Session 10 December 2016

[Laura]

How about selecting our future road map - to what timeline [branch] we wish to go? Check the news, see who answered what to an actual event. Select the group of major geopolitical players, who seem to intend to end up in the same timeline, as we and deeply consciously align with their actual plans toward World Peace breakout, prosperity, rebuilding countries, properly preparing to address incoming dangers. Through a livable mitigated journey.

Example:
- Cheney, Pentagon, Hillary and Obama talk about retaliation and destructive ruling of the Middle East, bombing this country to hell and that country to another failed state..
..Versus..
- Putin, Syria, Turkey, Iran, China is talking about a coalition, an ideal goal solving the terrorism-problem on this planet, do peaceful and prosperous building projects.

Passive witness reaction:
- "Oh, what can we do??" "We are soo weak and inconsequential!"

The Active Witness reaction:
- "Aha. I condemn and deeply refuse in my mind and dismiss all Western PtB destructive plans and their calls for actions. I always had a kind heart. I want to share with people and animals what goods I have and wish peace to everybody so we can bring children to a World in the Future. So I like the Russian intent and I'm deeply consciously choosing to align myself with that Road Plan, because I want to end up in that timeline or at least as close to that as possible, in what ever acceptable form we can get it!"

Reinforce above as new events happen and a definite future intent is declared by a favorable political leader. Consciously choose it via free will, in mind, "I want to go there!" to a timeline, where his or her plans are realized as much as possible!

The Active Witness, who is acutely aware of power of the mind, knows its possible to not only flap our butterfly wings as we have been doing so far, but consciously align ourselves with the Will and Intent of Putin and who ever he can get on board in this Creative-Psychic-Space-Time-Many-Branches Continuum - and go with them!

Always course-correcting based on fresh news events. Actively willing ourselves by the power of our free will and MIND, that what ever actions we do, it is to bring us closer to that ideal goal. Where-ever it should be. Whatever livable-acceptable form it takes.

I think its doable. Especially considering what personal and global disasters have been averted so far during the entire existence of the Cassiopaean Experiment.

I've highlighted the important ACTIONS that can express the intent.

It is not always possible to express intent in actions, but we still have a window in which to work. What the next window will be and what the actions will be, we don't know. But right now, we do know that social media is playing a rather big part in the information war of our reality.

Notice that when you put "Putin" into the search on Twitter, you get a whole slew of tweets, MOST of which are negative toward Putin. That means that the Pentagon/NATO information warriors are quite busy. They have a big budget and can pay lots of money for people to create sock puppet accounts and tweet endlessly. Well, we need to counter this action by tweeting positive comments and articles and retweeting the positive articles and comments of others.

If you are tech challenged, just go to my Twitter tweets page and retweet my stuff. In fact, that's a good idea because the more retweets something gets, the more attention it gets from others. https://twitter.com/Laurel700 If 100 people make only two tweets a day, that's something. If you can do more, like 20 or so, that gets VERY BIG. And indeed, people are influenced by social proof.

Here you can go to my media tweets: https://twitter.com/Laurel700/media and re-tweet images and videos and stuff.

Here you can see what I retweet and some of the replies I make to other people's tweets: https://twitter.com/Laurel700/with_replies

Regarding the last, if I'm smacking an idiot, I never go back to engage with them if they start to argue... I just hit and run. What I wrote is there for others to see and if it gets re-tweeted, those others see that it is a popular view.

Same things apply to posts on FB.

So, who is with me? Remember, 15 minutes per day of tweeting, retweeting, sharing posts COULD be the flap of butterfly wings that could change reality.

 

[Adaryn]

So, who is with me? Remember, 15 minutes per day of tweeting, retweeting, sharing posts COULD be the flap of butterfly wings that could change reality.

Yeah, raising my hand! Ready to rock'n'roll

 

[Ant22]

So, who is with me? Remember, 15 minutes per day of tweeting, retweeting, sharing posts COULD be the flap of butterfly wings that could change reality.

Yeah, raising my hand! Ready to rock'n'roll

I'm in too!!!

 

[Anamarija]

So, who is with me? Remember, 15 minutes per day of tweeting, retweeting, sharing posts COULD be the flap of butterfly wings that could change reality.

Yeah, raising my hand! Ready to rock'n'roll

I'm in!

 

[Beau]

Just a note on Twitter: If you begin a tweet by tweeting at someone, for example: @realDonaldTrump, you should put a period before it. That way it shows up in your followers' feed. So it should go:

.@realDonaldTrump USA needs justice to become great again. Make the truth known. Prosecute the REAL terrorists.

The reason for this is because Twitter doesn't show your followers @ replies. So by putting the period first, you are going around that setting.

 

[Juba]

So, who is with me? Remember, 15 minutes per day of tweeting, retweeting, sharing posts COULD be the flap of butterfly wings that could change reality.

Agree and sharing both on Facebook and Twitter.

 

[mariowil7]

So, who is with me? Remember, 15 minutes per day of tweeting, retweeting, sharing posts COULD be the flap of butterfly wings that could change reality.

Agree and sharing both on Facebook and Twitter.

Yep... Definely I'm in too...

 

[Anamarija]

Just a note on Twitter: If you begin a tweet by tweeting at someone, for example: @realDonaldTrump, you should put a period before it. That way it shows up in your followers' feed. So it should go:

.@realDonaldTrump USA needs justice to become great again. Make the truth known. Prosecute the REAL terrorists.

The reason for this is because Twitter doesn't show your followers @ replies. So by putting the period first, you are going around that setting.

I'm really lousy with this Twitter thing. Can you please explain me little bit more, because sometimes when I reetweet there is message with @blablabla, but other times there is something like this (most of the time):

 

[Ant22]

Just a note on Twitter: If you begin a tweet by tweeting at someone, for example: @realDonaldTrump, you should put a period before it. That way it shows up in your followers' feed. So it should go:

.@realDonaldTrump USA needs justice to become great again. Make the truth known. Prosecute the REAL terrorists.

The reason for this is because Twitter doesn't show your followers @ replies. So by putting the period first, you are going around that setting.

I've just retweeted a couple of Laura's posts and it looks like I did it the wrong way. Thanks Beau, I'll do it again now.

 

[Beau]

I'm really lousy with this Twitter thing. Can you please explain me little bit more, because sometimes when I reetweet there is message with @blablabla, but other times there is something like this (most of the time):

Twitter shows retweets in your followers' feed, so don't worry about that.

Here is an example of a tweet that won't show up in your follower's feed, although it WILL show up on your main Twitter page

Like I said, just put a period at the beginning and it will show up.

 

[Beau]

I've just retweeted a couple of Laura's posts and it looks like I did it the wrong way. Thanks Beau, I'll do it again now.

Well, retweets are looked at differently by Twitter, so you probably are fine. It's when you are replying to someone or just decide to direct a tweet at someone that you need to put a period first so it is visible to your followers.

 

[Ant22]

Well, retweets are looked at differently by Twitter, so you probably are fine. It's when you are replying to someone or just decide to direct a tweet at someone that you need to put a period first so it is visible to your followers.

Thank you for clarifying the difference, I'm not a frequent Twitter user so I didn't pick up on it straight away in your initial post.

 

[Anamarija]

Well, retweets are looked at differently by Twitter, so you probably are fine. It's when you are replying to someone or just decide to direct a tweet at someone that you need to put a period first so it is visible to your followers.

Thank you for clarifying the difference, I'm not a frequent Twitter user so I didn't pick up on it straight away in your initial post.

Me too, thank for clarification Beau.

 

[Iron]

Seems like 2017 is gonna be even more "fun".
Thanks for the session!

 

[Anamarija]

Ok, I just got unusual message from Twitter that I have never received before.
Is it possible that lot of tweeting make you suspicious? ;D