I think Laura explained it very well. It's strange to watch, and to do it. Each protocol has its specific set of "filters" and movements in a specific order, although sometimes they overlap. Some protocols had those pictures, others just the filters/harmonizers. You can relate certain answers to specific organs, meridians, dates in the person's life, emotions and specific questions made by the person. It reminded me of a mixture of kinesiology, dowsing, Reiki and the I-Ching.
Some other testimonials we heard (some were videos with the patients relaying their story):
- A baby with a genetic defect (a mutated protein in the brain). He was constantly crying and miserable. After the first session, he became calmer and stopped crying more than normal.
-Stories about animals getting better and more energetic.
- A 6 y.o girl with autism, who started reading and writing.
- A woman with a terrible back pain who could hardly move, and after the session felt much better and it stayed like that (she was at the course).
- A woman with multiple sclerosis getting much better and having big life realizations.
- A man with psoriasis disappearing-
- A man having combated a drug addiction
- Many with pains and aches that would go away after they had changed something in their lives. For example, doing something that they had always wanted to do but feared doing, having an honest conversation with someone they were in conflict with, and things like that. Suddenly feeling more able to decide, to be themselves, to open doors for themselves that led to a better life.
Was it coincidences, placebo, the fact that they were trying something new with a practitioner they felt they could trust? With babies and animals that is harder to explain, though.
The most difficult part of the process is to get the "feedback" thing going. You press your thumb on either your index or middle finger where you are supposed to be able to feel a pulse. This pulse reacts to the scanning and tells you what to do. Some say they feel a buzz or a small shock or something like that. I'm just trying to feel an ordinary pulse!
I don't consider myself "sensitive" to this kind of stuff and it's just the beginning, but FWIW, for me it's a "pulse", and if you press with the right kind of pressure on the artery, you get a rhythm, same as when you do it on the wrist, except milder. But while following the protocol, the closest I can describe it as is that the "normal" state is a fainter pulse, while the "response" is like a much louder pulse or a wave as if you were pressing hard on the finger when you are not, or a current. The first day I didn't feel a thing. The second, the "pulse", and only once a "response". With more practice, a couple more "responses", and so on. Most people said to go with the first hint of a response, but it's hard to leave it at that, and I usually try to check over and over. The other difficult thing is to focus on the intent, and on "forgetting" what you know about the person, so as to avoid influencing them. That also requires concentration, focus, non-anticipation, etc. So, I reckon it's a learning curve in many respects.
Anyway, it is very interesting. The inventor, Marcel, (very nice man and we had dinner with him and his wife in Paris), says that the method can even cure genetic conditions by giving information to the body to turn off bad genes and turn on good ones, or bypass, or bring something else online, or whatever.
Yes, there are several protocols, for specific "fields" and conditions. There is even one where he talked about past lives, and another one for souls "in the no-time zone" (5D?) and the process of incarnation. Strange, but plausible. Just by reading the website, I didn't want to go! It was so vague... And it sort of still is, but now we know a bit more about how it may be working, or at least a theory. And the explanations, although Marcel used different terms, very often matched what we have been researching. E.g., they are not big at all on the theory of evolution and on medicine being the end of all except for mechanical fixes. They consider the hypothesis of parallel universes and different "dimensions", different degrees of consciousness, and a field consisting not of energy, but of pure information.
One of the things I liked about them was that they weren't pushy about people getting all the "kits". They advised to start with the two basic protocols (and most of the testimonials above came from using those two protocols alone), and only after having more practice and if we saw results or had a particularly difficult case, to try the others. That seemed like an honest approach to me, as opposed to people who would try to get as much money as they can right this minute.
Another thing were the people at the course, and the organizers themselves. Except for a a very few and some we didn't get to talk to much, most of them seemed to be quite rational and open minded. We had a couple of "bashing the New Agers" conversations, and they were open to exchanging ideas, talking about reality, etc. They were pleasant, super helpful, always willing to answer questions, some of them well read.... This didn't seem to be the usual audience in "healing courses", FWIW. Most of them were going back for a refresher and the newest protocols, and have been practicing for years. There were only 6 newbies including OrangeScorpion and myself. There were people from all areas of life: normal office jobs, an engineer, osteopaths, psychologists, an astrophysicist, acupuncturists, massage therapists, etc. Most of them had gotten to know the system because either they had tried it themselves, or a loved one had, with positive results.
Even after all the good experiences and stuff, I came back thinking: "I don't know what all of this is, or if it's safe/worth it!" But after seeing some benefits in others, now that Laura, Andromeda and others have experienced it a bit, and having asked the Cs, I feel much better and I'm looking forward to learning a lot more. Who knows? It could be a very good tool if used in the best way we can. And it was also great to share the experience with OrangeScorpion, to have more eyes, more questions, etc.
There is a way to do it at a distance, yes, but we were advised to first practice with real people.
