Session Date: March 1st 2025
Laura and Andromeda at the board
Niall, Joe, Gaby, Ark, PoB, Chu, Scottie, Princess Leia, Bella
FOTCM Members attending via Zoom:
3DStudent, A Jay, Adobe, Aeneas, aimarok, Alana, Alejo, Altair, aluminumfalcon, anartist, Anthony, Approaching Infinity, Aragorn, Arwenn, Aya, Beau, Bluefyre, Bo , Bobo08, brandon, Breton, Carl, cassandra, Cosmos, Deliverance, domi, dugdeep, Ellipse, Ennio, fabric, Finduilas495, France, Gawan, genero81, Glenn, gottathink, Gwenllian, Harmony99, herondancer, Hesper, hesperides, Honzap, iamthatis, irjO, iscreamsandwish, Jacques, Jeanne T, JEEP, Jefferson, Jenn, Jono, Josi, Juba, Keyhole, kinyash, KJN, Konstantin, latulipenoire, Learner, Lilou, LQB, luc, Lucius, Luis Miguel, Mark, Maat, Manitoban, marek760, Mark7, Martina, Mike, Mikkael, Mililea, Miracle, Mrs. Peel, Natus Videre, Navigator, neema, Nicholas, Nienna, Obi, Ollie, OrangeScorpion, Oxajil, Pecha, PopHistorian, Redrock12, Regulattor, Ryan, rylek, ryu, Saman, ScioAgapeOmnis, Seamus, seek10, seeker2seer, Stoneboss, sToRmR1dR, Temperance, thorbiorn, Timótheos, Tomek, Tristan, Turgon, Uperios, Voyageur, Vulcan59, whitecoast, Windmill Knight, Yas, Ysus, zim
Q: (L) Today is March the first, 2025 and the usual suspects are present. [Review of those present] We have a number of puppies scattered about, so let's say: Hello, hello?
A: Miojlla of Cassiopaea here. Good evening. Yes, there are agents of chaos loose upon your plane. Worry not. Awareness and mental blocking can protect.
Q: (L) All right, so Gaby's first question is:
(Gaby) Do I have hypermobile Ehler Danlos and/or spectrum hypermobility syndrome?
(L) I mean, do they have to be in together, or is it one or the other?
(Gaby) They're the same thing.
(L) They're the same thing. So something like that is going on?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) From which ancestry as it is known today because I don't know my genealogy?
(L) In other words, your mother's side or your father's side?
(Gaby) Yeah, I don't know where my father originally came from.
(L) Okay. Is it from her mother's side or father's?
A: Father.
Q: (Gaby) Is it generally good to have it officially recognized?
(L) In other words, is it a good idea to have an official diagnosis?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Can you tell me the genetic mutation?
A: No. There are several interactive genes. And to some extent it can be mitigated by up or down regulation.
Q: (Gaby) Like the carnivore diet.
(L) Is carnivore diet...?
A: Yes definitely.
Q: (Gaby) Does this syndrome confer any advantages at all?
A: For some.
Q: (Gaby) It depends on the orientation, like STO...?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) Okay. From my father's side, is it from an Indian side or a Spanish European side?
A: Spanish.
Q: (Gaby) It explains the psychic abilities in that side of the family.
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) So if you're aligned with STO forces, it is good... or better.
A: Can be.
Q: (L) Okay. And now we have [redacted] on the forum, who asks:
([redacted]) Is my hypothesis about what happened to me true in all three components? (1) Was I sexually abused as a child, (2) by my Dad, and (3) is this the primary causal factor in my symptoms? If not, which of the components are not true?
(L) Well, why do we have to limit it to being true in all three components? I guess the first question is:
([redacted]) Was I sexually abused as a child?
A: Yes
Q: ([redacted]) By my dad?
A: Yes
Q: ([redacted]) Is this the primary causal factor in my symptoms?
A: No
Q: ([redacted]) If not, which of the components are not true?
(L) Well, you see that... Trying to tie three components together is not an open way of asking a question because they said "yes" to two and "no" to three. Okay. So what is the primary causal factor in their symptoms?
A: Genetic.
Q: (L) Does it have anything to do with brain chemistry?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) All their tests were normal. Could it be something like what I have?
A: Similar, but different genes.
Q: (Joe) Does their cluster of symptoms have a medically known name or syndrome attached to it?
A: Not as such. But close to Gaby's syndrome. There are many conditions that are specific to the individual. Your science likes to group them for definitive diagnosis when that is not always possible or accurate.
Q: (L) So there can be theoretically as many conditions as there are people, thanks to that wonderful process called genetic recombination. [Laughter]
(Gaby) Great.
(L) So they just kind of group together in a general way.
(Andromeda) Very general.
(Joe) So would it be true to say that any solutions or mitigating factors that apply to Gaby's case will also apply, generally speaking, to [redacted]?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I've been thinking a lot about this carnivore diet. I mean, we've gone through one thing after the other, tried this, and carnivore and ketogenic diets seem to be probably the most promising for a lot of things. I've been reading a lot about it lately and it seems that... and I just started thinking that... Is it possible that there's some kind of genetic switch in us that can sense, say for example, an oncoming ice age, and people are born with certain genes or genetic combinations in preparation for something like that? For a change in either an ice age change or even with the awareness that there's going to be a change to fourth density or something like that? Is it possible that there is some kind of switch in us, or some kind of receiver, that understands upcoming changes and it manifests in a large way in a human population?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I know that was a really crappy question... [Laughter] And all I got was a "Yes"! [Laughter] I feel cheated.
(Joe) They say a soul entering a body can change the genes, right? So what's a soul but consciousness or information. So, if prior to incarnation a soul had a general idea of the kind of conditions it was going to enter into, then that would be part of its awareness, its consciousness and as it entered the body, it may then change...
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) All I got was "Yes" as well... [Laughter]
(L) Very good, Joe. Very good. All right. Let's see what's next.
(Ina) Is the near-Earth asteroid 2024 YR4 going to impact the Earth or the moon or neither?
A: Moon most likely, but still open.
Q: (L) We're not close enough where we can get an answer on that. There are still variables.
(Joe) Wouldn't it be cool if a big meteorite hit the moon?
(L) It would be cool? Well, I think there've been quite a few, well, not big ones. I mean, we've seen little ones. Well, I guess that would be kind of cool.
(Ellipse) It was recently discovered that the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way has constant brightness activity and especially that there was a major outburst. Is this linked to the Wave?
A: No
Q: (L) Well, they said no.
(Niall) That's unusual. Nearly everything going on out there IS linked to it in some way.
A: Wave is universe phenomenon not galactic.
Q: (JEEP) Are any of the recent spate of airplane collisions/crashes the result of 4D bleedthrough?
A: Some!
Q: (JEEP) If yes, are plane instruments giving readings that are confusing the pilots and leading to collisions/crashes?
A: Some!
Q: (L) Well, friendly...
Q: (JEEP) Will air travel become much more dangerous generally?
A: Yes and all other.
Q: (Joe) Like walking? [Laughter]
(Chu) Cycling?
(Niall) Rollerblading.
(Joe) Walking in the back garden - that's travel, no? On that plane thing, that was a general question, but I just want to know: The Black Hawk helicopter that crashed into the jet over the DC area, what was the cause of that?
(L) Didn't we already ask about it?
(Niall) We haven't had a session since then. Was that one an accident as reported?
A: Mostly.
Q: (Niall) Mostly? Ah. It could have been one of the bleedthrough ones where the pilot was unsure or something...
(L) What was the root of it?
A: DEI.
(Niall) Oh, really?!
(Joe) Oh wow.
(L) Were there any otherworldly elements to it?
A: Some.
Q: (L) So in other words, a DEI-selected person was involved, who was susceptible to manipulation. Is that what we're getting at?
A: Yes exactly.
Q: (Joe) And what about two days after that crash, when there was the jet that crashed in Philadelphia?
(Niall) The Medivac Learjet?
(Joe) Yeah. Was that an accident as described?
A: Not exactly.
Q: (L) Okay. What was the root of that one?
A: Bleedthrough.
Q: (Niall) That makes sense. The pilot was going so fast he thought he was at a different altitude, I guess.
(L) So we could ask that about every single one and probably every single one would have a different combination of factors. Is that it?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) Well, one more then. These are the three big ones. There are lots of little things. The Toronto one: so a Delta Airlines plane crashed into a snowy runway in Toronto and flipped upside down. What was at the root of that one?
A: DEI hubris
Q: (Joe) The way they were flying it, they just slammed it down and broke the landing gear.
(L) They just thought they knew what they were doing and they didn't.
(Joe) The Black Hawk one over DC was weird.
(Niall) Joe had a whole conspiracy theory.
(Joe) I mean, that helicopter was training for carrying out an emergency continuity of a government situation where they would have picked up Trump in the current administration...
(L) Well, what did they just say? It was DEI and... susceptible to manipulation.
(Joe) It looked a lot like… kind of like a message they were training for a situation...
(L) Well, DEI susceptible to manipulation IS a message.
(Niall) But from the next level up.
(Joe) Was it considered as a possible message by the Trump administration or as a warning?
A: No
Q: (Joe) Oh well.
(L) Alright. Next question:
(hlat) Are reports of a new coronavirus, HKU5-CoVs, an attempt to bring back covid lockdowns?
A: They are trying everything but may be trumped by the real deal!
Q: (L) You don't mean that in any kind of pun-ish way, do you?
A: No
Q: (L) In other words, no pun intended.
(Altair) Who is usually being transferred from 3D to 5D by means of these "high-tech" elevators, which were mentioned in the January 25th, 2025 session?
A: What you know of as "angels" or "demons".
Q: (L) Like Jacob's ladder.
A: Yes
Q: (L) I see. So it would be like 5D angel/demon types that would use them to come and go, but it's not... Well, I don't know what to say. Okay. Two:
(Altair) What is the most common purpose of transferring somebody from 3D to 5D by means of these "high-tech" elevators?
A: SPA
Q: (L) And I guess, number three is kind of already answered, the question being:
(Altair) Who operates such elevators, apart from 4D STS beings?
(L) So I guess if we're talking about from 3D to 5D, we're talking about demons or angels. And if we're talking about people, I mean, is this how people go to 5D when they die?
A: Not exactly.
Q: (L) So when people die, they transfer through their own kind of silver cord to their 5D self and that's a different activity. Is that correct?
A: Yes
Q: (L) But 4D can also use these because they exist or maybe they exist because of angels or demons that come into and out of our world. Is that true?
A: Yes
Q: (PopHistorian) On a scale of 1-10, how well are the plans of the powers that be succeeding right now?
A: Depends on who you think you are referring to. Current "elites" are not doing so well. But the quorum is doing quite well.
Q: (L) And the quorum was the one that was in charge of deciding that Trump would not be assassinated, was that correct?
(Joe) Would be assassinated and then had to change their plans...
(L) And to change their plan because they were, because there were imbalances of some sort. So... They're up to something!
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) As usual.
(Mrs. Peel) Are the meditations and prayers we are doing for the world and others having any effect?
A: Yes
Q: (Mrs. Peel) Are they having the intended effects?
A: Since you are careful with your intentions, yes.
Q: (Mrs. Peel) If yes, is there anything more or different that we can do to enhance it?
A: Repetition.
Q: (Mrs. Peel) Is there anything we are doing wrong that we can correct or do better?
A: Practice makes perfect. You are all growing more proficient at navigating in the etheric realms.
Q: (L) Anybody want to add a question to that? Anything else? Yes. No? Okay. Thor... Boy, you got a bunch of questions in here, fella! Trying to wear me out!
(thorbiorn) In countries with a high percentage of psychopaths, as per the information in the transcripts, are there also fewer OPs?
A: No
Q: (L) And I guess your reasoning is that if there are more psychopaths, that the psychopaths are taking up or occupying the OP status. Is that what you're getting at Thor?
(thorbiorn) Yeah, that's what I had in mind.
(L) You figured if there were more psychopaths, there were fewer OPs because there were more OPs that were turned into psychopaths. Is that it?
(thorbiorn) Well, I was thinking that if it's half/half and then there are some countries where there are very many psychopaths, and I was just wondering if the psychopath is, as they explain, a failed OP, if then that took up the space, so to say, of that 50%.
(L) Okay. Well they said no.
(thorbiorn) In countries with a higher percentage of psychopaths, are the ones you include all of the failed OP type?
A: No
Q: (thorbiorn) If no, what other types are included?
A: Strong STS candidates.
Q: (thorbiorn) Can they give an example of how much these types contribute to the elevated numbers?
(L) How much? Are you asking for percentages?
(thorbiorn) Suppose 25% or 20% psychopaths are in the country, then I understand some of them are failed OPs and I think it was 6% or something on average. But what about the others? Are there other categories? How do they mix? If you have, for instance, red and green and black balls and you mix them together, you want to know how many of each of these would be produced?
(L) Okay, I guess, well, I'm trying to think of a way to frame this question...
A: You are thinking in 3D terms.
Q: (L) It would be probably very few of them that are strong STS candidates. Am I correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So the reason for there being more psychopaths, probably of the failed OP variety, would be simply genetic?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And once again, we're back to that good old genetic recombination. Somehow people cluster together and they reproduce and strengthen or enhance certain genetics, and then you end up with more psychopaths. Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (thorbiorn) When you said psychopaths will get all the blame, does that mean that many people will misinterpret the deeper level of manipulation, like walk-ins, undergrounders and what have you, so that psychopaths of the OP type will be like shields for other malefic actors?
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) I mean, let's face it. How many people on the planet are going to believe in walk-ins, 4D manipulation, undergrounders, et cetera? The majority of the population just usually doesn't want to go there.
(thorbiorn) Is it so, that in countries with many 4D candidates there are also many psychopaths?
(L) What do you mean 4D candidates? There are 4D candidates of the STS variety, and 4D candidates of the STO variety. So what do you mean?
(thorbiorn) That is true, but I think I was thinking about STO, because they said that when a person is close to graduating, then there's a possibility that they insert more units around that person.
(L) All right, I see what you're asking. Okay, so he's asking about 4D STO candidates, and does that mean that there are more agents inserted around them and that there are also many psychopaths?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, glory, hallelujah for all of us... Okay. Now, referring back to the 25 January, 2025 session about individuals who have been genetically modified to be hosts for 4D beings:
(L) And the question is:
(thorbiorn) Can these 4D beings download themselves into both the bodies of souled people, and into the bodies of OPs and failed OPs, like psychopaths?
A: Such "downloading" into soul beings is generally referred to as possession and implies a conflict and thus is not optimal for "downloading."
Q: (L) Okay, so as a general rule, they do not download into the bodies of souled people.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) They only use the bodies of OPs and failed OPs, like psychopaths.
A: Yes.
Q: (thorbiorn) Can a 4D STS being download itself into more than one 3D body at the same time?
A: No.
Q: (L) But they can control more than one individual at the same time, if they're doing it from hyperdimensional realities?
A: Yes.
Q: (thorbiorn) Is there more than one type of 4D STS being, besides the Lizzies, that can be found among walk-ins?
A: Walkins are generally not "Lizzies" but rather humanoid types for frequency reasons.
Q: (L) So in other words, Lizzies are too reptilian to frequency-match with the human genetics.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) All right. That was the last of the questions. Do any of y'all present here have any questions?
(Joe) Is Macron Brigitte's son?
A: No but he sure looks like it!
Q: (Niall) Well, that's just left dangling there. Is that just a coincidence? A matching of frequencies?
A: People tend to be attracted to types.
Q: (L) Well, I can give an example: My father was very similar in type, and had similar facial features to my grandfather, and that's why my mother married him. Other questions?
(Niall) I have one, but it's probably too dangerous. It's related to that.
(Joe) Go ahead and ask.
(Niall) What happened to Brigitte Trogneux, the sister of Jean-Michel Trogneux?
(L) What does Candace Owens think happened to her?
(Niall) No one knows. No one said it. She asked Xavier Poussard, and he just went...
(Joe) Well, we haven't actually established...
(Niall) We have, we asked if Jean-Michel was in fact, Brigitte, and they said yes.
(Joe) Oh, okay. Well, then the question is what happened to the original Brigitte that the current Brigitte is impersonating.
(Chu) They know she married but then she disappeared. There's nothing about her.
(L) What happened to her?
(Joe) The current Brigitte is Jean-Michel, her brother.
(L) Right.
(Joe) He had a younger sister that existed, but then disappeared, and then Jean-Michel took her persona. That's the theory. It's open, it's out there.
A: She is [the planchette moves very slowly] mort.
Q: (Joe) That makes sense.
(L) They really didn't want to answer that question.
(Niall) I know!
(Gaby) Yeah, let's just leave it.
(Joe) Well, they're only answering now, I suppose, because there's at least some information because of Candace Owens, so it's out there. But to get any more answers, you'd probably have to stick within what's already been made available publicly and make it a little bit extra. But you're probably not going to get any definitive answers because it's touchy.
(L) All right...
(Niall) I don't know exactly how to ask it. Did the AfD really come second in the general election that took place in Germany last week?
A: No.
Q: (Joe) Did they get most votes?
A: Yes.
Q: (Niall) It was rigged.
(Joe) Surprise, surprise...
(Niall) So that's interesting. That gives us an idea that the vox populi in Europe is the same, roughly, as in the US.
(Joe) Right. I think it's just being expressed.
(Andromeda) Yeah.
(Niall) So they're still rigging. Oh, Gaby, you mentioned this to me today. How come...? Well, do you want to ask it?
(Gaby) Well, how come that in the US abridging of free will is very dangerous, so the election cannot really be rigged, but in Europe it's fair game, with Le Pen, and now the AfD won, and they rig the election every time? Why?
(Niall) Well, they rigged it in the US but the abridging of free will was the assassination of Trump.
(Gaby) That's true.
(Joe) Yeah, rigging is allowed, you know? If they can get away with it, then...
(L) God, they've been doing it since forever. I mean, there's even serious questions about the election of John Kennedy, that there were a lot of votes that were bought.
(Niall) By his dad, yes, and the mob. Okay.
(Joe) I have a question about soul smashing. Why do higher selves of souls allow them to be smashed? Couldn't they just "call them home" before that happened?
A: Souls that are subject to being "smashed" are generally unindividuated and the smashing process is a sort of degaussing and the "higher self" perceives this loss of energy as a sort of cleansing. Sort of like amputation in your realm.
Q: (L) And then they begin growing again.
(Joe) They grow the body part back. You grow your tail back.
(L) If they're a lizard. [Laughter] All right.
(Andromeda) That was interesting.
(L) Anybody have anything that is dreadfully important, because my arm is getting sore...
(Chu) No, there are more questions on the chat, but they're sneaking them in.
(L) They're sneaking them in? [Laughter]
(Chu) Instead of putting them on the thread.
(Niall) Sneaky!
(Chu) So, I think we can probably copy them and save them for next time?
(L) Yeah. Copy and save them for next time, or put them on the thread and discuss them. All right. Any final words of wisdom for those of us here in the past, from those of you there in the future?
A: Reread past warnings. Things are going to get chaotic. Goodbye.
Q: (L) Well, we have thrilling, and we have chaotic.
[Laura reads out loud a compilation of past warnings:
All recent final messages/warnings from the Sessions]
END OF SESSION
