Quotes

  • Thread starter Thread starter rs
  • Start date Start date
A description of a meeting with a pathocrat:

“An important event for me in those years was my meeting with the chief of security of the dictatorship, the most hated man after Odria himself. I was then a delegate of the University Federation of San Marcos. There were many students in jail and we knew that they were sleeping on prison floors, with no mattresses or blankets. We organized a collection and bought blankets. But when we wanted to take them to the Penitentiary – the prison that was on the site now occupied by the Sheraton Hotel where, so the story goes, the souls of the victims tortured in the old dungeons still wander 'in torment' – we were told only the Ministry of the Interior, Don Alejandro Esparza Zañartu, could authorize the delivery. The Federation agreed that five delegates should ask for a meeting. I was one of the five.

I still remember very vividly the impression it made on me when I saw the feared character close up, in his office in the Interior Ministry. He was a small man of about fifty, wrinkled and bored, who seemed to be looking at us through water and did not listen to a word we said. He let us speak – we were trembling – and when we finished, he kept looking at us without saying anything, as if he was laughing at our confusion. Then he opened a drawer in his desk and took out some copies of Cahuide, a mimeographed little journal which we published clandestinely and in which, of course, we attacked him. 'I know which of you has written each of these articles,' he told us, 'where you meet to print it, and what you plot in your cell meetings.' And, indeed, he did seem omniscient, but, at the same time, deplorable, a pitiful mediocrity. He spoke in an ungrammatical way and his intellectual poverty was quite apparent. Seeing him in this interview, I had an idea for a novel that I would write fifteen years later: Conversations in the Cathedral. In it, I tried to describe the effects that a dictatorship like the eight-year period of Odria had on people's daily lives – their studies, work, loves, dreams and ambitions.”

- Mario Vargas Llosa, in the essay “The Country of a Thousand Faces” (1983).
 
"Ptolemy, who was a great man, had fixed the limits of our world, and all the ancient philosophers thought they had taken its measure, excepting some remote islands which might have escaped their notice. A thousand years ago it would have been a case of Pyrrhonizing to question the science of cosmography, and its universally accepted conclusions. It was heresy to admit the existence of Antipodes. And behold! In this century of ours there has just been discovered an infinite extent of terra firm, not merely an island or one particular country, but a hemisphere nearly equal in extent to the one we knew! The geographers of our time do not stick at assuring us that to-day all is discovered, everything has been seen:

For what we have at hand,
That chiefly pleases and seems best of all.
- Lucretius

The question is, if Ptolemy, grounding his belief on reason, was once mistaken, whether it would not be foolish on my part now to trust the word of those geographers; and whether it is not more likely that this great body which we call the World is quite another thing than we imagine."

- Montaigne, in the long essay “Apology for Raimond Sebond” (1595 edition), translated by E. J. Trechmann.
 
“Life will hit you hard in the face, wait for you to get back up just so it can kick you in the stomach.
But getting the wind knocked out of you is the only way to remind your lungs how much they like the taste of air.”

~ Sarah Kay
 
We have an obligation to sift the wheat from the chaff, if only because our immortality is at stake. Immortality must be earned and we are inviting setbacks and confusion if we allow ourselves to be distracted from this task by psychism's world of glamour and illusion. It is easy, much too easy, to be seduced by hungry ghosts and fall into the snare of dependency, a snare that can prove deadly. As Carl Jung observed, we die to the extent that we fail to discriminate. Or, to quote Virgil: "We make our destinies by our choice of gods."

From: Joe Fisher's The Siren Call of Hungry Ghosts.
 
Herman Boerhaave said:
simplex veri sigillum

Which means: simplicity is the sign of truth.

Sources:

_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Boerhaave
_http://www.samueljohnson.com/boerhaave.html
_http://www.pro-folia.org/files/1/2004/1/editorial.pdf
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_phrases_%28S%29
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle
 
The truly "creative" aspect of language resides not in it's "infinite generative capacity" but in cycles of production and comprehension mediated by a mind capable of reflecting upon the multiple meanings attachable to an utterance, meanings that need not have been present in the thought that gave rise to the utterance but which become available through self-comprehension(or deep interpretation of another's utterance) and can lead to a new thought to be expressed and reinterpreted, and so on indefinitely.

-H. Stephen Straight, "Comprehension vs Production in Linguistic Theory"

When I read this quote, I thought about taking the time to stop and reflect on what I am reading during short rest breaks, and re reading what I may not have understood the first time. This first quote had me thinking about reading books, and reading threads on the forum.

as Karl Pearson pointed out in The Grammar of Science, this method always consists of three steps:
1. The observation and recording of facts
2.The grouping of these facts with proper correlation and with proper distinction from other facts
3. The effort to devise some summarizing or, if possible, explanatory statement which will enable one to grasp conveniently their significance

-"Mask of Sanity"

This second quote thought brought to mind writing on the forum, and how this quote could be a useful guide/advice when writing a post or organzing thoughts.
 
This third quote, from Ouspensky's 'The Fourth Way' that I am reading, related to the quote I posted above on scientific method. FWIW, I found it interesting because it appears to describe a similar but more defined approach to gathering information and data, evaluating the truth of it and understanding how that information/truth ties or fits into a wider context, and how our thoughts/identifying can lead us closer to, or further from, that truth.

Q. Is formulation a proper function of the intellectual centre?

A. Quite right. There may be different degrees, but at present we can only speak about formulation and formation. In this connection it is important to understand the right meaning of the word ‘formatory’. There are two methods of mental conclusions: ‘formation’ and ‘formulation’. ‘Formation’ is a conclusion arrived at by the way of least resistance, avoiding difficulties. It is easier because it makes itself— ready-made phrases, ready-made opinions, like a stamp. It is generally defective with the exception of the simplest cases. ‘Formulation’ is a conclusion arrived at on the basis of all the available material; it needs effort and is sometimes difficult, but it means the best we can do.

Q. How is it possible for us to formulate? Will not certain ‘I’s distort the evidence?

A. If they distort, they will distort the formulation. But certainly it is necessary to learn to distinguish formulation from formation. Formation is, so to speak, just one glance, sometimes quite wrong, and formulation, as I said, is when you collect all you know about a given subject and try to make some deduction from it.

Ouspensky, P. D. The Fourth Way
 
Imagination is a kind of mediator, opening the way to the activity of the intelligible and spiritual life of the human being
--Raymond Lullius
 
Once we’ve thrown off our habitual paths, we think all is lost; but it’s only here that the new and the good begins.” ~ Leo Tolstoy
 
"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents."

--Major General Smedley Darlington Butler
 
"I have a new destination. My journey is the same as yours, the same as anyone's. It's taken me so many years, so many lifetimes, but at last I know where I'm going. Where I've always been going. Home, the long way round. "
—The Eleventh Doctor.
 
"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."

- J.R.R. Tolkien, The Two Towers
 
Truth is Truth is Truth.
I mean, it's not your truth, my truth, his truth, her truth,
It's that freakin' feel good shit! Get over it!
There is TRUTH! There is REALITY!

-Laura Knight-Jadczyk, on Sott radio show.

;D
 
Back
Top Bottom