Question(s) for the C's?

[John G]

In 3 dimensions, what divides left and right is a plane. In 4 dimensions, what would be the analogue would be a sphere where the division is inside/outside the sphere. This may be what was being described as inside/outside.

In exact terms the analog would be a hyperplane:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperplane

But if you do other things like perhaps add imaginary number coordinates, then a sphere analog could come into play too. Any kind of extra large spatial dimension can mess up left vs. right-handedness.

From http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000713/00/parity.pdf

The other objection runs along the same lines, but this time exploits the fact
that the incongruence of two hands in part depends on the dimensionality of the
space in which they are embedded. One could move a left hand into the space
occupied by a right hand if there was an extra spatial dimension through which
it could be moved, just as the letter “F” can be brought into coincidence with its
mirror image on the page if one is allowed to lift it off the page. Does whether
or not hands have primitive left-handed or right-handed properties depend on the
dimensionality of space?

 

[Cyrus Wallace]

I want to make an additional suggestion: I want ALL of you to think about the amount of energy I must expend in engaging with the Cs in order to ask and receive the responses to your questions. In short, a bit of external considering is in order here. With that in mind, make sure your question is clear, concise, that there is sufficient background data included so that I, myself, can decide if I think my energy is well spent on that particular question. Then, make sure that you cannot figure out the answer yourself with some research and thinking. Finally, is the question crucial to understanding our reality here and making it possible for us to learn our lessons HERE.

Then, having done that, one - or several - of you, compile the questions and background data and justifications into a document and send it as an attachment to sott(at)sott.net.

I didn't know that. Sorry...

I'll withdraw some questions and leave those that can be answered with "yes"/"no" or some numbers. If it requires a lot of energy too, it's up to you if you don't want to use them. ;) My post:

-What "%" of Organic Portals are currently in Argentina?
-Is blood type related to the genetical condition to have an individual soul?

Those ones can be answered with "yes"/"no" and numbers.

-Why is UK so concerned in keeping their bases near to the South Pole and occupying "our" Islas Malvinas?
-Why USA is buying Argentina's south territory?

That's bothering me a lot. I don't know if I can trust in history books, so I could appreciate some "extra help". And since Laura and C's like history, I've got an history question here. :D

Some background:

Between 1976-1983 Argentina underwent some of its darkest years in which de facto rulers imposed a right wing military dictatorship which claimed to strive for economic recovery via a 'National Reorganisation Process'. This involved thousands of unexplained 'disappearances', lives lost, families separated and violence to keep people in line with the wishes of the government.

The culminating economic problems that this period caused the country, topped off with being defeated by the UK in the Falklands War in 1982 led to the end of the dictatorship and finally, in 1983 Raúl Alfonsin took control. During his six year reign Argentina began to resemble more closely the Argentina we know and love today. A contract was signed with Brazil to put in place the basis of Mercosur, which today includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru and operates as the largest trading bloc in South America.

In 1989 Peronist Carlos Menem was voted into power, however he proceeded to go against many of Perón's original policies and his actions sparked the Piquetero movement in which unemployed workers (predominantly women) protested for their rights.

Click on the link to read about Argentina's Modern History and Politics.

_http://www.whatargentina.com/argentina-military-dictatorship.html

The question is: What did actually happen with those teenagers that dissapeared during that military dictatorship and they cannot be found yet?

And again, if you find those questions useless, you're free to avoid them. Have a nice day. :)

 

[dant]

The quote/question below was posted in the "Sesion 4 July 2009" thread,
and it was suggested that I repost here, perhaps a question for
the Cs?

A: Yes but not only. The point is this: when you speak while merged,
cosmic elements are transmitted via your voice. More than this, it
has the power to heal those of similar goals who are not yet at the
correct frequency. In short, through your voice we can set frequency
resonance for those of "the blood."

Is the above quote taken to mean that deaf, hearing-impaired,
or otherwise handicapped people are out of luck, if one cannot
physically see or hear the "voice" or is this beyond human physicality
and more towards that which can only be "seen", "heard", and/or "felt"
through one's own "FRV"?

FWIW,
Dan

 

[PepperFritz]

The quote/question below was posted in the "Sesion 4 July 2009" thread,
and it was suggested that I repost here, perhaps a question for
the Cs?

A: Yes but not only. The point is this: when you speak while merged,
cosmic elements are transmitted via your voice. More than this, it
has the power to heal those of similar goals who are not yet at the
correct frequency. In short, through your voice we can set frequency
resonance for those of "the blood."

Is the above quote taken to mean that deaf, hearing-impaired,
or otherwise handicapped people are out of luck, if one cannot
physically see or hear the "voice" or is this beyond human physicality
and more towards that which can only be "seen", "heard", and/or "felt"
through one's own "FRV"?

Hi Dant. Here's what I posted in response to your question in the other thread, before I saw that you'd posted it here as well, FWIW:

Well, it's true that such people cannot experience the benefits of hearing Laura's voice, which is unfortunate. However, it hardly means that they are "out of luck" in a larger sense, since we cannot assume that Laura's voice is the one and only means that 6th-density has to "set frequency resonance for those of 'the blood'." Bear in mind that the C's have said that Laura and her group are just "one developing conduit" among others in the world. Also bear in mind that Laura's voice is just another "tool" for those working to align themselves with an STO orientation, and not a magical means "skipping" the conscious work involved in doing so. In other words, I would think that one could listen to her voice all day long and not progress one iota if they are not doing the Work (or its equivalent) at the same time....

 

[gaman]

Hey Laura, now that the questions to the C's are being reorganized, will it still help to email the summary to SOTT? If so, was the way it was laid out in the email I sent okay?

 

[Steve M.]

My apologies for having not read through all the questions, and not knowing if this question has been asked.

Every time I read a story about the space shuttle and the disaster/explosion of 2003 a particular question often comes to mind. I've read the article where Laura wrote about space based weapons http://www.sott.net/articles/show/139903-Ultra-terrestrials-and-9-11 and could give a bit of time to reading 911 the ultimate truth, which I have not read (working over more books than I can count currently). But if I were able/could pose a question to the C's about this particular matter it would be this:

"I'm curious if the space shuttle accident in 2003 was intentional. Were the Astronauts murdered because they fixxed/repaired/reloaded the satellite that was used to (help) knock down the towers on 911?"

And I wonder if that question has been asked in unpublished transcripts? Also, is it even a potential question, as it may be saying, "just gimme the answer(s)!" without any brain power being exercised. It just always comes up and something I've often pondered. It is also kind of speculative that there was a space based weapon, but the article really makes a good argument, from my perspective, that there was!

 

[Johnno]

My apologies for having not read through all the questions, and not knowing if this question has been asked.

Every time I read a story about the space shuttle and the disaster/explosion of 2003 a particular question often comes to mind. I've read the article where Laura wrote about space based weapons http://www.sott.net/articles/show/139903-Ultra-terrestrials-and-9-11 and could give a bit of time to reading 911 the ultimate truth, which I have not read (working over more books than I can count currently). But if I were able/could pose a question to the C's about this particular matter it would be this:

"I'm curious if the space shuttle accident in 2003 was intentional. Were the Astronauts murdered because they fixxed/repaired/reloaded the satellite that was used to (help) knock down the towers on 911?"

And I wonder if that question has been asked in unpublished transcripts? Also, is it even a potential question, as it may be saying, "just gimme the answer(s)!" without any brain power being exercised. It just always comes up and something I've often pondered. It is also kind of speculative that there was a space based weapon, but the article really makes a good argument, from my perspective, that there was!

There is a transcript around about this somewhere.

02.02.2003 Ark, Laura SF and HS

Q: Hello.
A: Hello group from Cassiopaea.
Q: One of the first questions we want to ask tonight is about the event of the Space Shuttle that was lost. First, was it an explosion, or was it just disintegration, or breaking up?
A: It was a "direct hit."
Q: A direct hit by what?
A: EM pulse.
Q: (S) What was the source of the EM pulse?
A: 3/4th density Consortium.
Q: Well, I thought Bush was a puppet of the Consortium? (A) Well, we know that the military are scrambling planes to go after UFOs...there are even reports of firing on them and there have been reports of military jets being disintegrated by UFOs. The UFOs are, somehow, in cahoots with the consortium. It seems that Bush and the gang are not in control of the Consortium and maybe they needed to be "reminded?"
A: It is not so much that he needs to be reminded, as he needs to be stimulated to react.
Q: (L) You once before said that Bush knows very little anyway - or that the "White House" level is pretty much in the dark about the plans of the Consortium - even if they are carrying them out. So, you are suggesting that they are being driven by forces of which they are unaware and do not understand?
A: Exactly. Bush is a "reaction machine."
Q: (L) I would like to know about this supposed “body guard” of Saddam recently presented by MOSSAD? Was he one of Saddam’s former bodyguards?
A: To an extent, yes. But certainly not in the way presented. Just remember
this: if pilots can be conditioned to commandeer airliners that will fly into
certain death, how hard is it to “Produce” a “bodyguard?”
Q: (L) Piece of cake to produce a bodyguard, I guess. (A) He is saying exactly what the Israelis want him to say. He is not revealing any particular data that counts. It is just general things. Anybody could say such things and be called a “bodyguard.” (L) Exactly. Okay, you say that an EM pulse brought down the Shuttle. (A) Where did the EM pulse come from?
A: From space based satellite.
Q: (A) Does NASA know about the cause?
A: There are some who suspect.
Q: (L) Which explains why they are so anxious to convince everyone that it was NOT sabotage. Like Wellstone's death, there was "no question" about it being a terrorist attack. The likelihood is that the Bush Junta was behind Wellstone's death. In both cases they "know" the cause and want to divert the attention away from it. But, in the case of the shuttle, they aren't "dirty," but they most definitely do NOT want anyone to realize that they also are not "in charge." It makes me think of the remark the C's made a few years ago about the reason for the Military Industrial Complex build-up and manipulations. C's said that the REAL enemy is "out there" and that war was just a "cover" to prevent the masses from realizing what they were really doing. Maybe Bush and the gang are really convinced, in their own minds, that they are acting to "protect" humanity from this threat. Meanwhile, they are simply being drivent to fulfill the agenda of the Consortium. And it is so interesting that the shuttle broke up over Palestine, Texas... as though it was saying to Bush: this is what is going to happen to you: Palestine is going to be your destruction. But, of course, Bush would be incapable of perceiving it in that context. Is it so that a message was intended in this event?
A: As always, confusion is the mask.
Q: (L) In other words, everyone's reaction to the event will depend on their own context. There is the view that it was a "message to Bush." Bush and gang will, of course, see it only as a stimulus to faster and more "decisive" military action. So, it will really work on them the way it is wanted. (A) And of course, we wonder how they will make use of this event.
A: The primary effect among the masses will be shock, thus making them less resistant to Bush's policies. Still other groups will see the clear threat to Bush and Co. from their activities. Bush and Co. will, of course, seek to capitalize on the event even while remaining in the dark as to its meaning. But there most certainly is awareness among them that there is a "Maverick" element at loose. Bush has even "felt" a bit of primal fear in respect of this event.

 

[seek10]

can we ask C's about the effects of component like 'Magnesium stearate' in the vitamins we all take and its ability to stop the absorbability of vitamins in intestines. We can't get any vitamin with out magnesium stearate or its equivalents.

How to cleanse Magnesium stearate from the intestine's walls ?

 

[vinny]

My apologies for having not read through all the questions, and not knowing if this question has been asked.

Every time I read a story about the space shuttle and the disaster/explosion of 2003 a particular question often comes to mind
[...]

There is a transcript around about this somewhere.

there's also some background about this in podcast 30: The Cassiopaean Experiment Part 1:

http://www.sott.net/podcasts/listall?page=5

 

[bjorb]

A: It was a "direct hit."
Q: A direct hit by what?
A: EM pulse.
Q: (S) What was the source of the EM pulse?

A: From space based satellite.

Once I though, well with those space based satellite's they have couldn't they just shot down those comets nearing our planet to oblivion and take those Nephalim vessels with them. But with the consortium in control that will most likely not fit there agenda.

Anyway enough for this speculation lets continue


impression of a space based satellite cannon

 

[PopHistorian]

Another point about external consideration to consider: will the answer to your question help others, or even all?

If I could "second" any questions listed here I would second Justin's:
<< Are the chemical chelation methods to detoxify heavy metals from the body safe and effective? Specifically the use of EDTA, DMSA and DMPA? >>

More, specifically, it might be better to ask about orally taken EDTA, as this is within reach of anyone who can buy the capsules, and it was not mentioned in the diet discussion or anywhere else on the board. I'm not even sure if this is a without-recourse question, but the research trail is pretty darned littered and obscure on this, I've found, for a non-biochemist, anyway.

 

[genero81]

Another point about external consideration to consider: will the answer to your question help others, or even all?

If I could "second" any questions listed here I would second Justin's:
<< Are the chemical chelation methods to detoxify heavy metals from the body safe and effective? Specifically the use of EDTA, DMSA and DMPA? >>

More, specifically, it might be better to ask about orally taken EDTA, as this is within reach of anyone who can buy the capsules, and it was not mentioned in the diet discussion or anywhere else on the board. I'm not even sure if this is a without-recourse question, but the research trail is pretty darned littered and obscure on this, I've found, for a non-biochemist, anyway.

Try vrp.com I trust them because I've done business with them for many years now. They have recommended EDTA for chelation therapy for as long as I have dealt with them. Use your own judgment, however.

 

[Steve M.]

Thanks Johnno for sharing that info. Also thanks for pointing out what is now obvious PopHistorian - the question wouldn't have had any effect on helping others or at all. While the EM Pulse did answer my question, my thoughts (due to lack of remembering what Johnno quoted) was, instead of what the C's pointed out, that potentially since the Astronauts might have reset/fixed the satellite in reference to 911, that they were killed. After the quote Johnno, by way of the transcripts, made though my asking that question was of no use.

Thank you both for helping clear up both issues. :)

 

[Justin]

Another point about external consideration to consider: will the answer to your question help others, or even all?

If I could "second" any questions listed here I would second Justin's:
<< Are the chemical chelation methods to detoxify heavy metals from the body safe and effective? Specifically the use of EDTA, DMSA and DMPA? >>

More, specifically, it might be better to ask about orally taken EDTA, as this is within reach of anyone who can buy the capsules, and it was not mentioned in the diet discussion or anywhere else on the board. I'm not even sure if this is a without-recourse question, but the research trail is pretty darned littered and obscure on this, I've found, for a non-biochemist, anyway.

Another point about external consideration to consider: will the answer to your question help others, or even all?

If I could "second" any questions listed here I would second Justin's:
<< Are the chemical chelation methods to detoxify heavy metals from the body safe and effective? Specifically the use of EDTA, DMSA and DMPA? >>

More, specifically, it might be better to ask about orally taken EDTA, as this is within reach of anyone who can buy the capsules, and it was not mentioned in the diet discussion or anywhere else on the board. I'm not even sure if this is a without-recourse question, but the research trail is pretty darned littered and obscure on this, I've found, for a non-biochemist, anyway.

Try vrp.com I trust them because I've done business with them for many years now. They have recommended EDTA for chelation therapy for as long as I have dealt with them. Use your own judgment, however.

I'm going to copy this question to it's own topic in the "Questions for the C's" section. I'll elaborate on the original question with more detail and some research data. The research on this is a bit murky...there is data showing that these chemicals actually do remove heavy metals, but the information on their safety is mixed and less clear.

 

[cubbex]

From my apparent 3D point of view, "I" am located just behind my eyes. From that vantage point I see the world and it has a left and a right where that is defined as a vertical plane which bisects my body from my head to my feet, and passes through my nose. Ironically my left is on your right, when viewed from your point of view. If you look from my point of view, looking at you, and your point of view looking at me, and do so simultaneously, obviously left and right have no meaning because there is no single dividing plane.

Perception on higher planes has been described as having "spherical vision". Unless you have had an Out of Body Experience (I have), it is hard to describe what this is like. There is simply no analogue to compare it to. The experience I had was being able to see everywhere at once (a complete 360 degree sphere) and with perfect "fovial" vision. It is hard for me to even accurately remember the experience because it was so different from my normal everyday 3D environment.

My question to the 'Cs' would be "is the experience of spherical vision related to the above left/right, point-of-view comments? If so, is there a way to describe how?

More musings:

In 3 dimensions, what divides left and right is a plane. In 4 dimensions, what would be the analogue would be a sphere where the division is inside/outside the sphere. This may be what was being described as inside/outside.

In 3 dimensions, each eye sees a 3 dimensional world projected onto a "plane" (not literally, but the geometric point is the same). By combining two planar projections, the brain is able to synthesize "stereo" where the 3d dimensional information is inferred by the brain based on the relative differences in the two planar images.

I wonder if there is a 4 dimensional inside/outside "stereo" analog.

Ark: is my comparison to the plane vs. the sphere correct, geometrically? Or am I missing something?

I think they were talking about perception, and you know, i think something similar

i think all about that, is about perception, not just outside/inside

my question is:

the % of the people, that at this present time, could contact with the cassiopeans(transitory passengers) without being in the presence of laura????