1. a. Do you use AI such as Otter to transcribe the recording and then correct it afterwards (just to make it easier and less time consuming)?
1. b. Is it even wise to let AI in on the sessions? What is the stance of Laura et al?
1. c. Is there a policy against it?
Well, I am myself trying never to use AI in any form whatseover:
(Data) I have one question. It might be silly, but I'm gonna ask it anyway. Has it ever happened since the invention of mobile phones that a text message has been sent from the spirit world to a person?
A: Many times! Entities love tech!
...
(Perceval) When they said that entities love tech, is that why they said in a previous session that Wi-Fi is evil? Can these entities in some way influence the feelings of people in a house by these waves?
A: Related, certainly. Such energies can be drawn upon by all sorts of "critters" in your environment.
...
Q: (L) So, basically by having so much technology, microwaves, and all that kind of stuff, we're basically feeding entities in other realms and enabling them to enter ours?
A: Pretty much! Fun for materialists galore!
Q: (L) In other words, people who believe only in technology are in for a big surprise?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Well, that's interesting.
(Perceval) Is it because those kinds of microwaves and other kinds of waves transcend, or are perceived in other dimensions?
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) Well, geez! Apple takes on a whole new meaning now!
(Data) Poor Apple users.
(Scottie) That answers my question from before: Why did technology evolve the way that it did? Like why electronics, microchips, and so on when there are other types of technology that could have developed. They had to make the soup!
It has been discussed, here, if the next problematic phase would be "a technocracy". Some said that the phase before today was "capitalism" (and the one before it, "communism"). I don't see "technocracy" as powerful enough, so to speak, and becoming a serious threat. I would then think of "socialism" - or something really bigger than just "technocracy". This matter has been discussed, as well, in regard of STO intervention - so it remains open if we will even see any form of "next phase". It seems that the Earth requires some STO Intelligent design and that it has been a while since it hasn't seen any bit of it. That's my evaluation of "the objective danger of AI".
I understand as well that AI, despite it being quite wrong, may not be "the problem". If you look at cellphone, with those, we have an even bigger problem than AI. As for myself, I won't come closer to any form of AI, as precaution. I can, and there are other things I am less cautious about. But AI, I don't like, and I will keep it at bay.
If you see, the cell phone is too widespread. Some time ago, I was mourning "the thug mentality" of the youngsters. I was telling myself - oh my, twenty years more of those analphabets and society will be full of Snoop Doggy dogs. But those, have bought a cell phone. Slowly, this "social class" has found "the common tool" (and find it "great"). Soon, this social strate shall disappear (I won't mourn them!).
This was my requiem for tech, and I believe that it's wiser than not to use AI, be it only because of the above session! I believe that we still figure out AI's limits, contrarily of what we currently spectate: for now, it sounds super promizing (according to some), but I believe that what we are looking at is a "bet". We see some allegedly glowing light, for the most AI-optimists, but I believe it's so uncertain and unknown that it may be a big 50/50, actually, or else. Technically speaking, the brain cannot be replaced for thinking, because we use the hearth and other spiritual features, in order to "be". I believe that things will adjust, in this fashion. We would end up figuring out that AI will not be "the real deal" - while today people are staring at "a bright future full of glowing super AI stuff". This light may not be objectively there. I believe it's juts an idea - because of something new - and that we need something to believe in.
Let humans find out some real nitty gritty - we see that this AI is not gathering all.
Q: (L) In other words, people who believe only in technology are in for a big surprise?
Could be that people will figure this out. When this quote came by, in 2015,I was thinking at the elctronical grid going down. But today, I could foresee that AI would loose its superb, for the benefit of some real nitty-gritty.