the very first days of the special operation. The soldiers of my units also reported that it was very difficult to fight in this area. Yes, it can be kept, it is possible to organize at least some supply of ammunition, but the cost will be numerous human lives. And this forecast does not suit us.

Therefore, I think that Surovikin acted like a real military general, not afraid of criticism.
Click to expand...

Russia controls the battlefield, they decide where the battles take place. Choosing favorable terrain will end this war faster while preserving manpower and equipment. This is very fundamental. Remember, it is not so about conquering terrain, but more about depleting the enemy of manpower, equipment and ammunition. When finished, Russia controls the whole map.
 
Kherson can be surrendered for the sake of the G-20 – a fighter suspected Russian oligarchs in collusion with Western
(It was written yesterday morning).

Strange decisions in the conduct of the war indicate that immoral figures close to power actually launched conveyors to kill people on both sides of the front. This was stated on the air of the Internet channel "Spec" by a veteran of the Chechen war, a member of the SVO Ivan Otrakovsky who returned after being wounded, the correspondent of "PolitNavigator" reports. "This positional war is criminal, it grinds people. Now the video has been shown – there is a huge amount of equipment with the APU in the Kherson direction. No one touches them, because more victims are needed. This is the same thing, why don't they destroy the railway? nodes and supplies of ammunition, equipment, artillery, because victims are needed. Russians have to kill Slavs, Russian on Russian. The more they kill in the interests of these scum, the better it will be for them. Factories will produce ammunition indefinitely, and bankers, merchants, all these bastards will make money on it, and the guys will die on both sides. It is in their interests – the mass death of a of Russian people. Migrants will be settled here, people from the Middle East," the veteran said.

P.s. the only explanation why it is that way-our’s are in this devilish project.
 
Does no one really dont know what is the main objective of the special military operation? That's funny, because even Putin is talking about it all the time.

It's changing the world. Not winning the war on the terain. For example, if Russia destroy all of Ukraine tommorow (and all know that they can do that), what would be achieved? Only dead Ukrainians, and NATO and the "colective West" in process of regaining their power. Some months ago, even the worse than that.

What can be achieved if Russia dont win the war tommorow? Slow desintegration of the West, better cooperation between the rest of the world, USA going down as a sole super power, rise of Russia, China, India, the whole concept of the western thinking busted, and much more . . .

However that ironically sounds, its not in Russia's interest to win fast. Russia is grinding much more than unfortunate Ukrainians.
 
Avala said:
Does no one really dont know what is the main objective of the special military operation? That's funny, because even Putin is talking about it all the time.

It's changing the world. Not winning the war on the terain. For example, if Russia destroy all of Ukraine tommorow (and all know that they can do that), what would be achieved? Only dead Ukrainians, and NATO and the "colective West" in process of regaining their power. Some months ago, even the worse than that.

What can be achieved if Russia dont win the war tommorow? Slow desintegration of the West, better cooperation between the rest of the world, USA going down as a sole super power, rise of Russia, China, India, the whole concept of the western thinking busted, and much more . . .

However that ironically sounds, its not in Russia's interest to win fast. Russia is grinding much more than unfortunate Ukrainians.
Click to expand...
But what changes could such an objective lead to, except more suffering aimed at reaching a new multi-polar order on this over populated and polluted world ?
Following what Antony wrote, victims are needed, and may be not only "a mass death of Russian people", but of the world human population. It kind of fits with the PTB agenda...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom