Question(s) for the C's?

[Vulcan59]

Hi MilkoJanovich,

Try searching for astrology in the various sessions. Here is one that I found:-

Q: Why was astrology absent from the myths of ancient Greece?
A: Not absent, "Stalinized."
Q: What does that mean?
A: Soviets removed Stalin from the history books when he fell from popularity. So, Greeks, Astrology... "Stalinized"...
Q: Why?
A: Deadly secrets would be revealed.
Q: Revealed to whom?
A: You.
Q: If we could find the pieces and put them together, they would show us the drama and the connection between 3rd and 4th density?
A: You would have to use the original astrology, before cosmic changes of a planetary nature; there was no Venus,
for one example, and earth was oriented differently axially speaking.

Now here is what the C's said about Edgar Cayce's source of knowledge:-

Q: (L) What was the source of knowledge accessed by Edgar Cayce?
A: Well, he had a unique biochemical composition which allowed for easy opening and closing of his consciousness
from outside sources without interference with his electromagnetic flow stream. It is a very unique and unusual
situation. The first manifestation of this was when he asked for help. If he had not asked for help from a higher source,
possibly his awareness of his abilities would never have come forth.

So perhaps Edgar Cayce wasn't really reading "astrology".

 

[Erna]

Of course, naturally Joe, I mean without noticeable compromised health, like everyone in my circles, who have all been vaccinated...

 

[gaman]

In working on summarizing the questions per Laura's request, and the difficulty therein of tracing follow-up responses back to the question in the same thread, I have formed the opinion that the area of questions to the C's might be better served as a it's own board where each question underneath is a separate topic. That way responses to the question are right there in context, and also any responses from the C's could be quoted in. This is my suggestion if Laura and the gang want to continue to entertain our questions as it would make it much easier for them.

To me it seems this would make things much more organized and easier for everyone to go through and follow. Just a thought to see what you think. I'll continue to work on the list from the current postings.

 

[rs]

981114
Q: (A) I have another question. In a session from April, you made the following comment: 'four dimensional, fourth density, see?' So you related four dimensions to fourth density. I don't know a mathematical representation of density. I know how to represent four dimensions. This was the first time that you related dimension to density. Is there really a relation?
A: Yes, because 4th density is experienced in 4th dimensional reality.
Q: (A) Speaking now about 4 dimensional reality, is it four dimensional reality of the Kaluza-Klein type?
A: Visual spectrum.
Q: (A) Does that mean that the fourth dimension is NOT related to the fifth dimension of the Kaluza-Klein theory?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Yes it is related?
A: No, yes it is not. There is a flaw in these theories, relating to prism. What does this tell you?
Q: (A) To prism?! Visual spectrum? I don't know what it tells me. I never came across any relation to prism. But, what is this 4th dimension? Is it an extra dimension beyond the three space dimensions, or is it a time dimension?
A: Not "time," re: Einstein. It is an added spatial reference. The term "dimension" is used simply to access the popular reference, relating to three dimensions. The added "dimension" allows one to visualize outwardly and inwardly simultaneously. (my emph: SFT models inward and outward simultaneously, it is a matter of flipping the sign)
Q: (A) When you talk about this 4th dimension, what is the closest thing in currently understood physics that corresponds to this term? I cannot find anything that corresponds. It is not in relativity theory, it is not in Einstein, it is not in Kaluza-Klein...
A: Exactly, because it has not been hypothesized.

970104
Q: (L) If gravity is the binder, is gravity consciousness?
A: Not exactly. Did you know that there is no "right" or "left" in 4th density through 7th density? If you can picture this exactly, then you may be able to understand the responses to all the questions you are asking. If not, best "give it a rest." Because it will only be productive learning when you ponder and reflect/review "later."

If there is no right and left and the fourth dimension has to do with inward vs. outward simultaneous, these two statements are actually the same.

From my apparent 3D point of view, "I" am located just behind my eyes. From that vantage point I see the world and it has a left and a right where that is defined as a vertical plane which bisects my body from my head to my feet, and passes through my nose. Ironically my left is on your right, when viewed from your point of view. If you look from my point of view, looking at you, and your point of view looking at me, and do so simultaneously, obviously left and right have no meaning because there is no single dividing plane.

Perception on higher planes has been described as having "spherical vision". Unless you have had an Out of Body Experience (I have), it is hard to describe what this is like. There is simply no analogue to compare it to. The experience I had was being able to see everywhere at once (a complete 360 degree sphere) and with perfect "fovial" vision. It is hard for me to even accurately remember the experience because it was so different from my normal everyday 3D environment.

My question to the 'Cs' would be "is the experience of spherical vision related to the above left/right, point-of-view comments? If so, is there a way to describe how?

 

[Laura]

In working on summarizing the questions per Laura's request, and the difficulty therein of tracing follow-up responses back to the question in the same thread, I have formed the opinion that the area of questions to the C's might be better served as a it's own board where each question underneath is a separate topic. That way responses to the question are right there in context, and also any responses from the C's could be quoted in. This is my suggestion if Laura and the gang want to continue to entertain our questions as it would make it much easier for them.

To me it seems this would make things much more organized and easier for everyone to go through and follow. Just a thought to see what you think. I'll continue to work on the list from the current postings.

Probably not a bad idea. It could be a "daughter board" kind of like the recipes board. Maybe one of the moderators who knows how to use the software can set it up?

 

[Joe]

Wow, thank you! Well, in that case, there is a question or maybe a series of questions I've had on my mind and I don't believe they've been specifically addressed in the other sessions.

What was the cause of the "Swine flu" deaths in Mexico this past spring?

Was it a:
1.) intentional bioweapon (possibly "genetic specific" whether natural or artificial)
2.) biological of natural origin (mutated virus, virus from space a la Hoyle, etc)
3.) media misrepresentation of deaths (i.e. deaths were due to other causes covered up by the media under the guise of "Swine flu")
4.) intentional poisoning (poisoned food/water)
5.) natural poisoning (a la Bailey: comet gas, trapped earth gas, etc)
6.) electromagnetically induced (HAARP, cell towers, etc)
7.) unknown method
- some combination of these

Given recent transcripts, the answer is most likely to be that the virus was intentionally spread by someone.

 

[Joe]

What percentage of the world population will die from the “Swine Flu” pandemic?

What percentage of the current world population will be alive in 6 years?

If you read the transcripts you will realise that these type of questions are generally answered with "open". It's pretty obvious to even us that an specific answer to how many people will be alive in 6 years is largely dependent on what people themselves choose to do. Do you really think that our lives are do totally fated? That we have no free will whatsoever? If you do then it doesn't bode well for your own chances of stepping outside of the general law.

 

[Joe]

Q: (L) In other words, there's no hope for our planet or our species if normal human beings do not come together and get over these varied pathological belief systems and religions and "your truth" and "my truth" and all that sort of thing?

A: Yes. All of that was created and spread by pathological types under the influence of their hyperdimensional masters for the purpose of turning this planet into a "hell on earth" with them as the masters. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. What is needed is for many people to begin to make direct connections with their higher centers. This has been done via the "work" up to now, but there are other methods to accelerate the process and obtain the needed assistance.

What is meant by, "obtain the needed assistance"?

Assistance to make direct connections with higher centers (as mentioned in the previous sentence) would seem to be the most obvious answer.

 

[John G]

If there is no right and left and the fourth dimension has to do with inward vs. outward simultaneous, these two statements are actually the same... My question to the 'Cs' would be "is the experience of spherical vision related to the above left/right, point-of-view comments? If so, is there a way to describe how?

The physics of adding a large 4th space dimension is known to have that can't tell left from right property or as one guy put it "you can't tie your shoes".

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=11292.msg81227#msg81227

 

[Laura]

I've made a "daughter forum" for questions and started trying to sort them into threads... yikes! Some of ya'll need to create threads with your questions separated since some posts have multiple questions that go all over the place! I could sit here all day trying to fix this mess! So, those of you who can, reproduce your posts as single questions beginning a thread (if such a thread does not already exist, which it probably doesn't). Those of you who have responded to any given question, please reproduce your posts in response to these questions in the appropriate threads. This will obviously take a few days to sort out, but in the end, we'll know what is left after all the questions that can be easily answered are dealt with.

Also, I'm going to try to be getting ALL the sessions in the session sub-forum, by date and with my personal notes that are included in my file copies. That will take awhile if I just do like 2 or 3 of them a day. But, once that is done, they will be on the forum and thus searchable.

Ya'll please be patient!

 

[Jacques]

Also, I'm going to try to be getting ALL the sessions in the session sub-forum, by date and with my personal notes that are included in my file copies. That will take awhile if I just do like 2 or 3 of them a day. But, once that is done, they will be on the forum and thus searchable.

Ya'll please be patient!

Many, many thank you.

 

[Marcus-Aurelius]

Also, I'm going to try to be getting ALL the sessions in the session sub-forum, by date and with my personal notes that are included in my file copies. That will take awhile if I just do like 2 or 3 of them a day. But, once that is done, they will be on the forum and thus searchable.

Ya'll please be patient!

Many, many thank you.

Yes thanks Laura

 

[Breton]

...reproduce your posts as single questions beginning a thread (if such a thread does not already exist, which it probably doesn't). Those of you who have responded to any given question,

Yes, this sounds the way to go - everyone pitch in and clean up their own areas of interest, so all of this work does not need to go on Laura's shoulders!

I had really been pondering a way to get this cleaned up with so many people all of the world, at so many different points on the learning curve throwing out questions and not result in draining too much of Laura's energy.

Excellent suggestion by gaman! Thanks for speaking up!

Oh Yes!
;D

_Breton_

 

[Leo40]

981114

If there is no right and left and the fourth dimension has to do with inward vs. outward simultaneous, these two statements are actually the same.

Our 3D world has 3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time. Since the universe always balances there must
exist a world with 1 dimension of space and 3 dimensions of time. (reflection).
This seems to me to be 4D. Therefore there is no left or right.

 

[rs]

From my apparent 3D point of view, "I" am located just behind my eyes. From that vantage point I see the world and it has a left and a right where that is defined as a vertical plane which bisects my body from my head to my feet, and passes through my nose. Ironically my left is on your right, when viewed from your point of view. If you look from my point of view, looking at you, and your point of view looking at me, and do so simultaneously, obviously left and right have no meaning because there is no single dividing plane.

Perception on higher planes has been described as having "spherical vision". Unless you have had an Out of Body Experience (I have), it is hard to describe what this is like. There is simply no analogue to compare it to. The experience I had was being able to see everywhere at once (a complete 360 degree sphere) and with perfect "fovial" vision. It is hard for me to even accurately remember the experience because it was so different from my normal everyday 3D environment.

My question to the 'Cs' would be "is the experience of spherical vision related to the above left/right, point-of-view comments? If so, is there a way to describe how?

More musings:

In 3 dimensions, what divides left and right is a plane. In 4 dimensions, what would be the analogue would be a sphere where the division is inside/outside the sphere. This may be what was being described as inside/outside.

In 3 dimensions, each eye sees a 3 dimensional world projected onto a "plane" (not literally, but the geometric point is the same). By combining two planar projections, the brain is able to synthesize "stereo" where the 3d dimensional information is inferred by the brain based on the relative differences in the two planar images.

I wonder if there is a 4 dimensional inside/outside "stereo" analog.

Ark: is my comparison to the plane vs. the sphere correct, geometrically? Or am I missing something?