Sam Vaknin - Narcissist or Psychopath?
Hi Purplehaze. Thanks for responding. "There's nothing wrong, IOHO with being a victim - but don't turn it into a lifestyle! We believe the word Victim needs to be reclaimed because there's POWER in it."
This is exactly my thinking. And the power is within us. Being a victim was not my fault, but staying a victim, wallowing in self-pity after 10 years, 15 years, etc, continuing the same behaviours, and justifying them all by saying, "I was a victim"? That robs me of my power.
That's what I tried to discuss on the other site. Learning what strength I possessed and used to survive, and learning to re-focus it in a positive direction. At that site, I got slammed for it, it went against the staus quo.
"The site owner could care less, now she's out promoting her book about Online Dating! (um... a lot of her members were hurt by online dating... duh!)"
Yes!! A book!! Well, here is my suspicion about AAC. I wonder if the owner of the site is writing about cults. But it's hard to observe one unless you are in it, or there is a glass roof over the commune, right? I sense the site is trying to use Sam or his tactics to create a cult mentality. I can't figure out the similarities between WD and Free and Sam and Femfree, though- unless it ties into narcissistic cult leaders and its followers. Some of the legitimate posters come to that site at their lowest ebb, beaten, broken down emotionally and financially, no means of counseling, and they are always told "Read Codependent No More" and then the mind f**k just progresses from there.
And take out my far-fetched theory of make-your-own-cult-to-research-it, assume it's just a playground for some real disturbed people to canter around in. Consider what Equitoria said "It's pretty risky to assume an active and unqualified expert role (especially in not allowing dissenting opinions) when people are showing up in all kinds of conditions of mental health as a result of abuse. It's not enough just to have site disclaimers if you're harrassing and demeaning members already in frail mential health, and the net just isn't going to be this big free for all forever."
I tried googling online research ethics but got very little.
Hi Purplehaze. Thanks for responding. "There's nothing wrong, IOHO with being a victim - but don't turn it into a lifestyle! We believe the word Victim needs to be reclaimed because there's POWER in it."
This is exactly my thinking. And the power is within us. Being a victim was not my fault, but staying a victim, wallowing in self-pity after 10 years, 15 years, etc, continuing the same behaviours, and justifying them all by saying, "I was a victim"? That robs me of my power.
That's what I tried to discuss on the other site. Learning what strength I possessed and used to survive, and learning to re-focus it in a positive direction. At that site, I got slammed for it, it went against the staus quo.
"The site owner could care less, now she's out promoting her book about Online Dating! (um... a lot of her members were hurt by online dating... duh!)"
Yes!! A book!! Well, here is my suspicion about AAC. I wonder if the owner of the site is writing about cults. But it's hard to observe one unless you are in it, or there is a glass roof over the commune, right? I sense the site is trying to use Sam or his tactics to create a cult mentality. I can't figure out the similarities between WD and Free and Sam and Femfree, though- unless it ties into narcissistic cult leaders and its followers. Some of the legitimate posters come to that site at their lowest ebb, beaten, broken down emotionally and financially, no means of counseling, and they are always told "Read Codependent No More" and then the mind f**k just progresses from there.
And take out my far-fetched theory of make-your-own-cult-to-research-it, assume it's just a playground for some real disturbed people to canter around in. Consider what Equitoria said "It's pretty risky to assume an active and unqualified expert role (especially in not allowing dissenting opinions) when people are showing up in all kinds of conditions of mental health as a result of abuse. It's not enough just to have site disclaimers if you're harrassing and demeaning members already in frail mential health, and the net just isn't going to be this big free for all forever."
I tried googling online research ethics but got very little.