Thanks again to the Chateau team for an interesting and inspiring session. Clearly there is a lot fo keto popcorn in our futures as we sit back and enjoy the show. As usual, Ark, many people are praying for you.
Indeed Sweden is a cliffhanger! I visited many times when I lived in Europe and it does puzzle me somewhat as to why they escaped it. I love Sweden, bit of an enigma, so humanitarian but it had it's own eugenics program back in the day! As for it's diversity it stands at 24% according to Wikipedia.
Q: (Joe) How likely is it that there will be some major public chaos or civil chaos if Trump wins?
A: Very likely and will lead to martial law.
And then there's this:Q: (Joe) Will a lot of the chaos in a certain sense be artificially induced?
Whitney’s article goes on to explain that the organizers of TIP have ties to the Obama administration, several pro-Biden groups, and the Biden campaign and that this is particularly troubling. Whitney writes:…according to TIP’s own documents, even their simulations involving a “clear win” for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis, as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.
Such concerns are only magnified by the recent claims made by Hillary Clinton, that Biden “should not concede under any circumstances.” Clinton continued during an interview with Showtime,“I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is.”…the fact that a group of openly pro-Biden Washington insiders and former government officials have gamed out scenarios for possible election outcomes and their aftermath, all of which either ended with Biden becoming president or a constitutional crisis, suggest that powerful forces influencing the Biden campaign are pushing the former Vice President to refuse to concede the election even if he loses.
Since this article was a little long, I used the quote box to compress it. However, I think it's important to note what was written in the last portion of the article:And then there's this:
The last line of Webb’s article states: “By keeping Americans angry and distracted by the partisan divide through pre-planned election chaos, a “New America” waits in the wings – one that is coming regardless of what happens on election day. That is, of course, unless Americans quickly wake up to the ruse.” The media is great at inciting division, both here and in other countries.The question then becomes, who benefits from complete chaos on and following the 2020 election? As the TIP suggested in several of their simulations, the post-election role of the military in terms of domestic policing, incidentally the exact expertise of the TIP’s co-founder Rosa Brooks, looms large, as most of the aforementioned doomsday election simulations ended with the imposition of martial law or the military “stepping in” to resolve order and oversee the transition.
The domestic framework for imposing martial law in the U.S., via “continuity of government” protocols, was activated earlier this year under the guise of the coronavirus crisis and it remains in effect. Now, a series of groups deeply tied to the Washington establishment and domestic and foreign intelligence agencies have predicted the exact ways in which to engineer a failed election and manipulate its aftermath.
Who would stand to benefit the most from the imposition of martial law in the United States? I would argue that one need look no further than the battle within Washington power factions over the future of AI…
Thanks, genero81. I don't have much to add to what I've already stated. I wasn't being emotional, I was pointing out that the question wasn't asked in an open ended way. Either one agrees with that, or the importance of that, or not. To me it seemed significant enough to bring up. It's at least something we can all think about.Yes but... The C's decided to affirm without a question actually being asked which tends to make me think they wanted to confirm what was being said. I live in the U.S. I prefer that it not be true that the U.S. is too far gone, but it is what it is. We'll see how it all plays out.
I noticed at the time that you seemed to be having a bit of an emotional reaction. Your argument didn't seem as logical to me as it probably did to you. It was like you were saying, if only you had phrased it just the right way, the C's would have given a more hopeful reply. Maybe I misread you though. FWIW, I'm not a big fan of the thumbs down button either but I think it's just part of the current forum program.
Also if you put@ in front of who you are addressing, it will alert them. FYI
Why will you make a group of your own? If this one doesn't suit you, it's oK, but I have a hard time understanding why you will use those crystals for YOUR group...Thank you for sharing your communication with the C's.
When we make a donation and then receive our crystals, will we be able to do any group work with the crystals for prayers and meditation.