Thomas Sheridan
Just so people know as I am getting a little annoy with the rumors out there.
I have nothing personal against David Icke. I think he is a well meaning person in terms of his message and I am on side with a lot of what he says. But the Reptilians is where I draw the line. After 20 years he has given no hard proof - I wish he would drop it. He is brilliant at tearing the media and BBC a new one and this is were his great personality and charisma works best for me.
I can't help it if some Icke supporters are coming to my work now. I am not trying to undermine the man and the amazing foundation he laid for the alternative movement. This is because my work is more accessible to the general public than shape shifting space lizards in Windsor Castle. That's just a fact. Nobody laughs when you start talking about psychopaths and the reptilian brain. They listen and they get it. They world at large is not ready for space lizards and moon spaceships - even if this stuff were real.
That's just how things are going. Nothing to do with me attacking Mr Icke as a person and the human being. Good luck to him and his supporters and thanks for kicking the door down so others like me could add our input too.
Carl Ruppert: What's your beef with Alex Jones?
Thomas Sheridan: Jones is a Fear Speculator.
Carl Ruppert: Can you name anyone who provides as much accurate news as Jones?
Thomas Sheridan: To be fair Icke was getting information from channellers back then and no good ever comes from that.
T****: I think that David Icke could theoretically be right about us living in a narrow band of reality, just as the people at sott.net talk about different densities with us being in the 3rd one and divided into, as Mouravieff put it, Adamic and pre-Adamic types. There are more than 3 dimensions and we'd be arrogant to assume that our 3D one is all there is. But it doesn't matter because while it might be useful to know about these possibilities, we can only reason and operate in our 3D world in which we are now, and nowhere else. In which case, Thomas' work is just as valid - perhaps more so. There might well be genuine reptoids operating from a different density outside of our perceptions and feeding off of our psychic energy via toxic people, but I think that for now, in our limited tangible world, the concept of a reptilian shape-shifter must remain metaphorical, referring to the primitive use of the psychopath's brain and the chameleon nature of his/her personae. Nevertheless, the common enemy remains the same despite our differences in how we perceive it.
Carl Ruppert: Since everyone is expressing OPINIONS about various personalities, I'll state that sott.net and Laura K-J are bogus. She's a crook.
T**** Maybe, Carl, and maybe not. But what's the evidence? And why do you think they do all that work?
about an hour ago · Like
Carl Ruppert In this discussion evidence doesn't matter. It's ALL opinion.
about an hour ago · Like
T****: But I think it's important, if you believe they might be crooks, that you share it because a lot of people seem to follow them. Also, you didn't express an opinion; your exact words were: 'I'll STATE (caps mine) that sott.net and Laura K-J are bogus. She's a crook.' I'm not trying to call you out but simply want clarification because, frankly, if they are crooks, they're very prolific and convincing ones.
about an hour ago · Like
Carl Ruppert @Terry: there was a scandal in Florida before she moved to France; now there is another scandal in France. She always needs money... The C's are really her. And, as Thomas points out channeling is suspect. A friend of mine read some postings on the C blog, and said he felt like he'd been attacked by vampires afterwards. Mind -flick-.
about an hour ago · Like · 2
Carl Ruppert @Terry: I don't think you quite get me about opinions. I stated my opinion. People think opinions are something vague, but they are also declarative sentences.
about an hour ago · Like
T****: Most of us who aren't Wall St bankers always need money. But I must say that the 'C's seem to use odd colloquial language from time-to-time that one wouldn't expect from higher beings - not that you'd expect them to use the formal dialogue of a cheesy 1950s biblical epic either. That has always aroused my suspicions. Moreover, once when I suggested (opinion) to one of them on another thread that religions are often NOT started by psychopaths but are quickly infiltrated by them, I got what seemed like a reprimand, stating that I had not studied the matter for as long as they had and suggesting, therefore, that what I thought had no validity. I found that to be an odd response from people professing to be souled. There was another rather touchy response, too, from another member of that group on a different matter that unnerved me a bit. Yet I continue, in ever decreasing circles, to give them the benefit of the doubt, possibly because, as with disinformation, there is often still truth at the core.
Carl Ruppert: @Terry: heaven help you if you ever disagree with anyone in that group. That was the final straw for me. We all need money, it's how we get it that matters. She's been accused of fraud more than once, lawsuits, blah, blah, blah. The best way to determine is to place the person or thing or concept into your heart (chakra) and see what happens. Never fails...
